Jump to content
Jordan Washington chats with Bobby for Burnt Ends ×

Strategic Alliance Between The Big 12 And The Pac-12?

Beau Vine

By Beau Vine
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Beau Vine

Beau Vine 53625

Posted
Posted
Quote

Imagine a world in which Oklahoma’s non-conference lineup consists of Arizona, USC and Utah — yes, all in the same season — while Washington’s three out-of-league opponents that year are Oklahoma State, TCU and Iowa State.

Meanwhile, Texas plays Oregon, UCLA and Colorado.

The Ducks? They get Texas, Kansas State and Texas Tech.

In this world, the Big 12 and the Pac-12 are bound together by a strategic alliance in which all available non-conference dates are filled by teams from the other league.

No more FCS cupcakes.

No more Group of Five opponents.

It’s one Power Five against another: 30 head-to-head matchups, season after season.

The plan is radical enough that it would be easy to dismiss categorically, save for the identity of the author (a former Big 12 president) and his inspiration (a current Big 12 president).

Jon Wefald, who ran Kansas State for 23 years — he hired Bill Snyder — said he devised the strategic alliance after being asked by current West Virginia president Gordon Gee, in the fall of 2017, to consider ways to “strengthen” the Big 12.

“My first idea was to figure out a strategy to convince Arizona and Arizona State to become the 11th and 12th members of the Big 12,” Wefald told the Hotline via email. “I rather quickly dismissed that idea.”

Wefald, who was not working for the Big 12 in an official capacity, concluded his pet project months later with an 11-page document titled, “A Proposal to Create A Strategic Alliance Between The Big 12 And The Pac-12.”

In it, he writes:

“This alliance of 22 universities from the Great Plains to the West Coast would provide the vital content of big-time football games that dovetail nicely with the new developing platforms of information.”

Wefald’s proposal calls for all 30 of the Big 12’s non-conference games and for 30 of the Pac-12’s 36 out-of-league games to be played against each other.

The matchups would be spread evenly across the season (10 per month) with the winners of each conference meeting at the end of the regular season for a championship game, which would rotate between the Rose Bowl and AT&T Stadium.

Gee called the proposal “brilliant,’’ according to Wefald, but declined to comment.

“Dr. Gee is not prepared to discuss President Wefald’s proposal,’’ a university spokesperson said in response to an interview request.

Before anyone sounds the super-conference alert, let’s be clear: Both a trove of emails between Gee and Wefald shared with the Hotline and a lengthy interview with Wefald make it clear his project did not stem from concern that either conference is on the verge of getting poached or embarking on an acquisition spree.

(There is no indication a realignment wave is forming across major college football.)

Instead, the motivation appears to be straightforward.

After so much tumult, the Big 12 is stable and prosperous. Gee was simply seeking ways to secure that existence into the next decade and beyond when he asked Wefald “to think of ways to further strengthen the Big 12,” according to an account of their exchange.

Rather than fending off dissolution or expansion, the alliance is designed to appeal to media partners of the future and deepen fan engagement by creating a barrage of quality matchups. (Wefald devised the alliance with the help of Dick Robertson, the former president of Warner Bros. Television Distribution.)

But before digging deeper into the matter, context is required on several fronts.

Wefald “is not an emissary of the Big 12,” commissioner Bob Bowlsby told the Hotline. “He is a former president with an interest in our conference, but he hasn’t been authorized to serve in any outreach role whatsoever.”

Other Big 12 presidents are aware of the plan, according to Wefald.

“President Gee did talk to all of the other 9 Big 12 Presidents (on) the merits of our Strategic Proposal,” he explained via email.

“He also talked to Commissioner Bob Bowlsby. Of course, the Commissioner has to listen to all 10 of the Big 12 Presidents. How many of the other 9 CEOs liked it, I do not know.”

While creative and bold, Wefald’s strategic alliance is considered impractical by the schools on multiple levels:

*** For competitive reasons, the head coaches wouldn’t agree to play every non-conference game against Power Five opponents.

