Jump to content

Cannabis 'more harmful than alcohol' for teen brains


phdhorn

Recommended Posts

Interdasting

===========================================================


Cannabis 'more harmful than alcohol' for teen brains

Teenagers using cannabis are causing long-lasting damage to their developing brains, a Canadian study suggests.

It found the impact on thinking skills, memory and behaviour was worse than that of teenage drinking.

The researchers, from the University of Montreal, urged teenagers to delay their use of cannabis for as long as they felt able.

The study tracked and tested 3,800 adolescents over four years, starting from around the age of 13.

Drinking alcohol and taking drugs, such as cannabis, at a young age is known to cause problems with cognitive abilities such as learning, attention and decision-making as well as academic performance at school.

This study found these problems increased as cannabis use increased - and the effects were lasting, unlike those of alcohol.

The teenagers, from 31 different Canadian schools, gave details of their drug and drinking habits once a year.

Their brain skills were also tested every year in school using computer-based cognitive tests.

Developing brains

Although levels of cannabis use in the study were low compared with alcohol use, 28% of the teenagers still admitted to some kind of use.

This compared with 75% of the teenagers who said they drank alcohol at least occasionally.

Prof Patricia J Conrod, lead study author, from the department of psychiatry at Montreal, said she had expected alcohol to have had more of an impact on the teenagers' brains.

But, instead, the research detected greater increases in errors in cognitive tests on the teenagers using cannabis - while they were taking the drug and after they had stopped.

These effects were seen in working memory, reasoning and their ability to control their behaviour.

"Their brains are still developing but cannabis is interfering with that," Prof Conrod said, of teenagers.

"They should delay their use of cannabis as long as they can."

She also said the findings highlighted the importance of drug-prevention programmes.

Cannabis is thought to be the most widely used illegal drug in the UK.

It can be addictive and using it has been shown to increase the risk of developing psychotic illnesses, particularly in adolescents.

Giving up cannabis can lead to withdrawal symptoms, such as sleeping problems and mood swings, experts say.

The study is published in the American Journal of Psychiatry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Giving up cannabis can lead to withdrawal symptoms, such as sleeping problems and mood swings, experts say."

Meh. Giving up weed was always easier than giving up any other substance. Alcohol, nicotine, narcotics, and caffeine say "Hi!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Deej said:

"Giving up cannabis can lead to withdrawal symptoms, such as sleeping problems and mood swings, experts say."

Meh. Giving up weed was always easier than giving up any other substance. Alcohol, nicotine, narcotics, and caffeine say "Hi!"

Yeppers.  Shit, I'm out of weed, oh well........  No more bourbon?  Gimme a ginger ale.

Hell I got a sugar Jones that's harder to kick than weed, and alcohol put together.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, phdhorn said:
But, instead, the research detected greater increases in errors in cognitive tests on the teenagers using cannabis - while they were taking the drug and after they had stopped.

Brilliant level of analysis there deducing it affected them while high... rest of the study is suspect imo. How long after they were high did they re-test? Sounds like fear mongering instead of anything constructive that can be used for a sensible drug policy

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think weed is that dangerous, but I do chuckle at the thought that it’s not addicting. I had this convo many times

”one of the good things about weed is that it’s not addicting, you can stop whenever you want and not have problems.”

”so then stop.”

”nah man I don’t want to it makes me feel really good and it’s not dangerous.” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weed isn't physically addictive, which is how it differs there from alcohol, caffeine, nicotine, etc.

 

For high school kids, without any studies or anything, it seems like the biggest risk is becoming a "stoner" as your predominant identity.  I wonder how that would change if weed itself became less illicit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Celery Man said:

Weed isn't physically addictive, which is how it differs there from alcohol, caffeine, nicotine, etc.

 

For high school kids, without any studies or anything, it seems like the biggest risk is becoming a "stoner" as your predominant identity.  I wonder how that would change if weed itself became less illicit.

There'd be more stoners ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Celery Man said:

If weed was no more illegal than booze, would it create more "stoners", or would it decrease the amount that smoking pot became central to pot smoking teenagers' core identity.

