Leaderboard
-
in Posts
- All areas
- Events
- Event Comments
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Articles
- Article Comments
- Sticky Posts
- Sticky Post Comments
- Commitments
- Commit Comments
- Files
- Topics
- Posts
- Status Updates
- Status Replies
-
Custom Date
-
All time
March 25 2018 - August 5 2025
-
Year
August 5 2024 - August 5 2025
-
Month
July 5 2025 - August 5 2025
-
Week
July 29 2025 - August 5 2025
-
Today
August 5 2025
-
Custom Date
10/08/19 - 10/08/19
-
All time
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/08/19 in Posts
-
18 points
-
Turns out closetojumping is just doing a Mike Roach bit, who recently discovered that we're pushing for Kelvontay Dixon.18 points
-
They live in a world where their QB is simultaneously NFL bound but also the reason they suck.17 points
-
14 points
-
13 points
-
13 points
-
Texas is interested in a new guy on the radar. Dynamic and could play on either side. Great in the return game. Doing what they do, finding guys the whole way through the process and evaluating constantly.13 points
-
13 points
-
12 points
-
With the caveat that everything should be thrown out of the window for this game: I'm surprised by how much of this offense Hurts carries with his legs. They aren't especially dangerous running the ball (with backs, they are with Hurts); their counter trey play that has owned the Big XII for the past few years doesn't look particularly dangerous, because the pulling offensive linemen aren't that athletic, and they shield rather than drive, whenever they don't completely whiff. When at least one tackle isn't holding on a pass play, they're both holding; I frequently shake my head in amazement when watching them at some of the flagrant holds they get away with. Swenson is good, Ealy is average, and Proctor really sucks. If Swenson is out, that's especially big, I think. They're good at sucking you in and holding so Hurts can gash you with his legs (that's they're best play, DL run of the field and the OL holds them while Hurts runs past); he's fucking good running, basically Ehlinger with home run speed. Or black Tebow. I was expecting more passing down the field, like we've seen in the past with OU, or even something similar to LSU this year, considering OU's strong receiver group. However, the passing mostly comes in three forms; short passes (a lot of times they'll throw a screen to a jet sweep guy after he's run past the QB) that Hurts is pretty good at hitting accurately, guys getting open in zone (most teams play zone so they have eyes on Hurts for when he runs) where Hurts usually finds the open guy if he has time, and guys running wide open deep when there's a coverage bust. I didn't see a lot of throwing 1 vs 1 down the field. I don't think Hurts is the type of dual threat that you just keep in the pocket and wait for him to make a mistake, he's good enough now to where he can beat you that way. I think you have to pressure him, but have to be careful to not overrun him. One of the keys to the game, imo, is tackling Hurts when you get a chance. He's strong, crafty, and slippery, and hardly ever goes down from the first defender. Teams spy him and he breaks the spy's tackle, teams try to control rush him and he outruns them, teams spring towards the sidelines to contain him and he plants and cuts upfield. If we tackle him, it takes away a big part of their offense. Defensively, they play really aggressive and downhill in their front six. The DL shoot gaps and slip into the backfield en mass, and their two off the ball LB come downhill hard, which leads to big plays both offensively and defensively. They aren't trying to take on blocks, they're trying to slip under them; Perkins is especially good at this. They haven't really played a passing attack worth a shit, so maybe they play more cautiously when a QB can easily RPO behind the backers. They rotate DL a lot, so I'd try and keep them from subbing and hopefully eventually make them tap out. To be honest, there's not a ton to take away from past games defensively, because the opposing QBs have been poor passers, and the offensive lines haven't been good. They've given up a ton of garbage time yardage.11 points
-
Enough with the mayo talk. Whataburgers come with mustard you goddamn yankee.11 points
-
How about we relax and just let things happen instead of trying to shine light where darkness is intentional.10 points
-
Q: What's the difference between Case McCoy and Baker Mayfield? A: Case McCoy beat out Garrett Gilbert.10 points
-
