Jump to content

Israel


SmokeyBear1861

Recommended Posts

If not for all the history, it would make some measure of sense to roll WB and a Gaza strip that could be made contiguous (river to the sea oh noes) under temporary Jordanian protection/administration as a bridge to sovereign independence. But Arab geopolitics gonna Arab geopolitic so that will never fucking happen. 

Edited by Anastasis
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

Killing a bunch of them without addressing the environment and conditions that lead to a far-right fundamentalist group like Hamas gaining power is just kicking the can down the road. They'll either return or something worse will replace them.

I think it would help if Iran were kept from using the Palestinians as part of their own game board. 

Edited by statsman
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Willfully Horn said:

Stolen land was stolen, was stolen, was stolen, was stolen….. 

I don’t get how anyone can draw a timeline and declare either side indigenous. Maybe I missed that explanation.

For what it's worth, I was watching one of those ancient history docs a few weeks ago, and they were discussing a recent genetic analysis on Israeli Jews and Palestinians, saying that about 50% of the DNA of both groups can be traced to the original Canaanite population.

The difference is that Israeli Jews tend to have more DNA from European haplogroups filling out the remaining 50%, while Palestinians tend to have more Arab admixture.

In other words, both groups basically have an equal claim to being indigenous since they're derived from the same genetic stock if you're looking at it from that perspective. The big picture is they're basically half-siblings sharing the same dad but different moms (or different dads and the same mom).

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bolverk said:

For what it's worth, I was watching one of those ancient history docs a few weeks ago, and they were discussing a recent genetic analysis on Israeli Jews and Palestinians, saying that about 50% of the DNA of both groups can be traced to the original Canaanite population.

The difference is that Israeli Jews tend to have more DNA from European haplogroups filling out the remaining 50%, while Palestinians tend to have more Arab admixture.

In other words, both groups basically have an equal claim to being indigenous since they're derived from the same genetic stock if you're looking at it from that perspective. The big picture is they're basically half-siblings sharing the same dad but different moms (or different dads and the same mom).

One thing that I was surprised by at first, then after reflection understood, was the reaction my European friends had to the 23andme craze a few years back (aside from the whole selling genetic data to the CCP thing). 
 

I never did it but found it benign and could see why people would be interested.  My European friends found it horrifying and dystopian and explained that only awful people cared about their genetic mixture.  After some cogitation, I realized that tracked, and that my feelings would have been different in the American South at a certain point in time. 
 

I am concerned about any attempts to use genetics as a data point for who has a right to live where.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

I am concerned about any attempts to use genetics as a data point for who has a right to live where.  

Yeah, I tend to agree. But when a nation is created on the basis of having the first claim to a land and run as a religious ethnostate, it opens up Pandora's Box where you kinda want to know something about the people who are being displaced.

I mean, what's the reason for the Israeli government's opposition to allowing Palestinians to return to the villages from where their grandparents were kicked out? Well, they don't belong to the Jewish ethnoreligious group.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, whenever I hear about settler colonialism and its great and unique evils, I am reminded to go to my bookshelf and pull off my favorite relic of my time in Pakistan, a slight illustrated tome called “A Children’s History of Sindh.” 
 

What’s remarkable about this book is the matter of fact chronicling of successive waves of conquest and exchange, framed as benign to positive, all contributing to the beauty and uniqueness of Sindh culture. The Persians, the Indo-Greeks, the Arabs, the Mughals. All part of the beautiful and complex tapestry of Sindhi culture and religion. 
 

Until you got to the British.  A bunch of bloody minded buggers who fucked hp the beautiful, peaceful harmony that was the Indus River valley, bringing nothing of value, destroying, spreading cruelty and hate. 
 

Now, I imagine that if you were an actual Sindhi living through the Arab conquest and forced Islamization of your home, you’d have found it bloody and terrifying indeed.  But that was a long time ago and Islam was quite effective at conversion indeed.

