Jump to content

Minneapolis Cop Murders A Black Man


HenryJames

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, OU Sucks said:

Just out of curiosity, do you think troops should have come in and displayed overwhelming force against these protestors INSIDE the Michigan capitol?

 

Yes if they had went on a rampage. That’s the difference. Those protests didn’t lead to property damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SHOOTER12 said:

NSIAP...

Fox News is not high on my list, but Tucker Carlson just destroyed Art Acevedo over some insane rant he made to reporters and citizens about his people built this country, yada, yada

It was beautiful. 

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Iconoclast Texan said:

Yes if they had went on a rampage. That’s the difference. Those protests didn’t lead to property damage.

Did the DC protestors just go on a rampage?  Did they damage property?  Since you didn't watch it, I will answer it for you...no they didn't.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OU Sucks said:

Did the DC protestors just go on a rampage?  Did they damage property?  Since you didn't watch it, I will answer it for you...no they didn't.

Obviously they are linked in spirit to all of the protests nationwide, some of which have had some violence and vandalism.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

You guys are killing it right now.  Only what, two generations from being done.  All it is now is suing each other on who owns the real estate.  

Unfortunately, you’re correct. I love the Episcopal Church but keep losing members like other mainline churches.

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Iconoclast Texan said:

Yes and we both know the Presiding Bishop and the Dean of the National Cathedral hate this President 

The sanctity of the church was just profaned by violence and the Bible blasphemed for a photo op, and you’re blaming the clergy of your church. Your worship appears misdirected.
 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Iconoclast Texan said:

Those gathered the past few nights did. 

So again, what did the protestors TONIGHT do to get gassed/pushed back/etc.?  The answer is nothing.  You're trying really hard to defend an action that was indefensible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mdmost said:

Ah, so no more protests any more, even if peaceful. A clear violation of the Constitution. And you're okay with that. 

The fires and destruction outside the White House gates the past few nights would seem to be a better indicator of what would happen. You don’t think it would have been a bloodbath if those protestors thought they could actually get close enough to harm the President 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Iconoclast Texan said:

The fires and destruction outside the White House gates the past few nights would seem to be a better indicator of what would happen. You don’t think it would have been a bloodbath if those protestors thought they could actually get close enough to harm the President 

So not trying to put words in your mouth, but is it fair to say then that you support a decision to tear gas a crowd that might get violent but has not actually gotten violent?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Serak The Preparer said:

So not trying to put words in your mouth, but is it fair to say then that you support a decision to tear gas a crowd that might get violent but has not actually gotten violent?

Yes. He is a fascist parading as an American that loves our history...of fighting fascists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Iconoclast Texan said:

The fires and destruction outside the White House gates the past few nights would seem to be a better indicator of what would happen. You don’t think it would have been a bloodbath if those protestors thought they could actually get close enough to harm the President 

You would’ve made a great loyalist back in 1776.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

How do you think you are doing right now? Pretty well?

Yes.  Life is very good.  I’m always an optimist though.  Still prospering.  I’m 42 and could retire now.  Wife is still hot.  Kids are prospering.  I’d say a 9 out of 10 overall.  
 

You?

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Serak The Preparer said:

So not trying to put words in your mouth, but is it fair to say then that you support a decision to tear gas a crowd that might get violent but has not actually gotten violent?

After 3 nights of rioting and with a curfew enacted? Are you serious? Show of force is a deterrent. Seeing troops on American streets will end this quick. Did I say I want people gunned down? No. I want the rioters to see a force they respect and would not dare to confront. That’s not the case anymore with the cops.

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DefinitelyNotHollywoodColt said:

So long as he still has his Dad’s money, @Johnny Sack is doing great. Should something threaten his inheritance, he’ll be upset about it. That is the only thing on this planet that impacts the Deacon.

My dad died when I was 14.  And left me basically nothing.  Well he did leave me and my siblings some mineral interests.  Which his brother stole.  
 

I can’t wait one day to inherit all this money you think I’m going to get.  
 



 

 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After 3 nights of rioting and with a curfew enacted? Are you serious? Show of force is a deterrent. Seeing troops on American streets will end this quick. Did I say I want people gunned down? No. I want the rioters to see a force they respect and would not dare to confront. That’s not the case anymore with the cops.

So you DO want them tear gassed because they MIGHT become violent?

Also, they were NOT going to be attacked like that, but for the president’s need to go to a photo-op, so your justification is totally irrelevant.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I miss the days when we all hated each other for not taking covid seriously. Refusing to wear masks and not believing next week we would be Italy.  Those were the days 

I'm still trying to figure out where I'm supposed to stand on the pallets of bricks issue. It's all so confusing.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mdmost said:

You would’ve made a great loyalist back in 1776.

I’ve never understood why this is thrown around as an insult. The Revolution was ethically ambiguous and most people were just caught up in the middle. Something we’d do well to remember.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

My dad died when I was 14.  And left me basically nothing.  Well he did leave me and my siblings some mineral interests.  Which his brother stole.  
 

I can’t wait one day to inherit all this money you think I’m going to get.  
 



 

 

Wait, are you saying you actually worked for what you have? That’s impossible! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stone oak said:

Understood. But, you’re plain ignorant if you think Antifa has zero involvement with this entire event. 

And it you think that Antifa pulled in multiple pallets of bricks in multiple cities in preparation for multiple riots with nothing leaking before hand you would be plain... what? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, blacklab said:

Slorch and a few others are taking some time off.

If you can't respond without making personal attacks put the person on ignore and move on

So, question.  I thought being an asshole and calling assholes assholes was part of the surly mantra.  Are we going the way of whale cunt?  I thought threats of violence were the only posts that got one banned, outside of the no politics rule.   Just want a little clarity. 

Edited by DigglerontheHoof
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DigglerontheHoof said:

So, question.  I thought being an asshole and calling assholes assholes was part of the surly mantra.  Are we going the way of whale cunt?  I thought threats of violence were the only banned posts, outside of the no politics rule.   Just want a little clarity. 

Shut up, asshole. Martial law has been declared. Deal with it!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...