Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, billfromlaketravis said:

Straight nightmare fuel.

image.thumb.png.5af354e20d2e8793e1dd7262f54ef538.png

Not at all. Sark isn't going to let Mack spread his poison. He will use Mack for what Mack is good for and then shit him out like the turd that he is.

Edited by Thetexashammer
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Red Five said:

Shannon is the biggest camp surprise for me to this point. I had written that dude off. Jaydon Chatman too.

I would like to see a photo of your list of players that you had written off that is notarized with a date from before fall camp. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Magus Ossis said:

Yes, arthroscopic-assisted ACLs are very different, as are rehab protocols now, than what was done a couple of generations ago. Technically, I would call the LCL (lateral collateral ligament) the anterior part of the PLC (postero-lateral corner, not to be confused with the PCL, posterior cruciate ligament). Depending on whether he avulsed (pulled off) or tore mid-substance on his LCL, he might have had different surgeries; with a high-level RB like him, my guess is that he had some graft sewn in there unless it was obviously strictly avulsed. I can't remember with certainty, but I think the early concern was that Baxter had torn PCL, too. Not tearing PCL and not tearing more of the posterior portions of the PLC (eg Popliteus) would take some of my concerns away regarding aggressive early motion in therapy and hence help him be better positioned for a potentially faster and more complete recovery. Once he is this far out, his recovery trajectory is more about how rapidly he can re-train and how well he re-adapts to full go.

i was not aware of that waynes world GIF

Posted
Mack needs a girdle and Sark needs a bra 

For real? Sark looks to be in much better shape than previously. Especially for a guy with an infant.
Yes I understand he's a millionaire and has lots of help. That shit is still hard.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
13 hours ago, closetojumping said:

Bobby’s thoughts this morning on scrimmage outcomes, etc.

  Hide contents

 

Steve Sarkisian will meet with the media immediately following this morning’s scrimmage.

It’ll be interesting to see exactly what Sark reveals.

After all, there is an open competition for the back-up QB role. There’s a group of players contending for a various combination of roles in the secondary (I heard yet again about Graceson Littleton’s ascent last night). And then there’s the health of the team, particularly the sidelining of Stanford transfer Emmett Mosley V most of the last week.

In other words, there are a lot of open questions, questions that scrimmages are specifically designed to answer.

We’ll see if the head coach decides to give us any of those answers or if he’s found them himself later today.

**

The NCAA’s decision to prioritize financially penalizing Michigan rather than enforce substantial, lasting scholarship reductions (10-percent is a farce) fails to create any real deterrent to others in the future. It does so yet again.

What does someone have to do to get truly penalized?

Connor Stalions dressed as an opposing staffer and was on the sidelines of a future opponent’s game in an effort to steal intel.

Find me something more egregious than that - outside of gambling and illegal recruiting - that directly can effect the outcome of game in an institutional manner.

It’s just ridiculous what Michigan did and how they benefitted. That image of Stalions in a fake mustache and fake coaching credential will forever tarnish the image of Michigan.

The punishment IMO does not match the crime. Far from it.

**

Gerry and I talked about the Texas run game in this morning’s Saturday Conversation.

Texas finished 69th in the country in rushing yards per game a year ago.

If Texas wants to win a national title, that figure alone must improve.

Perhaps it’s the rehabilitation of Cedric Baxter, perhaps it’s the threat of a QB run game, or maybe it’s the makeup of the interior OL (or perhaps a mix of all of those factors) that can do the trick.

But if Texas wants to win big this season, running the football effectively has to be a major piece of the puzzle.

Furthermore, if Texas can effectively run the ball, the Texas defense will get just that much better as a result.

Hook’Em!

 

slight derail: do scholarship limits even matter in the age of NIL?  "Sorry BillyBob, we can't give you a schollie, so you will need to walk-on and pay your own way.  BTW, here's a big NIL check".

Am I wrong? 

Posted
As a guy with a 3 and 1 year-old, I can confidently say that I'm in the worst shape of my adult life.

4 year old and 2 year old and I was in the worst shape of my life 15 lbs ago.
  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Steamboat1874 said:

My god the Mack haters seem to be the same guys that hate Quinn.

I suggest if you hate Mack so much you should try and find any of his former players that dislike him.

I will hang up and listen to.

There is a Mack thread, and his picture popping up here is not a reason to merge it into this one

Posted
9 minutes ago, Steamboat1874 said:

My god the Mack haters seem to be the same guys that hate Quinn.

I suggest if you hate Mack so much you should try and find any of his former players that dislike him.

I will hang up and listen to.

image.gif.d216b6b26eacc412ed62227868770d48.gif

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Steamboat1874 said:

My god the Mack haters seem to be the same guys that hate Quinn.

I suggest if you hate Mack so much you should try and find any of his former players that dislike him.

I will hang up and listen to.

That's....not really how criticizing coaches works 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Bevo said:

 

It may not be so bad. I set up a friend with a girlfriend of mine and he tore a hamstring having sex with her. He got over it pretty quickly and we were playing rec ball a few weeks later. Interestingly, he never had to choose between rec ball and her. Mainly, because she broke up with him, but that's another story. 

Bevo is a pimp?

Edited by Nivek
Posted
3 hours ago, closetojumping said:

I thought these two posts were attempts at sarcasm or being funny or something. Nope. After reading them again and seeing other responses, I see that vaginas are in full bloom on this site right now

The media team should run with this idea. Have a camera rolling as Sark tells Baxter that they’re going to run him into the ground against the preseason #3 team. But, there is zero chance he gets to build a resume and pad stats against mid-major teams after that. 

Posted

You fuckers know Arch got his bell rung in the playoffs, you also know if it happens again we are an ass hair away from the David Ash situation. That would have been Owens and the freshman, we had to bring somebody else in.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

slight derail: do scholarship limits even matter in the age of NIL?  "Sorry BillyBob, we can't give you a schollie, so you will need to walk-on and pay your own way.  BTW, here's a big NIL check".

Am I wrong? 

Reportedly the NCAA is going to a roster of 105 with no walk ons, but no idea when that’s supposed to roll out.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Dr Climax said:

You fuckers know Arch got his bell rung in the playoffs, you also know if it happens again we are an ass hair away from the David Ash situation. That would have been Owens and the freshman, we had to bring somebody else in.

image.jpeg.42379efd7bc72ec48fdf88ce8e4c0136.jpeg

Has anyone argued we shouldn't have signed Caldwell?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...