Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Do y’all think he’s a Tito’s guy now or still Grey Goose?

With that hair cut? Wine coolers is my bet. Zima probably. He probably misses Bartles & James everyday. 

Edited by scramblyn
Posted
Just now, Im_smarter_then_you said:

Aint nooone forcing me on no instagram

 

That is my point.  The description and screen shots of it showed up here.  You never had to even sniff IG and you're, nonetheless, now fully aware of what she was putting down.  

You never had a choice because you read this thread. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Cajun said:

That is my point.  The description and screen shots of it showed up here.  You never had to even sniff IG and you're, nonetheless, now fully aware of what she was putting down.  

You never had a choice because you read this thread. 

I think we'll be OK.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Cajun said:

 

That is my point.  The description and screen shots of it showed up here.  You never had to even sniff IG and you're, nonetheless, now fully aware of what she was putting down.  

You never had a choice because you read this thread. 

What was actually posted?

Posted
Just now, Stunns38 said:

Regarding Loreal, it just personifies Sark’s poor decision making, lol.

And oh, I would still bang her like a 4.3 WR.

How many 4.3 WRs have you banged?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

Don’t disagree, he went from having an edge to looking like he had been to a busted hypnotist. It wouldn’t bother me at all to see passion on the sideline.
 

He looks detached for the most part but it’s bc he decided to also be the OC and he’s not really watching the defense in the field. He’s thinking of plays in his head.

 

And realizing nothing will work bc our O line is busted that he was responsible for addressing in the offseason. That’s what that far away I just seen a ghost look is about. 

I think he was actually focused on how to blame this on the players rather than holding himself or any of his staff accountable. Add to it, this focus on figuring out his top blame game strategy prevented him from checking out the most recent Murder With My Husband podcast. Also it was difficult crouching yesterday and who the hell can focus when you're forced to stand while not being able to watch your favorite YouTube podcast on your IPad. 

Edited by BurntEyes
Posted
7 hours ago, Hank_Hill said:

I get your overall point but several of those players are terrible examples

I used ant hill as an example because I remember specifically one of the recruiting insider guys on here talking about how he had no clue how to play the LB position. Sanders was a DE who was soft as charmin and had to switch to TE because he was too athletic to keep off the field. You think worthy and Mitchell were wr’s when they showed up at Texas? I’m fully aware development happens in college but you shouldn’t have to teach these mother fuckers how to crawl or walk, they should have some refined positional skills when they show up at a place like Texas rated as a 5 star. In your defense there are probably much better examples but those guys pop out at me in the last 3 years. 

Posted

so if his wheels are truly off can he be fired for cause?  is that in his contract?  I know that’s been addressed here somewhere but I’m not reading 50 pages searching for it.

Posted
5 minutes ago, futureman said:

so if his wheels are truly off can he be fired for cause?  is that in his contract?  I know that’s been addressed here somewhere but I’m not reading 50 pages searching for it.

I think you force him to take a nfl job and call it an even split. Firing him for getting sloppy drunk again would be massively embarrassing for Texas. 

Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, WinningIsHard said:

I think you force him to take a nfl job and call it an even split. Firing him for getting sloppy drunk again would be massively embarrassing for Texas. 

given his history, I guess I always assumed that to hire someone like sark you would need to hedge for the fact that he's an alcoholic before you guaranteed him whatever 60, 70, 80 million dollars that we gave him.  I haven't seen his contract so I don't know what it says.  and I don't know that he's drinking, but this has been one hell of a weird year and his demeanor is off.  let's just say I'm somewhat familiar with alcoholism and the thought of guaranteeing that amount of money to a guy with a history of termination for getting bombed on the job (and then suing the school that fired him) seems like ignorance from the BOR, if not incompetence.  or maybe there are clauses in place.  but I don't write the contracts or do the hiring, I'm just spitballing here.

Edited by futureman
Posted

Something is just waaaayyyyy off with Sark.   I just have to go back to his comments at halftime when he said our run game was doing well.  I could understand him saying something maybe not completely in line with what was seen with the defense and being wrong.  But he’s calling the offense so he should absolutely know if something is not working.    

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...