Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
7 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

I suppose the notion of working on an historic project was too tempting

Yes, who wouldn’t want to knock down an historic, if not all that old, building and replace it with Trump’s pleasure palace?

2 minutes ago, Nuge said:

Isn't @Superhero's firm involved in this?  What's the word?  Any insider dirt?

His was just a demo contractor iirc

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

They/he was announced as the architect pretty much from the get-go, definitely before the demo.

I remember because I looked him up and he seemed credible.

But he should have known he was working for a grimy little pimp and that the "visions" would diverge.

I suppose the notion of working on an historic project was too tempting.

Oh, he was definitely on from early days - when the renderings came out it was difficult to even find out who the architect was, but eventually I found a blurb somewhere. He's definitely creditable but the weird thing was is, unlike most architecture firms his was difficult to find much info on. At the time there were about 2 intern-level staffers on LinkedIn and his website looked like something a small residential shop would've done about 10 years ago.

Most of his work appears to have been on Catholic churches and for a conservative Catholic university, along with some smaller neoclassical projects. His work isn't bad - style is irrelevant; we all work in the style we tend to be comfortable with, and neoclassical certainly is an appropriate style here - but he seems to be one of those architectural demagogues that believe in One True Style, much like King Charles or Trump himself (or Speer/Hitler, if you want to take it there).

He was all on board but is now the perfect example of the frog on the scorpion. "You knew what I was when you got on."

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Nuge said:

Isn't @Superhero's firm involved in this?  What's the word?  Any insider dirt?

Nope. East coast business units that do work around DC. We on the west coast are libruls are not fond of that decision.

Starting construction without a full set of documents isn’t out of the norm. On most projects we work on these days, the drawings are broken into different packages, eg foundations, site, structural, architectural, etc. But you at least need the architects to “freeze the backgrounds” so other designers can get to work.

If they’re still working on the concept of the plan, then yeah, that’s really strange - and will be full of changes leading the project to miss the schedule and being over budget.

On projects like these; assuming there’s stone and custom materials, you’ll want to order materials far in advance. Any delay in material releases means the schedule moves right. So yeah… we’ll probably end up with a federal building with plaster and clad with hardy board. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Superhero said:

Starting construction without a full set of documents isn’t out of the norm. On most projects we work on these days, the drawings are broken into different packages, eg foundations, site, structural, architectural, etc. But you at least need the architects to “freeze the backgrounds” so other designers can get to work.

Yes, this is typical, particularly on larger projects where you can "stage" the various permits (clearing/grading, dry utilities, site, foundation etc.) and begin work on each in turn. Of course here there's likely no permitting authority, or if there is it was ignored, so here we are.

We try to "freeze the backgrounds" as early as possible, especially where stuff is touching ground, so that those permits can be obtained early and subsequent work begun. Freezing the backgrounds in other areas sometimes doesn't occur until closer to building permit application, mainly due to clients constantly changing their minds. (Right, McCrery?)

Posted
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

In nine months in appointed office, she racked up 10 ethics charges and resigned.

8 months.  Early January -> early September.

Posted
24 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

8 months.  Early January -> early September.

The attempted "gotchas" we are treated to every once in a while around here are hilarious. Zero ownership of this fucking hellscape we're living in, but by golly here they come with some incredibly stupid, meaningless horseshit. 

Posted
2 hours ago, HenryJames said:

I like how Trump brags about how he's getting weekly cognitive tests.

Yeah, my parents were 86 and 80 when they died.  No cognitive tests for either.  Curiously enough, their doctors never though such a test was warranted.

  • Like 5
Posted
14 minutes ago, Red Five said:

The attempted "gotchas" we are treated to every once in a while around here are hilarious. Zero ownership of this fucking hellscape we're living in, but by golly here they come with some incredibly stupid, meaningless horseshit. 

It wasn't a "gotcha", it was an effort to further clarify the absurdity of her time in office.