A good reminder that sometimes it’s just centuries and single-mindedness that separates culture exchange from imperial colonialism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

One thing that I was surprised by at first, then after reflection understood, was the reaction my European friends had to the 23andme craze a few years back (aside from the whole selling genetic data to the CCP thing). 
 

I never did it but found it benign and could see why people would be interested.  My European friends found it horrifying and dystopian and explained that only awful people cared about their genetic mixture.  After some cogitation, I realized that tracked, and that my feelings would have been different in the American South at a certain point in time. 
 

I am concerned about any attempts to use genetics as a data point for who has a right to live where.  

Yeah that is an interesting thing to think about. I've never done it but I considered it just out of curiosity. I wouldn't care one way or another of course, but I can see how some people might find it very weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Yeah, I tend to agree. But when a nation is created on the basis of having the first claim to a land and run as a religious ethnostate, it opens up Pandora's Box where you kinda want to know something about the people who are being displaced.

I mean, what's the reason for the Israeli government's opposition to allowing Palestinians to return to the villages from where their grandparents were kicked out? Well, they don't belong to the Jewish ethnoreligious group.

I get that, I just see it as a short logical leap from “I get to come because I belong” to “you should go back where you came from because you don’t belong.” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

I get that, I just see it as a short logical leap from “I get to come because I belong” to “you should go back where you came from because you don’t belong.” 

Of course, it is or can be. Like you, I see the whole DNA thing from both an American and Western European perspective (I did a year-long study abroad program in France, living with French families and going to an all-French school and a separate summer program in Germany).

For your standard issue American of European stock, it's just something that scratches that curiosity itch, especially for those of us (myself included) who're adopted. But, then, we've got our history of octoroon bullshit, so yeah...

And for most Western Europeans, that whole ethnicity and nation-states built around them is one of the major reasons for the whole EU thing. Most of them kind of want to get away from that bloody history (fuck you, Le Pen), not to mention wars of religion. And, well, needless to say, there was that whole Holocaust thing not too far in the past.

This is all just a long way of saying you're preaching to the choir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Also, whenever I hear about settler colonialism and its great and unique evils, I am reminded to go to my bookshelf and pull off my favorite relic of my time in Pakistan, a slight illustrated tome called “A Children’s History of Sindh.” 
 

What’s remarkable about this book is the matter of fact chronicling of successive waves of conquest and exchange, framed as benign to positive, all contributing to the beauty and uniqueness of Sindh culture. The Persians, the Indo-Greeks, the Arabs, the Mughals. All part of the beautiful and complex tapestry of Sindhi culture and religion. 
 

Until you got to the British.  A bunch of bloody minded buggers who fucked hp the beautiful, peaceful harmony that was the Indus River valley, bringing nothing of value, destroying, spreading cruelty and hate. 
 

Now, I imagine that if you were an actual Sindhi living through the Arab conquest and forced Islamization of your home, you’d have found it bloody and terrifying indeed.  But that was a long time ago and Islam was quite effective at conversion indeed.

A good reminder that sometimes it’s just centuries and single-mindedness that separates culture exchange from imperial colonialism. 

Five point five thousand years. Fifty five centuries. 
 

Five is a tumultuous number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the much larger and more powerful Kingdom of Assyria began a period of expansion, and small states such as Israel and Judah were no match against the Assyrian armies. Eventually, Samaria fell and Israel became a part of the Assyrian provincial administration. By 721 b.c. Israel ceased to exist as an independent nation.

https://www.metmuseum.org/blogs/now-at-the-met/features/2013/cyrus-and-the-judean-diaspora#:~:text=the much larger and more,exist as an independent nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Welshy said:

the much larger and more powerful Kingdom of Assyria began a period of expansion, and small states such as Israel and Judah were no match against the Assyrian armies. Eventually, Samaria fell and Israel became a part of the Assyrian provincial administration. By 721 b.c. Israel ceased to exist as an independent nation.

https://www.metmuseum.org/blogs/now-at-the-met/features/2013/cyrus-and-the-judean-diaspora#:~:text=the much larger and more,exist as an independent nation.

MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail-fubTbrqX.jpg.65b45000315aef61f35b73a655707920.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Breaking:

Israel, Hamas reach tentative 5-day ceasefire deal for release of hostages: Report

Hostages would be released in small batches, every 24 hours, in exchange for a pause in the ongoing ground operation of the Israeli army in Gaza, a news report said.
 

https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/israel-hamas-ceasefire-release-hostages-report-gaza-us-2464723-2023-11-19

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I jdon't understand how anyone can support a "2 state solution" to this never ending fued, when we know the newly created Palestinian state would never agree to recognize Israel as a sovereign nation with normalized relations. It's a large part of the reason why every other attempt has failed, and why it won't work this time either. Israel isn't going to "Free Palestine" when they know it would just be creating another Arab nation that wants to destroy it. That new nation would immediately become (or continue to be) a pawn of neighboring Arab states as the primary location for continuing their never ending proxy war on Israel. 

Nothing has changed in the last few decades, no matter how many people die on either side, you can't force Gaza to try a progressive democracy and use diplomacy to settle issues. And I can't really blame Israel for not wanting to create a more formidable enemy out of Gaza or the West Bank by granting them nation status. So I think this military operation will continue until they are satisfied, but it will "end" with most of Gaza occupied by the IDF, and it will become their Iraq-like quagmire. Their troops will be attacked periodically, some will die in IED blasts, and they will continue to use the never ending sporadic attacks as justification for their military presence forever and ever. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't agree. things were changing. Turkey has always traded with Israel. They were working on a pipeline for the offshore project. Jordan was developing a desalinization project with Israel. Saudi Arabia was talking about normalizing relations. Shit, you have Israelis going to Dubai as both investors and tourists. October 7th changed all of that. 

I spent 7 years living in the Middle East. One team in the company I worked for was involved in some development projects in Israel. Mainly agriculture technology they were using in Africa. To get there they would travel to Turkey and then Tel Aviv. In Turkey their passports would not be stamped upon entry in Israel or Turkey.  Instead there would be a peace of paper stamped and inserted. Why? Because no one with an Israeli stamp could enter the UAE and we all lived there. Me with my Afghan visa? No problem. 

A two state solution could work. But it requires guarantees by both Egypt and Jordan. Israel has pretty good relations with them. Do no confuse Syria with Oman. Yemen with Jordan. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Satchel said:

That ol’ booger, Biden gets a lot done before he goes to bed at 6p.

Yeah seems like he’s killing it. SA meanwhile appears to be looking to China to be a peacemaker. What a fn world. 
 

https://english.alarabiya.net/amp/News/middle-east/2023/11/19/Arab-Islamic-ministerial-committee-to-kick-off-Gaza-war-talks-in-China-Saudi-FM-

A ministerial committee tasked by the Arab-Islamic summit to formulate an action plan to stop the war on Gaza will kick off its work from China, Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan announced.

Ministers from Arab and Muslim countries are expected to start their flurry of political activity from China on Monday, Prince Faisal said in a video posted on the ministry’s account of platform X on Saturday.

“The first stop will be in China and will then move to a number of capitals to deliver the clear message that there must be a ceasefire immediately as well as aid and humanitarian needs must be immediately delivered to Gaza,” Prince Faisal said after meeting with European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell on the sidelines of a conference in Bahrain.

“We must work to end this crisis and end this war on Gaza as soon as possible,” Prince Faisal said.
 

Edited by Anastasis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

There’s always “context” and “circumstances” that lead to a far-right group gaining power. Imagine how you’d feel if you lost 19 percent of your country and had to tolerate enemy occupation in your industrial heartland!  A stab in the back! 
 

As far as election margins go, Netanyahu received a far lower percentage than Hamas did and no one is racing to contextualize that or pretend like Israelis don’t bear some responsibility for who governs them. 
 

