Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

I was looking at the roster on Texaslonghorns.com 

I had not seen a pic of our punter. He um... looks like a very experienced punter. Zero hate, just taken back.

resize.webp.07ac430c6f641327367ed6c6ab4bdf03.webp

Pretty sure he's one of those old ass Australian Rules football guys that they converted at their academy. He looks 35 here though. Damn.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, closetojumping said:

I don't disagree. but we worried about this last year as well. There's definitely going to be attrition every year from here forward that hurts because the roster is simply loaded. I see risk on youth at WR and at TE, depth at QB, RB and in the secondary all being factors. That said, they have a process for managing it all, and money to help. The scouts they have covering the portal have also shown that they are top notch. Sarkisian got to learn under the roster retention master in Saban. Keep putting 10+ guys into the league every year and more players will wait their turn than they would virtually anywhere else. 

I may be a chick but I'm not a sandy vagina. I was not worried last year and thought to the hand wringers --> insert michael keeton jack off gif. I'm also not worried this next year, you can't be so fucking loaded that you add from the portal, add from NSD and then have no attrition of "good" players. it's just not possible.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

I was looking at the roster on Texaslonghorns.com 

I had not seen a pic of our punter. He um... looks like a very experienced punter. Zero hate, just taken back.

resize.webp.07ac430c6f641327367ed6c6ab4bdf03.webp

this is what you want in a punter. dude has been roughed up a bit, kicked in the teeth even (no pun in tended). he ain't scared. shit he's got a lil gangsta in him with that smile saying come at me bro, I'll fuck your shit up. i like it.

Edited by troph
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

Pretty sure he's one of those old ass Australian Rules football guys that they converted at their academy. He looks 35 here though. Damn.

We should have a pipeline to the aussies and get a new one every 3-4 years. 

Posted
Just now, troph said:

I may be a chick but I'm not a sandy vagina. I was not worried last year and thought to the hand wringers --> insert michael keeton jack off gif. I'm also not worried this next year, you can't be so fucking loaded that you add from the portal, add from NSD and then have no attrition of "good" players. it's just not possible.

If you could see how the sausage was being made in the last cycle, you'd have been plenty worried. It's just best to remember that multiple dudes will be putting a gun to the program's head in December, no matter much we all may like them as fans. Moore, Muhammad and Niblack all got way out over their skis in the last cycle and we could very well be looking at all 3 on other rosters.

We don't care and kind of laugh at Niblack's deal, but playing chicken with the other two luckily wound up in Texas' favor with Muhammad and broke some spirit with Moore. Neither would have been good losses. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

We should have a pipeline to the aussies and get a new one every 3-4 years. 

Apparently they need at least 1 year to get used to the ball spinning clockwise or something so they don’t do stupid shit like drop it or shank it. Better get a new one every 2 years so we can break them in just in case. 

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

If you could see how the sausage was being made in the last cycle, you'd have been plenty worried. It's just best to remember that multiple dudes will be putting a gun to the program's head in December, no matter much we all may like them as fans. Moore, Muhammad and Niblack all got way out over their skis in the last cycle and we could very well be looking at all 3 on other rosters.

We don't care and kind of laugh at Niblack's deal, but playing chicken with the other two luckily wound up in Texas' favor with Muhammad and broke some spirit with Moore. Neither would have been good losses. 

fair enough. from the cheap seats it looks like we will win more than we lose and be net benefactors from this system with the money all out in the open and above the table. salary cap type shit - the stuff Mack Brown has been talking about - is what will worry me, because that means the bag game comes back to be a differentiator without even the faux police force (NCAA) to scare folks, unless a new armed governing body takes over and there are real penalties for cheating.

Edited by troph
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

We should have a pipeline to the aussies and get a new one every 3-4 years. 

Don't tell that to @Helobious. He's going to fuck your take up, bro. 