Good question. Remove the stigma of illegality and bad boy image. It's still gonna be illegal for kids to smoke it, so little different than raiding the parents liquor cabinet at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, achooloco said:

Brilliant level of analysis there deducing it affected them while high... rest of the study is suspect imo. How long after they were high did they re-test? Sounds like fear mongering instead of anything constructive that can be used for a sensible drug policy

Propaganda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Helobious said:

I don’t think weed is that dangerous, but I do chuckle at the thought that it’s not addicting. I had this convo many times

”one of the good things about weed is that it’s not addicting, you can stop whenever you want and not have problems.”

”so then stop.”

”nah man I don’t want to it makes me feel really good and it’s not dangerous.” 

funny-pictures-stoner-humor-auto-408960.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2018 at 10:33 AM, Onboard 2.0 said:

Yeppers.  Shit, I'm out of weed, oh well........  No more bourbon?  Gimme a ginger ale.

Hell I got a sugar Jones that's harder to kick than weed, and alcohol put together.

 

I get the sugar Jones off and on.   I'll go months without a craving, and then it hits for a couple weeks and I just can't say no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, deft said:

I teach middle school. Fortnite is a greater threat for their brain development than pot or alcohol.

 

As was pitfall, asteroids, pacman, legend of Zelda, tetris, etc. Water is wet. I just read an article of some 29 year old dipshit in bumfuck Iowa making $500K a year playing fortnite for a living. 

 

Edited by JimmyHoffa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JimmyHoffa said:

 

As was pitfall, asteroids, pacman, legend of Zelda, tetris, etc. Water is wet. I just read an article of some 29 year old dipshit in bumfuck Iowa making $500K a year playing fortnite for a living. 

 

Next you'll tell me that there is an entire website where people play video games and viewers pay them money for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Celery Man said:

Weed isn't physically addictive, which is how it differs there from alcohol, caffeine, nicotine, etc.

One problem is that weed usage has not studied that closely but experts say that some become addicted.    It's also important to realize that like many controversial subjects, some experts create facts to suit their own beliefs or agenda.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

weed is absolutely addictive in the broad sense that people have a hard time walking away/putting it down.  It is not physically addictive in the same way as alcohol or heroin.  You stop smoking weed and you realize that eating cheetos and watching adventure time is fucking boring.  You don't have tremors, night sweats, hallucinations, and then die of a heart attack.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, JimmyHoffa said:

 

As was pitfall, asteroids, pacman, legend of Zelda, tetris, etc. Water is wet. I just read an article of some 29 year old dipshit in bumfuck Iowa making $500K a year playing fortnite for a living. 

 

The top Fortnite streamer is Ninja, a kid from Chicago, who makes $500k a month

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SpiralOut said:

The top Fortnite streamer is Ninja, a kid from Chicago, who makes $500k a month

 

Yep. Not saying that every Tom, Dick and Harry can do what Ninja does but when you have a car full of 8 year olds talking about his youtube videos you are doing something right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, immortal13 said:

The fuck is a juul?

I was wondering the same thing.  Urbandictionary tells us:

 
Quote

 

A highly concentrated nicotine vaporizer which underage kids use to get a buzz. It is commonly mistaken for a USB stick which makes it easy to take use in class. A rip from this device is usually referred to as a 'wop' and the stick itself is also known as a wop machine. High school age kids often ask to use the bathroom, but instead they are getting nic rpped in the bathroom off of wops.
Student: Hey teacher can I drop a log in the bathroom right quick? 
Teacher: Yeah get your shitty smellin ass outta my classroom. 
Student gets into bathroom and immediately starts takin mad wops from his USB lookin ass Juul.

 

