Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, elguapo said:

Oh right, all of the "Dems" didn't give a shit, you are so smart 

Reaction Ok GIF

Well, none of the ones who could’ve fucking done anything about it seems to have given a shit. Do you have any evidence they did? Merrick Garland is a fucking disgrace.

42 minutes ago, TexasEd said:

Side A:  Conspiracy, Cabal, Prosecute the pedophiles, if we were in power we'd do something. If you vote us in we'll release the names!!!!

Side B: In power and letting the justice system take its course.

Side A: We're in power now, all that stuff we said we would release, it's a nothing burger move on.

BB - See it's Side B's fault for not doing something.

Side B did Jack shit for four years.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Well, none of the ones who could’ve fucking done anything about it seems to have given a shit. Do you have any evidence they did? Merrick Garland is a fucking disgrace.

Side B did Jack shit for four years.

Do you have any evidence that there was prosecutable evidence beyond Epstein himself and Maxwell?

Those prosecutions were handled by SD NY spanning both administrations.  Indeed, only the Biden DOJ, "Merrick Garland," saw things through to conviction.

Had SD NY been politically restrained from pursuing indictments/convictions of those related to Epstein, I'm sure you would have seen some resignations like you're seeing under Trump.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Do you have any evidence that there was prosecutable evidence beyond Epstein himself and Maxwell?

Those prosecutions were handled by SD NY spanning both administrations.  Indeed, only the Biden DOJ, "Merrick Garland," saw things through to conviction.

Had SD NY been politically restrained from pursuing indictments/convictions of those related to Epstein, I'm sure you would have seen some resignations like you're seeing under Trump.

No, I don’t have any evidence. They haven’t released any evidence. Also, Garland has fucked up so much other shit, I do not give him the benefit of the doubt on this, especially when the guilty party either killed himself or was murdered, and his girlfriend was convicted of sex trafficking minors. Who the fuck did she traffic them to? There must be a list. Those fuckers are guilty of raping children, and should be prosecuted. Why were none prosecuted? Were any even indicted? This whole thing stinks to high heaven all the way back to Acosta in Florida 

 

Why would you assume there would be resignations? That is begging the question. I will go ahead and beg the question another way. There were no resignations because this shit goes really deep and affects people across the political spectrum and at very high levels in almost every industry and includes international leaders. Everybody wants this shit covered up and moron Trump fanned the flames of his dipshit base to the point that it may all come to light.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Well, none of the ones who could’ve fucking done anything about it seems to have given a shit. Do you have any evidence they did? Merrick Garland is a fucking disgrace.

Side B did Jack shit for four years.

Side B put Ghislaine Maxwell on trial, convicted her and sentenced her to 20 years.

Side A had Epstein die in custody.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TexasEd said:

Side B put Ghislaine Maxwell on trial, convicted her and sentenced her to 20 years.

Side A had Epstein die in custody.

What did Maxwell get convicted of?

Posted
1 minute ago, Sawbonz said:

What did Maxwell get convicted of?

Just make your point if you have one.  I'm sure you've done your own research and know all the conspiracy theories about why she was prosecuted for certain crimes and all the outrage that goes along with it but it still stands that Side B has a conviction on their ledger and Side A only has coverups.

  • Drool 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, TexasEd said:

Just make your point if you have one.  I'm sure you've done your own research and know all the conspiracy theories about why she was prosecuted for certain crimes and all the outrage that goes along with it but it still stands that Side B has a conviction on their ledger and Side A only has coverups.

My point is to traffic a minor there has to be a third party who is also guilty. Why were none of the men fucking the kids charged? I haven’t done any research dipshit but I have a brain

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

My point is to traffic a minor there has to be a third party who is also guilty. Why were none of the men fucking the kids charged? I haven’t done any research dipshit but I have a brain

Maxwell, 62, was found guilty in December 2021 of luring young girls to Epstein so he could molest them, between 1994 and 2004. She was sentenced to 20 years in prison in June 2022.

