Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, perfectchaos007 said:

Aaaaand thats why Gibson isn't higher up in the depth chart for those wondering

I feel for the dude. Hes talented, but you CANNOT put it on the ground over and over.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
41 minutes ago, Cap Hooked said:

In year 3? Are you retarded?

 

40 minutes ago, alincoln said:

What happened in Vince’s third year

We went 11-1 and beat Michigan in the Rose Bowl, with a 12-0 loss to OU.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, ztejas said:

Are you saying this with a straight face? And people are repping you?

Some of you need to get some fresh air. 

This like struggling to run against North Texas 20 years ago. This is a bad offense. Extremely bad. Ohio State is going to get run on this year, a lot. 

Posted
1 minute ago, The Earl of Texas said:

Play ugly, win big. Not too bad all things considered.

Room for improvement is equally encouraging and concerning.

There isn't much encouraging. 

Posted
Just now, William Bludworth said:

A win is a win. A lot to complain about, but still, I'll take the W

Dude. It's San Jose State. We won the moment the ink dried on the contract. 

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, chemHORN said:

Fuck trying to win. Im gonna sell my tickets and just go to the free concerts and tailgate from now on

I've thought about trying this for a game. I watched the first half of uh in Houston this way and i enjoyed the vibe I had,if you know what I'm saying. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, theBigHen said:

Yeah that should be his last touch for this team. Good luck at Sacramento state next year 

If he's not fumbling in practice, I wouldn't write him off just yet. Definitely on probation though. We still have a couple of tune-up games where he could get snaps without too much risk. He clearly has potential otherwise.

Posted
1 minute ago, William Bludworth said:

A win is a win. A lot to complain about, but still, I'll take the W

Agree.  I would have killed for a game like this when I was on the 40.  The defense gave up like 11 pts a game and we still lost 6 games.  Freshman year, '91.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Bodowned said:

We scored 28 points over 4:56 with three quick-succession turnovers in the first half and played a 10-7 game for the other 55:04.

Well, after that we didn’t need to play it any other way. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Knoxtnhorn said:

Agree.  I would have killed for a game like this when I was on the 40.  The defense gave up like 11 pts a game and we still lost 6 games.  Freshman year, '91.

I was lucky enough to be one the 40 when we were hitting 11 wins, but I don't want to go back to the Charle Days. My heart can't take it. My frosh year was '05

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bodowned said:

We scored 28 points over 4:56 with three quick-succession turnovers in the first half and played a 10-7 game for the other 55:04.

Luckily points don’t matter more/less based on when they happen

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, William Bludworth said:

A win is a win. A lot to complain about, but still, I'll take the W

This sums it up. B-/c+. Lots to be happy about but more to worry about. Our line looked like it got whipped in the second half. Arch’s stuff-not seeing wide open receivers and the wtf throws. Wideouts need to get more separation. Livingstone, can’t believe it but I can. I dk what to think. Not good not bad 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...