 
Not sure what this has to do with Italians.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things;
- Fortnite is not allowed in our household (probably outing myself as a square). Or maybe not knowing much of anything about Taylor Swift in the other thread already outted me.
- A friend at work has high school aged kids in a tony suburb, and he claims literally every teenage kid he knows or encounters are sucking on juuls as if they are the new thing. I then saw something on LinkedIn saying like 75% of teenage boys have admitted to using Juul, so take that for what’s its worth. And I’m not sure that stuff is safe, you have kids sucking on electricity and nicotine and whatever else. That seems worse, as a habit, than smoking pot twice a year or drinking some beer responsibly (which I fully understand kids don’t drink or smoke pot in moderation and responsibly, but they can’t hid it in plain sight like you can a Thumbdrive size Juul).
It's easier than ever to get high on pot without anyone knowing. You think vaping devices are just for nicotine?
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, trauma babe said:
3 hours ago, OatmealRaisinCookie said:
Two things;
- Fortnite is not allowed in our household (probably outing myself as a square). Or maybe not knowing much of anything about Taylor Swift in the other thread already outted me.
- A friend at work has high school aged kids in a tony suburb, and he claims literally every teenage kid he knows or encounters are sucking on juuls as if they are the new thing. I then saw something on LinkedIn saying like 75% of teenage boys have admitted to using Juul, so take that for what’s its worth. And I’m not sure that stuff is safe, you have kids sucking on electricity and nicotine and whatever else. That seems worse, as a habit, than smoking pot twice a year or drinking some beer responsibly (which I fully understand kids don’t drink or smoke pot in moderation and responsibly, but they can’t hid it in plain sight like you can a Thumbdrive size Juul).

It's easier than ever to get high on pot without anyone knowing. You think vaping devices are just for nicotine?

I don't think that is what he is saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2018 at 10:40 AM, achooloco said:

Brilliant level of analysis there deducing it affected them while high... rest of the study is suspect imo. How long after they were high did they re-test? Sounds like fear mongering instead of anything constructive that can be used for a sensible drug policy

I don't think that is what that means.  It means during the time they were actively using versus the time they had stopped using.  In other words, the effects persisted after cessation of use.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
As was pitfall, asteroids, pacman, legend of Zelda, tetris, etc. Water is wet. I just read an article of some 29 year old dipshit in bumfuck Iowa making $500K a year playing fortnite for a living. 
 


I’m sure there was a point you were making. I wasn’t around for asteroids and Pac-Man coming of age but I can almost guarantee you kids were staying up literally all night playing it. We’re talking about addiction level obsession with this game for a lot of kids.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Celery Man said:

weed is absolutely addictive in the broad sense that people have a hard time walking away/putting it down.  It is not physically addictive in the same way as alcohol or heroin.  You stop smoking weed and you realize that eating cheetos and watching adventure time is fucking boring.  You don't have tremors, night sweats, hallucinations, and then die of a heart attack.

I would just add that it is "psychologically" addictive in that, as a mood-altering substance, one can become dependent upon it in flight from reality.  It isn't "physically" addictive in that there are no defined withdrawal symptoms or syndrome.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

I would just add that it is "psychologically" addictive in that, as a mood-altering substance, one can become dependent upon it in flight from reality.  It isn't "physically" addictive in that there are no defined withdrawal symptoms or syndrome.

marijuana-is-not-a-drug-used-to-suck-dic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Celery Man said:

weed is absolutely addictive in the broad sense that people have a hard time walking away/putting it down.  It is not physically addictive in the same way as alcohol or heroin.  You stop smoking weed and you realize that eating cheetos and watching adventure time is fucking boring.  You don't have tremors, night sweats, hallucinations, and then die of a heart attack.

Alcohol isn't physically addictive the way heroin is.  It requires pretty serious abuse to have a true physical withdrawal akin to getting off smack.  Pretty much everyone who does heroin gets addicted.  I would not equate them on the scale of physical addictiveness.

But your point that there's zero physical side effects to quitting pot is definitely accurate.

Edited by Al_4_ISU
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Al_4_ISU said:

Alcohol isn't physically addictive for a large chunk of the population.  It requires pretty serious abuse to have a true physical withdrawal akin to getting off smack.  Pretty much everyone who does heroin gets addicted.  I would not equate them on the scale of physical addictiveness.

But you're point that there's zero physical side effects to quitting pot is definitely accurate.

Maybe not addictive for a large % of the population, but you're born with it, and it is not hard to fall into that abyss.  Dealing with that shit right the fuck now !!!!!

 

No side effects to not smoking pot ? Psssshaw....  weight loss.....

Edited by Onboard 2.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Al_4_ISU said:

Alcohol isn't physically addictive the way heroin is.  It requires pretty serious abuse to have a true physical withdrawal akin to getting off smack.  Pretty much everyone who does heroin gets addicted.  I would not equate them on the scale of physical addictiveness.

But your point that there's zero physical side effects to quitting pot is definitely accurate.

