Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

He fired directly at a windowless ICE van and into the ICE facility.  In what way is this not a direct attack against ICE?  That he was too much of an idiot and hit detainees instead speaks to unprepared he was.  

Or was the plan to wait until people were apprehended, then wait outside of the facility with a rifle and then carefully try and take them out as they were walked to the vehicle and perfectly time the entire thing?

tumblr_oi3xq4iTok1qmob6ro1_400.gif

  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Don Johnson said:

I used to think tigerdroppings.com was the epicenter of SEC message board conspiracy theories, but I think you guys are passing them up.  Impressive. 

Buying any narrative from this executive branch is foolhardy.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:

Third recent shooting at ICE agents in Texas alone.

This comes right after the Charlie Kirk assassination two weeks ago.

It follows the leftists attack on the Sacramento ABC station.

It follows the leftists attack on the wedding in Connecticut.

It follows the ongoing attacks against any memorials for Charlie Kirk.

It's been a busy couple of weeks for you guys.

  Hide contents
Date Incident Description Source
September 10 Assassination of Charlie Kirk Right-wing activist Charlie Kirk was fatally shot during a speech at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Suspect Tyler Robinson (22) texted a roommate about being "fed up" with Kirk's "hatred," citing anti-right views; charged with murder, prosecutors seeking death penalty. Trump administration attributes to "radical left" rhetoric, though motive classification is ongoing. , ,
September 20–21 (approx.) Dallas ICE Facility Shooting A gunman opened fire at a Dallas ICE detention center, wounding three detainees (two fatally). Suspect linked to anti-ICE activism and far-left anti-deportation views; no ICE agents hit, but attack targeted the facility amid heightened immigration enforcement. Officials call it domestic terrorism. [post:42], [post:53], [post:55], [post:68]
September 21 "Free Palestine" Country Club Shooting Shooter motivated by pro-Palestine extremism attacked a country club event (possibly tied to a wedding or gathering), yelling slogans during the assault. One killed, several wounded; suspect's online history shows far-left radicalization against perceived "Zionist" targets. [post:78], [post:82], [post:86]
September 22 ABC Studio Attack Attempt Suspect attempted to bomb an ABC news van and fired at the station, citing response to Jimmy Kimmel's commentary on Gaza/Israel; confirmed as retaliation by far-left partisan motives. No fatalities, but part of a pattern of media-targeted extremism. [post:78], [post:82]
September 15–20 (ongoing threats post-Kirk) Vandalism and Threats at Kirk Memorials/Vigils Multiple acts: Defacement of Kirk murals, harassment/interruption of vigils (e.g., in Seattle), physical assault on a Utah state lawmaker supporting Kirk, and an attempted incendiary attack on a conservative Utah news outlet. Perpetrators linked to anarchist/Antifa networks celebrating Kirk's death online. [post:88], [post:93]

 

Reap the whirlwind.

According to Jesus Kirk, some gun violence is an acceptable cost for the right to bear arms against tyranny.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Reap the whirlwind.

As of the last election, polling showed 70% support for deporting "all of them". This is another 80/20 issue and you are on the minority side of things. Did you know that Trump won 12 of the 14 Texas counties that border Mexico? Your side is going to FAFO themselves into Bolivia.

I may be wrong, but I just don't think the public is going to broadly support mass killings.

Edited by Thetexashammer
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Fuck You 4
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Electoral popularity, especially among the stupidest Americans, does not make a policy right.  If that puts me in the minority, fine.

And, maybe now that people have seen what this actually means, we're not such a minority anymore. https://apnews.com/article/immigration-polling-trump-deportation-d138992f803e2d0b5b399aa9eaa36581

Have an administration of violence and inhumanity, reap.

Indeed. I disagree strongly with your preference for violence. It seems morally wrong and designed to terrorize the people. 

Edited by Thetexashammer
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Fuck You 11
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:

Indeed. I disagree strongly with your preference for violence. It seems morally wrong.

