Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, Hank_Hill said:

Absolutely not. One and out cold. Held onto the cigarette I was taking a drag of when he hit me though 💪🏼

You shouldn't smoke, doctor.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

Er my God why is the ignorant national media giving Arch credit?  Try watching the game bozos!!

 

IMG_4110.thumb.png.7fd7e524d9a5dace8c3597d4c72a165e.png

 

11 minutes ago, Duane Moore said:

 

I was about to say those are pretty good numbers. Tick the completion % up a tad and he’s playing really well. Looking at you wingo. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, OU Sucks said:

You're expecting a coach, who twice tried passing on third and short, only to fail, then decided to pass on third and short again the next time, to change his ways. That may be a tall task.

If this fucking dipshit calls another slowe ass developing reverse play with this OL that has never shown the ability to hold blocks long enough for a play like that to work someone needs to tackle his dumb ass on the sideline.

Posted
9 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

I can't find the post from another thread, but I think @Thatguy is right. We're doing this all wrong with Arch. 

I know he came here for Sark's NFL-esque offense. But right now, he's pretty shitty at all that stuff. His timing sucks, struggles with play action, we're playing bunched 12 personnel all the time and depending on too many rhythmic passing plays. While playing behind one of the shittiest OLs I can remember.

Simplify everything. Spread it out. Embrace off-schedule plays/throws. If he needs to see guys open in order to throw it, then get him out of the fucking pocket to create. Honestly, it reminds me of the VY situation with Mack/GD. 

If it pisses off the Manning family, so be it. Do they want him to be successful, or continue to struggle in a style that he's clearly not ready for while getting killed in the pocket? 

 

Both sides are right. 

We want to win, and Arch needs to play like VY / Colt / Tebow / Cam (but slide, Son... Quick putting your head and shoulders on a platter) 

The Manning wasn't him to learn to play pro ball now, not learn in the pros. Learn now , then perfect / iterate. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
5 hours ago, scottsins said:


I need to see a better angle of that play. I couldn’t tell if it was double coverage or just Wingo’a guy leaving his assignment to break on that ball after it was thrown. I want to see where that second defender was and what they were doing right before the ball was thrown.

Bracket. It was double covered. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, elguapo said:

If this fucking dipshit calls another slowe ass developing reverse play with this OL that has never shown the ability to hold blocks long enough for a play like that to work someone needs to tackle his dumb ass on the sideline.

Seeing these reverse plays makes me want to photoshop a dildo under Sark’s ass when he is squatting down because it’s fucking stupid and ridiculous.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

 

4 hours ago, Victor Lazlo said:

It doesn’t matter if it was double coverage, he beat it and the ball was perfectly thrown.

It bounced off of Livingstone’s hands.

How about our receivers catch the fucking ball when the QB hits them in the hands, in stride?

Seemed to be a problem quite a few times today.

Such an easy concept, but seems to be easier for trolls (like the one you responded to) to blame it on the QB

Lol. Of all the balls that got dropped yesterday this wasn't the one to bitch about. That ball was high and into double coverage. Parker jumped, got his legs clipped from under him, and saw his life flash before his eyes. Dude is a freshman. It would've been an extremely tough catch, but hey, at least he left his feet and went up for it. We should really focus our attention to the diva in the number 1 jersey. That's who we should be bitching about. 13 made a few tough catches yesterday. Meanwhile 1 is out there like 

 

spill-spill-app.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, MrBig said:

Seeing these reverse plays makes me want to photoshop a dildo under Sark’s ass when he is squatting down because it’s fucking stupid and ridiculous.

demanding do it GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, MrBig said:

Seeing these reverse plays makes me want to photoshop a dildo under Sark’s ass when he is squatting down because it’s fucking stupid and ridiculous.

My mind goes lots of interesting places at random times but I can’t say that watching bad football has ever led me to wanting to see that.  

Edited by Your Mom
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, elguapo said:

If this fucking dipshit calls another slowe ass developing reverse play with this OL that has never shown the ability to hold blocks long enough for a play like that to work someone needs to tackle his dumb ass on the sideline.

Any kind of delayed handoff in the modern game is just asking for a loss, but trying one on short yardage is pure idiocy. Coach, step away from the chalkboard, please. Start thinking.

Edited by Irish Wrist Watch
  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, OU Sucks said:

Maybe Sark should've tried running the ball on 3rd and very short to take pressure off Arch. 

14 hours ago, BurntEyes said:

FTFY 

We had less than 100 yards rushing 2 weeks in a row and won both games because of the QB, D and punt returner. 

13 hours ago, UTEE97 said:

And no running game. Also, worst performance by our defense in a while.

