Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:


I immediately got the app to add back the dislikes. And the worst decision they made was taking an extreme social marxist political position and engaging in censorship. They destroyed their own platform thinking they had an impenetrable monopoly.

i too like to masturbate words into a conversation when i don't know their definitions.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Posted (edited)
On 6/6/2025 at 1:51 PM, SydneyCarton said:

Additionally, no one here is showing off their lives, because most of these people are degenerate slobs who should be ashamed of themselves. And the rest, like myself, have zero desire to give away enough information that the rest of you unwashed plebians could actually find me. 

 

Edited by Blotto
Posted
5 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:

What was actually going on was that YouTube was pushing to create TV on the internet, pushing corporate content like CNN and MSNBC, and those videos were all getting disliked intensely. If you have the app, you can still see it. Never click on those videos, you will get spammed with MSNBC or FOX videos for all eternity. 

In summary, YouTube sucks dicks and is run by women and emotion rather than logic and facts.

Social Marxist theory. Not an algorithm that says “he clicked on this before, serve more of the same because YouTube likes clicks.” 
 

please explain to us how a for profit, capitalist company, that exists in America, is pushing “social Marxist” theory against its own financial interest, to…what exactly?  have you ever heard of Occam’s Razor? Hell, show me some of this corporate content that specifically advocates for the public ownership of the means of production and all property that is on MSNBC. 
 

This isn’t some casual internet tough talk, so I hope this sinks in…you’re one of the dumbest posters on this website. Your brain has been completely hollowed out by right wing media. You have eroded any critical thinking skills you may have once had in favor of buzz word salad that literally doesn’t mean anything. Is living in a conspiracy filled world where the all powerful left and George Soros are out to get you bring you pleasure? Happiness? Get help. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
48 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Social Marxist theory. Not an algorithm that says “he clicked on this before, serve more of the same because YouTube likes clicks.” 
 

please explain to us how a for profit, capitalist company, that exists in America, is pushing “social Marxist” theory against its own financial interest, to…what exactly?  have you ever heard of Occam’s Razor? Hell, show me some of this corporate content that specifically advocates for the public ownership of the means of production and all property that is on MSNBC. 
 

This isn’t some casual internet tough talk, so I hope this sinks in…you’re one of the dumbest posters on this website. Your brain has been completely hollowed out by right wing media. You have eroded any critical thinking skills you may have once had in favor of buzz word salad that literally doesn’t mean anything. Is living in a conspiracy filled world where the all powerful left and George Soros are out to get you bring you pleasure? Happiness? Get help. 

Just out of curiosity, do you think George Soros's influence is a negative or positive on society?

  • Fuck You 4
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, WineGuy69 said:

Just out of curiosity, do you think George Soros's influence is a negative or positive on society?

Just out of curiosity, do you think the legacy of the Koch brothers is a negative or a positive on society?

Perhaps, let’s start by you documenting all of the acts and behaviors of George soros so we can get a better idea of how to grade him. Verifiable documentation, mind you, not just the internet boogeyman shit that some people piss their pants about. Show me how his money lead directly to human rights violations and shit. Because other than the fact he donates a lot of money to left wing organizations and candidates after having viewed fascism first hand, I’m not sure I’ve seen anything other than a rich dude who donates to political campaigns and causes. Which makes him no different than Sheldon Adelson and his wife, the Koch Brothers, the guy who owns Home Depot, Elon musk, etc. Or Bill Gates. Of course we know what certain people think of Bill Gates. 
 

so tell and show me what soros has done, other than internet speculation, and we can have a conversation. 
 

you should read this:

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/who-is-george-soros-and-why-is-he-blamed-in-every-right-wing-conspiracy-theory/

Edited by SydneyCarton
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, WineGuy69 said:

Just out of curiosity, do you think George Soros's influence is a negative or positive on society?

Don't forget to put the three parenthesis around his name.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
2 hours ago, SydneyCarton said:

Just out of curiosity, do you think the legacy of the Koch brothers is a negative or a positive on society?

Perhaps, let’s start by you documenting all of the acts and behaviors of George soros so we can get a better idea of how to grade him. Verifiable documentation, mind you, not just the internet boogeyman shit that some people piss their pants about. Show me how his money lead directly to human rights violations and shit. Because other than the fact he donates a lot of money to left wing organizations and candidates after having viewed fascism first hand, I’m not sure I’ve seen anything other than a rich dude who donates to political campaigns and causes. Which makes him no different than Sheldon Adelson and his wife, the Koch Brothers, the guy who owns Home Depot, Elon musk, etc. Or Bill Gates. Of course we know what certain people think of Bill Gates. 
 

so tell and show me what soros has done, other than internet speculation, and we can have a conversation. 
 

you should read this:

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/who-is-george-soros-and-why-is-he-blamed-in-every-right-wing-conspiracy-theory/

Adelson is everything that the right thinks Soros is

Projection, as usual. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Js1 said:

Adelson is everything that the right thinks Soros is

Projection, as usual. 