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Sawbonz said:

My point is to traffic a minor there has to be a third party who is also guilty. Why were none of the men fucking the kids charged? I haven’t done any research dipshit but I have a brain

Well clearly you don’t know shit from fuck so sure why not crash out on surly about it Dr

Posted
5 minutes ago, elguapo said:

Well clearly you don’t know shit from fuck so sure why not crash out on surly about it Dr

Ah yes of course Maxwell only procured children for Epstein. You’ve convinced me genius

Posted
4 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Ah yes of course Maxwell only procured children for Epstein. You’ve convinced me genius

Yeah I didn’t write that Dr, what I wrote is it’s clear that you don’t know shit from fuck, hope that helps

Posted
2 minutes ago, elguapo said:

Yeah I didn’t write that Dr, what I wrote is it’s clear that you don’t know shit from fuck, hope that helps

Clear as mud

Posted
3 minutes ago, F250 said:

Epstein and Maxwell were sex traffickers but no sex trafficking occurred. 

- El Guapo

He doesn’t think that. He just knows you don’t know shit from fuck. We don’t know how he has come to that conclusion, but know he is correct 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Clear as mud

I would love for all of the evidence to have been made public last admin but as far as I know that’s not how open investigations work. Trump knew he could run on this and a bunch of idiots fell for it, now he’s trying to walk it back. 

Why is he trying to walk it back though? Trump doesn’t give a fuck about the rules and if there was evidence in the documents that would kill shot his opponents it would already be out.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

He doesn’t think that. He just knows you don’t know shit from fuck. We don’t know how he has come to that conclusion, but know he is correct 

I don’t know shit about how to conduct open investigations into federal sex crimes against minors and I’m guessing as a bone Dr you don’t either, but you are free to play the expert on the internet like every other dumb ass nowadays.

Edited by elguapo
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, elguapo said:

I don’t know shit about how to conduct open investigations into federal sex crimes against minors and I’m guessing as a bone Dr you don’t either, but you are free to play the expert on the internet like every other dumb ass nowadays.

See that wasn’t so hard was it? 
 

I am done giving any of these fucks the benefit of the doubt. It’s gross incompetence or a cover up and I just don’t buy incompetence in this case. Remember all the shit the FBI pulled out of Epstein’s NYC residence?
 

There is no fucking way it should take 4 fucking years to get an indictment on someone other than the motherfucker who killed himself. Oopsie we were almost ready and then we lost the election darn!
 

I’m sorry but I have to believe my lying eyes on this one

Edited by Sawbonz
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

See that wasn’t so hard was it? 
 

I am done giving any of these fucks the benefit of the doubt. It’s gross incompetence or a cover up and I just don’t buy incompetence in this case. Remember all the shit the FBI pulled out of Epstein’s NYC residence?
 

There is no fucking way it should take 4 fucking years to get an indictment someone other than the motherfucker who killed himself. I’m sorry but I have to believe my lying eyes on this one

It does seem absurd to have taken that long and the whole thing stinks

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Bobby_Batronic said:

I have no questions. It appears Trump and company are actively trying to suppress any information they have. Which, if you’ve read any of the thread  has been a theme. Nobody in power or who held power wants it released. 

 

Odd, it would appear that 210 Dems 'in power' in the House want it released.  Not that this resolution would be binding or anything anyways, but it is funny that the R's were able to find just 1 more vote than the Dems had present to shut this down, and then let some of their people not vote on it to save face or something. 

image.thumb.png.531487e6b29eb32d9fef220862a1eca5.png

It's interesting who didn't vote for the R's, since every one of these people won their district easily. I wonder why they don't vote to release the files?  What are they scared of?  Trump/Bondi/Patel would ignore this resolution if it passed anyways. 