I don't have a preference for violence. But when an administration is violent and lawless, that seems to be a natural result from the populace.

I would rather the administration not be violent, lawless, and hateful ab initio.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 8
Posted
16 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:

As of the last election, polling showed 70% support for deporting "all of them". This is another 80/20 issue and you are on the minority side of things. Did you know that Trump won 12 of the 14 Texas counties that border Mexico? Your side is going to FAFO themselves into Bolivia.

I may be wrong, but I just don't think the public is going to broadly support mass killings.

No politics in DT!

  • Haha 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Electoral popularity, especially among the stupidest Americans, does not make a policy right.  If that puts me in the minority, fine.

And, maybe now that people have seen what this actually means, we're not such a minority anymore. https://apnews.com/article/immigration-polling-trump-deportation-d138992f803e2d0b5b399aa9eaa36581

Have an administration of violence and inhumanity, reap.

Man, that chart is pretty interesting. Steady 2/3 support for immigration, going back 20 years, and then all of a sudden it plummets among a certain cohort in the build-up to the election, and then boom. It bounces back to historical norms. It's almost as if pounding away at a single message demonizing immigrants to a captive, racist, and under-educated audience that's in the thralls of its favorite propaganda channel actually works. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
5 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:

As of the last election, polling showed 70% support for deporting "all of them". This is another 80/20 issue and you are on the minority side of things. Did you know that Trump won 12 of the 14 Texas counties that border Mexico? Your side is going to FAFO themselves into Bolivia.

I may be wrong, but I just don't think the public is going to broadly support mass killings.

It’s also important to remember that demographics was destiny to their side up until about 5 minutes ago. They’re lazy and dumb for the most part. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 11
Posted
3 hours ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Or….Americans didn’t appreciate being gaslit the last four years about the border being secure

He signed an EO in June of ‘24. He couldn’t have cared less even if he tried. 

  • Fuck You 12
Posted

This guy has been here since he was 4 years old, he has a visa application in process and he's working as a firefighter.  What are we even trying to accomplish by harassing people like this?  It's crazy.

 

 

  • Rage+1 5
Posted
3 minutes ago, fuggled said:

This guy has been here since he was 4 years old, he has a visa application in process and he's working as a firefighter.  What are we even trying to accomplish by harassing people like this?  It's crazy.

 

 

Doing it right.

Earning a living.

Serving the country and community at large.

BUT....dirty messikan.  Don't think that this purge is about anything but this last point.  The lie of "no, we're just against illegals" has already been proven.  The lie about "we just want em to do the right thing" has been proven.  The lie of "we're going after criminals" has been proven.  The lie of "we're going after freeloaders" has been proven.

It's all lies.  The only truth is "we need to purge our society of non-whites."  That's it.  That's the whole thing.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Rage+1 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, fuggled said:

This guy has been here since he was 4 years old, he has a visa application in process and he's working as a firefighter.  What are we even trying to accomplish by harassing people like this?  It's crazy.

 

 

Dude, we have to rid the country of all these criminals that have made our cities look like Kabul. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

Doing it right.

Earning a living.

Serving the country and community at large.

BUT....dirty messikan.  Don't think that this purge is about anything but this last point.  The lie of "no, we're just against illegals" has already been proven.  The lie about "we just want em to do the right thing" has been proven.  The lie of "we're going after criminals" has been proven.  The lie of "we're going after freeloaders" has been proven.

It's all lies.  The only truth is "we need to purge our society of non-whites."  That's it.  That's the whole thing.

It does, however, appear that stories like these are having an effect on those who bought the crimmigrant narrative.

Posted
2 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

It does, however, appear that stories like these are having an effect on those who bought the crimmigrant narrative.

