Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, texastroubadour said:

The 2nd qtr drive which ended at the 2 yard line. Good drive until we got to the 9 yard w

Right. Then we decided to eliminate the pass as an option for Arch. Where was the play action? Roll out? Dump off near the LOS? He’s so good at the run-pass option and we only saw it once 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, hobbes2702 said:

The “would be pick” was on a play that he had to reverse drop, get his feet switched and try to squeeze a throw in with perfect timing. That play call is the definition of the sark problem.

Run some RPO (with qb run options), attack the seams and the deep sidelines. Utilize the backs and tight ends in the screen game. Play to the strengths of the players on the field.

He displayed nothing resembling a strength today. Stop pretending otherwise. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

He was plenty effective in hurry up, quick read situations. We sat him in the pocket and hoped he would just learn to be accurate
Arch is the quarterback, our coach should know what he can and cannot do. But Sark doesn’t adjust his offense to his players. It’s been the problem in every game against equal talent. Every single time.

We do tend to have unrealistic expectations as fans

Posted
2 minutes ago, Gaffords said:

Dumb take is a dumb take.  There was nothing open. The one real throw down field should have been picked.  Our WRs arent not the same we had in the past plain and simple.  

Wingo was open. Moore was open. Baxter was open. There were plenty of plays to be made. He either didn't see them or couldn't get the ball near them. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
There is no schematic cure for not being able to throw to a wide open crossing route or constantly throwing short passes behind or at the feet of receivers. There were plays to be made based upon what was called. Arch didn't come close to making them. 

Correct, but also what was called (in the aggregate) was hyper conservative dogshit and played against Arch’s supposed strengths.
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, hookem48 said:

Oline is elite? Did they ever get to the second level and break a run open? Looked like the exact same Oline we always have. Good pass blocking, average as he'll run blocking. 

I'll take 4.5 ypc any day of the week against one of the top 1-2 defenses we'll play all year.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
Just now, Michael Knight said:

Arch had a bad game on the road in a hostile environment, it happens hopefully he'll get better. Hell his uncle shit the bed plenty of times and he's a HoF QB 

True, quite a baptism. He will be better. He was inconsistent all day, starting with the first dirt ball. Had a couple good throws. I’m concerned that our WRs may be very average 

Posted

 

3 minutes ago, Steamboat1874 said:

You are an idiot.

Arch had guys open and shit the bed.

Where did I say otherwise? It’s almost like I’m saying we should run plays that our quarterback can make not the ones he can’t.

Posted

That was, uh, wow. Imagine being told Texas would hold Ohio State to 200 yards and 14 points, and get completely dog-walked.

It's never quite as good or as bad as it seems and it's a long season. We have a month to clean whatever that was up so we can bring a competitive offense into league play. The defense appears to be more or less as advertised and should keep us in games. It will obviously be overshadowed by the passing game struggles but the run game and offensive line looked pretty good in the context, though I want to rewatch. All is not lost.

Stunning incompetence in the passing game and again with red zone play calls though. Baffling offensive coaching fail by Sark. A lot of what we saw was correctable, but there is so much to clean up that it makes me doubt it can be done by October. I'm hopeful the defense (appears as advertised) 9-3 is feeling more like the ceiling than the floor today, but maybe that ends up an overreaction. 

lol at Livingstone not only scoring but getting the only TD, and taking the CB for an absolute ride in the process. CTJ loved that I'm sure.

Posted
Would love to know how often a team out rushes their opponent by over 2:1 on almost equal carries and loses the game. That has to be really rare I'd assume. 

Hell, we were also very close to being the only #1 ever to be shut out.
Posted
1 minute ago, Michael Knight said:

Arch had a bad game on the road in a hostile environment, it happens hopefully he'll get better. Hell his uncle shit the bed plenty of times and he's a HoF QB 

Stfu. I’m the last one to shit on some revisionist history shit… d gave you every opportunity to win it. Idgaf what Sark calls… make it fuckin work and get us in the end zone. I cannot believe we lost that game  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

He displayed nothing resembling a strength today. Stop pretending otherwise. 

He made two fantastic throws to the deep sideline, he had multiple good runs when he evaded the pocket. Literally the things we already knew he was good at. But we only called those things a handful of times 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
Just now, Foosters said:

I'll take 4.5 ypc any day of the week against one of the top 1-2 defenses we'll play all year.

Yes.  Look I love the Horns and Arch seems like a super kid but he was the reason we lost.  It’s ok and he’ll get better.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Don't be too sure about that. Also, no one has to pay to be pissed on in Ohio. It comes free with the travel, don't be silly. 

I was based in Cleveland when I started at Continental. It's true.
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, hobbes2702 said:

 

Where did I say otherwise? It’s almost like I’m saying we should run plays that our quarterback can make not the ones he can’t.

We were told we’d have the full Sark offense available. If we can only hit the deep ball sometimes we’re fucked either way.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, B00M said:

True, quite a baptism. He will be better. He was inconsistent all day, starting with the first dirt ball. Had a couple good throws. I’m concerned that our WRs may be very average 

That throw to Endries was magic. Maybe Endries should be our feature receiver, since he is actually big fast and talented. Where were the TE plays the rest of the game?