Nor would the Big 12 athletic directors agree to commit every non-conference opening to teams from the Pac-12, and vice versa.

Why would Texas, for instance, remove from its schedule potential dates with the likes of Alabama, Notre Dame or Texas A&M?

*** Many teams have scheduled home-and-home series against other Power Five opponents through the 2020s, with contracts that carry hefty buyouts.

Oregon, for example, has dates with Michigan State in ’29 and ’30.

*** Financially, the alliance simply won’t work.

Most athletic departments need seven home football games per year to generate the revenue (through ticket sales and gate receipts) to meet budget requirements.

In an inter-conference alliance, the seven-home-games math doesn’t work.

“We can’t possibly play all our non-conference games against the Pac-12,” Bowlsby said, “and they can’t do it against us.”

On a broader level, however, a limited partnership between the conferences has merit at the turnstiles and in the homes.

Selling tickets to watch second-rate opponents is increasingly difficult, even for the powerhouses in the football-crazed SEC.

“I’ve always been an advocate of playing all Power 5 schools,” Alabama coach Nick Saban said in 2018.

editorial note: giphy.gif

“I think we need to have more really, really good games on TV for the players. We can’t have fans who pay a lot of money for tickets and boxes and loges who support our programs to pay for games that no one is interested in watching.”

With so many options for content delivery and consumption, quality is king. The Pac-12’s current Tier 1 media rights contracts with ESPN and Fox expire in 2024; the Big 12’s deals are up the following year.

Bowlsby is one step ahead, having discussed consortiums with Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott and officials from other Power Fives.

“(Scott) and I talk frequently about ways we can collaborate on different things,” Bowlsby said, adding that a scheduling partnership in a greatly reduced form (compared to Wefald’s version) “is not far-fetched” for the Big 12.

Nor is it for the Pac-12.

In the late 2000s, the conference played the Big 12 in the Hardwood Series, with games in late November and early December.

And in the early 2010s, the Pac-12 discussed a partnership with the Big Ten by which each team from one conference would play a team from the other. (The plan ultimately fell apart.)

“In collaboration with our members,” Scott told the Hotline, “we regularly discuss scheduling opportunities with other conferences where we can help our programs and our fans.”

A football scheduling partnership between the Big 12 and Pac-12 would do more than provide quality content for future network partners. It would do so across the canvass of broadcast windows, potentially increasing the value of the package.

Because of campus geography, a partnership would cover all four times zones with desirable kickoff options: Games could start as early as 12 p.m. Eastern on Big 12 campuses and as late as 10:30 p.m. Eastern on Pac-12 campuses. In other words: a quadruple-header.

 

Instead of filling every non-conference date with an opponent from the other league, as Wefald proposed, what if just one spot was filled each year.

Instead of all 22 schools participating each season, what if six from each conference were involved on a rotating basis?

Maybe a dynamic scheduling component could be included within the broader alliance, with teams told in advance to block off certain Saturdays in a given year.

Each spring, after rosters were set and expectations established, the conferences would announce the matchups.

It could be like the World Cup draw, without the Group of Death.

However unrealistic the specifics of Wefald’s plan, the Big 12 and Pac-12 might be stronger venturing into the future side by side.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huckleberry

Huckleberry 32142

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Js1 said:

No thank you the Slack 12 will drag down our SOS and we’ll both get left out of the CFP

Actually, Strength of Schedule would be impossible to calculate because computer ratings could no longer be performed. The Pac-12 and Big 12 would be intentionally disconnecting themselves from the FBS schedule graph and turning themselves into an unconnected subset of teams.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aqua Buddha

Aqua Buddha 13897

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, DeadArmadillo said:

It's becoming clearer and clearer that the PAC-10 / 12 needed the Texhoma Four much more than the Texhoma Four needed the PAC

Yup.  It took them a few years to realize it but when they saw West Virginia getting more money than USC, they knew they chose poorly.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GHOSTUSER

GHOSTUSER 361

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, longhornmatt said:

Or maybe we could just see if Nebraska wants to come back.