No they're not.  And here's why: the "crimmigrant" narrative didn't actually matter on the substance.  It never did.  It had only one purpose: cover.  "I don't hate him and want him gone, and gleefully smile when I see him slammed to the ground, bleeding because he's messikan....I feel all those things because he's a criminal!"  No, they loved all those things EXACTLY because he's a dirty messikan, who is -- in the words of the President of the fucking United States -- "poisoning the blood of our country."  It's all just blood and soil bullshit, everything else is a cover for that.

Everyone who voted for this shit is happy with this story, because it accomplishes the thing they actually like and want: fuck up a dirty messikan.

Stop attributing any decency to the people who voted on "we gotsta be strong on immigration." They know why they voted that way.  We know why they voted that way.  They don't cringe when they see a brown person - whether or not they are a criminal, whether or not they are even here without proper documentation - thrown to the ground, cuffed, and roughly shoved into the back of a van to be disappeared....THEY SMILE.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
Just now, Chopper said:

Is the administration a bunch of nazis?

YOU CANT SAY THAT

They get so upset when you call a spade a spade

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted

What a difference four years make...

Quote

“The deteriorative condition within Venezuela, which presents an ongoing national security threat to the safety and well-being of the American people, warrants the deferral of the removal of Venezuelan nationals who are present in the United States,” Trump said in a memorandum released Tuesday.

Trump grants Venezuelans temporary legal status on his way out - POLITICO

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
On 9/26/2025 at 10:55 AM, TwiceHorn said:

It does, however, appear that stories like these are having an effect on those who bought the crimmigrant narrative.

I smile very hard when I read posts like this one. I will allow that you are an exception to the rule. However, as a rule, who would want to engage in people whose only response to facts is to try and get you banned from the site, and to call you nazi/fascist/racist? As a group, your team's behavior is vile and childish. Your behavior is, collectively, that of emotionally damaged children.  

It is peak delusion - screaming, insulting, and churlishly neg-repping, then wondering why nobody likes them.

Edited by Thetexashammer
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

So drop 600,000 humans into a country a lot think you are going to invade? Yeah..... 

The article is dated the day before he left office in 2021.   Wanna bet he extended status because he hoped some of them were gang members and hooligans?

Posted
58 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:

I smile very hard when I read posts like this one. I will allow that you are an exception to the rule. However, as a rule, who would want to engage in people whose only response to facts is to try and get you banned from the site, and to call you nazi/fascist/racist? As a group, your team's behavior is vile and childish. Your behavior is, collectively, that of emotionally damaged children.  

It is peak delusion - screaming, insulting, and churlishly neg-repping, then wondering why nobody likes them.

You get called a fascist and racist because you cheer on fascist and racist policies and acts of violence against your fellow man. This shit is straight out of Kristallnacht

https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agents-dragged-naked-children-out-homes-chicago-raid-10823150

Ebony Sweets Watson, who lives across the street from the building, told WBEZ Chicago that she saw federal agents dragging residents, including children, out of the building without clothes and loading them into U-Haul vans. She said the children were separated from their mothers.

Watson says she observed what appeared to be “hundreds” of agents outside her home.

“It was heartbreaking to watch,” Watson told the news station. “Even if you’re not a mother, seeing kids coming out buck naked and taken from their mothers, it was horrible.”

“Stuff was everywhere,” Watson told WBEZ. “You could see people’s birth certificates and papers thrown all over. Water was leaking into the hallway. It was wicked crazy.”

Pertissue Fisher, a woman who lives in the building, told CBS News Chicago: "No shoes, the kids didn't have no shirts or no pants on. They just treated us like we were nothing."

  • Rage+1 5
Posted
1 hour ago, Thetexashammer said:

I smile very hard when I read posts like this one. I will allow that you are an exception to the rule. However, as a rule, who would want to engage in people whose only response to facts is to try and get you banned from the site, and to call you nazi/fascist/racist? As a group, your team's behavior is vile and childish. Your behavior is, collectively, that of emotionally damaged children.  

It is peak delusion - screaming, insulting, and churlishly neg-repping, then wondering why nobody likes them.

Not sure what your point is here.

