Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, 'stache said:

but nothing to establish that they had sex with minors.

Possibly important to add "beyond a reasonable doubt."  There's probably oodles of stuff in there that heavily implicates Trump and others, maybe, probably even making it more likely than not that they abused minors with Epstein.

But that's not the burden of proof in a criminal case and if as a prosecutor you don't in pretty good faith believe the evidence can establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, its pretty close to unethical to indict on it.

And once the authorities decide not to indict, all that evidence in the normal case gets deep sixed and it stays there in perpetuity.

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

This stuff is extremely stage managed and this Admin, more than perhaps any other, is EXTREMELY cautious about the use of symbols and signaling around the President. 
 

DOJ and the FBI have press rooms and places for photo-ops.  Nothing is ever done at the White House without the explicit aim to show direct presidential support and direction. 

Is it possible that Bondi and these other "QMAGAts" got over their skis with this and didn't really have Trump's permiso?

Of course, it would be pure MAGAt of them not to realize that this shit is bad for the boss pretty much any way you slice it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

There's probably oodles of stuff in there that heavily implicates Trump and others, maybe, probably even making it more likely than not that they abused minors with Epstein.

But that's not the burden of proof in a criminal case

Which, according to DOJ standards, wouldn’t matter anyway if the target of investigation was the president. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Is it possible that Bondi and these other "QMAGAts" got over their skis with this and didn't really have Trump's permiso?

Of course, it would be pure MAGAt of them not to realize that this shit is bad for the boss pretty much any way you slice it.

No. Categorically no. No one uses the West Wing without going through Susie. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...