Jump to content
Hugo Stiglitz

The Robert Mueller Investigation

Recommended Posts

A2FB85D5-8F0F-45F9-AEA6-1EAF8EBA8292_zps

https://www.justice.gov/sco

 

Mueller’s Charges:
 
18 U.S. Code § 1001 - False Statements
Paul Manafort 
Rick Gates
Alex van der Zwaan
Michael Flynn
George Papadopoulus
 
 

18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to defraud the United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/371

Paul Manafort 
Rick Gates 
Konstantin Kilimnik 
26 Russians
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 981 - Civil forfeiture
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/981

Paul Manafort 
Konstanstin Kilimnik 
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 982 - Criminal forfeiture
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/982
Paul Manafort 
Konstantin Kilimnik 
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1956
Paul Manafort
Konstanstin Kilimnik 
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 1349 - Conspiracy 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1349
Paul Manafort
Rick Gates 
26 Russians
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 1344 - Bank fraud Conspiracy 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1344
Paul Manafort 
Rick Gates
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 1028 - Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information.  Identity theft/fraud.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1028
26 Russians
Richard Pinedo

 
Edited by Hugo Stiglitz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck no there's no indictments. There's no evidence. Only evidence is of Hillary trying to sell nuclear material to the Russians and Trump doing his best to stop the Russians. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Incredulity said:

Still pending...... good to know.  Probably indict some Laotians next.  I think the noose is tightening.

Are they Chinese or Japanese?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CrownKing said:

I hope the other smokey gets lost in the woods. 

 

Trampled in the stampede. 

1 hour ago, Jimbaround said:

Already over 700 users.  Shouldn't take too long to get back to normal.

Edited by Pods

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Clearlakehorn said:

Fuck no there's no indictments. There's no evidence. Only evidence is of Hillary trying to sell nuclear material to the Russians and Trump doing his best to stop the Russians. 

Back and clueless as ever. Bravo!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why we can't have nice things.  And by this I mean having to start a new Ignore list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From all the recent news to break, it’s remarkable Cambridge Analytica behaved EXACTLY like a sophisticated Kremlin covert influence operation:  Bribery/blackmail tactics, nefarious data/info acquisition, fake news proliferation, plausible deniability with third party front accounts and organizations.  And they operated on a global scale subverting democracy for profit.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

From all the recent news to break, it’s remarkable Cambridge Analytica behaved EXACTLY like a sophisticated Kremlin covert influence operation:  Bribery/blackmail tactics, nefarious data/info acquisition, fake news proliferation, plausible deniability with third party front accounts and organizations.  And they operated on a global scale subverting democracy for profit.

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

9 minutes ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

New board, same bleeding cunt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

The fact that you can't see the difference between the two is mind boggling, but par for the course with you, so not unexpected. 

1. Obama launched an app called something like "Obama 2012" to support...well, Obama vs. Cambridge Analytics used data gathered from a generic "personality quiz"

2. Obama's use of the data collected from HIS app was legal....Cambridge Analytics acquired the data from a 3rd party, which breached Facebook's user agreement, and failed to delete it when asked by Facebook.  That is what's called an illegal use of the collected data.

BTW, good to see the wi-fi's back up.  Must have been that increase in military spending that did the trick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

QA82k11.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

At least this bit moved over to the new board - I was worried that some personal growth might take place.

Any comparison between 2012 and 2016 is suspect because there were fundamentally different processes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

From all the recent news to break, it’s remarkable Cambridge Analytica behaved EXACTLY like a sophisticated Kremlin covert influence operation:  Bribery/blackmail tactics, nefarious data/info acquisition, fake news proliferation, plausible deniability with third party front accounts and organizations.  And they operated on a global scale subverting democracy for profit.

yes, and after learning from taped comments from the chief of CA how committed they are to gaining kompromat that we have a house and senate that mostly fears taking one step off the path dictated for them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

How fucked is Zuckerberg? 

so fucked that zucked is the new fucked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

BUT OBAMA!!eleventyone.!.!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

confused.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

So many taking the Swam bait.  He wins when this happens.

Because it's fun in moderation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course he's got someone chasing all of his posts around giving him thumbs up (probably his own sock).  Sad!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

And of course he's got someone chasing all of his posts around giving him thumbs up (probably his own sock).  Sad!

You can see everyone's rep now. All 3 pos reps are from udaydanceparty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, SquishMitten said:

You can see everyone's rep now. All 3 pos reps are from udaydanceparty

That sounds highly homoerotic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

Yes sir this is 100% correct. They were the EXACT same thing. Completely the same. Hacking third parties to illegally gain information to use against the American electoral system on the behest of a presidential candidate? What? That was all Hillary! She hired Steele and paid for the dossier! The dossier that is completely fake news because it doesn't exist. 

Now the Dems are preparing for the next election hacking by taking 17 year old kids who will be old enough to vote and brainwashing them with their garbage/paying them with that plutonium money to March against our right to own assault weapons! It's all happening brother and it stinks. 

They are even getting that little bald illegal Mexican lesbian to be the face of their corruption and attempts to overthrow the greatest part of the Constitution. 

Edited by Clearlakehorn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Clearlakehorn said:

Yes sir this is 100% correct. They were the EXACT same thing. Completely the same. Hacking third parties to illegally gain information to use against the American electoral system on the behest of a president candidate? What? That was all Hillary! She hired Steele and paid for the dossier! The dossier that is completely fake news because it doesn't exist. 

Now the Dems are preparing for the next election hacking by taking 17 year old kids who will be old enough to vote and brainwashing them with their garbage/paying them with that plutonium money to March against our right to own assault weapons! It's all happening brother and it stinks. 

They are even getting that little bald illegal Mexican lesbian to be the face of their corruption and attempts to overthrow the greatest part of the Constitution. 

Alright, who are you and why did you snipe clh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“I asked Olson about being recruited for Trump’s squad. He rolled his eyes, suggesting that this was never going to happen and that it was not just a matter of conflicts. (Though a conservative stalwart, Olson has in recent years enhanced his reputation by becoming a forceful advocate for gay marriage. Associating with Trump could well tarnish that shine.)

So this didn’t get too far? I queried. Olson shrugged in an I’m-not-getting-into-details way. “Who knows how these trial balloons happen?” he said, in a manner that definitely suggested he knows how they happen. He then joked, “Joe [diGenova] lasted longer. At least two days.” 

So is Trump going to have trouble finding attorneys? Olson shrugged again. “Let me ask this a different way,” I said. “In the last few days has any lawyer come up to you and said, ‘I’m willing to work for Trump?'”

Without hesitation, Olson said, “No.” Not at all? “Not at all.”

Washington, I noted, is full of Republican lawyers who generally do not mind being in the middle of headline-generating scandals and earning a bit of notice. Olson laughed: “That’s right.” And not one of them had contacted him to say he or she was willing to sign up? “No,” he repeated.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mpu


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Recruiting ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Help ... For Sale ... Politics ... Board Discussion
×
×
  • Create New...