True. Nebraska leaving for the B1G was the biggest loss the XII suffered. They’re a blue blood program and were a huge rivalry game for OU and a lesser, but still important one for us. I would love for them to come back. Scott Frost will make them the dominant program in their division and they have a chance to be the cream of the crop in their conference with Urban leaving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LTbear

LTbear 4031

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Iconoclast Texan said:

True. Nebraska leaving for the B1G was the biggest loss the XII suffered. They’re a blue blood program and were a huge rivalry game for OU and a lesser, but still important one for us. I would love for them to come back. Scott Frost will make them the dominant program in their division and they have a chance to be the cream of the crop in their conference with Urban leaving.

Nebraska and Arky. That group of twelve would be perfect (WVU is still out there, but culturally they feel right).

Oh well. Will obviously never happen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrashMaster G

TrashMaster G 17263

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Iconoclast Texan said:

True. Nebraska leaving for the B1G was the biggest loss the XII suffered. They’re a blue blood program and were a huge rivalry game for OU and a lesser, but still important one for us. I would love for them to come back. Scott Frost will make them the dominant program in their division and they have a chance to be the cream of the crop in their conference with Urban leaving.

We would probably have to agree to let Nebraska beat us more than once every ten times.  Not sure it's worth it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Liquor and Poker

Liquor and Poker 3659

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Iconoclast Texan said:

True. Nebraska leaving for the B1G was the biggest loss the XII suffered. They’re a blue blood program and were a huge rivalry game for OU and a lesser, but still important one for us. I would love for them to come back. Scott Frost will make them the dominant program in their division and they have a chance to be the cream of the crop in their conference with Urban leaving.

I really can see them taking over the Leaders or Legends or whatever, but I just don't see them competing nationally again - unless it's accompanied by those 90s-era issues like spitting on opposing female cheerleaders and dragging girlfriends down stairwells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jinx

jinx 2635

Posted
Posted
On 2/27/2019 at 6:31 PM, Huckleberry said:

Actually, Strength of Schedule would be impossible to calculate because computer ratings could no longer be performed. The Pac-12 and Big 12 would be intentionally disconnecting themselves from the FBS schedule graph and turning themselves into an unconnected subset of teams.

So we would be the new SEC?  I like it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beau Vine

Beau Vine 53625

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 2/27/2019 at 6:31 PM, Huckleberry said:

Actually, Strength of Schedule would be impossible to calculate because computer ratings could no longer be performed. The Pac-12 and Big 12 would be intentionally disconnecting themselves from the FBS schedule graph and turning themselves into an unconnected subset of teams.

Huck, you ignorant slut.

Despite the names, there are two more teams in the Pac-12 than the Big 12.  Do you think those two teams are just going to sit at home and not play each week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huckleberry

Huckleberry 32142

Posted
Posted
Huck, you ignorant slut.
Despite the names, there are two more teams in the Pac-12 than the Big 12.  Do you think those two teams are just going to sit at home and not play each week?
We're talking about Larry Scott. He'll just have 6 of his teams play a "non- conference game" against each other.

Or FCS teams which will limit the number of systems that can rate the two conferences (and realistically make it impossible for any to rate them accurately).
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman 3851

Posted
Posted
On 2/28/2019 at 6:54 PM, longhornmatt said:

Or maybe we could just see if Nebraska wants to come back.

Why?

15 hours ago, TrashMaster G said:

Minnesota was a national power once.  Nebraska is headed for the same fate.

This is their most likely fate.  Frost may delay it a bit if he can get them to be a perennial 7/8 win team.

Who wrote the OP's initial article?  What's the source?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kopp0e

kopp0e 1135

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, TrashMaster G said:

Minnesota was a national power once.  Nebraska is headed for the same fate.

I hope not, as I still have a soft spot for the Cornhuskers, but that B1G west division is #WeakSauce...
The school left it's core rivals (even small ones, like Kansas), and now has no historic rivalry brand foe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...