 

Netanyahu won last year, Gaza has not had elections since VY

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dutchrudder said:

I jdon't understand how anyone can support a "2 state solution" to this never ending fued, when we know the newly created Palestinian state would never agree to recognize Israel as a sovereign nation with normalized relations. It's a large part of the reason why every other attempt has failed, and why it won't work this time either. Israel isn't going to "Free Palestine" when they know it would just be creating another Arab nation that wants to destroy it. That new nation would immediately become (or continue to be) a pawn of neighboring Arab states as the primary location for continuing their never ending proxy war on Israel. 

Nothing has changed in the last few decades, no matter how many people die on either side, you can't force Gaza to try a progressive democracy and use diplomacy to settle issues. And I can't really blame Israel for not wanting to create a more formidable enemy out of Gaza or the West Bank by granting them nation status. So I think this military operation will continue until they are satisfied, but it will "end" with most of Gaza occupied by the IDF, and it will become their Iraq-like quagmire. Their troops will be attacked periodically, some will die in IED blasts, and they will continue to use the never ending sporadic attacks as justification for their military presence forever and ever. 

 

Because security wise there is absolutely no difference as there is now, Lets pretend for a fucking second that it is just Gaza, that the WB with all the land stealing, Jerusalem, Dome of the Rock, settlers, partitioned into 5 quasi states (the Edhud Barak deal), 3% land loss. Etc lets pretend the real prize for Israel and the only thing it wants to keep no longer exists.

Then we have just Gaza, Israel does not want Gaza, they tried to pawn if of to Egypt, and Egypt said fuck no, you won it fair and square in that sneak attack in 67. Leaving Israel either giving them independence, or continuing apartheid (they control the borders, sea and air, and kill with impunity extrajudicially hence apartheid).

I honestly see no difference as a security threat, I mean they still use their brains to smuggle all the weapons they need. Are they ever going to get an airforce or something?

Hezbollah is in an independent Lebanon that Israel has no problem violating their sovereignty, if anything they have more to lose and are therefore less crazy than Hamas.

Honestly if the WB did not exist Israel would just make any peace deal in Gaza, like literally keep everything, a two state solution would happen yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is true that hostages were brought in here, it should spark a serious debate about the complicity of hospital administrators and staff (not patients). It is one thing to be bullied in peace time to accept hideouts and logistics rooms. It’s quite another to be complicit in using a medical facility as a hostage stash house, all the while preening about how sacrosanct and inviable it ought to be. 
 

I’m reminded very much of how medicine was hijacked by Europe’s 20th century totalitarians. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/17/2023 at 5:49 PM, InkaUtexas said:

Yep. And with the same logic so could Israel. Neither will of course. 

 

You truly think if Israel "surrendered" that Hamas would stop trying to kill them?  What has Hamas ever done to make anyone think that?  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2023 at 12:50 PM, Brian Fantana said:

Killing a bunch of them without addressing the environment and conditions that lead to a far-right fundamentalist group like Hamas gaining power is just kicking the can down the road. They'll either return or something worse will replace them.

I have a real problem with this sentiment.  Maybe I am not understanding your point.

The vast majority of people who are condemning Israel for their offensive and seemingly being supportive of Palestinians (as opposed to Hamas) all seem to suggest that Hamas represents a small percentage of Palestinians.  I hear this a lot.  Israel is killing "innocent" non combatives.  I hear most Palestinians just want to live in peace and go to work and raise kids etc.  So, IF that is true (I do not believe it to be) then why or how could another Hamas type group emerge in a post Hamas Gaza?  Israel is going to shred Hamas including both people and weapons.  It will be effectively destroyed.  

So if we assume that post Hamas Gaza gets vast international aid to rebuild their territory and some sort of international police force is present in Gaza during the rebuilding, how would a new Hamas get a foothold there?  The only way would be if there really are a larger percentage of Gazans that are fine with killing Jews and trying to destroy Israel.  

