Jump to content

I think I’m gonna need a lawyer (collision)


XYZ

Recommended Posts

My daughter is driving on a road that has two lanes each way. She is driving on the rightmost lane. She turns right onto a street. As she is turning right, another car that was behind her had gotten on the shoulder and was more or less to my daughter’s right and behind. As she turns right, the other car hits her on the passenger side. The other driver’s insurance company is trying to claim that it was my daughter’s fault because she should have been turning right from the shoulder, not the rightmost lane. So at this point should I let my insurance company fight to make the other driver at fault, or should I lawyer up? And if I should lawyer up, who do I call? I live in Austin. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will represent you. I also represent the stunt ranch next to immamac's house. I will be filing both cases together to save money, so your daughter is going to need to learn how to do some stunts and also testify that immamac was driving the car that hit her. I've already got experts (Derka) lined up. I will PM you with the details. 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shit, I still can't post pictures. What the fuck am I doing wrong? I used tinypic.

OK, trying imgbb. This is the situation a second before my daughter starts to turn right:

IMG_1969.jpg

And this is the outcome:

IMG_1970.jpg

Edited by XYZ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said:

As a general rule there isn't much point hiring a lawyer if there are no injuries. 

I'd like for the other driver's insurance to pay for my car's repairs. I'd also like for my insurance premium to not go up to the stratosphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gene Parmesan said:

Looking at your drawings, if the other car is driving in the shoulder to turn right and your daughter turned into them to also make a right, it sort of would seem to be her fault.  I don't think it's a necessity to be in the shoulder to turn right, but it's certainly allowed and standard practice.

Really? I thought you were not supposed to drive on the shoulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, XYZ said:

I'd like for the other driver's insurance to pay for my car's repairs. I'd also like for my insurance premium to not go up to the stratosphere.

I get it, but because there is no cash award involved, you will have to go out of pocket for the lawyer and that is going to rapidly exceed both your deductible and whatever rate raise you get. 

 

As Reagan says, your insurance will handle it if not go to the mat for you. 

The standard for fault is negligence, not breaking traffic laws although sometimes the two go hand in hand. This might be one of those cases where the other guy broke the law but your daughter was negligent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Reagan1k said:

There is a junior level employee of your insurance carrier sitting at a desk right now waiting to take this on.

Let them hash it out.

 I dunno about this.  That junior probably has a zillion cases sitting on his desk and if the damages are not huge, which it doesn't sound like they are, he's just gonna take the easiest path to get this one off his desk which may be rolling over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote


 

Sec. 545.058. DRIVING ON IMPROVED SHOULDER. (a) An operator may drive on an improved shoulder to the right of the main traveled portion of a roadway if that operation is necessary and may be done safely, but only:

(1) to stop, stand, or park;

(2) to accelerate before entering the main traveled lane of traffic;

(3) to decelerate before making a right turn;

(4) to pass another vehicle that is slowing or stopped on the main traveled portion of the highway, disabled, or preparing to make a left turn;

(5) to allow another vehicle traveling faster to pass;

(6) as permitted or required by an official traffic-control device; or

(7) to avoid a collision.

 

So it's clear as mud.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good find. The way that works into negligence is that daughter probably should not have to account for traffic on the shoulder so her failure to do so is not a breach of the duty of care. Similarly, it is probably prima facie negligent to turn from the shoulder inasmuch as doing so is prohibited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, shakahorn said:

I get it, but because there is no cash award involved, you will have to go out of pocket for the lawyer and that is going to rapidly exceed both your deductible and whatever rate raise you get. 

 

As Reagan says, your insurance will handle it if not go to the mat for you. 

The standard for fault is negligence, not breaking traffic laws although sometimes the two go hand in hand. This might be one of those cases where the other guy broke the law but your daughter was negligent. 

What's this about his daughters negligee?

Edited by El Diablo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Good find. The way that works into negligence is that daughter probably should not have to account for traffic on the shoulder so her failure to do so is not a breach of the duty of care. Similarly, it is probably prima facie negligent to turn from the shoulder inasmuch as doing so is prohibited. 

I agree.  Vis a vis, concordantly

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think if he was passing or next to your daughter, he was decelerating before making a right hand turn, and it was done unsafely.