In truth, I think the last 2 Aussie punters that Texas had didn't work out. Pearson has become really good at SMU, if memory serves, but he never kicked at Texas. I can't remember the other dude's name but it was like Polish or something and he punted for us for a year, poorly. I don't know where he went from Austin, however. 

I'm a bigger proponent of chickenhawking proven FBS punters into and through the portal. Worked with the Stanford dude and returns on the new guy are positive. But, apparently Banks disagrees, as we have some high schooler teed up to be here next season again.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, troph said:

fair enough. from the cheap seats it looks like we will win more than we lose and be net benefactors from this system with the money all out in the open and above the table. salary cap type shit - the stuff Mack Brown has been talking about - is what will worry me, because that means the bag game comes back to be a differentiator without even the faux police force (NCAA) to scare folks, unless a new armed governing body takes over and there are real penalties for cheating.

I wouldn't worry about the bag game. It will always show up in the dumbest of recruitments even today, sure. That said, the monetary requirements have elevated to heights that make it largely irrelevant. LSU, Bama, Georgia, OU, Clemson, etc., these are all programs that are going to repeatedly struggle to hit their nut on the revshare side to begin with, so boosters will be tapped and fatigued. We're seeing that already. $800k used to win a recruiting cycle for Bama or LSU. That seems quaint now. 

The bigger thing to worry about is when a program with plenty of money starts pushing large sums above the $20.5 revshare allotment into the payrolls and acting like that's not what they're doing. A limited number of programs could do that, but the most obvious one to go there and be fucktards about it sits 90 miles east of Austin.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, troph said:

fair enough. from the cheap seats it looks like we will win more than we lose and be net benefactors from this system with the money all out in the open and above the table. salary cap type shit - the stuff Mack Brown has been talking about - is what will worry me, because that means the bag game comes back to be a differentiator without even the faux police force (NCAA) to scare folks, unless a new armed governing body takes over and there are real penalties for cheating.

I might make the suggestion you stop listening to anything Mack Brown has to say.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Bodacious Bevo said:

Bobby this morning 

  Hide contents

 

DT Maraad Watson - When I say that folks inside the building are extremely high on Watson, there are no two ways about it. Watson is seen as a real steal. He is expected to be a rotational starter and has opened eyes all camp long. He is a very good athlete for his size. I’m not sure Texas would trade the tandem of Watson and Alex January with any sophomore duo in the country.

 

 

No Way Jose! BlowU has by far the best DT tandem in the country and it's not even close. I know for sure about that because I read it on gooner goop.

Posted
7 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

I wouldn't worry about the bag game. It will always show up in the dumbest of recruitments even today, sure. That said, the monetary requirements have elevated to heights that make it largely irrelevant. LSU, Bama, Georgia, OU, Clemson, etc., these are all programs that are going to repeatedly struggle to hit their nut on the revshare side to begin with, so boosters will be tapped and fatigued. We're seeing that already. $800k used to win a recruiting cycle for Bama or LSU. That seems quaint now. 

The bigger thing to worry about is when a program with plenty of money starts pushing large sums above the $20.5 revshare allotment into the payrolls and acting like that's not what they're doing. A limited number of programs could do that, but the most obvious one to go there and be fucktards about it sits 90 miles east of Austin.

How are you guys (meaning folks involved with allocating dollars for players) discussing what Cody and Tech are doing right now?

Posted
4 minutes ago, babysdaddy said:

How are you guys (meaning folks involved with allocating dollars for players) discussing what Cody and Tech are doing right now?

