Jump to content
Jordan Washington chats with Bobby for Burnt Ends ×

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty

Cairn Horn88

By Cairn Horn88
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

dcbc

dcbc 14179

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Lol, right. The audio of his “grab ‘em by the pussy” comment didn’t do it. Video of him shooting someone on Fifth Ave wouldn’t do it. His base is bereft of standards, values, or fixed principles of any kind. No decent person supports Trump.

Its sad but true. It also makes them totally predictable. There is no bottom. Nothing that will change their minds. 

I left out the sarcasm punctuation.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 28.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

HillCountryBevo
HillCountryBevo

Imagine your basis of hating Trump is because of mean tweets, January 6 and “hush money” trial all because liberal media is crooked. Fuck right off. This is my last post in this forum  dumb fucki

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

When you're a court, you just grab their asset, and they let you do it!

HillCountryBevo
HillCountryBevo

Bye bitch. Enjoy living in literal hell if your man Biden is re elected

Posted Images

The Dog

The Dog 42744

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

making comments to a prospective juror that his attorneys are challenging. Nothing happens. News at 11. 

 

 

 

what happened is the challenge by his lawyers was denied.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GenXer

GenXer 2470

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

😂😂😂

 

Isn’t this like an automatic contempt of court or something? The juror has to be excused now right? I mean the juror may hold a grudge against a defendant that confronts a juror.

This seems really big. Am I missing something?

I did serve on a jury a couple decades ago on a trial for two counts of aggravated assault. That’s the extent of my legal and courtroom experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Willfully Horn

Willfully Horn 7820

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, The Dog said:

what happened is the challenge by his lawyers was denied.

The challenge was for cause, ie posting a “honking cheer video” the night of the election. Near as I can determine, that’s a video of cars honking.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Dog

The Dog 42744

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Willfully Horn said:

The challenge was for cause, ie posting a “honking cheer video” the night of the election. Near as I can determine, that’s a video of cars honking.

yes.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dcbc

dcbc 14179

Posted
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

#guilty

 

 

Objection.  The witness is unqualified to characterize what constitutes a "legal expense."  The evidence before the court conclusively demonstrates that he never once has paid a legal bill.

 

Edited by dcbc
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 30715

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, GenXer said:

Isn’t this like an automatic contempt of court or something? The juror has to be excused now right? I mean the juror may hold a grudge against a defendant that confronts a juror.

This seems really big. Am I missing something?

I did serve on a jury a couple decades ago on a trial for two counts of aggravated assault. That’s the extent of my legal and courtroom experience.

It's highly unusual. Most defendants are not stupid enough to make antagonizing comments about or towards a potential juror. 

Lawyers actually spend some time coaching demeanor during a trial, but Trump just can't help himself, obviously. 

Pretty much everyone gets a warning before the hammer comes. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dcbc

dcbc 14179

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

It's highly unusual. Most defendants are not stupid enough to make antagonizing comments about or towards a potential juror. 

Lawyers actually spend some time coaching demeanor during a trial, but Trump just can't help himself, obviously. 

Pretty much everyone gets a warning before the hammer comes. 

The penalty is, at the very least, he has to burn a peremptory strike on her.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Willfully Horn

Willfully Horn 7820

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

It's highly unusual. Most defendants are not stupid enough to make antagonizing comments about or towards a potential juror. 

Lawyers actually spend some time coaching demeanor during a trial, but Trump just can't help himself, obviously. 

Pretty much everyone gets a warning before the hammer comes. 

What sort of hammer are you referencing? If it is a fine, I’d argue the hammer is relative to assets. If he is removed from the courtroom, then I’d argue he gets what he wants.

There is historical precedent for a different hammer:

image.jpeg.1e3055faf664469e6ec888787016a303.jpeg

Edited by Willfully Horn
Accuracy
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tbone_

tbone_ 13968

Posted
Posted
It’s going to be fascinating to watch, because we know he can’t control himself. And this is going to last a long time. How many warnings will he get?

He wants nothing more than to be thrown in jail and brought into court in an orange jumpsuit and shackles.

PERSECUTION! ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!1!1!1!1!1!!!!!!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9440

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

He can't control himself, he will threaten jurors, prosecutors, witnesses, etc.,...do whatever the fuck he wants, and the judge will do nothing.  Guaran-fucking-teed. 