I firmly believe that we are going to find out.  Hamas is going to be wiped out.  Gaza is going to be given an opportunity at true self determination after this conflict is over.  International aid in the billions will flow into Gaza.  If in 10 years, Gaza is living peacefully then they will be left alone by Israel.  If in 10 years another Hamas type emerges to some position of control then Israel is going to decimate the whole population.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2023 at 10:48 AM, 956 Worldwide said:

This op-ed in The Guardian is very clear eyed and scathing about Netanyahu. And I agree.  I will also say that there appears to be serious momentum and pressure on Netanyahu internally and hopefully this will spell the end of his tenure, one way or another. 
 

It is equally clear-eyed about Hamas and the need to eliminate them as a capable governing authority.  It really is adequate to compare them and their ideology to the Nazis.  Adolf Hitler was quite clear in his ideology that if Germans could not win the war, they did not deserve to exist. They were willing to sacrifice every single German to accomplish their aims and did end up with their country ruined. People need to be clear-eyed about what it means to live next door to a political entity with similar fanatical aim and outlook. 
 

 

Good read.  Just my opinion but I believe that after this conflict is resolved, Bibi will step down.  I hope so.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good read.  Just my opinion but I believe that after this conflict is resolved, Bibi will step down.  I hope so.  

Nope.
Don’t forget a very important fact: Bibi is an actual fucking criminal, and being PM is his plan to stay out of prison. He will not give up power willingly.
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2023 at 3:35 PM, Willfully Horn said:

Stolen land was stolen, was stolen, was stolen, was stolen….. 

I don’t get how anyone can draw a timeline and declare either side indigenous. Maybe I missed that explanation.

It’s always fascinating when you have an intersection of religion and geography. As a practical matter, anyone’s Promised Land did not come about from God making it happen, but from your side killing all the people who were there before you - and/or killing enough until you drove the rest of them out.  The Old Testament is pretty clear that the children of Israel committed genocide on the people who were there to get their Promised Land.(God’s command that every living person in Canaan be put to death).  It’s also clear since the crusades that people who are not Jews have been declaring it their land, and killing the people who were living there at any given time, no matter what their religion.

So how much validity to we give a claim that this is my sacred God given land? I’m often reminded of the Lakota Sioux  and the Sacred Black Hills that the white man stole.  In a lot of ways that claim is a whole lot of bullshit. The land used to belong to the Cheyenne, before the Lakota were driven out of the great lakes area and pushed west. The Cheyenne also fucked up by introducing horses to the Lakota, who eventually became so numerous that they drove the Cheyenne out of the Black Hills.  IOW, the sacred Black Hills of the Sioux we’re only the sacred Black Hills from about 1775 on.  

That said, once you claim some places your sacred land, then it is hell to pay if somebody else comes along and drove you outta there the same way you drove out the previous inhabitants.  I have no idea where the hell I’m going with this, but I just had a thought bubble about the factor of the land belonging to someone because their religion said it does.

When the smoke clears, you have the military juice to keep it or you don’t. Whether you attribute your successful military operations that took it in the first place to God or not, well, that is another matter for another day’s discussion. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Dutchrudder said:

I jdon't understand how anyone can support a "2 state solution" to this never ending fued, when we know the newly created Palestinian state would never agree to recognize Israel as a sovereign nation with normalized relations. It's a large part of the reason why every other attempt has failed, and why it won't work this time either. Israel isn't going to "Free Palestine" when they know it would just be creating another Arab nation that wants to destroy it. That new nation would immediately become (or continue to be) a pawn of neighboring Arab states as the primary location for continuing their never ending proxy war on Israel. 

Nothing has changed in the last few decades, no matter how many people die on either side, you can't force Gaza to try a progressive democracy and use diplomacy to settle issues. And I can't really blame Israel for not wanting to create a more formidable enemy out of Gaza or the West Bank by granting them nation status. So I think this military operation will continue until they are satisfied, but it will "end" with most of Gaza occupied by the IDF, and it will become their Iraq-like quagmire. Their troops will be attacked periodically, some will die in IED blasts, and they will continue to use the never ending sporadic attacks as justification for their military presence forever and ever. 

