Jump to content

Texas recruiting notes 2019


bigup2dahorns

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, satyanash said:

SIAP but this is weird. TE Logan Compton posts a video of him getting in a dust-up with a DB who successfully covers him on two plays. After people start calling him out in the replies, his own mother and father jump into the thread to defend him.

 

Charlie was right, social media will be the end of us all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, satyanash said:

SIAP but this is weird. TE Logan Compton posts a video of him getting in a dust-up with a DB who successfully covers him on two plays. After people start calling him out in the replies, his own mother and father jump into the thread to defend him.

 

Bobbie Jo Compton?  That's a mom that smokes her Virginia Slims while popping her Dentyne.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, satyanash said:

SIAP but this is weird. TE Logan Compton posts a video of him getting in a dust-up with a DB who successfully covers him on two plays. After people start calling him out in the replies, his own mother and father jump into the thread to defend him.

 

We talked about it here a bit  ... 

but that was before the parental involvement. Any surprise that fucking meathead has dumbasses for parents? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, golfclap said:

We talked about it here a bit  ... 

but that was before the parental involvement. Any surprise that fucking meathead has dumbasses for parents? 

Getting physical and heated at a camp is fine. Whatever. Although going to IMG and still not being able to get off press coverage isn't a good look. 

Posting "Don’t start something you can’t finish..." on twitter for the world to see after you didn't do anything of note in the clip is moronic, and instead of jumping in to defend their baby, his parents should have made him delete the tweet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, satyanash said:

E.J. Holland's Big Board: Quarterbacks

 

  Reveal hidden contents

With the spring evaluation period over and done with, it’s time to reset the big boards and look at where Texas stands with its targets at each position. We kick off the series by taking a look at quarterback recruiting.

Commits:

Roschon Johnson, Port Neches-Groves— There really won’t be much to this big board as Johnson gave Texas a verbal commitment last summer and became the first pledge of the cycle. The four-star prospect is completely solid to the Longhorns and is not listening to any other programs. Johnson is fully focused on graduating in December and enrolling early at UT. We do not expect Johnson to waver at any point in the process. It appears that Johnson will be the only quarterback take this cycle, and the Longhorns are perfectly content with that. Johnson is one of the most electric prospects in the state this cycle and is one hell of a runner. However, he needs to continue to develop as a passer. Johnson has made strides in that area this offseason and advanced to the Elite 11 Finals.

Offered Targets:

None

On The Radar:

QB Grant Tisdale, Allen —Tisdale seems to be the runner-up in the race to be UT’s quarterback take this cycle. Texas could take a second look if something happens with Johnson, but that appears extremely unlikely. Tisdale recently made a verbal commitment to Ole Miss.

 

 

Even EJ should be ashamed of this bullshit.  Just shameful. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could also be Cine telling the Texas recruiting reporter nerds what the Texas recruiting reporter nerds want to hear, or the Texas recruiting nerds misrepresenting his words to make it seem like Texas is in a better position than they really are, or it could be that Texas is actually making up ground. No one knows shit. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, irishtexan said:

It could also be Cine telling the Texas recruiting reporter nerds what the Texas recruiting reporter nerds want to hear, or the Texas recruiting nerds misrepresenting his words to make it seem like Texas is in a better position than they really are, or it could be that Texas is actually making up ground. No one knows shit. 

We are surging in his recruitment but we need to hit it out of the ballpark on his OV.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bevo said:

We are surging in his recruitment but we need to hit it out of the ballpark on his OV.

Texas seems to be pulling away, but I wouldn't count Penn State out just yet. It's going to be a fight til the end, with Penn State now closing the gap since I started this reply.

Edited by UncleBuck
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, irishtexan said:

It could also be Cine telling the Texas recruiting reporter nerds what the Texas recruiting reporter nerds want to hear, or the Texas recruiting nerds misrepresenting his words to make it seem like Texas is in a better position than they really are, or it could be that Texas is actually making up ground. No one knows shit. 

<Mr. Blond> Either he's alive or he's dead. Or the cops got him or they don't. </Mr. Blond>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fucking CHAOS incoming 

NCAA makes major change to transfer, redshirt rules

The subject of transferring in college athletics has always been a tricky one. Some believe that the student-athletes should have the right to go wherever they want. It is their future, after all. Others worry that this would lead to some impulsive decisions and tampering within college athletics. 

The way a transfer works currently is that a student-athlete must alert his or her school prior to transferring. Then, that school can block the student-athlete from having contact with certain other schools. In terms of college football, that often means conference opponents and any schools on the schedule in the near future. Those days are in the past, or at least they will be very soon. As of Wednesday, the NCAA’s Division I council approved a proposal that will switch the transferring process to a “notification-of-transfer” system.

