Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

The fuck there is. No real antifascist would walk around with a fucking nazi tattoo for 18 years!

“Sir, you seem very agitated by my aesthetics. Have you actually read all of my Reddit posts?”

image.jpeg.87f940a9b3260ba584ef79d924fc51f2.jpeg

  • Haha 2
Posted

No. I think the most likely explanation is he got it and kept it because he thought it looked cool and thought that it being a nazi symbol wasn't a big deal, because he's not particularly concerned about opposing fascism or white supremacy.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, wildcat09 said:

No. I think the most likely explanation is he got it and kept it because he thought it looked cool and thought that it being a nazi symbol wasn't a big deal, because he's not particularly concerned about opposing fascism or white supremacy.

Yeah, which was totally a fine position until *checks calendar* 10 months ago. 

Its a whatever. And a fart in the wind compared to the much larger systemic problems we are facing. The fact that this is dominating this thread is the entire problem with the Democratic party. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Let the people of Maine decide.

I mean this is exactly what I’m saying.

How confident are you that the average voter, not the hyper-online nerds like us, but the average voter (whose only information about this race will come down to the commercials that air during sporting events) will be able to get over what we now know will be the attack angle.

I am not saying this dude needs to drop out.  I’m saying that there needs to be a bulletproof plan to get past this, because it has potential to be the most predictable hindsight in recent political history if he loses the general.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

How confident are you that the average voter, not the hyper-online nerds like us, but the average voter (whose only information about this race will come down to the commercials that air during sporting events) will be able to get over what we now know will be the attack angle.

When you're a star, they let you do it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

Chainsaw, "Politician says what I want to hear" is supposed to be the minimum they need to do to earn your vote, it's not supposed to mean you immediately agree to throw your basic sense and values into the garbage. I don't believe it's likely, but it's entirely possible that he's literally a fucking CIA plant they wanted to use to help steer voters on the left. His backstory could certainly align with that. Restless son of successful parents, joined the military to see action and got out and joined up with Blackwater to see more action. That's certainly a type of guy intelligence agencies like to recruit. But he said the right words about Gaza and used the term "oligarch" and now you're just gonna overlook all that plus a nazi death camp guard tattoo? A tattoo he clearly lied about and is only now removing while basically saying "fuck you if you got offended but yeah I guess I'll get rid of it"? 

Again, this is not the redemptive arc you want it to be. He hasn't apologized, he hasn't demonstrated any growth, etc. He just said a few of the right things about a couple of topics you care about and you're willing to disregard a thousand red flags? You think the state that has re-elected fucking Susan Collins a hundred times is going to agree with you on this?

Posted
1 hour ago, David Dennison said:

Would you vote for him?

I would 100% vote for him over Janet Mills or Susan Collins. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

dems: "we need a tough looking Millennial with a military record, who's rough around the edges, and can appeal to males, ages 20-40."

...done

Monkeys Paw Paw GIF - Monkeys Paw Paw Monkey - Discover & Share GIFs

Edited by Foosters
  • Haha 7
Posted
16 minutes ago, immamac said:

The fact that this is dominating this thread is the entire problem with the Democratic party. 

Indeed

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

How many fucking people do y'all think have nazi tattoos? What percentage of voters are you worried about alienating here? What percentage of voters do you think will be alienated by pretending that a candidate having a nazi tattoo shouldn't be a big deal? Think about the world in which "has a nazi tattoo" is a completely acceptable thing for a fucking Democratic candidate for public office to have. Think about what that would tell young men. Think about what it would tell Jews. Fuck, think about what it would tell all the young people who've recently been stomped on for advocating for Palestinian lives, which was characterized as unacceptable anti-Semitism.

In two months those of you still stanning this guy are all going to be looking back at yourselves wondering how you could've been so dumb. I'm just trying to save y'all the time here. You know I'm right. 