I remember the guy who represented himself in that wisconsin parade car chase guy case, she had to put him in a different room and forced him to participate over video whenever he got too disruptive

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 30715

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, chainsaw said:

I remember the guy who represented himself in that wisconsin parade car chase guy case, she had to put him in a different room and forced him to participate over video whenever he got too disruptive

Yeah, as with most things Trump, it's an all-new situation.  Who knows what the judge will do, but he seems pretty sharp. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19443

Posted
Posted

So he basically only wakes up to scream at jurors.  Seems totally normal for a person in control of their body and faculties.  

I've seen this done a number of times before.  Berate a juror you feel will be against you so you can order them gone from the pool for bias.  

And nobody can do much about it, because all he has to do is violate the gag order or judge's instructions on courtroom decorum, and Trump posts their family's addresses to his MAGA gun-toting acolytes.  And around and aroune we go.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 30715

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

Just have someone sitting next to him with a spray bottle give him a couple of squirts every time he starts flapping his jaws.

Judge Lucius Desha Bunton of the Western District of Texas, RIP, had a number of rules about how lawyers could walk around the courtroom and how witnesses behave. He enforced the rules with a water pistol. At first. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HenryJames

HenryJames 64900

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Judge Lucius Desha Bunton of the Western District of Texas, RIP, had a number of rules about how lawyers could walk around the courtroom and how witnesses behave. He enforced the rules with a water pistol. At first. 

He replaced Judge John Wood who was murdered by Woody Harrelson's dad.

  • Hook 'Em 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Dog

The Dog 42744

Posted
Posted

Twitter folks may be over-selling it a bit. there's a play by play on Threads has that Merchan noticed Trump's grumbling and then smacked him down. wasn't terribly dramatic.

6 minutes ago, dcbc said:

The penalty is, at the very least, he has to burn a peremptory strike on her.

apparently they did. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GenXer

GenXer 2470

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, dcbc said:

The penalty is, at the very least, he has to burn a peremptory strike on her.

When we were being questioned as jurors, all the jurors were present. If a defendant confronted a prospective juror in front of me, it would’ve affected my impression of said defendant regardless of the judge’s instructions. It’s human nature to do so.

Is trump trying to affect the entire jury pool as another delay tactic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
'stache

'stache 21489

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

TBH, other than the reasons he's there, nodding off during jury selection is about as humanizing as he's appeared in decades. 

Edited by 'stache
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
'stache

'stache 21489

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

07ad7f0c-7618-41bc-97fa-5abf22679eac.png

 

27 minutes ago, Foosters said:

Trump forced to confront 8 years worth of memes poking fun at him? And you people said there'd be no justice . . . 

Seriously, I've always assumed that he has people protecting him from seeing anything negative about him online or elsewhere, like the episode of South Park where Butters goes crazy after being forced to protect Cartman from online negativity against him. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17088

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Red Five said:

What did Dotard say to the juror?

Nearest I can tell, nothing. This was more about body language and possibly non-verbal grunts. I'm assuming this is more about him rolling his eyes or huffing slightly during the questioning. I also assume that the judge's warning did not happen in front of the prospective jurors.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
High Plains Drifter

High Plains Drifter 10914

Posted
Posted

 

What did doTARd say to the juror?

A lot of people are saying I'm one of the "Best" Defendents ever, top two or three, maybe even THE BEST EVER. A lot of people don't know that. I know more about being a defendent than anybody. I'm the KING of DEFENDENTS! Other Defendents come up to me, big tough defendents, straight out of Central Casting, tears in their eyes. "SIR!" they say. They always call me sir. "Sir! thank you for being the Best Defendent Ever!". 

 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
GenXer

GenXer 2470

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
50 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

IMG_5998.png

I absolutely love this. Trump having to sit there and take this feedback from the populace rather than his cult.

Judge says “Mr GenXer, we found several  posts that you made on a site called surlyhorns that seem prejudicial to the defendant. The court will read several of them now..”

GenXer being dismissed as a juror.

image.gif.63e95376d2299a259154ccd8b23ddbe8.gif

 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Haha 24
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...