Jump to content

Austin Homeless Free for All Ordinance


rage-a-holic

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

I know I keep going back to this but throwing tax payer money on this homeless shit is infuriating, especially when we have many other community issues to address. Case in point, funding for teachers. This is an AISD decision but shit like this could be addressed if the city funded shit that mattered. Instead we want to spend 100s of millions on coddling leeches because it makes some people feel good.

https://www.kxan.com/investigations/decision-is-final-austin-isd-will-no-longer-allow-ptas-to-fund-staff-positions-due-to-equity-concerns/

 

 

Where’s the grift in that?

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

I know I keep going back to this but throwing tax payer money on this homeless shit is infuriating, especially when we have many other community issues to address. Case in point, funding for teachers. This is an AISD decision but shit like this could be addressed if the city funded shit that mattered. Instead we want to spend 100s of millions on coddling leeches because it makes some people feel good.

https://www.kxan.com/investigations/decision-is-final-austin-isd-will-no-longer-allow-ptas-to-fund-staff-positions-due-to-equity-concerns/

 

 

Frankly this is worth it’s own thread.  Interesting topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LCHorn said:

Frankly this is worth it’s own thread.  Interesting topic

agreed. i'm for equality but aisd is just punishing kids in the name of equality. in this case, let the pta teachers funded schools continue to fund/hire teachers and then divert some of this bullshit homeless money to those schools who do not have pta funding to hire teachers. it's fucking win/win for the kids. no, we'd rather throw money away on giving the homeless fucking everything because fuck kids and investing in the future.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crash_davis said:

agreed. i'm for equality but aisd is just punishing kids in the name of equality. in this case, let the pta teachers funded schools continue to fund/hire teachers and then divert some of this bullshit homeless money to those schools who do not have pta funding to hire teachers. it's fucking win/win for the kids. no, we'd rather throw money away on giving the homeless fucking everything because fuck kids and investing in the future.

 

Yep, obvi funding the homeless will do way more for the city than funding a better education for our kids :( Race to the bottom, even for educating our children. I have several friends that will now be sending their kids to Trinity, St Andrews, etc for these exact reasons. Nothing is going to stop the widening gap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

agreed. i'm for equality but aisd is just punishing kids in the name of equality. in this case, let the pta teachers funded schools continue to fund/hire teachers and then divert some of this bullshit homeless money to those schools who do not have pta funding to hire teachers. it's fucking win/win for the kids. no, we'd rather throw money away on giving the homeless fucking everything because fuck kids and investing in the future.

 

AISD is going to see an even bigger exodus to private schools than they already have. Enrollments are dropping and that was primarily due to just how poorly AISD handled CV19, now you add this to the mix and you will see people in these more affluent schools bailing at even greater clips.

My youngest is at Casis and will be at O'Henry next year and his incoming 6th grade class is down roughly 50% from numbers last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

agreed. i'm for equality but aisd is just punishing kids in the name of equality. in this case, let the pta teachers funded schools continue to fund/hire teachers and then divert some of this bullshit homeless money to those schools who do not have pta funding to hire teachers. it's fucking win/win for the kids. no, we'd rather throw money away on giving the homeless fucking everything because fuck kids and investing in the future.

 

Don’t they pay the “art consultant” $150k a year?  
 

Can’t spare a few dollars from the W’s new subway line?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BrazilHorn said:

AISD is going to see an even bigger exodus to private schools than they already have. Enrollments are dropping and that was primarily due to just how poorly AISD handled CV19, now you add this to the mix and you will see people in these more affluent schools bailing at even greater clips.

My youngest is at Casis and will be at O'Henry next year and his incoming 6th grade class is down roughly 50% from numbers last year.

Might be the plan?  Frees up resources for their targets, it’s not like you stop paying taxes when you put your child in private school. 
 

Cabo Steve has dibs when they close and consolidate some schools. That’s valuable real estate they are wasting. 
 

Easier to drag people down than lift them up in the name of “equality”. 