 

6 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Chainsaw, "Politician says what I want to hear" is supposed to be the minimum they need to do to earn your vote, it's not supposed to mean you immediately agree to throw your basic sense and values into the garbage. I don't believe it's likely, but it's entirely possible that he's literally a fucking CIA plant they wanted to use to help steer voters on the left. His backstory could certainly align with that. Restless son of successful parents, joined the military to see action and got out and joined up with Blackwater to see more action. That's certainly a type of guy intelligence agencies like to recruit. But he said the right words about Gaza and used the term "oligarch" and now you're just gonna overlook all that plus a nazi death camp guard tattoo? A tattoo he clearly lied about and is only now removing while basically saying "fuck you if you got offended but yeah I guess I'll get rid of it"? 

Again, this is not the redemptive arc you want it to be. He hasn't apologized, he hasn't demonstrated any growth, etc. He just said a few of the right things about a couple of topics you care about and you're willing to disregard a thousand red flags? You think the state that has re-elected fucking Susan Collins a hundred times is going to agree with you on this?

I was wondering exactly what your theory was here, and it looks like “GOP CIA recruits Nazi to run as Democrat for Maine Senate”.

That is fucking stupid.

This guy got a stupid tattoo while drunk, didn’t know it was Nazi shit, found out, and is having it removed.  Now, getting that tattoo in the first place was not good.  And not finding out what it meant before now and having it removed was also not good.  Both of those things are really stupid and enough reason for a lot of people not to vote for him.  Nobody is “stanning” for him.  We just aren’t  flinging ourselves into conspiracy theory idiocy.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Chainsaw, "Politician says what I want to hear" is supposed to be the minimum they need to do to earn your vote, it's not supposed to mean you immediately agree to throw your basic sense and values into the garbage. I don't believe it's likely, but it's entirely possible that he's literally a fucking CIA plant they wanted to use to help steer voters on the left. His backstory could certainly align with that. Restless son of successful parents, joined the military to see action and got out and joined up with Blackwater to see more action. That's certainly a type of guy intelligence agencies like to recruit. But he said the right words about Gaza and used the term "oligarch" and now you're just gonna overlook all that plus a nazi death camp guard tattoo? A tattoo he clearly lied about and is only now removing while basically saying "fuck you if you got offended but yeah I guess I'll get rid of it"? 

Again, this is not the redemptive arc you want it to be. He hasn't apologized, he hasn't demonstrated any growth, etc. He just said a few of the right things about a couple of topics you care about and you're willing to disregard a thousand red flags? You think the state that has re-elected fucking Susan Collins a hundred times is going to agree with you on this?

Point of order, giant Nazi tattoos on potential recruits have long been more of a giant problem than an asset for the CIA. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, immamac said:

The fact that this is dominating this thread is the entire problem with the Democratic party. 

Why fight MAGA's authoritarianism and fascism when we can just fight amongst ourselves?

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
1 minute ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Point of order, giant Nazi tattoos on potential recruits have long been more of a giant problem than an asset for the CIA. 

Maybe it's become such a problem they literally didn't have any other options for their intended Senate candidate. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Chopper said:

There's hope that Indiana may not become an even larger homeland for nazis

 

The Nazis saw Indiana and were like, "no thanks we're good"

  • Haha 1
Posted

Yeah.....I am a noted nazi-hater.  And I'm having a hard time trying to find this to be a deal-breaker.

When the survival of the fucking Republic is a stake - and it absolutely is - you take any and all allies you can find.  FFS, we shipped a billion metric shittons of military equipment to fucking Stalin back in the day.  Fucking Stalin.  

So, yeah, to defeat the greatest existential threat our country has seen since the Civil War, I'll take someone who can win a battle.  Distasteful, not ideal, all that shit.  But we're getting our shit pushed in by an opposition that will fucking run Beelzebub Satan Puppykiller for office -- their only purity test is "can the candidate win?"  

First, we need to win.  THEN we can refine shit.  But right now, start fucking winning.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

  

I've seen some truly braindead takes on Bluesky. One of them was like "GUYS IT'S NOT TOO LATE FOR SOMEONE TO MOVE TO MAINE AND RUN"

Yes, nothing Mainers love more than a carpetbagger who waited until scandal hit one of its homegrown candidates to uproot their own lives and try to unseat an incumbent. Apply the Conclave principle here.

Politicians who want to be politicians are the worst people for the job. It's one thing to be from the community that has been misrepresented by Susan Collins, seeing nobody else doing anything about it, and feeling called to fix it.