Is she? She gives money to causes she believes in, even if we think they're fucked up. I don't like her, but I also don't think she manipulates world banking markets and hires legions of fucking crisis actors. I don't think she's single handedly responsible for every ill that can remotely be tied to something political. She's a rich person who doesn't think palestinians should be alive, or most middle easterners, and she aggressively donates money to people she thinks furthers that cause. 

Posted
3 hours ago, WineGuy69 said:

Just out of curiosity, do you think George Soros's influence is a negative or positive on society?

Did you type up this sick burn while wearing your pizza-gate pajamas? You obviously have something to say on Soros, so say it.

  • Haha 5
Posted
10 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:

In summary, YouTube sucks dicks and is run by women and emotion rather than logic and facts.

GTFOH with this misogynistic BS. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Fondren & Main said:

Can we just agree that billionaires are cunts?

Sure. But that's not about. Some people think THEIR billionaires are freedom fighters, and others are the fucking illuminati. 

It's fucking stupid. George Soros's net worth is fucking 8 billion. Id love to have 8 billion, but lets face it, in billionaire world he's basically not shit, and folks think he's ruling the entire fucking world with 8 billion dollars. Critical thinking is dead. Of course, the real issue with Soros is probably just that he's a fucking jew, but no one has the balls to own that one. 

Edited by SydneyCarton
  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
8 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Is she? She gives money to causes she believes in, even if we think they're fucked up. I don't like her, but I also don't think she manipulates world banking markets and hires legions of fucking crisis actors. I don't think she's single handedly responsible for every ill that can remotely be tied to something political. She's a rich person who doesn't think palestinians should be alive, or most middle easterners, and she aggressively donates money to people she thinks furthers that cause. 

Mavs fans hate her. So there’s that.

Posted
15 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Sure. But that's not about. Some people think THEIR billionaires are freedom fighters, and others are the fucking illuminati. 

It's fucking stupid. George Soros's net worth is fucking 8 billion. Id love to have 8 billion, but lets face it, in billionaire world he's basically not shit, and folks think he's ruling the entire fucking world with 8 billion dollars. Critical thinking is dead. Of course, the real issue with Soros is probably just that he's a fucking jew, but no one has the balls to own that one. 

Elon is everything people on the right have spent years saying Soros is. Funny enough, turns out none of these conspiracy theorists gave a shit when their conspiracy came true, but it turned out to be a guy who they thought was on their side. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Sure. But that's not about. Some people think THEIR billionaires are freedom fighters, and others are the fucking illuminati. 

It's fucking stupid. George Soros's net worth is fucking 8 billion. Id love to have 8 billion, but lets face it, in billionaire world he's basically not shit, and folks think he's ruling the entire fucking world with 8 billion dollars. Critical thinking is dead. Of course, the real issue with Soros is probably just that he's a fucking jew, but no one has the balls to own that one. 

I'm just gonna go on record and say I despise all of our corporate oligarchs. From Buffet to Gates, from Koch to Bloomberg, from Elon to Zuckerberg, from Soros to Dell, from Walton to Schwartzman, from Brin to Bezos. Feel free to put Theil, Cohen, Carp and Lonsdale in there too. I'm okay with whatever that makes me.

(Now I'm on all the lists)

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
4 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

Guardians.  Of.  Pedophiles.

You do realize they are all pedophiles and right or left, nothing ever changes....this idea that only one side is the wrong and injustice is absolutely asinine.

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Baldwin said:

You do realize they are all pedophiles and right or left, nothing ever changes....this idea that only one side is the wrong and injustice is absolutely asinine.

Were you dropped on your head as a child?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Baldwin said:

You do realize they are all pedophiles and right or left, nothing ever changes....this idea that only one side is the wrong and injustice is absolutely asinine.

No, man.  They are NOT "all pedophiles."  I know plenty of leadership, of several political persuasions, who are not sexual abusers.  But only ONE political persuasion has recently (1) made "rescue the children from pedophiles and end sex trafficking!" the #1 most important issue evar, and then (2) consistently, over and over, protects actual fucking sex abusers and traffickers.  Because...and this is important...sex is in the end a power dynamic, and these folks believe that power is its own end, and once achieved, doesn't just allow you to sexually abuse people, but you're actually doing God's will because God wouldn't have given you that power if he didn't want you to use it to subjugate people.

