Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, satyanash said:

 

lol. Shut the fuck up Anwar and Sark.  
 

if Sark didn’t qualify this in anyway than he’s a pos who lacks accountability.  The kind of guy that would sue a school because he’s an alcoholic 

I hope he said some decent things about PK.  Bailed his ass out twice vs Kentucky.  Shut down ou and aggy

Edited by Im_smarter_then_you
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RockyMountainHighHorn said:

How have the recruits reacted? Looked like Atkinson was at least on board. Samari is the next important one with Wesley. Hopefully Simmons sees that he is set up to be one of the top 10 picks next year if not top 5.

Recruits don’t care because they never talk to PK anyway

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Red Five said:

There was some initial "This was a mutual decision" from the 9.95s yesterday. This is looking less and less like a mutual decision. 

People mutually tell eachother to fuck off all the time

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Grippe said:

15 years ago I was screaming bloody murder to try and lure Juan Castillo, he was great then, not so much now.

 

Just took the Syracuse OL coach job

Posted
49 minutes ago, SarkAfterDark said:

I think you have me confused with someone that cares about “what ifs” or someone that puts more emphasis on what happened during the game instead of the game result. Watching us win games with you must be painful for all those involved. 

No i have you confused with someone who associates competence with success. The same issues that lead to Vandy making us look like keystone cops on defense in the 4th quarter got us beat by Florida and Georgia.

Posted

PK was good. 
 

Will Muschamp is elite. 
 

We are better today than we were two days ago. If you think otherwise, that’s fine, I guess, but that objectively makes you a highly ignorant football fan. You should be ignored. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
3 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

Not having to sweat whether he made the perfect complementary and assertive quasi-DC DB coaching hires to help his titular DC who can't solve the back end by himself was an obvious burden.

I loved PK, but this is a fair complaint for someone at his pay grade. Sark should approve hires, but the 2 million dollar DC should have a long list of guys that he can coordinate the coverages with.

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
40 minutes ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

lol. Shut the fuck up Anwar and Sark.  
 

if Sark didn’t qualify this in anyway than he’s a pos who lacks accountability.  The kind of guy that would sue a school because he’s an alcoholic 

I hope he said some decent things about PK.  Bailed his ass out twice vs Kentucky.  Shut down ou and aggy

We know it's total and complete bullshit since Anwar wrote it. We all know that's not what happened considering there is a myriad of evidence to prove it's not true. Sark knows nothing about running a D. How can he hold PK's hand when we doesn't even understand the defensive language? 

And yes, I'm sure Sark is and will continue to give PK his flowers, as he should. He took us from the morgue to respectable on defense. Unless Sark or PK ever tell the story, we won't know what happened. And the "firing" may be language off-set so he can collect a bonus, and he really did tell Sark way ahead of time and was asked to stick around until he can find a new DC. 

Anwar is a dumb fuck. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Ricky Butler said:

I loved PK, but this is a fair complaint for someone at his pay grade. Sark should approve hires, but the 2 million dollar DC should have a long list of guys that he can coordinate the coverages with.

I have a suspicion that this isn’t really about the 2025 season performance, it’s at least partially about the 2025 offseason when Sarkisian disappeared.  
 

It sounds like he trusted Kwiatkowski to handle some things, maybe hiring, maybe recruiting, and got let down. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
Just now, pyrofiend said:

That's cool and all, but we've been red zone retarded for 5 years, and now that PK is gone it will magically get better? Lol k. I can honestly say I have never even heard Sark talk about the D in detail. I've never seen him even walk over there. If he thinks pulling a hammy in his head that that now things will finally work, I'm at a loss. 

Posted

The defensive secondary under Sark/PK has been outright bad in 4 out of the 5 years he's been here. We as fans blame the position coaches like Terry Joseph and Duane Akina, but I think it's fair for Sark to place the blame on the defensive coordinator for a recurring theme. At some point it should have been up to PK to figure things out, and he hasn't given us confidence in that aspect.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

I have a suspicion that this isn’t really about the 2025 season performance, it’s at least partially about the 2025 offseason when Sarkisian disappeared.  
 

It sounds like he trusted Kwiatkowski to handle some things, maybe hiring, maybe recruiting, and got let down. 

This would make sense, but then you have to wonder why Sark thought he could handle that? He's known the man for 4 years by that time, and he doesn't think to maybe dot his I's and cross his T's? 

Posted
13 minutes ago, pyrofiend said:

 

Ryan Day when asked a few weeks ago how much time he spends with the defense:

“Not much. Not much. Yeah. Matt (Patricia) and I talk here and there just about philosophically what we’re trying to get done, but he’s doing a great job. He’s really the head coach of the defense, organizes it all, and he’s got a great staff with him.”