 

I agree with those who believe the hope of any lasting peace in the region exists in a two state solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gatorubet said:

It’s always fascinating when you have an intersection of religion and geography. As a practical matter, anyone’s Promised Land did not come about from God making it happen, but from your side killing all the people who were there before you - and/or killing enough until you drove the rest of them out.  The Old Testament is pretty clear that the children of Israel committed genocide on the people who were there to get their Promised Land.(God’s command that every living person in Canaan be put to death).  It’s also clear since the crusades that people who are not Jews have been declaring it their land, and killing the people who were living there at any given time, no matter what their religion.

So how much validity to we give a claim that this is my sacred God given land? I’m often reminded of the Lakota Sioux  and the Sacred Black Hills that the white man stole.  In a lot of ways that claim is a whole lot of bullshit. The land used to belong to the Cheyenne, before the Lakota were driven out of the great lakes area and pushed west. The Cheyenne also fucked up by introducing horses to the Lakota, who eventually became so numerous that they drove the Cheyenne out of the Black Hills.  IOW, the sacred Black Hills of the Sioux we’re only the sacred Black Hills from about 1775 on.  

That said, once you claim some places your sacred land, then it is hell to pay if somebody else comes along and drove you outta there the same way you drove out the previous inhabitants.  I have no idea where the hell I’m going with this, but I just had a thought bubble about the factor of the land belonging to someone because their religion said it does.

When the smoke clears, you have the military juice to keep it or you don’t. Whether you attribute your successful military operations that took it in the first place to God or not, well, that is another matter for another day’s discussion. 

The Comanche were relative newcomers, too. Certainly, the Comanche were not (yet) indigenous to Texas when Jack C Hays convinced the other Texas Rangers to mount up, at Plum Creek, and take the fight to Buffalo Hump’s raiding party.

Just saying.

 

 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Comanche were relative newcomers, too. Certainly, the Comanche were not (yet) indigenous to Texas when Jack C Hays convinced the other Texas Rangers to mount up, at Plum Creek, and take the fight to Buffalo Hump’s raiding party.
Just saying.
The Comanche had been in Texas, 80 or 90 years before Plum Creek, but your point stands.   The fuckers lived in Colorado and New Mexico, and came south in the 1700s.    Why was the territory of Comancheria so large? Because those deadly fuckers killed anyone who disagreed with them. With the passage of 100 years it was now their ancestral homeland. 
Then Rangers like Hayes and soldiers like Col. Ranald McKenzie said it wasn’t. 
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Brisketexan said:


Nope.
Don’t forget a very important fact: Bibi is an actual fucking criminal, and being PM is his plan to stay out of prison. He will not give up power willingly.

He'll be out soon or soonish. He's lost too much support among the Knesset. Israelis seem to have realized, albeit belatedly, that his negligent policies opened the door for Hamas' invasion. Maybe he'll try to pull a Trump and stay illegally as PM. I don't think he can get away with that and even as PM he's not in charge of fighting the war.

Also Brisket while I have your attention I enjoyed your pics and photos in the Estonia/Sweden/Finland thread. I purchased a flight yesterday into Krakow in late June, from which we'll make our way up to Tallinn. The wife has a meeting and conference to attend with the Mindvalley U folks. I was surprised there was only one Tallinn thread on this board but you covered it extremely well.

Edited by Chopper
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Satchel said:

In a just released statement, Bibi gives special thanks to Brandon for improving the terms of the pause and the fate of the hostages.

Left unsaid is that if it hadn’t been for the Biden administration’s involvement, Netanyahu likely wouldn’t have negotiated for the release of any hostages at all.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Left unsaid is that if it hadn’t been for the Biden administration’s involvement, Netanyahu likely wouldn’t have negotiated for the release of any hostages at all.