So GTFO of here with that shit.  It's the same intellectually and logically bankrupt shit of "everyone tells lies!" that allows you to support psychotic serial liars, and "everyone has committed a crime!" that excuses your support of open and proud criminals, and "everyone is corrupt!" that leads you to support the most corrupt regime this country has ever seen.  You fuckers ignore volume and degree as if those things don't matter.  Fuck you.  Someone who once inappropriately leered at a 16 year old girl is not in the same ballpark as someone who regularly had sex with trafficked underage girls.  I can judge both, but I will never, ever, deem them equivalent.  You do.  Because you have to, in order to justify the evil you actually support.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

No, man.  They are NOT "all pedophiles."  I know plenty of leadership, of several political persuasions, who are not sexual abusers.  But only ONE political persuasion has recently (1) made "rescue the children from pedophiles and end sex trafficking!" the #1 most important issue evar, and then (2) consistently, over and over, protects actual fucking sex abusers and traffickers.  Because...and this is important...sex is in the end a power dynamic, and these folks believe that power is its own end, and once achieved, doesn't just allow you to sexually abuse people, but you're actually doing God's will because God wouldn't have given you that power if he didn't want you to use it to subjugate people.

So GTFO of here with that shit.  It's the same intellectually and logically bankrupt shit of "everyone tells lies!" that allows you to support psychotic serial liars, and "everyone has committed a crime!" that excuses your support of open and proud criminals, and "everyone is corrupt!" that leads you to support the most corrupt regime this country has ever seen.  You fuckers ignore volume and degree as if those things don't matter.  Fuck you.  Someone who once inappropriately leered at a 16 year old girl is not in the same ballpark as someone who regularly had sex with trafficked underage girls.  I can judge both, but I will never, ever, deem them equivalent.  You do.  Because you have to, in order to justify the evil you actually support.

When I said "they are all" I meant both sides of the aisle. 
 

I am not supporting either side right now. All I am saying is that having all this rage at one side of the party whether you are rooted on the right and angry at the left or vice versa is essentially a fools errand. The system wants us angry at each other. It is easier to control a society divided than one united. 

It is really really easy to make fun of republicans and it is easily as easy to make fun of democrats.

Edited by Baldwin
  • Fuck You 3
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Baldwin said:

It is really really easy to make fun of republicans and it is easily as easy to make fun of democrats.

Only one is actively trying to end our Republic and replace it with an irrevocable authoritarian state.  Only one has turned the entire apparatus of the federal government into a mechanism solely for (1) punishing anyone not loyal and/or who "doesn't play ball" and (2) rewarding - sometimes literally with direct cash payments from our US treasury - loyalists and cronies.  Get the fuck out of her with that shit.  By equivocating on it, you enable it.   You should fucking stop that shit.

And like fuck you aren't "supporting either side right now."  That's fucking scared code for "you know exactly who and what I regularly vote for, I just know that it's loathsome and indefensible if I admit what that is."  "I don't support either side" is a locked-in vote for fascism.

Edited by Brisketexan
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Baldwin said:

When I said "they are all" I meant both sides of the aisle. 
 

I am not supporting either side right now. All I am saying is that having all this rage at one side of the party whether you are rooted on the right and angry at the left or vice versa is essentially a fools errand. The system wants us angry at each other. It is easier to control a society divided than one united. 

It is really really easy to make fun of republicans and it is easily as easy to make fun of democrats.

Funny Face Eye Roll GIF by MOODMAN

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Baldwin said:

You do realize they are all pedophiles and right or left, nothing ever changes....this idea that only one side is the wrong and injustice is absolutely asinine.

 

15 minutes ago, Baldwin said:

Don't remember

 

10 minutes ago, Baldwin said:

When I said "they are all" I meant both sides of the aisle. 
 

I am not supporting either side right now. All I am saying is that having all this rage at one side of the party whether you are rooted on the right and angry at the left or vice versa is essentially a fools errand. The system wants us angry at each other. It is easier to control a society divided than one united. 

It is really really easy to make fun of republicans and it is easily as easy to make fun of democrats.

mock-hahaha.gif.75ea61c4b1dd0d22efd09ea0258685a5.gif

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Only one is actively trying to end our Republic and replace it with an irrevocable authoritarian state.  Only one has turned the entire apparatus of the federal government into a mechanism solely for (1) punishing anyone not loyal and/or who "doesn't play ball" and (2) rewarding - sometimes literally with direct cash payments from our US treasury - loyalists and cronies.  Get the fuck out of her with that shit.  By equivocating on it, you enable it.   You should fucking stop that shit.

And like fuck you aren't "supporting either side right now."  That's fucking scared code for "you know exactly who and what I regularly vote for, I just know that it's loathsome and indefensible if I admit what that is."  "I don't support either side" is a locked-in vote for fascism.