Edited by ChickenSandwich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, crash_davis said:

I know I keep going back to this but throwing tax payer money on this homeless shit is infuriating, especially when we have many other community issues to address. Case in point, funding for teachers. This is an AISD decision but shit like this could be addressed if the city funded shit that mattered. Instead we want to spend 100s of millions on coddling leeches because it makes some people feel good.

https://www.kxan.com/investigations/decision-is-final-austin-isd-will-no-longer-allow-ptas-to-fund-staff-positions-due-to-equity-concerns/

 

 

I’ll say it again - So glad I moved out of ATX.

The city will never be what it once was.  Ever.  Weird was ok.  Weird worked.  Now it has evolved into an unadulterated freak show and all of those freaks have full control of the machinery.

RIP

Edited by Cajun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

agreed. i'm for equality but aisd is just punishing kids in the name of equality. in this case, let the pta teachers funded schools continue to fund/hire teachers and then divert some of this bullshit homeless money to those schools who do not have pta funding to hire teachers. it's fucking win/win for the kids. no, we'd rather throw money away on giving the homeless fucking everything because fuck kids and investing in the future.

 

Is it true that AISD spends $11,000/year on each east side students vs. $7,000 for west side kids.... and that’s why the west side PTAs are raising money to pay for additional staff to make up for their shortage?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/16/2021 at 7:16 AM, Bozo_Casanova said:

 

2) Rising income inequality and wages stagnation encouraged by the tax code, with the middle class taking an decreasing share of productivity gains and 

#3 is the only one that state/local governments can respond to.
 

Why can't states and localities respond to #2? They don't have control over the federal tax code but they certainly have control over the state and local tax codes. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Armybrat said:

the west side PTAs are raising money to pay for additional staff to make up for their shortage . . . 

The ability to raise funds from the community is a blessing. Not all areas areas have that capability because the wealth simply isn't there.  Smart wealthier communities use the asset to enhance their basic programs.  Many thrive under that model. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

The ability to raise funds from the community is a blessing. Not all areas areas have that capability because the wealth simply isn't there.  Smart wealthier communities use the asset to enhance their basic programs.  Many thrive under that model. 

 

We all agree to that model. I'm in the rich side. I don't mind my taxes helping those kids who have no say on how much their parents make. The "rich" side gives more money to the poor side so the rich side funds teachers via PTA. AISD says that's unfair to the poor side even tho the poor side already gets more tax payer money. Beyond fucking stupid. Again just punishing kids.

Use fucking money earmarked for the homeless to pay for more teachers on the poor side, or just more teachers in general. It's not that fucking hard. Dipship city leadership makes it hard because they don't make side money solving actual community problems. 

This highlights just one issue that can be better spent by the homeless money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CDAK said:

Why can't states and localities respond to #2? They don't have control over the federal tax code but they certainly have control over the state and local tax codes. 

The shortest and most complete answer is simply that the Federal tax code is the biggest contributor to the problem. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Armybrat said:

Is it true that AISD spends $11,000/year on each east side students vs. $7,000 for west side kids.... and that’s why the west side PTAs are raising money to pay for additional staff to make up for their shortage?

That seems logical.  Not as many ESL educational services are required on the west side, I'm thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DalTxHornFan said:

That seems logical.  Not as many ESL educational services are required on the west side, I'm thinking.

In 2018-2019, AISD spent an average of $14,067 per student, but they only spent $6,436 per student at Casis Elementary School. So yes, Casis absolutely needs this additional source of funding.

Btw, I'm on a few parent PTA threads and shit is blowing up over this. I guess the trustees still have to vote so lots of letters going out.

Edited by ZB'Tejas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DalTxHornFan said:

That seems logical.  Not as many ESL educational services are required on the west side, I'm thinking.

One of the articles I read on this mentioned that one west side elementary had a PTA funded ESL teacher.  So wealthy parents were paying to help less fortunate students in a very direct way, and AISD is stopping it in the name of equality.  This is so colossally stupid.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

Damn, I had the exact opposite read on that. Not a chance in hell I’m dealing with one of those camps for that.  