It's all socialist professors just like any other college. The students get high and drunk and drift into becoming libtards or, even worse, intellectuals. Some become libtard generals just like all the libtard FBI agents. Here's video from their last graduation. Pretty sad, really. We are fortunate that Trump has unsurpassed wisdom and knowledge in all things. I mean, he knows more than the generals. He told us so. We'd be better off shutting the War College down and sending those hippies to Liberty University, by God.9 points
-
9 points
-
8 points
-
As an aside....the use of WhatsApp for official government communications is almost certainly a stand-alone violation of law. It is a purposeful and intentional violation of the Federal Records Act, done for the express purpose of circumventing the Federal Records Act. If a person is acting in his capacity as an official of our government, the messages are not theirs -- they are the government's. Acting in a way to conceal them from the government, not preserve them, and even destroy them (not to mention using an unsecured third-party system to do so -- which may also violate numerous national security laws) is a crime. Remember Hillary's email scandal? I'm sure you've heard mention of it. After all the hubbub, I remained concerned about, at the very least, one important fact: her communications as SOS were the property of the US government and the American people, and if she acted in a way to purposefully conceal or destroy any of those records, I don't care what the hell was on them, whether it was super juicy or not. She hid and destroyed information that belonged to we the people, which is a crime. And now, it's SOP for the Trump regime. Countless people acting in an official capacity are using unsecure third-party apps to conceal their official communications, and to forever conceal and possibly delete/destroy them. To put this in context, most states have open records laws. Texas does. And if Mayor Bubba wants to tell the City Manager to fire police chief Jones because police chief Jones is poking a little to closely at some of the Mayor's special deals, any and all written record of that OFFICIAL communication is subject to the Texas Public Information Act. If the Mayor sent that as an email, we all know that it would be an official record. Well, guess what? The same is true if he sends it as a text....or a WhatsApp message. Here, we have a criminal conspiracy, using off-books communication networks (which is itself a violation of at least two federal laws, concerning information preservation and information security), for the nefarious purpose of hiding evidence of their official actions. THAT ALONE IS GROUNDS FOR PROSECUTION AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE.8 points
-
30 years later and it looks like the NFL may have fallen for it again. Oklahoma douchebag wears a headband and acts like a fucking idiot all the time while running his mouth. Plays on a ridiculously loaded roster in college, wins awards and gets drafted high thanks to the media loving the douchebag act, flops in the NFL. 30 years from now Baker Mayfield will be the sheriff of Fansville.8 points
-
We give our dog meds daily for allergies. The dog needs half a pill. Her: make sure you break the pills in half Me: I do, everyday her: what?! You have to break all the pills in half me: I do. Everyday when I get a pill and then break in half if not already her: but what do you do with the other half? me: put it back in the bottle her: then you will lose it. Why would you do that? You have to break all the pills at once so you don’t lose them me: w t f her: you won’t be able to find the other half of the pill if you put it in he bottle me: w t f her: I will just do it so you don’t mess it up me, walks away8 points
-
7 points
-
Also, thanks for being so patient with all of us hysterical liberal cabal members (tovarisch) who blow the whole betrayal of our comrades in arms and alienation of our long time allies all out of proportion. We really do get carried away when the president incorrectly states how tariffs work and fawns over murderous autocrats. I mean, really, why all the hubbub? Further, who better than the president to identify enemies of the state and the treasonous members of Congress and the press? He has the mandate of the people and maybe even the Mandate of God. God smiles on his concentration camps and expulsions of people in the US for life-saving care while we dumbasses hyperventilate about the whole nothing burger. Surely your patience and wisdom have helped you to your comfortable life and the political choices you make. Stay the course. The world, the climate, world conflicts and the rise of fascist nationalism will all be fine. Human compassion awaits just around the corner to wash away cruelty-it needs no encouragement or cultivation. We're the greatest country the world has ever known or will ever know because we (you, actually) are the greatest people in the world. You're a model to us all.7 points