I'm mostly out of the loop on details as they've developed their ways of working internally. Sometimes during peak nonsense periods, you hear a lot. I know from one conversation recently that Tech is absolutely on the radar and one bit of intel folks have picked up is that they're basically forming like 100 LLCs that can each pay players $4899 for NIL as an apparatus for just avoiding the clearinghouse in general. Sounds absurd and complicated, but, hey, it's their problem to manage and sell to the roster/recruits.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
46 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

I was looking at the roster on Texaslonghorns.com 

I had not seen a pic of our punter. He um... looks like a very experienced punter. Zero hate, just taken back.

resize.webp.07ac430c6f641327367ed6c6ab4bdf03.webp

homer simpson GIF

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

I wouldn't worry about the bag game. It will always show up in the dumbest of recruitments even today, sure. That said, the monetary requirements have elevated to heights that make it largely irrelevant. LSU, Bama, Georgia, OU, Clemson, etc., these are all programs that are going to repeatedly struggle to hit their nut on the revshare side to begin with, so boosters will be tapped and fatigued. We're seeing that already. $800k used to win a recruiting cycle for Bama or LSU. That seems quaint now. 

The bigger thing to worry about is when a program with plenty of money starts pushing large sums above the $20.5 revshare allotment into the payrolls and acting like that's not what they're doing. A limited number of programs could do that, but the most obvious one to go there and be fucktards about it sits 90 miles east of Austin.

and a team we play first week of the season i'd think.

 

good info, i don't spend a lot of time thinking about the financing of college football teams, in a parallel universe I might go all in and want to be on the team but the universe i'm in it's a passing interest and other things tickle my strategic finance itch. but it's good to roll down the bowling alley with bumpers and learn a bit more this morning. thanks.

Edited by troph
Posted
41 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

Pretty sure he's one of those old ass Australian Rules football guys that they converted at their academy. He looks 35 here though. Damn.

 

23 minutes ago, TrashMaster G said:

Dude looks like a 35 year-old firefighter.

That's what the standard Australian 17 year old male looks like. That's what happens when your youth is predominantly spent in some combination of drinking/boxing kangaroos/surfing/drinking/dingo wrasslin'. Honesty, this guy looks pretty fucking young for 24 by Australian standards.

Fortunately for us the women age much better. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

 

That's what the standard Australian 17 year old male looks like. That's what happens when your youth is predominantly spent in some combination of drinking/boxing kangaroos/surfing/drinking/dingo wrasslin'. Honesty, this guy looks pretty fucking young for 24 by Australian standards.

Fortunately for us the women age much better. 

it's well known, all the animals in australia are venomous and prey on humans.

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

I'm mostly out of the loop on details as they've developed their ways of working internally. Sometimes during peak nonsense periods, you hear a lot. I know from one conversation recently that Tech is absolutely on the radar and one bit of intel folks have picked up is that they're basically forming like 100 LLCs that can each pay players $4899 for NIL as an apparatus for just avoiding the clearinghouse in general. Sounds absurd and complicated, but, hey, it's their problem to manage and sell to the roster/recruits.

100 LLCs sounds like a fucking gun shot to the head. especially if/when the rules foreclose these asinine stupid loopholes.

Edited by troph
Posted
1 minute ago, troph said:

100 LLCs sounds like a fucking gun shot to the head. especially if/when the rules foreclose these asinine stupid loopholes.

I wouldn't hold my breath for that. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
35 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

I might make the suggestion you stop listening to anything Mack Brown has to say.

he had way too much press on his way out from UNC back to Austin. btw, he reminds me of my dad, so believe me, I do everything I can to avoid looking at or listening to Mack.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Bodacious Bevo said:

And Bouwmeester could be a real difference maker as well

Must be referring to entertaining the guys with captivating tales of didgeridoos and dingoes, 'cuz we won't ever need to punt.

  • Haha 4
Posted

In past years, it was much more confusing with different sites having very different takes on practice reports. Sure, some may have been clickbait but before, it became a worry. This year it seems to be not enough positions for the players deserving playing time. And that’s one good problem to have. My NFL team is the chiefs and it’s amazing how similar the teams are. If we can just protect the QB, give him time and open up some holes in the running game, the sky is the limit. My only concern, minus the OL, is a weird one but it’s kind of been our bugaboo and that’s having a lead going into the 3rd/4th and not keeping the distance or extending it. I hope we can get back to some blowouts and limit the heart attacks we’ve all suffered the last 10+ years. 

