Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Sbbruin said:

You can't bypass it.  I asked the dealer.  You have to turn it off every time you start the car.

So you press the button to turn the car on and then press the button right above it to turn the auto on/off feature off. At least in my car and every rental I’ve driven over the past few years that’s how it works. It’s never struck me as some huge pain in the ass or inconvenience.

Posted
7 minutes ago, royiv said:

So you press the button to turn the car on and then press the button right above it to turn the auto on/off feature off. At least in my car and every rental I’ve driven over the past few years that’s how it works. It’s never struck me as some huge pain in the ass or inconvenience.

You have to press TWO buttons to turn it on the way you want?  What is it, a woman?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Sbbruin said:

You can't bypass it.  I asked the dealer.  You have to turn it off every time you start the car.

Depending on the vehicle you can.

Posted
5 hours ago, Satchel said:

I can’t decide if these people are crazy, mean, evil or a combination of all three. It still boggles the mind that people like this guy fancy themselves as Christian:

https://www.aol.com/doj-weaponization-group-shame-individuals-205413048.html

 

WASHINGTON — The conservative activist named by President Donald Trump as the head of the Justice Department's "Weaponization Working Group" said Tuesday he planned to "name" and "shame" individuals the department determines it is unable to charge with crimes, in what would amount to a major departure from longstanding Justice Department protocols.

Ed Martin described himself at a press conference as the "captain" of the group that is investigating prosecutors who launched past investigations into Trump and his allies.

“There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people. And if they can be charged, we’ll charge them. But if they can’t be charged, we will name them," Martin said. "And we will name them, and in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are ashamed. And that’s a fact. That’s the way things work. And so that’s, that’s how I believe the job operates.”

During Trump's first tenure, the justification given for Trump's firing of former FBI Director James Comey was that Comey had given a press conference in which he released "derogatory information" about then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016.

"Derogatory information sometimes is disclosed in the course of criminal investigations and prosecutions, but we never release it gratuitously," then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein wrote in a memo, adding that he believed Comey had given a "textbook example of what federal prosecutors and agents are taught not to do."

Martin's remarks came on his last full day as interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia on Tuesday. Trump announced last week that he was naming Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as interim U.S. attorney following Martin's 120-day tenure, instead making Martin the pardon attorney, associate deputy attorney general, and director of the "Weaponization Working Group" that Attorney General Pam Bondi established at the Justice Department in response to one of Trump's executive orders.

Cancel Culture!!!!

Posted

Priorities = Jesus

Planes falling out of the sky and pilots losing contact with ATC? Not priority 

 

 

  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 5
Posted
14 hours ago, Pancho said:

Priorities = Jesus

Planes falling out of the sky and pilots losing contact with ATC? Not priority 

 

 

Look, you don't put your wifi router in the basement because it's going to cause connectivity issues. Moving Jesus upstairs is going to fix the radio failures between pilots and ATC. 

Posted

I'm going to nitpick a little with Warren though.  She's asking POTUS can revoke a non-profits status.   The statute their discussing is whether POTUS (or anyone else) can order or stop an audit.   Those are two different, albeit both important, issues.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
10 minutes ago, Macanudo said:

I'm going to nitpick a little with Warren though.  She's asking POTUS can revoke a non-profits status.   The statute their discussing is whether POTUS (or anyone else) can order or stop an audit.   Those are two different, albeit both important, issues.

I don’t think that’s nitpicking. I’m not going to read the statutes to figure it out, but I got the same impression as you from the video. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Macanudo said:

I'm going to nitpick a little with Warren though.  She's asking POTUS can revoke a non-profits status.   The statute their discussing is whether POTUS (or anyone else) can order or stop an audit.   Those are two different, albeit both important, issues.

Fair enough, but it seemed like she was trying to maneuver him over a trap door. The language says “an audit or other investigation.

In order to grant or revoke status, there would have to be determination made by the IRS, an administrative process with multiple opportunities for appeal. If you made a determination you gathered and found facts, and if you gathered and found facts, that’s an investigation. Otherwise you have an arbitrary and capricious determination, which is invalid and subject to reversal. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

I mean, one look at that guy and we all why he did it. 

he's a fat fuck...a rich fat fuck...a rich fat fuck with a micropeen...a rich fat fuck with a micropeen that loves watching sluts fuck on camera.

fuck that fat fucking fuck

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Fair enough, but it seemed like she was trying to maneuver him over a trap door. The language says “an audit or other investigation.

In order to grant or revoke status, there would have to be determination made by the IRS, an administrative process with multiple opportunities for appeal. If you made a determination you gathered and found facts, and if you gathered and found facts, that’s an investigation. Otherwise you have an arbitrary and capricious determination, which is invalid and subject to reversal. 

I agree.  In either case, POTUS should NOT be involved.   

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Fair enough, but it seemed like she was trying to maneuver him over a trap door. The language says “an audit or other investigation.

In order to grant or revoke status, there would have to be determination made by the IRS, an administrative process with multiple opportunities for appeal. If you made a determination you gathered and found facts, and if you gathered and found facts, that’s an investigation. Otherwise you have an arbitrary and capricious determination, which is invalid and subject to reversal. 

"it's arbitrary.  It's capricious"

Seinfeld-Jackie-Chiles.jpg

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Chad Fuck said:

I mean, one look at that guy and we all why he did it. 

The hackers got me.

Oh no! Did they steal your identity? Did they rack up credit card charges? 

No. Worse. 

??? 

They followed so many accounts on Twitter.  Accounts I have no interest in. Disgusting things like “voluptuous lonely college babes.” “Voluptuous college babe sapphic fantasy.” “Voluptuous sapphic college babes so lonely they’re looking for overweight middle age daddies.” “Voluptuous college babe-loving daddy tries out gay stuff, not because he’s gay or anything but just to be sure he’s really straight.” “Middle aged daddy convinces wife to play with his butt, not because he’s gay though.” Things I would NEVER follow. 
 

Oh shit. That sucks? Did they try to blackmail you? Tell business associates or friends and family?

No, they just waited until I became IRS commissioner nominee and then reporters and vetters found their dirty tricks! 

Edited by 956 Worldwide
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:

“Voluptuous sapphic college babes so lonely they’re looking for overweight middle age daddies.”

I'm not even "asking for a friend".   Where might one find these lasses?

  • Haha 1


×
×
  • Create New...