-
Boy, Bosa sure can hold a grudge....playing the long game two years later7 points
-
Maybe we shouldn't have convinced them to dismantle their defensive fortifications if we were about to up and leave them. Trump is compromised and has left our best allies in the war on terror to get slaughtered. You can have issues with how we wage that war, as we all fucking do, and still recognize that that is completely fucking inexcusable on every level. It's morally abhorrent and strategically disastrous. But no, you obviously can't miss a single opportunity to bootlick. You're a piece of shit who supports a traitor and you will be for the rest of your miserable life.7 points
-
The wailing is in regards to abandoning an ally that gave up thousands of their own men and women's lives so we could have less casualties and then standing aside to let them be slaughtered by their geographic rivals. It's one thing to not want to start a new war or get involved in the middle east in the first place. It's something else entirely to abandon a group you deliberately used and put in harms way and sell them out to a world leader that would like to see them wiped out. Do you see the distinction in that?7 points
-
the real issue I had with "the cops did it" was the fact that this case did not mean shit to most cops in dallas if one is going to put forth the idea that the dallas police have some massive corruption machine going where they kill off witnesses to crimes well I seriously doubt any of those that would be involved in that would take the risk of exposing that corruption on a case like this this case is a case of some stupid bitch that could simply not believe that she would ever be wrong and thus she had to be at the right apartment door and something was wrong that required her super police powers to rectify like busting in the door and shooting a shadow this was not a case where some cop did some crazy shit that could expose a bunch of other crazy shit that the cops needed to make sure to cover up or dozens of them would be fucked.....in fact this case was an easy throw away case where the cops can look back and have her go off to jail and say "see cops get theirs too" because it was a case that involved one cop, a dude that was killed that was pretty much as clean as they come and nothing else that remotely hinted at any giant conspiracy that required the death of Jean or his death being something that was needed to cover some massive corruption up there was nothing at all at risk for any potential group of corrupt cops or any long term corruption in this case that required taking the risk to make sure she was not convicted much less to retaliate against a pretty meaningless overall witness, especially after she was already convicted , in the case that was going to convict her with or without his testimony this is a case where any half way competent group of hard core corrupt cops would say let the bitch fry and move on because we don't need careless idiots like her around and her going to jail takes the heat off of us.....it is not a case where they would take a massive risk to get even with someone6 points
-
6 points
-
6 points
-
Let BJ Foster spy his ass. He will knock the fuck out of Hurts a couple times at least. Foster can bring the wood.6 points
-
Trump and Rudy's Ukraine scheme: it's worse than quid pro quo. The 1991 Intelligence Authorization Act prohibits the U.S. government from using covert actions — which include propaganda — to “influence United States political processes, public opinion, policies, or media.”6 points
-
I usually try not to laugh at others' misfortunes. But when that other is an insanely arrogant sooner douchebag bitch boy, I let the chortles flow like Keystone Lights in a shitty ass Oklahoma trailer park. Fuck this guy. I hope he ends up running a used car lot in Canada with Johnny Maziel, Tonya Harding, and O.J. Simpson.6 points
-
Imprisoning people shouldn’t be profitable because the fact that it is is why we shape policy to imprison so many people, most of whom are minorities.6 points
-
That's the dumbest thing I've ever seen on the internet, and I lurk texags.6 points
-
Saw this little gem from texags on one of their "college gameday crew took a crap on us" threads and couldn't help myself. Texas A&M record in Big 12: 106-80 / .569 winning pct Texas Tech record during same period: 119-68 / .636 winning pct6 points
-
In other words, normal emotions for decent people?5 points
-
5 points
-