Posted
1 hour ago, RockyMountainHighHorn said:

In past years, it was much more confusing with different sites having very different takes on practice reports. Sure, some may have been clickbait but before, it became a worry. This year it seems to be not enough positions for the players deserving playing time. And that’s one good problem to have. My NFL team is the chiefs and it’s amazing how similar the teams are. If we can just protect the QB, give him time and open up some holes in the running game, the sky is the limit. My only concern, minus the OL, is a weird one but it’s kind of been our bugaboo and that’s having a lead going into the 3rd/4th and not keeping the distance or extending it. I hope we can get back to some blowouts and limit the heart attacks we’ve all suffered the last 10+ years. 

To build on this, we've kicked ass in the first half and then stalled out in the second. It has been this way since 2021. Remember when we would build up solid leads and then watch them slip away? We got better at that in 2022, but still had the same issue and still lost games because of it. KSU in 2022 and 2023 are a good example. Then more of the same in 2024, albeit less dramatic because our defense was able to hold the line and - credit where it's due - the offense would usually do just enough in the fourth quarter to keep us up. 

I just do not understand what happens at half time. Is it a failure to adjust? Did Ewers injuries cool down and get sore, limiting him in the second half? Do we get comfortable and just play like shit with a lead? I can think of plenty of explanations but still none of them really make sense. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

Here's an odd sentence. We added a walk-on RB, formerly a LB at Stanford. 

Though the Texas Longhorns are at 85 scholarships with the elevation of Marshall Landwehr, they did make an addition at a key spot.

Stanford running back Carson Berger is listed on the Texas Longhorns’ 2025 online roster. Berger, a member of the class of 2023 out of The Woodlands (Texas) John Cooper, was part of the Cardinal’s 2023 squad. He was listed as a 6-foot-0, 216-pound linebacker by Stanford in 2023. He was not on their 2024 roster.

Texas lists Berger as a sophomore. His height and weight is 5-foot-11, 193 pounds. His bio only states “a first-year, walk-on running back who played the 2023 season at Stanford.“

He joins a room that features scholarship backs like CJ Baxter, Quintrevion Wisner, Christian Clark, Jerrick Gibson, Rickey Stewart Jr., and James Simon. Senior Colin Page is the only member of the walk-on corps in Chad Scott’s position group and is in his final year of eligibility.

Berger was a two-time SPC state champion in the 3A division that features schools like Houston Christian, Trinity Valley, Fort Worth Country Day, Oakridge, Greenhill, Cistercian, and St. Andrews. He was also the SPC linebacker of the year in 2022. Berger was selected to the Houston Chronicle’s 2022 All-Greater Houston private school team.

Walk-ons currently on the Texas roster include Carson Marshall, McCoy Bruce, Graham Gillespie, Ziky Umeozulu, Jackson Duffey, Isaiah Coleman, Tate Haver, Spencer Barnett, Brady Sarkisian, Eric Garza, Rick McBroom, Robert Sweeney, Brooks Kieschnick Jr., Gehrig Heil, Joe Tatum, Luke Dunham, Ridge Barker, Rett Andersen, Quinn Merritt, Remy Patson, Hamilton McMartin, Bryce Chambers, Hudson Powell, and Ty Boatright.

Texas continues its preseason training camp with a light practice on Friday. The Longhorns will have their first scrimmage of camp on Saturday. Stay tuned to Inside Texas for the latest details.

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
2 hours ago, SydneyCarton said:

That's what the standard Australian 17 year old male looks like. That's what happens when your youth is predominantly spent in some combination of drinking/boxing kangaroos/surfing/drinking/dingo wrasslin'. Honesty, this guy looks pretty fucking young for 24 by Australian standards.

Fortunately for us the women age much better. 