You're spot on.  My friend is the move-in coordinator for Mobile Loaves and Fishes Community First! Village in Austin.  It's a planned community of tiny homes to help the unhoused find permanent housing.  Let me tell you, I wouldn't wish that kind of responsibility on my worst enemy.  She is a god damned saint to put in the effort and care she does to ensure that people have proper housing, especially at her meager salary.  Mental illness is a big issue with most of their residents, so if you like being berated by those not of sound mind, go ahead and apply for the encampment director position.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hopkinsnhorns said:

You're spot on.  My friend is the move-in coordinator for Mobile Loaves and Fishes Community First! Village in Austin.  It's a planned community of tiny homes to help the unhoused find permanent housing.  Let me tell you, I wouldn't wish that kind of responsibility on my worst enemy.  She is a god damned saint to put in the effort and care she does to ensure that people have proper housing, especially at her meager salary.  Mental illness is a big issue with most of their residents, so if you like being berated by those not of sound mind, go ahead and apply for the encampment director position.

This is the best idea we have going, imo, so yes, she is a saint because their service is sorely needed. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

The shortest and most complete answer is simply that the Federal tax code is the biggest contributor to the problem. 

Maybe, but we can't even handle a small city problem much less a state funding or federal tax code issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Ollie Slatt said:

One of the articles I read on this mentioned that one west side elementary had a PTA funded ESL teacher.  So wealthy parents were paying to help less fortunate students in a very direct way, and AISD is stopping it in the name of equality.  This is so colossally stupid.  

Austin is working hard to push every single family out of town, or at least to private school.  Between cost of housing, Robin Hood (recapture) and the colossally stupid way AISD is run, sticking with AISD is becoming a more and more difficult choice.  I have no idea what they're going to do with the insane budget shortfalls coming thanks to all the kids who already bailed during Covid.  Moves like this one certainly won't help to draw any of them back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ZB'Tejas said:

In 2018-2019, AISD spent an average of $14,067 per student, but they only spent $6,436 per student at Casis Elementary School. So yes, Casis absolutely needs this additional source of funding.

Btw, I'm on a few parent PTA threads and shit is blowing up over this. I guess the trustees still have to vote so lots of letters going out.

I never knew how much some PTAs raise.  My brother in law was head of the PTA at Twain in Houston.  They raise $500k a year on average.  They fund several staff positions and extra curricular teachers. Why anyone would be against that is beyond me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, crash_davis said:

I know I keep going back to this but throwing tax payer money on this homeless shit is infuriating, especially when we have many other community issues to address. Case in point, funding for teachers. This is an AISD decision but shit like this could be addressed if the city funded shit that mattered. Instead we want to spend 100s of millions on coddling leeches because it makes some people feel good.

https://www.kxan.com/investigations/decision-is-final-austin-isd-will-no-longer-allow-ptas-to-fund-staff-positions-due-to-equity-concerns/

 

 

AISD and the city of Austin are not in any way related per texas State law. They city has 0 to do with education. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, hopkinsnhorns said:

She is a god damned saint to put in the effort and care she does...especially at her meager salary.  Mental illness is a big issue with most of their residents, so if you like being berated by those not of sound mind

So, she's like a moderator for Surly?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Samson's Wig said:

Austin is working hard to push every single family out of town, or at least to private school.  Between cost of housing, Robin Hood (recapture) and the colossally stupid way AISD is run, sticking with AISD is becoming a more and more difficult choice.  I have no idea what they're going to do with the insane budget shortfalls coming thanks to all the kids who already bailed during Covid.  Moves like this one certainly won't help to draw any of them back.

The other thing is the lower income schools have reading and math specialists funded outside of the PTA. This is just a direct "fuck you" to parents in schools where PTAs have been the ones funding these positions. It is so crazy.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BrazilHorn said:

The other thing is the lower income schools have reading and math specialists funded outside of the PTA. This is just a direct "fuck you" to parents in schools where PTAs have been the ones funding these positions. It is so crazy.

Doesn't seem crazy to me.  Seems exactly like what the people who are being put in charge have preached.  When bussing (the most failed experiment of all failed experiments) didn't get rammed through a couple of years ago, this was the next logical step.  No one gives a shit about improving the poorly performing schools.  The agenda is about punishing the successful ones.  I don't understand it, but it's the people that Austin keeps electing.  Lupo ran on a platform of this bullshit, and has never hidden her hatred from anyone not from her neighborhood.  This is exactly what they've been working towards.  I guess the joke will be on them when there are even fewer students, and therefore way less money, in AISD in the long run. 