I'm not sure this is precisely true.  I am reasonably sure that you are correct that there is a high correlation between heroin use and addiction, but I would submit that a big reason for that is that people who try heroin are pretty far down the addiction hole to begin with.

 

Also, alcohol withdrawal is commonly fatal when unsupervised.  Heroin withdrawal almost never is.  I'm sure it is quite unpleasant, though.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

I'm not sure this is precisely true.  I am reasonably sure that you are correct that there is a high correlation between heroin use and addiction, but I would submit that a big reason for that is that people who try heroin are pretty far down the addiction hole to begin with.

 

Also, alcohol withdrawal is commonly fatal when unsupervised.  Heroin withdrawal almost never is.  I'm sure it is quite unpleasant, though.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that to reach that level of alcohol withdrawal, the level of abuse has to be really, really high.  A much smaller percentage of alcohol users ever reach that point compared to the percentage of heroin users who suffer physical withdrawal. 

That's a good point about heroin users already being in the addiction cycle, but doesn't that speak more to the mental side of the equation addiction?  The specific physical addiction to heroin hasn't been developed at the point where usage starts (although general opiate addiction is already likely present from pain pill abuse).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

Maybe not addictive for a large % of the population, but you're born with it, and it is not hard to fall into that abyss.  Dealing with that shit right the fuck now !!!!!

 

No side effects to not smoking pot ? Psssshaw....  weight loss.....

There does seem to be that with alcohol.  There are a lot of people who just don't get physically addicted to it, but some who absolutely do.  

My thought with opiates/heroin is that pretty much everyone who starts ends up addicted.  Of course, as TwiceHorn pointed out, they may already be so far down that road by that point that it's the more likely explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't any surprise that alcohol use is bad for teenaged brains. The brain is still developing. This has been known for a while, and I'd be surprised if it isn't well-documented.

It makes sense that cannabis usage would have similar detrimental effects.

But what's bad for a developing child's brain isn't going to have the same amount of badness for a fully-developed adult's brain. That's why we have a drinking age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Al_4_ISU said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that to reach that level of alcohol withdrawal, the level of abuse has to be really, really high.  A much smaller percentage of alcohol users ever reach that point compared to the percentage of heroin users who suffer physical withdrawal. 

That's a good point about heroin users already being in the addiction cycle, but doesn't that speak more to the mental side of the equation addiction?  The specific physical addiction to heroin hasn't been developed at the point where usage starts (although general opiate addiction is already likely present from pain pill abuse).

Well, one of the fundamental things is you don't find heroin at tailgates, for example.  If more people say snorted heroin at parties, you might see more "casual" or recreational heroin users and a lower relative percentage of addicts.

All that's required for alcohol withdrawal is addictive-style use of being intoxicated at some level for most of the waking hours of the day for several weeks.  You are correct that people that get way fucked up on the weekends and stay sober during the week don't experience alcohol withdrawal.  By the same token, I don't think there are many users of heroin that don't stay fucked up on it 24/7.

I don't doubt that one of heroin's addictive factors is rapid onset of tolerance and withdrawal , but it's really hard to compare apples to apples when you are talking a real fringe drug and alcohol.  Plus, as far as I know, the relapse rate in heroin addiction is very high even once withdrawal is past, indicating that the people who become heroin addicts probably would have been alcoholics if never exposed to heroin.

Which brings to mind the burning question I have and that is did the overprescription of opiates just unleash a bunch of latent addicts?  Are the victims of the opiate crisis real addicts in the AA sense, or just weak people that can't get past a few days of dope sickness?

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding marijuana dependency/addiction, etc. I smoked/vaped/edible'd it 3-5x/week for 8.5 straight beginning in my mid-30s. 7 months ago I stopped and can say the only side effects were...

1. A few nights or so of it taking a *little* longer to fall asleep, but nowhere near as long as it takes when stopping alcohol.

2. Weight gain. I ended up drinking more during the 7 months when I wasn't using weed. I never get the munchies from it and I don't drink much alcohol at all when I'm high, so I ended up consuming a lot more calories during the 7 months of no weed because I was drinking more.

Other than that there were zero side effects- no 'jonesing' for it or inability to concentrate/function at all... nothing. I got back into it 2 weeks ago and am loving it again, but it wasn't an issue at all to abstain. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...