True. It’s times like these that require seasoned, skilled diplomats who know what they’re doing, even in the midst of seemingly intractable problems

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

Left unsaid is that if it hadn’t been for the Biden administration’s involvement, Netanyahu likely wouldn’t have negotiated for the release of any hostages at all.

Not sure that is accurate. From what I read today, the pressure was ratcheted up internally and from Israeli's to negotiate something after it came out he rejected a negotiation earlier. I think it would have happened regardless, but maybe not as good as terms without Biden's involvement as the original poster said.

https://apnews.com/article/israel-hamas-hostages-families-protest-war-netanyahu-9846d568b3021582b5c588e28850cbea?

Quote

 

The apparent benefits of the deal likely outweigh the downsides.

For Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu, domestic pressure to bring home the hostages has reached new highs (especially with reports that he turned down earlier hostage deals), and 

For Hamas, holding women and children hostage has gained it little (and it’ll still hold another ~190 hostages).

The other thing to keep in mind is that Israel and Hamas aren’t the only interested parties here. US President Biden has faced growing calls (both from inside his administration and beyond) to use US diplomatic muscle to pressure Israel into hitting pause. 

And more than half the ~240 hostages held by Hamas have foreign passports from 26 countries, meaning their home governments (including the US, France, Germany, Argentina, and more) have a direct stake in this.

 

 

Edited by BeardIP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Satchel said:

True. It’s times like these that require seasoned, skilled diplomats who know what they’re doing, even in the midst of seemingly intractable problems

The Embassy, who rarely gets credit, pulls off policy. Presidents and their cabinets just announce it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a really great read on the conflict and the failure of the Oslo Accords. It's an interview with 3 Israelis, 3 Palestinians, and 1 American about many of the issues and background. The link I'm providing is "gifted" instead of a copy/paste job because of the length and footnotes providing context.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/11/20/magazine/israel-gaza-oslo-accords.html?unlocked_article_code=1.AU0.oq9R.PBpkrIDkAAw5&smid=url-share

 

Here's the panel and their backgrounds:

Omar Dajani is a professor at the McGeorge School of Law at the University of the Pacific. From 1999 to 2001, he served as a legal adviser to the Palestinian negotiating team in peace talks with Israel, participating in the summits at Camp David and Taba. He currently sits on the board of A Land for All, an Israeli-Palestinian peace group.

Dana El Kurd is an assistant professor at the University of Richmond and author of ‘‘Polarized and Demobilized: Legacies of Authoritarianism in Palestine.’’ She is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Arab Center Washington D.C.

Efraim Inbar is president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security and head of the program in strategy, diplomacy and security at Shalem College in Jerusalem. He was a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University and the founding director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. He is the author of ‘‘Rabin and Israel’s National Security,’’ published in 1999.

Daniel Kurtzer was the United States ambassador to Egypt from 1997 to 2001 and the ambassador to Israel from 2001 to 2005. He is a professor at Princeton University’s School of Public and International Affairs.

Avishai Margalit is a professor emeritus at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He was the George Kennan Professor at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton from 2006 to 2011. He is a member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities and a senior research fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute.

Khalil Shikaki is a professor of political science, director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research in Ramallah and a senior fellow at the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University. Since 1993, he has conducted more than 200 polls among Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and, since 2000, dozens of joint polls among Palestinians and Israelis.

Limor Yehuda is a lecturer at the faculty of law at the Hebrew University and a research fellow at Haifa University and the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. She is also the author of the recent book ‘‘Collective Equality: Democracy and Human Rights in Ethno-National Conflicts’’ and a founder of the Israeli-Palestinian peace group A Land for All.