I won't be surprised if the state takes over the district, frankly.  Right before Covid hit AISD was one bad grade away from this happening anyway, and they're just doubling down on nonsense that will make things worse.  I assume everyone will get a do-over due to the pandemic, but if this is what leadership believes passes for running a school district it's only a matter of time.

The most insane part to me is that none of this happened before they slashed budgets back in 2011.  And the things being funded by the PTAs are often things that are mandated by federal law be provided by the district, e.g. reading intervention instructors for dyslexic kids.  Fuck them for not paying for this shit in the first place.  Somedays it feels like the twilight zone in this town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hopkinsnhorns said:

You're spot on.  My friend is the move-in coordinator for Mobile Loaves and Fishes Community First! Village in Austin.  It's a planned community of tiny homes to help the unhoused find permanent housing.  Let me tell you, I wouldn't wish that kind of responsibility on my worst enemy.  She is a god damned saint to put in the effort and care she does to ensure that people have proper housing, especially at her meager salary.  Mental illness is a big issue with most of their residents, so if you like being berated by those not of sound mind, go ahead and apply for the encampment director position.

The rep is for her.

I wonder if the City Council and the appropriate State legislative committee would be willing to hear her thoughts & imput about that laudable program?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Samson's Wig said:

Austin is working hard to push every single family out of town, or at least to private school.  Between cost of housing, Robin Hood (recapture) and the colossally stupid way AISD is run, sticking with AISD is becoming a more and more difficult choice.  I have no idea what they're going to do with the insane budget shortfalls coming thanks to all the kids who already bailed during Covid.  Moves like this one certainly won't help to draw any of them back.

My DIL, something of a perfectionist, resigned from her “upper” administration job at AISD headquarters because of the stupidity & stubbornness she saw running the school district for years. I’m surprised she could stand it for as long as she did.

Wonder if the administration will ever release the real numbers of kids they lost all track of during the past three semesters? 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw this - 

Northwest Recreation Center? right.. good luck w/ that. 

Also, Bull Creek, Lakewood Drive? I'm sure the Cat Mountain people will love that. 

https://www.kxan.com/news/local/austin/list-45-potential-city-approved-austin-homeless-camping-sites/?utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral

 

https://www.kxan.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/2021/05/Sanctioned-Encampment-Strategy-Land-Options.pdf

Edited by TexasBeta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DalTxHornFan said:

I'm convinced that this whole scheme is intentionally designed to fail.  Ridiculous.

But, how can you tell it apart from all of their other policies and plans that consistently fail?

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The list from the kxan story:

AUSTIN (KXAN) — The City of Austin has identified 45 city-owned areas to possibly turn into designated camps for people experiencing homelessness.

The move comes after the reinstatement of Austin’s citywide camping ban, which went back into effect May 11 after voters approved Proposition B in May 1’s election.

Here’s the initial list of the spots being considered:

  1. Walter E. Long 11455 Decker Lake Road
  2. John Trevino 9501 FM 969
  3. Walnut Creek Sports Park — 7800 Johnny Morris Road
  4. Given Recreation Center — 3811 E. 12th Street
  5. Fleet Service Yard — 8401 Johnny Morris Road
  6. Colony Park land
  7. 3511 Manor Road
  8. Tannehill Lane
  9. Onion Creek Metro North
  10. 7720 ½ Kellam Road
  11. 5400 E. William Cannon, Decommissioned WWTP
  12. FM 812 at FM 973
  13. Eco-Park at FM 973
  14. W. Slaughter Lane and 8908-8916-9006 Cullen Road
  15. Parque Zaragoza Recreation Center — 2609 Gonzales Street
  16. South Austin Recreation Center — 1100 Cumberland Road
  17. Roy G. Guerrero — 400 Grove Boulevard
  18. 6700 Bolm Road District Park
  19. Edward Rendon Dellgado Pavilion
  20. 4800 – 4906 Bolm Road
  21. Levander Loop
  22. 1311 Tillery Street
  23. Gus Garcia — 1201 East Rundberg Lane
  24. 7211 North I-35
  25. 7309 North I-35
  26. Mary Moore Searight — 907 W. Slaughter Lane
  27. Lakeline Neighborhood Park
  28. 12101 Anderson Mill Road
  29. 10900 FM 2222 (WWT)
  30. Commons Ford Park — 614 North Commons Ford Road
  31. Walnut Creek/Havens
  32. Northwest Recreation Center
  33. Sir Swante Palm Neighborhood Park — East Third Street
  34. Duncan Park — 900 West Ninth Street
  35. San Beach on Cesar Chavez
  36. Patterson Park — 4200 Brookview Road
  37. Bull Creek Park — Lakewood Drive
  38. Ryan Drive Warehouse
  39. Circle C
  40. Dick Nichols — 8011 Beckett Road
  41. 11800 FM 1826
  42. 9513 Circle Drive
  43. 4905 Convict Hill Road
  44. Norwood Tract
  45. Austin Recreation Center
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DalTxHornFan said:

I'm convinced that this whole scheme is intentionally designed to fail.  Ridiculous.

of course it is.  planned and designed this way from the beginning until the ransom is paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, bschoolprof said:

The list from the kxan story:

AUSTIN (KXAN) — The City of Austin has identified 45 city-owned areas to possibly turn into designated camps for people experiencing homelessness.

The move comes after the reinstatement of Austin’s citywide camping ban, which went back into effect May 11 after voters approved Proposition B in May 1’s election.

Here’s the initial list of the spots being considered:

  1. Walter E. Long 11455 Decker Lake Road
  2. John Trevino 9501 FM 969
  3. Walnut Creek Sports Park — 7800 Johnny Morris Road
  4. Given Recreation Center — 3811 E. 12th Street
  5. Fleet Service Yard — 8401 Johnny Morris Road
  6. Colony Park land
  7. 3511 Manor Road
  8. Tannehill Lane
  9. Onion Creek Metro North
  10. 7720 ½ Kellam Road
  11. 5400 E. William Cannon, Decommissioned WWTP
  12. FM 812 at FM 973
  13. Eco-Park at FM 973
  14. W. Slaughter Lane and 8908-8916-9006 Cullen Road
  15. Parque Zaragoza Recreation Center — 2609 Gonzales Street
  16. South Austin Recreation Center — 1100 Cumberland Road
  17. Roy G. Guerrero — 400 Grove Boulevard
  18. 6700 Bolm Road District Park
  19. Edward Rendon Dellgado Pavilion
  20. 4800 – 4906 Bolm Road
  21. Levander Loop
  22. 1311 Tillery Street
  23. Gus Garcia — 1201 East Rundberg Lane
  24. 7211 North I-35
  25. 7309 North I-35
  26. Mary Moore Searight — 907 W. Slaughter Lane
  27. Lakeline Neighborhood Park
  28. 12101 Anderson Mill Road
  29. 10900 FM 2222 (WWT)
  30. Commons Ford Park — 614 North Commons Ford Road
  31. Walnut Creek/Havens
  32. Northwest Recreation Center
  33. Sir Swante Palm Neighborhood Park — East Third Street
  34. Duncan Park — 900 West Ninth Street
  35. San Beach on Cesar Chavez
  36. Patterson Park — 4200 Brookview Road
  37. Bull Creek Park — Lakewood Drive
  38. Ryan Drive Warehouse
  39. Circle C
  40. Dick Nichols — 8011 Beckett Road
  41. 11800 FM 1826
  42. 9513 Circle Drive
  43. 4905 Convict Hill Road
  44. Norwood Tract
  45. Austin Recreation Center

fucking hilarious...NW hills/FW area not even close to being on the list and nothing in hyde park, rosedale, tarrytown.  Fuck these assholes.

close down Lions and have them all camp there until it is fixed.

Edit: in fact just use Lions and Hancock and be done with it.

Edited by dcar00
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dcar00 said:

fucking hilarious...NW hills/FW area not even close to being on the list and nothing in hyde park, rosedale, tarrytown.  Fuck these assholes.

close down Lions and have them all camp there until it is fixed.

Now that would be great to see -- Put cameras up.. stream... Wall it in.... let lions from Austin zoo roam about .... Profit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...