Your offense is the best in the country. I never said they weren't. Hell, I posted the damned stats that I think prove it. I said that Hurts is the reason your run game works, not your running backs, who (having seen them play) don't impress me that much.. If the planned QB run dimension were taken away, and if the passing game were limited (and, again, I would say good luck finding a defense that can do that consistently), then y'all would be in trouble, because on their own, especially behind this year's version of y'all's OL, that would not be very intimidating. If Texas wins, it will be because they took away Hurts' threat to run, got TFL on a significant number of first downs, and limited passing conversions on 3rd and long. Limiting the RBs should not really be that big a part of the game plan, because if Texas does those first three things, the RBs won't be a factor anyway. If OU's RBs run wild, it will be because Texas did not do those first three things, not because OU's RBs are all that great. Anybody can run through a defense that's backpedalling for its life because they're afraid on 2nd & short of Lamb, et al., going house, or Hurts taking a QB sweep for 20+ yards. Hell, I could probably do it, and I'm a slow, middle-aged, pencil-pusher. My premise is really pretty simple: OU's offense is great, and yes, statistically, that includes YPC by your running backs. But it's not because they're something special.5 points
-
As expected, it looks like a bunch of people need to come eat crow on this thread. I'm sure that will happen.5 points
-
So Putin helped Trump, they welcomed that help, everyone was hanging around with Russians, Trump’s campaign manager gave Russia polling data, etc. Maybe someone should look into this. Fuck you Bob Mueller.5 points
-
So the GOP is slowly but surely setting the table for a massive wipeout in 2020. The Trump Presidency simply believes it is above both branches of government and has put corrupt Barr into the Juestice Department to protect Trump and is fellow corrupt minions. What will happen over time is smart people are tiring of this shit show. College Educated women know that there have been congressional hearings for years upon years. Why is only when the most corrupt things are found to be going on, the need for congressional oversight is eliminated by Republican endorsed actions? People as a whole are fucking stupid, but the numbers are beginning to move in the right direction. Just think if Obama had in his second term simply refused allow anyone to testify before congress and told more lies than the truth every day? We all know what the answer to that would be from our now fully corrupt GOP breathern. Eventually GOP representatives are going to have to interact with their constituents. Did you see how painful it was for Joanie Ernst the other day? Tossing away all her morals and principles for all her constituents to see?!?! So the new rule will be that Congress can only investigate things that the Executive branch deems worthy of investigaiton? And that all actions in the executive branch are priviledged? I know that Republicans these days by necessity have to forget everything factual they ever knew prior to Trump, but a lot of folks are deciding they are no longer Republican. They don't like saying they elected a fucking moron, but the evidence keeps mounting. Think of impeachment the same way Kevin McCarthy did the partisan shit show that was Benghazi. It hurt Hillary Clinton, which was the entire objective of the 7 different comittee hearings on the same subject. There is an older couple that we hang out with, and they are ruby red Republicans and even they are tiring of the never ending Trump shit show. They are like a lot of voters (on both sides) that are basically legacy voters. But even they are talking about Trump's clear use of his office to help his 2020 campaign. They don't say that per say!!!! They allude amorphously, but something has changed their opinion, enough to utter displeasure. I don't see how a strategy of we are simply not going to let anyone in the executive branch ever testify before any committee not chaired by a Republican is going to work well over time. (I know that questioning the bounds of GOP self delusion is a tough premise to support) But any educated person knows It is quite clearly obstruction by definition. If I were a Dem I would ask over and over, why the President is unwilling to let anyone testify about a "Perfect call?" I would bring this up again and again and again. I would go on Fox news and bring it up over and over. Just simple questions. Why does a "perfect call" need to be hidden in a super secret server? I think these are simple questions that the American people deserve answers about. Why is the President unwilling to allow anyone to testify about these "perfect calls?" Why is the President so afraid of this "perfect call?" The only answer I can come up with is the President knows the call wasn't perfect at all.5 points
-
5 points
-
5 points
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... COOKIE MONSTER!