Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

Hard to enjoy when shitass Reed probably wins us the game yesterday 

Depends on who's coaching him and if he's told to run or not.  Both Ewers and now Arch have shown difficulty throwing short passes short to midrange passes, that they showed they could throw all day long in HS.  I don't know if their mind is focusing on multiple things at once, so that run of the mill, standard throws go to shit, but it needs to get fixed.

Posted
6 hours ago, Butch Had Not said:

I feel like I'm missing out on some good shit today from our friends in college station. I'm sure UTSA running for 200 yards is a nothingburger. 

Remember Elko told the broadcasters earlier in the week that UTSA had SEC starter level talent stupid sip 😂

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

No visiting fan letters yet, but they have about four or five threads about Manning. Two in the top five on Texags:

image.thumb.png.7d80eff8e889e4c929bc1bab0a90e17c.png

Here's the genius of How the Hell written yesterday morning:

image.png.93574bfa039c947f5c4a11587e51dfd8.png

 

Here's one of the ones about Manning. Fan fiction. 

image.thumb.png.32e92dca7a9502e8da7e5762bcc3dd5a.png

image.thumb.png.88eb90eacf9b05313a6e444606934e0b.png

Sure, the sips around the watercooler are wildly gesticulating and claiming Arch did great. The typists in the secretarial pool are having trouble concentrating.

Sure, the sports media has been impressively kind in their rage that the person they ballyhooed proved to be human. 

Toxic! Everybody drink!

Flash! This just in from QAnon:

image.thumb.png.ef101c3a039505e842302b4a252cc3ae.png

How many people has "the media" assassinated protecting their prized Manning brand?

 

image.thumb.png.abed84e2c1fc46631cd5d6cc581e121e.png

We're all hype. Sadly, we'll never attain the heights A&M has.

Now some Aggie boilerplate. We weren't that good/OSU achieved things against a mighty team:

image.thumb.png.b7b59d6375c1c7c840cfa3f8ecaa1cb5.png

Seems the game was definitely a 14-0 shutout. Just like the Aggies were gaining a single yard away from a "much different outcome" when we shut out their sorry ass team. Anyway, we suck.

However, OSU is great because they beat such a stud-filled team.

Lastly, to be fair, there are Aggies saying Arch will be good. The answer to that below is another interesting bit of Aggie tunnel vision.

image.thumb.png.767e6c054ee1c7f437e52bc8f851e221.png

Manning was awful Saturday. However, that's not the only sample of his work. He indeed started some games last year and did very well. The guy above mentions those starts but doesn't factor them in. The shriller Aggies have already written Arch off.

My feeling?

spacer.png

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

What the fuck does redass even mean

The human body rejects repeated beatings in the rear area. It shows its disapproval by swelling and turning red.

In all seriousness it means hardcore cultist.

  • Haha 2
Posted

We've got palpability, people! Narratives are being pushed. 

image.thumb.png.428d01d14145dbbf9804ce90bc793a60.png

*If you can't respect the performance (see directly above, and below), respect the depth!

image.thumb.png.b53eef9de379fbc64b9f43f32629ffd1.png

The Ags are gloomier than usual at this stage of the season. At least some maintain irony deafness:

image.thumb.png.4f51e69b20b97935852c7996e245563b.png

Hmmmm, where have we heard that before? 

Should the Ags not crush ND, you know the drill.

image.thumb.png.4af4f3cc803a2fe33a65dd81bc388ee6.png

image.thumb.png.d1ff94c47d054afb1bd1eb3736812587.png

  • Haha 1
Posted

If you just look at the amount of money spent on talent, there's no reason A&M/ND should be anything but a toss-up or an edge to A&M. Pre-loading the "they won't give us credit!" whining says it all about where they have always been and always will be, which is behind.

There is no "ND narrative". Notre Dame has won some games recently that are worth a crap. A&M hasn't. They never do. So if A&M wins, which they SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO, the proper narrative should be, "Good game, A&M, way to execute" and that's it. That should be the narrative when you beat a team you're either toss-up with or hold a slight edge over. Same for the Texas/Ohio State game. Two well-matched teams in terms of talent.

wah wah wah wah the media wah wah wah wah

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
17 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

We've got palpability, people! Narratives are being pushed. 

image.thumb.png.428d01d14145dbbf9804ce90bc793a60.png

*If you can't respect the performance (see directly above, and below), respect the depth!

image.thumb.png.b53eef9de379fbc64b9f43f32629ffd1.png

The Ags are gloomier than usual at this stage of the season. At least some maintain irony deafness:

image.thumb.png.4f51e69b20b97935852c7996e245563b.png

Hmmmm, where have we heard that before? 

Should the Ags not crush ND, you know the drill.

image.thumb.png.4af4f3cc803a2fe33a65dd81bc388ee6.png

image.thumb.png.d1ff94c47d054afb1bd1eb3736812587.png

"Elfin???" Like this? 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSZAjGqRU9h8_9RQW2M633

Posted
27 minutes ago, nnm said:

SEC! SEC! SEC!

(forget that TAMU lost at home to the unworthy Irish last year—MIB flashy thing).

 

He knows Elko wears Dryfit to games, too, it's just that his fit like a muumuu, right?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, closetojumping said:

The Elk was on College Sports Today on XM 84 for an interview last week. He's one of those guys that actually sounds fat. I tuned in mid-interview and listened for a minute and thought "who is this fat ass? is this Elko?" and then I listened to him breathe heavily and felt certain. He wasn't a bad interview, just a really fat one.

The last couple of times I've heard him talk I immediately thought I was hearing Kevin from The Office.

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 hour ago, closetojumping said:

The Elk was on College Sports Today on XM 84 for an interview last week. He's one of those guys that actually sounds fat. I tuned in mid-interview and listened for a minute and thought "who is this fat ass? is this Elko?" and then I listened to him breathe heavily and felt certain. He wasn't a bad interview, just a really fat one.

I did not laugh enough at this.

So I read it again.

  • Like 1
Posted

The Ags have worn all-white with white helmets pretty frequently over the decades.  It's a good look.  And although I don't hate the script Aggies, I still think their aTm logo is more classic and a better look.

None of that will help them win the game tomorrow.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Sgt Hulk said:

Nothing soeaks

bad ass more than a base level mustang in the back ground.  Which personifies the aggy offense 

Well, it's a GT 5.0 so I'm not sure there's a reason to scoff.  Clearly they went with the white paint and black trim because it looks like a stormtrooper uniform/helmet.

Edited by utee94
Posted
5 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

They got the white pants, too. New helmet for the ND Game. Looks good except no elegant, iconic logo like another team that they don't care about has.

image.png.58785041a83aaea3e9ee7d6000fddd27.png

https://twitter.com/i/status/1966260574041551342

And they got the swag back! 

Common responses:

image.png.f864299f0157eb568abd665789dfefdf.png

And this

image.png.0e4d36e1efa003193311848fef3fa735.png

So true. 

That background really brings it all home. Nothing says icy whites like an airstrip on a hot day and assorted shrubbery.

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...