Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, StassneyHorn said:

Bwahahahah what a dumb fucking post and I’m 10 drinks deep in wrigley

You're right. Christianity doesn't have a long history of manipulating adherents with the idea of hell.

My bad.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Huckleberry said:

Y'all are engaging the single dumbest poster in this forum. How boring. 

There should be a poll for this, because it’s honestly a tough choice

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

On your phone discussing religion on a message board while drinking in wrigley is crazy work. Slightly terrifying.

I rwalked in front of 4 cars. I’m a tank. Let’s keep it going though.

indulgences were 500 years ago and that has everything to do with 2025

Posted
1 minute ago, StassneyHorn said:

Were these widespread?  Or just Bawstin

In the early modern period, from about 1400 to 1775, about 100,000 people were prosecuted for witchcraft in Europe and British America.[1]Between 40,000 and 60,000[2][3] were executed, almost all in Europe.[citation needed]The witch-hunts were particularly severe in parts of the Holy Roman Empire.[citation needed]Prosecutions for witchcraft reached a high point from 1560 to 1630,[4][5] during the Counter-Reformation and the European wars of religion. Among the lower classes, accusations of witchcraft were usually made by neighbors,[6] and women and men made formal accusations of witchcraft.[7] Magical healers or 'cunning folk' were sometimes prosecuted for witchcraft, but seem to have made up a minority of the accused.[8][9] Roughly 80% of those convicted were women,[10] most of them over the age of 40.[11][12][13] In some regions, convicted witches were burnt at the stake, the traditional punishment for religious heresy.
 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_trials_in_the_early_modern_period

Posted

Et tu @tx 3 puttI liked you. Victoria guy born and raised, which probably doesn’t help ha

 

Just now, Pato del Muerto said:

In the early modern period, from about 1400 to 1775, about 100,000 people were prosecuted for witchcraft in Europe and British America.[1]Between 40,000 and 60,000[2][3] were executed, almost all in Europe.[citation needed]The witch-hunts were particularly severe in parts of the Holy Roman Empire.[citation needed]Prosecutions for witchcraft reached a high point from 1560 to 1630,[4][5] during the Counter-Reformation and the European wars of religion. Among the lower classes, accusations of witchcraft were usually made by neighbors,[6] and women and men made formal accusations of witchcraft.[7] Magical healers or 'cunning folk' were sometimes prosecuted for witchcraft, but seem to have made up a minority of the accused.[8][9] Roughly 80% of those convicted were women,[10] most of them over the age of 40.[11][12][13] In some regions, convicted witches were burnt at the stake, the traditional punishment for religious heresy.
 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_trials_in_the_early_modern_period

A copy paste bwahaha

Posted
1 minute ago, Pato del Muerto said:

In the early modern period, from about 1400 to 1775, about 100,000 people were prosecuted for witchcraft in Europe and British America.[1]Between 40,000 and 60,000[2][3] were executed, almost all in Europe.[citation needed]The witch-hunts were particularly severe in parts of the Holy Roman Empire.[citation needed]Prosecutions for witchcraft reached a high point from 1560 to 1630,[4][5] during the Counter-Reformation and the European wars of religion. Among the lower classes, accusations of witchcraft were usually made by neighbors,[6] and women and men made formal accusations of witchcraft.[7] Magical healers or 'cunning folk' were sometimes prosecuted for witchcraft, but seem to have made up a minority of the accused.[8][9] Roughly 80% of those convicted were women,[10] most of them over the age of 40.[11][12][13] In some regions, convicted witches were burnt at the stake, the traditional punishment for religious heresy.
 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_trials_in_the_early_modern_period

Relevant part below

Between 40,000 and 60,000[2][3] were executed, almost all in Europe.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

Y'all are engaging the single dumbest poster in this forum. How boring. 

The only person on this site that I have on ignore. It’s just a floodgate of stupidity when he gets going and people keep quoting him.

Posted
1 minute ago, StassneyHorn said:

Relevant part below

Between 40,000 and 60,000[2][3] were executed, almost all in Europe.

Which …is not Boston. Which is what you asked. It was all over the Christian world.  Now my question to you is- was it also in the non-Christian world?

Posted
4 minutes ago, royiv said:

The only person on this site that I have on ignore. It’s just a floodgate of stupidity when he gets going and people keep quoting him.

Name a parking lot in Scottsdale and I can meet you with this dumb shit

Posted
5 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Which …is not Boston. Which is what you asked. It was all over the Christian world.  Now my question to you is- was it also in the non-Christian world?

Not what I asked. Whole hug ass list of things not in America except what 2 or 3. It’s infantile percentages and it doesn’t sway public opinion

Posted
Just now, hookemATL said:

Stassney really enjoying his Fathers Day bender.🤘

it would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic, sad, and predictable. Get help you reckless fuckwit. 

What do you Actually have a problem with? I’m overwhelmingly correct

10 minutes ago, royiv said:

The only person on this site that I have on ignore. It’s just a floodgate of stupidity when he gets going and people keep quoting him.

Organized religion is a net positive, and this forum reacted to a nuclear bomb.

Posted
1 minute ago, miguelito said:

So did they catch the assassin guy yet?

Nope.  The most interesting thing to me in the press conference is that the wife and other family members are not in custody- even though it's reported that they had what amounts to an escape kit with them.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

I would just like to point out that any multibillionaire who gives away his entire wealth for tax reasons isn't smart enough to be a mutlibillionaire.  Therefore, that's not why it happens.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I would just like to point out that any multibillionaire who gives away his entire wealth for tax reasons isn't smart enough to be a mutlibillionaire.  Therefore, that's not why it happens.

Except for all the one listed from the billionaire pledge?

29 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

Can dude pick a schtick and stick to it for 3 minutes? Holy fuck.

Tell us what shticks



×
×
  • Create New...