Posted
11 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

It wasn't a "gotcha", it was an effort to further clarify the absurdity of her time in office.

Not you dude. The original post. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Zonahorn said:

hang 'em all 

Let's suppose for a moment that everyone on board that boat was a drug smuggler/dealer/whatever. Isn't that still just as much murder? I can't go blow up a jail and say "Well they were all criminals so who gives a shit?". No I would go to prison myself for the rest of my life. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

Sitting with my father. 37 years, most in special operations. Spent a lot of time doing interdiction work in Latin America. Told him about this. First words. War Crime. 

 

Can’t be a war crime if we aren’t in a declared war!

Posted

New term I just saw used by the President. 

"Narcocommunists" in reference to the elections in Honduras. 

OK, hear me out. Narcos want PROFIT. I thought commies were against that. Last paragraph in the AP article. 

“The only real friend of Freedom in Honduras is Tito Asfura,” Trump wrote. “Tito and I can work together to fight the Narcocommunists, and bring needed aid to the people of Honduras.”

https://apnews.com/article/honduras-castro-trump-moncada-nasralla-asfura-49924d1e047c7eba7e115ec9733e2098

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Isn't giving needed aid to people something only socialists do? I thought the people of Honduras were just supposed to get jobs. Not here of course...

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
56 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Let's suppose for a moment that everyone on board that boat was a drug smuggler/dealer/whatever. Isn't that still just as much murder? I can't go blow up a jail and say "Well they were all criminals so who gives a shit?". No I would go to prison myself for the rest of my life. 

Yes, that is unquestionably murder, Pete Hegseth is a murderer. A thug with a federal ID 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

“The Autopen is not allowed to be used if approval is not specifically given by the President of the United States.”

 

I could swear Joe Biden was President.  Also, Trump lashing out like this means some other scandal (or details about a current scandal) is about to rear its ugly head.

Poor Venezuela. He’s already announced a ground war of sorts, it’s just a matter of time where the scandal is too big.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

Holy fucking shit. "I'm cancelling his executive orders because he clearly didn't give them, because reasons. And if he said he did he's lying and I'll have him put in jail!" 

I guess we learned today the president doesn't know what perjury is.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

I could swear Joe Biden was President.  Also, Trump lashing out like this means some other scandal (or details about a current scandal) is about to rear its ugly head.

This here is proof that miller and others have taken the presidential agency away from Donald and are using auto pen for his signature (we know the last part already from exact signatures not long ago), under the every accusation doctrine. 

Edited by Pato del Muerto
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, InkaUtexas said:

Sitting with my father. 37 years, most in special operations. Spent a lot of time doing interdiction work in Latin America. Told him about this. First words. War Crime. 

 

But was he ever a Fox News host?  Guest, even? 

If not, his experience is irrelevant and his opinion is invalid

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, VABuckeye said:

Is this autopen thing legal or is he just making it up?

Well, it seems logical that if a POTUS can issue an executive order, a subsequent POTUS can issue the opposite order.  By doing it this way, he's throwing red meat to his psycho base. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, VABuckeye said:

Is this autopen thing legal or is he just making it up?

I think if it could be proven that a signature on an operative document, EO, legislation, etc. was executed without POTUS's knowledge and consent, that would be a problem, whether an Autopen was involved or straight forgery.

But, that would require some form of proof and adjudication, not some deranged demented shitgibbon ranting about it.

I think it would have to come up in a judicial challenge to the legislation, which would have to be brought by a party with standing to challenge it.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
No moral complexity here. Orange turd just wants his cut. 

Buried in that post is a golden nugget of truth, he said so himself:

“A wrong leader can only bring catastrophic results to a country, no matter which country it is.”

Ab-so-fucking-lutely. I couldn’t agree more. Kinda exactly what some of us have been sounding alarms on for a decade.
  • Hook 'Em 2


×
×
  • Create New...