Edited by Alien Octopus
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
True, quite a baptism. He will be better. He was inconsistent all day, starting with the first dirt ball. Had a couple good throws. I’m concerned that our WRs may be very average 

Separation was an issue, but plenty of WRs were open today and Arch either didn’t see them or threw the ball in the dirt. Very correctable (hopefully).
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

The people placing most of the blame for this game on just Arch and mistakes/penalties don’t really know what they are talking about. Arch was bad. But every game is going to have mistakes and this one was no different.

Arch had help….

Posted
1 minute ago, Texasborn91 said:

Stfu. I’m the last one to shit on some revisionist history shit… d gave you every opportunity to win it. Idgaf what Sark calls… make it fuckin work and get us in the end zone. I cannot believe we lost that game  

I'm sure your family is devastated I just hope you'll be able to recover somehow

Posted (edited)

Sark gets too obsessed with trying to win a psychological battle that has no tangible bearing on the actual game. Ramming it in from close with an interior OL not built for it, not taking 3 points, etc. I have a feeling he’ll age out of this mindset at some point soon

Edited by UnhappilyMarried
Posted
3 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

 

Where did I say otherwise? It’s almost like I’m saying we should run plays that our quarterback can make not the ones he can’t.

Which ones can he run?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Hank_Hill said:

We were told we’d have the full Sark offense available. If we can only hit the deep ball sometimes we’re fucked either way.

Probably. But is it more likely that we win by doing things we know the Qb can’t do, or trying the things we know he can do?

Posted

QB sneak inside the 1 was just dumb.   No pre-snap movement or window dressing was odd.   Arch was just horrible.  Maybe he needs less time filming commercials and more time practicing football plays. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, hobbes2702 said:

 

Where did I say otherwise? It’s almost like I’m saying we should run plays that our quarterback can make not the ones he can’t.

Which plays are those? Should we try rolling him out and having him throw to wide open crosser with an option to run? Oh, he missed that multiple times? Should we aim to take shots down the field? Oh, he missed badly on those. Maybe we have him throw screens and swing passes? Oh, he threw those behind or at the feet of the receivers. I struggle how anyone could watch whatever the fuck just happened and think there was some play call that would magically work. Arch just needs to play better. A lot better. He had a good pocket. He had a decent run game. He had targets that were open. He just fucking sucked today. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
Posted
Just now, UnhappilyMarried said:

Sark gets too obsessed with trying to win a psychological battle that has no tangible bearing on the actual game. Ramming it in from close with an interior OL, not taking 3 points, etc. I have a feeling he’ll age out of this mindset at some point soon

I swear people think Sark is younger than he really is...

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Dahobbs said:

Wingo was open. Moore was open. Baxter was open. There were plenty of plays to be made. He either didn't see them or couldn't get the ball near them. 

No, I agree with this. The few times one of them did manage to get open, the play didn't happen... I'm not saying Sark was perfect or even good today, but you can't use Sark to excuse what happened on the field. I'm sure Arch will settle in and do better,  but he is going to have to do it without an Xavier or Golden.  We don't have that player this year.  Wingo will be fine, but he will never have the separation those two were able to get

Posted

Haven't posted in over a year, but the wife is already threatening a divorce over my venting. Here in Europe and I had to work, so I've only been able to see the boxscore. 

WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED!? 7 months and our supposedly offensive genius HC and his 5 star qb that's been on campus for two years manage a single touchdown against a team breaking in a new DC? 

FML.  Sark peaked in September of 2023. We've done jack shit against anybody with a pulse since then. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, MIkeHoncho said:

QB sneak inside the 1 was just dumb.   No pre-snap movement or window dressing was odd.   Arch was just horrible.  Maybe he needs less time filming commercials and more time practicing football plays. 

Twice.  On fourth and one.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Party_Taco said:


Separation was an issue, but plenty of WRs were open today and Arch either didn’t see them or threw the ball in the dirt. Very correctable (hopefully).


He will never play in a tougher environment. I’m still disappointed we couldn’t be aggressive to end the first half 

Posted
3 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

He made two fantastic throws to the deep sideline, he had multiple good runs when he evaded the pocket. Literally the things we already knew he was good at. But we only called those things a handful of times 

He also got picked to the deep sideline, he fucking sucked shit through a straw, we all saw it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Gaffords said:

Dumb take is a dumb take.  There was nothing open. The one real throw down field should have been picked.  Our WRs arent not the same we had in the past plain and simple.  

Focus on this point for a minute. How many times have we seen mediocre teams play Texas over the last several years where they methodically throw short passes and work their way down the field against our defense: short curls, slants, screens, outs, etc.

Those teams don’t have 4-5 star receivers. They have a scheme to sit in the open areas of zone coverage, or run specific routes that are geared towards beating man, like the slant. 

The lack of effective scheme and game planning is why the offense was bad, and then with Arch throwing poorly and receivers not getting separation on the wrong routes, the offense was putrid. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, MIkeHoncho said:

QB sneak inside the 1 was just dumb.   No pre-snap movement or window dressing was odd.   Arch was just horrible.  Maybe he needs less time filming commercials and more time practicing football plays. 

Things like this don't help 

FB_IMG_1756582683114.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 6

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...