52 minutes ago, OU Sucks said:

You're expecting a coach, who twice tried passing on third and short, only to fail, then decided to pass on third and short again the next time, to change his ways. That may be a tall task.

This was eating me up. The color idiot kept saying that MSU had stifled our running game. No. We did, Mr. Brilliant Football Analyst Hired to Add Something Insightful.

Never running for a first on third down has become the new always go for it on fourth instead of kicking the FG or maintaining field position. You must make first downs to establish a running game. You have to stick with a running game to set up play action. On third and 2 or 3 after two running plays, you kill any groove you're getting into by always fucking throwing it thinking you're fooling anybody. 

We have a QB who is terrible at simple short passes. He throws maximum velocity cannonballs that are generally inaccurate and extremely hard to field. (I'm all for the Arch lovefest after yesterday's 4th quarter. I think I felt better about this win more than any other so far this season. It saved the season.) The one time he threw a ball to lead the receiver was on the first pass play to the sideline. That's what that play should look like but has only looked that way one time.

Work. On. Sustaining. A. Ground. Attack.

We have big OL. Sometimes they can run block. Wisner is hard to keep from getting a few yards. The pass plays with open receivers who should make first downs are not well executed. It doesn't matter if they are well designed and called if execution is a failure. We don't have a run game because we reject having it not because we're getting stuffed every play.

 

 

14 hours ago, Huckleberry said:

I would say he looked better, I would even say he looked good. But for the first three quarters he made a lot of bad plays, too. But yes he absolutely deserves kudos for that late game performance.

Yes. He carried the load as QB in the fourth quarter. Yet another corner he may have turned. I hope the concussion doesn't block him from remembering it. Bravo Arch!

However, Arch should be hot wired and delivered a shock every time he throws deep to the left side of the field to Wingo. It's his favorite pass. It almost never works. Stop fucking doing it and find a route that may actually work. 

Is there a reason Niblett isn't playing Wingo's position? 

 

11 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

We will win both games with Caldwell as the starter.  Then there will be a huge QB controversy, with former Applewhite devotees calling for the plucky Caldwell to start because all he does is win and Simms mavens saying that Arch should start because of his massive physical talent. 

spacer.png

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
14 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

No I expect average QB play. Not throwing dirt balls on screen plays out wide.

He threw a perfect pass out wide on literally the first fucking play from scrimmage.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Surly Bevo said:

That was after he tweaked his ankle on the TD run.

Yes. 

2nd play of the game. Was already yelling at the TV to just hand it off to Wisner on 1st an goal at the 3 or whatever. Instead QB run and Arch gets dinged up a little. Because of course. 

 

Posted

I think I even noticed the receivers not paying attention on that play. Anybody coming across the middle would be deadly.

Arch saw the situation and chose swiftly. Well done.

Posted
11 hours ago, Victor Lazlo said:

It doesn’t matter if it was double coverage, he beat it and the ball was perfectly thrown.

It bounced off of Livingstone’s hands.

How about our receivers catch the fucking ball when the QB hits them in the hands, in stride?

Seemed to be a problem quite a few times today.

Such an easy concept, but seems to be easier for trolls (like the one you responded to) to blame it on the QB

This….I noticed the aggy receivers looked like the Bama receivers during Sark’s last couple of years there….fast, run great routes, and make all the catches….they may have the best overall group in the conference.

Posted
20 hours ago, BurntEyes said:

And likely 450 were it not for the 5 drops from Wingo and definitely another TD.

Whats crazy is he was targeted 12 times, and I know for a fact he dropped 3 that I could see in person. I don't remember anymore than that, but it could have been 5. 

Posted (edited)

I think @Thatguyhas figured out how sark can scheme and play call for arch. And what definitely does NOT work with this Oline. 
 

I don’t know what the offense will look like if Sark is opening up the Caldwell play book.

 

imo based on the 4th quarter of the Miss State game there is a successful way for Sark and Arch to work together moving forward. There is a way for sark to scheme and play call with this OLine to have that type of success moving forward,

 

The real question is will Sark play call it that way? 
 

we likely won’t know about Arch’s availability until the Wednesday report. And whether medical personnel has signed off on him. Best guess. Hope he’s ok. 🤘🏼 

Edited by Nicole44
Posted

On the play where arch went out I looked at it a few times and thought it could have been targeting.  As he was going down the d-line guy came down with crown  of helmet to Arch’s helmet .  But no call.  Not that it would have mattered but looked to be targeting .