No, I think Trump lied about almost everything he campaigned on. His campaigning on Epstein and then his press conference where he blabbered on about "people are still talking about Epstein", absurd. Don't support him or the neo-con version of the Republicans. You can chill. The fact that you think everything you type is absolute and absolutely correct SHOULD require you to take a long hard look in the mirror, but we know that echo chambers rarely encourage people to do it. 

Edited by Baldwin
Posted
Just now, Baldwin said:

No, I think Trump lied about everything he campaigned on. Don't support him or the neo-con version of the Republicans. You can chill. The fact that you think everything you type is absolute and absolutely correct SHOULD require you to take a long hard look in the mirror, but we know that echo chambers rarely encourage people to do it. 

The fact that you're trying to equate what's currently going on in our country since right around January as "just partisan politics as usual, both sides" should require you to find said mirror.

You fucking simpleton.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Baldwin said:

No, I think Trump lied about almost everything he campaigned on. His campaigning on Epstein and then his press conference where he blabbered on about "people are still talking about Epstein", absurd. Don't support him or the neo-con version of the Republicans. You can chill. The fact that you think everything you type is absolute and absolutely correct SHOULD require you to take a long hard look in the mirror, but we know that echo chambers rarely encourage people to do it. 

I see evil -- either direct or collaborative -- in a shitload of places.  I'm usually right about that these days.

Posted
7 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

The fact that you're trying to equate what's currently going on in our country since right around January as "just partisan politics as usual, both sides" should require you to find said mirror.

You fucking simpleton.

You're right, only one party has issues and challenges. I am the fucking simpleton though. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I see evil -- either direct or collaborative -- in a shitload of places.  I'm usually right about that these days.

I do not disagree with you that there is evil all over the place. That is what I am fed up with. No matter which side is in power, nothing ever changes, and evil is the reason for that. Greed is the reason for that. Corruption is the reason for that. Money is the reason for that. I go through swings of really caring and realizing that nothing I ever do will change it. The system itself has become too powerful. 

Posted
Just now, Baldwin said:

I do not disagree with you that there is evil all over the place. That is what I am fed up with. No matter which side is in power, nothing ever changes, and evil is the reason for that. Greed is the reason for that. Corruption is the reason for that. Money is the reason for that. I go through swings of really caring and realizing that nothing I ever do will change it. The system itself has become too powerful. 

A lot has changed with one side in power. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Baldwin said:

I do not disagree with you that there is evil all over the place. That is what I am fed up with. No matter which side is in power, nothing ever changes, and evil is the reason for that. Greed is the reason for that. Corruption is the reason for that. Money is the reason for that. I go through swings of really caring and realizing that nothing I ever do will change it. The system itself has become too powerful. 

Hot Shots Idiot GIF

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Baldwin said:

I do not disagree with you that there is evil all over the place. That is what I am fed up with. No matter which side is in power, nothing ever changes, and evil is the reason for that. Greed is the reason for that. Corruption is the reason for that. Money is the reason for that. I go through swings of really caring and realizing that nothing I ever do will change it. The system itself has become too powerful. 

Both sides.

Go Fuck Yourself GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Baldwin said:

It is incredible that you think one side is special just because you cheer for them. So cute.

One side is special because they keep lobbying for the release of pedophiles and sexual abusers and human traffickers. It's the side that lobbied for Tates release. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, Baldwin said:

It is incredible that you think one side is special just because you cheer for them. So cute.

I don’t cheer for anyone.  But I’m violently anti-fascism.  And I don’t tolerate those who aren’t, like your dumb ass.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Baldwin said:

It is incredible that you think one side is special just because you cheer for them. So cute.

It is incredible you are even engaging in this discussion. In a fucking Andrew Tate thread. How do you think this will go for you?  I bet you successfully silence Brisket. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, DigglerontheHoof said:

I don’t cheer for anyone.  But I’m violently anti-fascism.  And I don’t tolerate those who aren’t, like your dumb ass.

I am confused where I have been cheering for facism, but that is the pretty typical defense these days. 

Just now, Cruz in Aledo said:

It is incredible you are even engaging in this discussion. In a fucking Andrew Tate thread. How do you think this will go for you?  I bet you successfully silence Brisket. 

Yea probably the wrong place for this debate, I don't give a fuck about Tate, just saw it bumped and thought maybe there was news and got side tracked.

Posted
55 minutes ago, Baldwin said:

When I said "they are all" I meant both sides of the aisle. 
 

I am not supporting either side right now. All I am saying is that having all this rage at one side of the party whether you are rooted on the right and angry at the left or vice versa is essentially a fools errand. The system wants us angry at each other. It is easier to control a society divided than one united. 

It is really really easy to make fun of republicans and it is easily as easy to make fun of democrats.

This dipshit cynicism is fundamentally no different than a 12 year old stamping his feet and insisting that the world is flat because his parents say it's round.  

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...