A carpetbagger cannot claim to have organic, sincere intentions. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Maybe it's become such a problem they literally didn't have any other options for their intended Senate candidate. 

I’m more pointing at the fact that mainstream center-leftism (of the “in this house we believe” variety) did indeed achieve almost total institutional domination of the security sector aside from maybe the enlisted ranks and actual uniform wearing LEO.  Donald Trump wasn’t directionally wrong in targeting them for an ideological purge, but they still catch strays from the left flank. 
 

The CIA does really fucking hate Israel but that’s coming from a different place than either the Nazis or the BDS man on the streets. 

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

On average, how many children a week do you molest?

Whatever the number is, he's going to have to bump it up if he's going to get a job in the current administration.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
19 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

The likeliest explanation is that he's a fucking idiot and he's always been a fucking idiot. That's why he was a jarhead in the first place, that's why he and his boys got nazi tattoos they probably thought looked cool as shit, and that's why he's posted a mixture of completely fine and reasonable and very stupid shit all over Reddit (and probably elsewhere online) for the past decade. His politics have probably evolved somewhat but are likely still largely incoherent because he's an idiot, but he figured out how to speak in a register that appeals to liberals and leftists who are looking for someone who seems like they'll actually fight Republicans. I get the appeal and why people are trying to defend him, but this guy ain't it.   

I'm with you.  I don't think we need any more idiots in government; we full up already.

Posted
53 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

When you're a star, they let you do it.

If we see evidence that this dude has been hit with the same fairy dust as Trump that makes him completely immune to indiscretions, then bring on the lobster man!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Yikes, videos of conservative African Americans speaking critical of Democrats! Someone post the videos of white male pedophiles speaking critically about the Republicans. Oh, wait, white male pedophiles are completely onboard with Trump's administration.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, gernblansten said:

Yikes, videos of conservative African Americans speaking critical of Democrats! Someone post the videos of white male pedophiles speaking critically about the Republicans. Oh, wait, white male pedophiles are completely onboard with Trump's administration.

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

If we see evidence that this dude has been hit with the same fairy dust as Trump that makes him completely immune to indiscretions, then bring on the lobster man!

I think voters want a platform that they can actually understand and feel will help them directly and materially. They will overlook a lot of indiscretions in search of a candidate they feel cares about them.

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

As he trolls, remember that Roll Left agrees with this core belief, by a current member of the administration:

“We need competent white men in positions of leadership. … The founding fathers were wrong that all men are created equal … We need to reject that part of our heritage,” 

So, when reviewing any Trumper's posts, remember that this is who they are and what they stand for.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

As he trolls, remember that Roll Left agrees with this core belief, by a current member of the administration:

“We need competent white men in positions of leadership. … The founding fathers were wrong that all men are created equal … We need to reject that part of our heritage,” 

So, when reviewing any Trumper's posts, remember that this is who they are and what they stand for.

How about I'm simply posting videos of others speaking on the topic at hand.  I do find it interesting you feel the need to direct others on how to interpret my posts.  Don't you think that, by now, i would be eager to admit if you were even remotely correct, lol. Try harder. Now explain to them how "guilty by association" ad hominem attacks work counselor. 

Edited by RollLeft
Posted
2 minutes ago, RollLeft said:

How about I'm simply posting videos of others speaking on the topic at hand.  I do find it interesting you feel the need to direct others on how to interpret my posts.  Don't you think that, by now, i would be eager to admit if you were even remotely correct, lol. Try harder. Now explain to them how "guilty by association" ad hominem attacks work counselor. 

Support for a regime that openly appoints and supports people who hold those beliefs is self-evident.

Support for a party that is openly declining to condemn straight racism, naziism, etc. in the discussions of its internal leadership is self-evident.