Emily Bazelon, a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine, moderated the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bolverk said:

This is a really great read on the conflict and the failure of the Oslo Accords. It's an interview with 3 Israelis, 3 Palestinians, and 1 American about many of the issues and background. The link I'm providing is "gifted" instead of a copy/paste job because of the length and footnotes providing context.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/11/20/magazine/israel-gaza-oslo-accords.html?unlocked_article_code=1.AU0.oq9R.PBpkrIDkAAw5&smid=url-share

 

Here's the panel and their backgrounds:

Omar Dajani is a professor at the McGeorge School of Law at the University of the Pacific. From 1999 to 2001, he served as a legal adviser to the Palestinian negotiating team in peace talks with Israel, participating in the summits at Camp David and Taba. He currently sits on the board of A Land for All, an Israeli-Palestinian peace group.

Dana El Kurd is an assistant professor at the University of Richmond and author of ‘‘Polarized and Demobilized: Legacies of Authoritarianism in Palestine.’’ She is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Arab Center Washington D.C.

Efraim Inbar is president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security and head of the program in strategy, diplomacy and security at Shalem College in Jerusalem. He was a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University and the founding director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. He is the author of ‘‘Rabin and Israel’s National Security,’’ published in 1999.

Daniel Kurtzer was the United States ambassador to Egypt from 1997 to 2001 and the ambassador to Israel from 2001 to 2005. He is a professor at Princeton University’s School of Public and International Affairs.

Avishai Margalit is a professor emeritus at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He was the George Kennan Professor at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton from 2006 to 2011. He is a member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities and a senior research fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute.

Khalil Shikaki is a professor of political science, director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research in Ramallah and a senior fellow at the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University. Since 1993, he has conducted more than 200 polls among Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and, since 2000, dozens of joint polls among Palestinians and Israelis.

Limor Yehuda is a lecturer at the faculty of law at the Hebrew University and a research fellow at Haifa University and the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. She is also the author of the recent book ‘‘Collective Equality: Democracy and Human Rights in Ethno-National Conflicts’’ and a founder of the Israeli-Palestinian peace group A Land for All.

Emily Bazelon, a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine, moderated the discussion.

Fuck them. 

And fuck Israel. And fuck Palestine.

Take what you can. It's as it always was, and what it will ever be. If you can't hold it, fuck you. You, Israel, and your 400B in aid from the US and you can't protect your borders? Fuck you. Seriously, fuck you for not protecting yoreself. Fuck jewish legislators for bleeding the US for Israeli Kibbutz Nirvana. Fuck us all. But Mostly you. 

 

$400, 000, 000 Billion dollars in aid to Israel equals ≈ $1,142.8571M PER PERSON IN THE US.

That's a million dollars + for every US citizen alive (kids too), spent to subsidize israel. Not to mention our own resources, ships, inteligence and blood...seriously, fuck them. Fuck SA, Jordan, AE - All of them - all of them and their god-granted bullshit. 

The US is so wealthy it doesn't realize it, but they spend more money on Israel than it does on it's own Elderly. Seriously, fuck semites. Arabls. Aztecs. Whatever. NOT OUT PROBLEM. NOT OUR PROBLEM. Everyone wants the US to go away? GREAT. Egypt, you don't get 3B a year. Jordan, you don't get 2B a year. Turkey...hate us? No more 2B a year. SERIOUSLY, FUCK THESE PEOPLE. 

uck you, Christians, jews, and you too Islam. All of you. Fuck you. I don't give a shit about any of your god in the sky virgin redemption theories. Israel doesn't deserve our money and Palestine doesn't deserve our tears. Fuck your death by religion, both of you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll quote myself and say the US spends well over 50 billion dollars a year in foreign aid. Fuck them. China can have its hemisphere...and fucking Iran and russia too. Good luck.

If Germany and GB don't care about Russian aggressions, fuck them. The hard truth is none of our enemies can hurt us. Our economy is bigger than all of theirs combined.

The US is not the world police. We're not the world's fall-guy. Or bad guy. Also fuck you if your country gets fucked and you happen to live in the US.

NOT OUR PROBLEM.

Move back and take a gun. Fight for Palestine. Or Mongolia. Israel...Carthaginian rights in north Africa. THE US DOESN'T OWE YOU SHIT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...