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

 

we likely won’t know about Arch’s availability until the Wednesday report. And whether medical personnel has signed off on him. Best guess. Hope he’s ok. 🤘🏼 

The scary thing on a macro level is Arch possibly being concussion prone.  How that would throw off the next 1 to 2 seasons trajectory.

He ain't colt, they won't keep trotting him out there with a rung bell. 

Posted

Honestly, the SEC should review that and issue a targeting penalty. The player should be DQ'ed for the next game. I don't feel guilty at all about the Caldwell end zone incompletion call being overturned.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, William Bludworth said:

Whats crazy is he was targeted 12 times, and I know for a fact he dropped 3 that I could see in person. I don't remember anymore than that, but it could have been 5. 

The rest he couldn't be bothered to try for. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

I don't know the true difference between the two, but Caldwell right now throws a better ball, and he also can run. We've only seen a small sample size, but he knows his reads and delivers the ball on time and almost perfectly. Sometimes a QB just needs better players and athletes around them for them to look better than they did at another school. 

I don't want t compare Chambliss to Caldwell, but Chambliss came from Ferris State, a DII school out of Michigan, and Caldwell has already played DI, even if they were not great  at Troy. He had a 63% comp with 13 passing TD's and 5 rushing TD's. I believe he was their backup. He also had 8 INT's. But again, look at their players compared to our players, and it's like night and day. Is Caldwell better than Arch? I don't know. He's a smart kid, seems relaxed, knows the playbook, where everyone needs to be. 

We don't have a choice, so the best we can hope for is our talent level elevates his play (see: Moseley, Emmett). I think we can beat Vandy with Caldwell, but until we see what his ceiling is, that's about all I'm guessing. If he face rapes them it will give me a little more hope, but Arch will be back after Vandy. 

3 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

The rest he couldn't be bothered to try for. 

That's pretty much where my thoughts were headed. His laziness is maddening. Truly. 

Posted
17 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

I can't find the post from another thread, but I think @Thatguy is right. We're doing this all wrong with Arch. 

I know he came here for Sark's NFL-esque offense. But right now, he's pretty shitty at all that stuff. His timing sucks, struggles with play action, we're playing bunched 12 personnel all the time and depending on too many rhythmic passing plays. While playing behind one of the shittiest OLs I can remember.

Simplify everything. Spread it out. Embrace off-schedule plays/throws. If he needs to see guys open in order to throw it, then get him out of the fucking pocket to create. Honestly, it reminds me of the VY situation with Mack/GD. 

If it pisses off the Manning family, so be it. Do they want him to be successful, or continue to struggle in a style that he's clearly not ready for while getting killed in the pocket? 

 

This has been talked about for quite awhile, but the issue is will Sark change. He sees the same thing everyone else does, but he has not shown the willingness to change. Hope was there after the OU game plan, only to see Sark revert to something resembling the Florida game plan vs UK. I hope it changes, but we will see 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

Never running for a first on third down has become the new always go for it on fourth instead of kicking the FG or maintaining field position. You must make first downs to establish a running game. You have to stick with a running game to set up play action. On third and 2 or 3 after two running plays, you kill any groove you're getting into by always fucking throwing it thinking you're fooling anybody. 

 

The one that killed me was in the 3rd qtr, down 24-14, 3rd and 2 from their 35. We're in 4 down territory, you can run it two times if needed to move the chains and a few more yards gets you in FG range.

Nope, Arch gets sacked and we're forced to punt.

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, William Bludworth said:

I don't know the true difference between the two, but Caldwell right now throws a better ball, and he also can run. We've only seen a small sample size, but he knows his reads and delivers the ball on time and almost perfectly. Sometimes a QB just needs better players and athletes around them for them to look better than they did at another school. 

I don't want t compare Chambliss to Caldwell, but Chambliss came from Ferris State, a DII school out of Michigan, and Caldwell has already played DI, even if they were not great  at Troy. He had a 63% comp with 13 passing TD's and 5 rushing TD's. I believe he was their backup. He also had 8 INT's. But again, look at their players compared to our players, and it's like night and day. Is Caldwell better than Arch? I don't know. He's a smart kid, seems relaxed, knows the playbook, where everyone needs to be. 

We don't have a choice, so the best we can hope for is our talent level elevates his play (see: Moseley, Emmett). I think we can beat Vandy with Caldwell, but until we see what his ceiling is, that's about all I'm guessing. If he face rapes them it will give me a little more hope, but Arch will be back after Vandy. 

That's pretty much where my thoughts were headed. His laziness is maddening. Truly. 

Caldwell hasn't had enough time for Sark, the sieve of an offensive line and Ryan Wingo to mind fuck him yet

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...