Indeed, guilt by association is a real thing.  One doesn't get to join the nazi party, pay their dues, and work to get them elected, and then argue "but I was only there for the free bratwurst, and I liked their ideas on fixing potholes."  You know what they are. You know what they stand for.  You know what they are actively working towards: a white nation, for the white race.  You are them.  They are you.  There is no separation.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, RollLeft said:

How about I'm simply posting videos of others speaking on the topic at hand.  I do find it interesting you feel the need to direct others on how to interpret my posts.  Don't you think that, by now, i would be eager to admit if you were even remotely correct, lol. Try harder. Now explain to them how "guilty by association" ad hominem attacks work counselor. 

House Democrats release image of alleged Trump birthday note to Epstein |  PBS News

What's it like supporting a career pedophile? 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Foosters said:

House Democrats release image of alleged Trump birthday note to Epstein |  PBS News

What's it like supporting a career pedophile? 

Hint: it's  feature, not a bug.

Pedophilia is in large part about power -- absolute power.  The turn-on is that they can do what they want -- exactly what they want, ALL that they want -- and the recipient can't do anything about it.  Which is PRECISELY how the regime is governing right now, to the delight of the MAGAs like Roll Left.

See, a human being of any decency would care about the other person involved in their sex act.  If she was incapable of consent, if she was terrified, if the only way you could have sex with her is because she knows your power can silence her, a decent human would not engage in that act.  Just like an American government of any decency and loyalty to American ideals would not take pleasure in hurting Americans, purposefully hurting them and saying "and what are you gonna do about it?"  But we have neither a government nor people within it with any such decency.

They are all exactly the kind of people who would rape underage girls.  Not in spite of the girls' fear and lack of power, but BECAUSE of it.

Edited by Brisketexan
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Support for a regime that openly appoints and supports people who hold those beliefs is self-evident.

Support for a party that is openly declining to condemn straight racism, naziism, etc. in the discussions of its internal leadership is self-evident.

Indeed, guilt by association is a real thing.  One doesn't get to join the nazi party, pay their dues, and work to get them elected, and then argue "but I was only there for the free bratwurst, and I liked their ideas on fixing potholes."  You know what they are. You know what they stand for.  You know what they are actively working towards: a white nation, for the white race.  You are them.  They are you.  There is no separation.

Wow, lmao.  I think I'll let that simmer.  Marinate is a better word.  I look forward to the aging process and future applications of this statement.   

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Chuckie Finster said:

I mean this is exactly what I’m saying.

How confident are you that the average voter, not the hyper-online nerds like us, but the average voter (whose only information about this race will come down to the commercials that air during sporting events) will be able to get over what we now know will be the attack angle.

I am not saying this dude needs to drop out.  I’m saying that there needs to be a bulletproof plan to get past this, because it has potential to be the most predictable hindsight in recent political history if he loses the general.


In a state full of milktoast, running a milktoast dem against the Magus Maximus of milktoast Susan Collins seems like a losing recipe.

Run the woke commie-Nazi America-hating shitposting PTSD laden oyster farming veteran 

You need the chemo candidate.

Best chance of success, but it also carries the highest probability of damaging the other parts of the body and possibly killing you. But you’ve got cancer and going to die anyways. So what’s the harm with the riskier play?

Posted
33 minutes ago, RollLeft said:

Wow, lmao.  I think I'll let that simmer.  Marinate is a better word.  I look forward to the aging process and future applications of this statement.   

 

It's okay.  Own the fact that you fully support an administration that stocks itself full of proud racists, religious bigots, incompetents with open disdain for the rule of law, and the like -- so long as it makes at least one lib hurt.  Be who you are, you'll find it oddly liberating.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:

I’m more pointing at the fact that mainstream center-leftism (of the “in this house we believe” variety) did indeed achieve almost total institutional domination of the security sector aside from maybe the enlisted ranks and actual uniform wearing LEO.  Donald Trump wasn’t directionally wrong in targeting them for an ideological purge, but they still catch strays from the left flank. 
 

The CIA does really fucking hate Israel but that’s coming from a different place than either the Nazis or the BDS man on the streets. 

Oh here we go now it's getting good.

Posted
1 minute ago, wildcat09 said:

Also, the coverup tattoo isn't itself a nazi symbol but definitely radiates a lot of Hitler particles. 

Yes. Because the best way to get ahead in the US in 2025 is to be a secret Nazi not a completely out in the open Nazi 🙄



×
×
  • Create New...