But to you and brisket, there have been a number of instances of people on record saying things to the effect of "I thought he was just deporting the criminals," notably from a goodly number of Latin-Americans, and expressing dismay at ICE tactics and the deportation of non-criminal immigrants.

For the MAGAts, there's almost no question it's cover for racism.  But Democrats lost some non-MAGAt votes to people who were concerned about immigration and seem to have bought the notion that a large percentage of immigrants are criminals.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Thetexashammer said:

I smile very hard when I read posts like this one. I will allow that you are an exception to the rule. However, as a rule, who would want to engage in people whose only response to facts is to try and get you banned from the site, and to call you nazi/fascist/racist? As a group, your team's behavior is vile and childish. Your behavior is, collectively, that of emotionally damaged children.  

It is peak delusion - screaming, insulting, and churlishly neg-repping, then wondering why nobody likes them.

Funny, your post is devoid of relevant fact. What point are you trying to make where the supporting facts you have yet to cite that are being ignored?

Do you deny that asylum seekers are being denied asylum, and then are being detained and scheduled for deportation? Do you deny that green card holders are being detained for deportation? Do you deny that children are being detained, separated from their parents, and whose status is hidden from the light of day? What about adults who entered this country as children? Do you hide behind the specious accusation that all of these humans are criminals?

Edited by Willfully Horn
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Thetexashammer said:

I smile very hard when I read posts like this one. I will allow that you are an exception to the rule. However, as a rule, who would want to engage in people whose only response to facts is to try and get you banned from the site, and to call you nazi/fascist/racist? As a group, your team's behavior is vile and childish. Your behavior is, collectively, that of emotionally damaged children.  

It is peak delusion - screaming, insulting, and churlishly neg-repping, then wondering why nobody likes them.

Do you need a mirror? This is the least self aware post you have ever made. Amazing.

Posted
1 hour ago, Macanudo said:

The article is dated the day before he left office in 2021.   Wanna bet he extended status because he hoped some of them were gang members and hooligans?

Sorry Sir. I saw the headline earlier than the post. So only 300K. And this is 5 hours or so old. 

The Supreme Court on Friday for a second time allowed President Donald Trump to strip temporary deportation protections from 300,000 Venezuelans, handing the administration another win in its effort to rapidly remove non-citizens from the United States.

In a brief order, and over the dissent of the court’s three liberals, a majority of the justices ruled that the administration could move forward with its plans to end a form of humanitarian relief known as Temporary Protected Status for the Venezuelans – a move that will make them more vulnerable to deportation.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/03/politics/supreme-court-tps-venezuela

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

Not sure what your point is here.

But to you and brisket, there have been a number of instances of people on record saying things to the effect of "I thought he was just deporting the criminals," notably from a goodly number of Latin-Americans, and expressing dismay at ICE tactics and the deportation of non-criminal immigrants.

For the MAGAts, there's almost no question it's cover for racism.  But Democrats lost some non-MAGAt votes to people who were concerned about immigration and seem to have bought the notion that a large percentage of immigrants are criminals.

There are roughly 200 countries in the world. I might be wrong, but damn near 200 countries have border enforcement. It is normal, ordinary course of business function of government. There are not 200 fascist countries in the world. Border enforcement is a basic function of all governments. 

Further, the policy is entirely race neutral. The civil rights act of 1965 eliminated Jim Crow. It made (superfluously, but whatever) discrimination of the basis of race illegal. There is absolutely nothing about the enforcement actions that is racist. It is not possible. If the law is racist, you or someone should identify the racist part of the laws, and have them overturned. I am told there are no such efforts underway.

If you think people in general are racist, that is a CULTURAL issue. It has nothing to do with enforcing laws that have been on the books for decades.

And I want to repeat it, because you can't explain it. Trump won 12 of 14 Texas border counties in the last election. It's a curious form of racism that dominates on the border. Maybe you can explain it.

Edited by Thetexashammer

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...