Hot Stuff Comedy GIF by Laff

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Park Gothic said:

To build on this, we've kicked ass in the first half and then stalled out in the second. It has been this way since 2021. Remember when we would build up solid leads and then watch them slip away? We got better at that in 2022, but still had the same issue and still lost games because of it. KSU in 2022 and 2023 are a good example. Then more of the same in 2024, albeit less dramatic because our defense was able to hold the line and - credit where it's due - the offense would usually do just enough in the fourth quarter to keep us up. 

I just do not understand what happens at half time. Is it a failure to adjust? Did Ewers injuries cool down and get sore, limiting him in the second half? Do we get comfortable and just play like shit with a lead? I can think of plenty of explanations but still none of them really make sense. 

I sometimes wondered how much of it was the staff being in their heads about letting leads go and turtling. The late-3Q/4Q conservatism was maddening at times. But we also didn't have a lot of consistency on explosive plays, so they were probably trying to call to our strengths. Hoping the deep ball will be the panacea to a lot this year. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I always just figured the defense would adjust to our short game and we couldn’t make them pay with the deep ball. If the opposition had some success slowing our run game down we would just stall out in the second half. Not ragging on Quinn but his lack of legs to make a play to keep a drive going in the second half forced some punts we shouldn’t have had. Hoping arch can get a few first downs with legs to keep the train rolling in second halves this year. Wear em out baby. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Hookem10 said:

I always just figured the defense would adjust to our short game and we couldn’t make them pay with the deep ball. If the opposition had some success slowing our run game down we would just stall out in the second half. Not ragging on Quinn but his lack of legs to make a play to keep a drive going in the second half forced some punts we shouldn’t have had. Hoping arch can get a few first downs with legs to keep the train rolling in second halves this year. Wear em out baby. 

I don't even think Arch needs to make that many plays with his legs. Assuming he isn't a nervous, happy footed self-sacking machine I think being able to hit the deep ball will force teams to lighten the box and running will be just fine. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
42 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Here's an odd sentence. We added a walk-on RB, formerly a LB at Stanford. 

Though the Texas Longhorns are at 85 scholarships with the elevation of Marshall Landwehr, they did make an addition at a key spot.

Stanford running back Carson Berger is listed on the Texas Longhorns’ 2025 online roster. Berger, a member of the class of 2023 out of The Woodlands (Texas) John Cooper, was part of the Cardinal’s 2023 squad. He was listed as a 6-foot-0, 216-pound linebacker by Stanford in 2023. He was not on their 2024 roster.

Texas lists Berger as a sophomore. His height and weight is 5-foot-11, 193 pounds. His bio only states “a first-year, walk-on running back who played the 2023 season at Stanford.“

 

Which politician or big money donor's dumbass kid or grandkid is this? 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

Which politician or big money donor's dumbass kid or grandkid is this? 

Dad is a litigator who played football at Pomona and went to UT Law. Mom is a pediatric dentist in the Woodlands who went to dental school at Ole Miss and Georgia.

Edited by Eggo
Posted
Just now, Eggo said:

Dad is a litigator lawyer who played football at Pomona and went to UT Law. Mom is a pediatric dentist in the Woodlands who went to dental school at Ole Miss and Georgia.

The sad thing is, I have no idea if this is true or if you just made it up, because it tracks either way.

Posted
2 hours ago, RockyMountainHighHorn said:

In past years, it was much more confusing with different sites having very different takes on practice reports. Sure, some may have been clickbait but before, it became a worry. This year it seems to be not enough positions for the players deserving playing time. And that’s one good problem to have. My NFL team is the chiefs and it’s amazing how similar the teams are. If we can just protect the QB, give him time and open up some holes in the running game, the sky is the limit. My only concern, minus the OL, is a weird one but it’s kind of been our bugaboo and that’s having a lead going into the 3rd/4th and not keeping the distance or extending it. I hope we can get back to some blowouts and limit the heart attacks we’ve all suffered the last 10+ years. 

3rd quarter offense and to a lesser degree D has been suboptimal for sure.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...