During a recent House vote on a procedural measure related to the release of Jeffrey Epstein files (Roll Call 195 on H. Res. 580), Nine Republicans abstained from voting: 
Andy Ogles (TN)
Michael McCaul (TX)
Thomas Massie (KY)
Barry Loudermilk (GA)
Wesley Hunt (TX)
Morgan Lutrell (TX)
Mark Green (TN)
Monica De La Cruz (TX)
Buddy Carter (GA) 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Dutchrudder said:

Odd, it would appear that 210 Dems 'in power' in the House want it released.  Not that this resolution would be binding or anything anyways, but it is funny that the R's were able to find just 1 more vote than the Dems had present to shut this down, and then let some of their people not vote on it to save face or something. 

image.thumb.png.531487e6b29eb32d9fef220862a1eca5.png

It's interesting who didn't vote for the R's, since every one of these people won their district easily. I wonder why they don't vote to release the files?  What are they scared of?  Trump/Bondi/Patel would ignore this resolution if it passed anyways. 

During a recent House vote on a procedural measure related to the release of Jeffrey Epstein files (Roll Call 195 on H. Res. 580), Nine Republicans abstained from voting: 
Andy Ogles (TN)
Michael McCaul (TX)
Thomas Massie (KY)
Barry Loudermilk (GA)
Wesley Hunt (TX)
Morgan Lutrell (TX)
Mark Green (TN)
Monica De La Cruz (TX)
Buddy Carter (GA) 

I see you’re trying to claim scoreboard like some of the other zealots here. 
 

Odd, I don’t recall the Dems amassing 200 votes to try to push for the release of the investigation’s information just 7 months ago. I guess they juuussssttt wrapped it up as Trump was sworn in, and couldn’t get it over the finish line. 
 

Quit playing “Yay team” and realize that no one in Washington, and probably a few other power circles and capitals world wide wants this released. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted

The amount of stupidity surrounding this whole situation makes my brain hurt so bad that I actually died.  So I asked God who was on Epstein's list, and he said there isn't a list.  I'm now shocked by how far up this conspiracy goes. 

  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Bobby_Batronic said:

I see you’re trying to claim scoreboard like some of the other zealots here. 
 

Odd, I don’t recall the Dems amassing 200 votes to try to push for the release of the investigation’s information just 7 months ago. I guess they juuussssttt wrapped it up as Trump was sworn in, and couldn’t get it over the finish line. 
 

Quit playing “Yay team” and realize that no one in Washington, and probably a few other power circles and capitals world wide wants this released. 


If the dems had released the documents prior to the election and there was evidence that Trump fucked a bunch of kids, would any of his supporters believe it? Absolutely not. Perhaps justifiably, it would have been seen as politically motivated bullshit. You know, just another witch hunt. The only way it will be seen as believable to his base is if it emerges during his administration. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 3
Posted
10 hours ago, F250 said:

Epstein and Maxwell were sex traffickers but no sex trafficking occurred. 

- El Guapo

 

10 hours ago, Anastasis said:

Saw bringing logic to a lawyer fight. Good luck. 

 

10 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

Clear as mud

Careful with the witch hunt.  Your president may have been on that island.  

Posted
16 minutes ago, B00M said:


If the dems had released the documents prior to the election and there was evidence that Trump fucked a bunch of kids, would any of his supporters believe it? Absolutely not. Perhaps justifiably, it would have been seen as politically motivated bullshit. You know, just another witch hunt. The only way it will be seen as believable to his base is if it emerges during his administration. 

Precisely 

Posted
19 minutes ago, B00M said:


If the dems had released the documents prior to the election and there was evidence that Trump fucked a bunch of kids, would any of his supporters believe it? Absolutely not. Perhaps justifiably, it would have been seen as politically motivated bullshit. You know, just another witch hunt. The only way it will be seen as believable to his base is if it emerges during his administration. 

It still won't be believable to them if that list somehow comes out between right now and January 19, 2029, unless Fox News tells them it is believable (they won't)

Posted
3 hours ago, GW Hayduke said:

The amount of stupidity surrounding this whole situation makes my brain hurt so bad that I actually died.  So I asked God who was on Epstein's list, and he said there isn't a list.  I'm now shocked by how far up this conspiracy goes. 

But then one man's God is another man's false idol.