The NCAA also announced revised redshirt rules, which would allow players to participate in up to four games without losing a year of eligibility.  

Under the new transfer policy, when a student-athlete informs a school that he or she wishes to transfer, that institution has two business days to enter that athlete’s name into a national database. Once the student-athlete’s name is in the database, other coaches from any school can contact that individual. It’s no longer up to the school to determine which university the student-athlete can talk to. Justin Sell, the chairman of the Division I Transfer Working Group and South Dakota State’s athletic director, sees this as a big win for the athletes.

“The membership showed today that it supports this significant change in transfer rules,” said Justin Sell. “I’m proud of the effort the Transfer Working Group put forth to make this happen for student-athletes, coaches and schools.” While some coaches may not be pleased with this rule change, there is no question it gives more freedom and independence to the student-athlete.

The one caveat is that conferences can still enforce their own transfer rules, but doing so may factor into a student-athlete’s decision to steer clear of schools in that conference. In order to prevent any sort of tampering by coaches or administrators after this rule change, tampering with a current student-athlete at a different school is now a Level 2 violation.

That rule change will take effect on Oct. 15 of this year.

Regarding the new redshirt rule, the new exception allows football players to preserve a season of competition if, for example, injuries or other factors result in them competing in a small number of games.

“This change promotes not only fairness for college athletes, but also their health and well-being. Redshirt football student-athletes are more likely to remain engaged with the team, and starters will be less likely to feel pressure to play through injuries,” said council chair Blake James, who serves as Miami’s athletic director. “Coaches will appreciate the additional flexibility and ability to give younger players an opportunity to participate in limited competition.”

The rule previously required a medical hardship waiver to receiver a fifth year of eligibility. It also required the injury to take place during the first quarter of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, golfclap said:


Fucking CHAOS incoming NCAA makes major change to transfer, redshirt rules

The subject of transferring in college athletics has always been a tricky one. Some believe that the student-athletes should have the right to go wherever they want. It is their future, after all. Others worry that this would lead to some impulsive decisions and tampering within college athletics. 

The way a transfer works currently is that a student-athlete must alert his or her school prior to transferring. Then, that school can block the student-athlete from having contact with certain other schools. In terms of college football, that often means conference opponents and any schools on the schedule in the near future. Those days are in the past, or at least they will be very soon. As of Wednesday, the NCAA’s Division I council approved a proposal that will switch the transferring process to a “notification-of-transfer” system.

The NCAA also announced revised redshirt rules, which would allow players to participate in up to four games without losing a year of eligibility.  

Under the new transfer policy, when a student-athlete informs a school that he or she wishes to transfer, that institution has two business days to enter that athlete’s name into a national database. Once the student-athlete’s name is in the database, other coaches from any school can contact that individual. It’s no longer up to the school to determine which university the student-athlete can talk to. Justin Sell, the chairman of the Division I Transfer Working Group and South Dakota State’s athletic director, sees this as a big win for the athletes.

“The membership showed today that it supports this significant change in transfer rules,” said Justin Sell. “I’m proud of the effort the Transfer Working Group put forth to make this happen for student-athletes, coaches and schools.” While some coaches may not be pleased with this rule change, there is no question it gives more freedom and independence to the student-athlete.

The one caveat is that conferences can still enforce their own transfer rules, but doing so may factor into a student-athlete’s decision to steer clear of schools in that conference. In order to prevent any sort of tampering by coaches or administrators after this rule change, tampering with a current student-athlete at a different school is now a Level 2 violation.

That rule change will take effect on Oct. 15 of this year.

Regarding the new redshirt rule, the new exception allows football players to preserve a season of competition if, for example, injuries or other factors result in them competing in a small number of games.

“This change promotes not only fairness for college athletes, but also their health and well-being. Redshirt football student-athletes are more likely to remain engaged with the team, and starters will be less likely to feel pressure to play through injuries,” said council chair Blake James, who serves as Miami’s athletic director. “Coaches will appreciate the additional flexibility and ability to give younger players an opportunity to participate in limited competition.”

The rule previously required a medical hardship waiver to receiver a fifth year of eligibility. It also required the injury to take place during the first quarter of the season.

Not sure chaos will rule but it will bring a change.  Players will still have to sit out a year so that will stop a free for all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JOSEYWALES66 said:

Not sure chaos will rule but it will bring a change.  Players will still have to sit out a year so that will stop a free for all.

Sounds reasonable.

I would say transfer where you want after notification,  sit a year,  but lose a year of eligibility.  

If player enrolls freshman year,  redshirts,  then transfers,  he has 3 years left to play.  

Edited by Laga4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...