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
4 minutes ago, William Bludworth said:

you have to wonder why Sark thought he could handle that?

It wouldn’t be an outrageous expectation coming off the 2024 defensive performance, having junior coaches become desirable enough to get promotions, etc.  

Remember that a lot of football organization takes its cues from the military in a “you’re always training your replacement” culture and coordinators should be working to get their position coaches ready to be a coordinator, the head coach should be training the coordinators to be a head coach, etc. 

Posted
6 hours ago, taybo20 said:

I choose to believe we are simply waiting for the new OL coach to be done with the playoffs 

Sam Pittman is still available, when he's not busy writing cookbook recipes.

IMG_8918-scaled.jpeg

  • Rage+1 1
Posted

I mean, I get that Muschamp is a marginal upgrade over an already pretty good DC when it comes to scheme and overall fit with what Sark wants to do and all that, besides being chums with him...whatever.

But I'm supposed to sit here and believe that the offense, in large part, was objectively putrid in year 5 because Sark had to divert some of his time and focus on Defense. And now that 100% of his attention will be on offense, it will consistently deliver.

Been following this shit for far too long to buy that load...

Granted, he may still make changes on the offensive side of the ball, we will see, but this statement is some weak sauce post-hoc rationalization.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

I have a suspicion that this isn’t really about the 2025 season performance, it’s at least partially about the 2025 offseason when Sarkisian disappeared.  
 

It sounds like he trusted Kwiatkowski to handle some things, maybe hiring, maybe recruiting, and got let down. 

You think he trusted PK with OL recruiting?

Posted
16 minutes ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

You think he trusted PK with OL recruiting?

I do wonder if the offense is starved a little on the NIL front because Sarkisian doesn’t trust Kwiatkowski to add much value in recruiting and they have to overpay to attract and retain players on that side of the field.  
 

Bobby and Gerry appear pretty adamant it’s entirely about the style of defense, fwiw.  
 

Posted

no way Sark gets an OC or playcaller - that ain't happening. 

Not getting a new O line coach when this is probably his last chance at a staff reboot would be monumentally stupid.  

Posted
11 minutes ago, My display name said:

I’m sure I know the answer, but is there at least one reporter out there who has the balls to straight up ask “are you going to hire an OC?” Pussies. 

That question has been asked and answered repeatedly. 

Posted
55 minutes ago, horn_of_the_morning said:

I mean, I get that Muschamp is a marginal upgrade over an already pretty good DC when it comes to scheme and overall fit with what Sark wants to do and all that, besides being chums with him...whatever.

But I'm supposed to sit here and believe that the offense, in large part, was objectively putrid in year 5 because Sark had to divert some of his time and focus on Defense. And now that 100% of his attention will be on offense, it will consistently deliver.

Been following this shit for far too long to buy that load...

Granted, he may still make changes on the offensive side of the ball, we will see, but this statement is some weak sauce post-hoc rationalization.

Well, he didn’t say that. It can’t hurt though.

Posted (edited)

But it wasn't the answer he wanted, so he's just going to keep bitching about it for the rest of fucking time.

Edited by kevwun
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, kevwun said:

His wife allegedly tried to do the same thing once on a booster's private plane when he was coach here.


Not allegedly. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, kevwun said:

His wife allegedly tried to do the same thing once on a booster's private plane when he was coach here.

You can remove “allegedly”. 

Posted

I'm gonna defend PK a little here. If the expectation when they got here was that Sark was going to be involved in the defense then PK was going along with the expectation set from day one. I might be misremembering but I thought Sark said he wants to be involved in all the aspects of the team.  Now If Sark had to intervene after giving PK full autonomy after say that year one debacle, ok I can see the messaging now. 

I don't shit about fuck though on this front.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

This isn’t really too hard. If you have the option to pick between Pete Kwiatkowski or Will Muschamp to run your defense (back to front) who do you take between the two? 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Wishbone said:

This isn’t really too hard. If you have the option to pick between Pete Kwiatkowski or Will Muschamp to run your defense (back to front) who do you take between the two? 

I would’ve said Muschamp by a landslide when Sark originally wanted him and still give him the edge now, but less so because PK was impressive 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

I would’ve said Muschamp by a landslide when Sark originally wanted him and still give him the edge now, but less so because PK was impressive 

Same. The expected response I had in mind when I typed that lines up with yours.

Edited by Wishbone
Posted
11 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

I would’ve said Muschamp by a landslide when Sark originally wanted him and still give him the edge now, but less so because PK was impressive 

I thought PK was excellent. The main gripe I have about him is that he let his secondary coaches call the coverages behind him. That is why we got all of those discombobulated coverages at odd times. Muschamp ties the coverage to the defensive call, which is how it should be. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...