I am still expecting a short list of little import written in sharpie followed by immediate acceptance on the right and immediate acquiescence on the left.

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

As I have said repeatedly, I am quite sure the DOJ under Trump and Biden, when relatively normal, investigated the rest of the Epstein cabal and found no indictable offenses after Epstein and Maxwell.

Everything else was performative nonsense.

And Trump wanting to release rumor bait until he came to understand that the rumors would be about him as much as anyone.

 

16 hours ago, Bobby_Batronic said:

Of all the possibilities I would like that to be true. 

What if it’s true (which I believe is the most likely scenario)? You’re railing on “performative bullshit” from the left, meanwhile the right won elections through “performative bullshit” insisting that the list exists and that all their political rivals were pedophiles. It worked. Our stupid as fuck electorate has proven they only care about performative bullshit. You still think the “left” should back down and take the high road? Do what prez says and just forget about it after all the bs from the last election cycle? Sounds like you just want them to keep losing elections which is why people are treating you like maga. This is the country we live in, there is no reason for the left to just step aside, even if it is largely performative at this point. He created this conspiracy, make him stew in it, for as long as possible. 

Edited by 'stache
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Drool 1
Posted

Imagine being disappointed in Trump.  Over this.  Over anything.  After he has shown for 30 years that he is a huckster and every third word out of his mouth is a verifiable lie.

 

Don't get mad at a dog for barking.  It's what dogs do.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Bevo Num1 said:

There has to be at least one person who isn't tied to this administration but worked the case that has these files. 

they have top men working on it.

top. men.

image.png.39fef3b6e047074ddecfd142c4bada6e.png

  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 hours ago, GW Hayduke said:

The amount of stupidity surrounding this whole situation makes my brain hurt so bad that I actually died.  So I asked God who was on Epstein's list, and he said there isn't a list.  I'm now shocked by how far up this conspiracy goes. 

IMG_4959.thumb.webp.79c6b8cb9aede0e65e66dd88dfa422f4.webp

How far up????   The god that you spoke with isn’t even our God….

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, huge said:

Imagine being disappointed in Trump.  Over this.  Over anything.  After he has shown for 30 years that he is a huckster and every third word out of his mouth is a verifiable lie.

 

Don't get mad at a dog for barking.  It's what dogs do.

image.jpeg.4f2c34cf7364fbbc5ab540d5b824fa3f.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

 

 

Careful with the witch hunt.  Your president may have been on that island.  

It’s a pedophile hunt. And everyone involved should be held to account 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Bobby_Batronic said:

I see you’re trying to claim scoreboard like some of the other zealots here. 
 

Odd, I don’t recall the Dems amassing 200 votes to try to push for the release of the investigation’s information just 7 months ago. I guess they juuussssttt wrapped it up as Trump was sworn in, and couldn’t get it over the finish line. 
 

Quit playing “Yay team” and realize that no one in Washington, and probably a few other power circles and capitals world wide wants this released. 

I'll root for the team that's not actively protecting child rapists, thanks. The Dems don't care who is included in the potential friendly fire, and I'm happy to see that. Bill Clinton is definitely in there, and I would have no problem seeing him locked away for life. I would imagine other Dems in office are also going to be caught up in it, and quite a few Republicans too, many actively serving in this administration.

I would expect the party of "morals" and "law and order" would want to see justice for the Epstein sex trafficking and rape victims, but as you can see above, 220 of them couldn't even bother to vote for a ceremonial nudge to make the criminals names public. We can't even get this administration to say there is an active investigation that would be impacted by the release. Instead it's all misdirection and pretending it doesn't exist, or it's a "hoax." It all just screams "I'm guilty" for Trump, and he should go down for it. Probably won't happen, but we can all dream. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

 

I don't understand why Elon does not have 120930129301293 microphones in front of him from a press that smells the blood of a juicy story in the water.  I mean, whether you think this is legit or a nothing burger, it's strange that the press does not seem to really be engaging the richest person in the world that brought Epstein/Trump into the national consciousness.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...