The operator driving on the shoulder shouldn't be passing traffic in the main lanes of travel unless they are stopped, like at a light or for traffic.

 

Sec. 545.058. DRIVING ON IMPROVED SHOULDER. (a) An operator may drive on an improved shoulder to the right of the main traveled portion of a roadway if that operation is necessary and may be done safely, but only:

(1) to stop, stand, or park;

(2) to accelerate before entering the main traveled lane of traffic;

(3) to decelerate before making a right turn;

(4) to pass another vehicle that is slowing or stopped on the main traveled portion of the highway, disabled, or preparing to make a left turn;

(5) to allow another vehicle traveling faster to pass;

(6) as permitted or required by an official traffic-control device; or

(7) to avoid a collision.

(b) An operator may drive on an improved shoulder to the left of the main traveled portion of a divided or limited-access or controlled-access highway if that operation may be done safely, but only:

(1) to slow or stop when the vehicle is disabled and traffic or other circumstances prohibit the safe movement of the vehicle to the shoulder to the right of the main traveled portion of the roadway;

(2) as permitted or required by an official traffic-control device; or

(3) to avoid a collision.

(c) A limitation in this section on driving on an improved shoulder does not apply to:

(1) an authorized emergency vehicle responding to a call;

(2) a police patrol; or

(3) a bicycle.

 

 

Sec. 545.101. TURNING AT INTERSECTION. (a) To make a right turn at an intersection, an operator shall make both the approach and the turn as closely as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway.

(b) To make a left turn at an intersection, an operator shall:

(1) approach the intersection in the extreme left-hand lane lawfully available to a vehicle moving in the direction of the vehicle; and

(2) after entering the intersection, turn left, leaving the intersection so as to arrive in a lane lawfully available to traffic moving in the direction of the vehicle on the roadway being entered.

(c) On a street or roadway designated for two-way traffic, the operator turning left shall, to the extent practicable, turn in the portion of the intersection to the left of the center of the intersection.

(d) To turn left, an operator who is approaching an intersection having a roadway designated for one-way traffic and for which signs are posted from a roadway designated for one-way traffic and for which signs are posted shall make the turn as closely as practicable to the left-hand curb or edge of the roadway.

(e) The Texas Transportation Commission or a local authority, with respect to a highway in its jurisdiction, may:

(1) authorize the placement of an official traffic-control device in or adjacent to an intersection; and

(2) require a course different from that specified in this section for movement by vehicles turning at an intersection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did she turn on her blinker to alert the shoulder-driver of her intension to turn? Something tells me she didn't. Then again maybe she did and the shoulder driver just sucks at driving. I'd just make sure that your insurance company knows that you disagree with anyone who thinks your daughter is at fault. In the end though, it's not going to be worth fighting over.

How's your daughter's back feeling since the crash? I bet it's starting to hurt. 

Bernard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really seems like both cars were turning right as I have no idea why the other car would be in the shoulder otherwise.  If they were passing, they would just pass in the left lane.  Both cars decelerating the same rate to turn on the same street and if the spacing is how you drew it, the other car was somewhat in your daughters blind spot, and your daughter turned into them.  I don't see how you are going to get the other insurance to claim fault if that's the fact pattern.  No lawyer and it's been awhile since my last Holiday Inn stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what you can do to force the issue.  Sue the other driver in small claims court.  I assume that it's less than $10,000 in damages? 

FIrst, I think you have a winnable case and one that a layperson can present.  However, it is probably your daughter that has to present it, as you would be acting as an attorney and that's a no-go.

More importantly, this is a way to press the issue with the insurance company and get someone other than the adjuster to weigh in on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

Another question is, is there really a built-up curb on each side of the street?  I'm having a hard time recalling any street with an actual curb that also has a shoulder.  That's gonna require some splainin.

Random example--Parmer Lane between I-35 and Mopac

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Team daughter.

I remember being taught that while it's legal to drive on the shoulder sometimes,  it's not required, nor does it give you the right of way.   While the daughter had the option of pulling off onto the shoulder she was also completely justified making her turn from the lane.  Who the fuck checks a blindspot before every right turn?  

If she had her blinker on the car behind her on the shoulder should have given way.  If she didn't have her blinker on then she should be imprisoned and may god have mercy on her soul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...