Jump to content

A story about a pathetic man's downfall [34 Felony Convictions]


Francisco 2.0

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Next to dogs playing poker, a velvet Elvis, and this:

619PFugCv6L._AC_SL1500_.jpg

Honest story--I bought an oil-on-canvas replica of that for Mrs.LL for our fifth wedding anniversary, and it has hung over our fireplace ever since.  Only a few weeks ago did it come down when I replaced it with a piece that we bought in Tokyo in March.

It is worth observing that Mrs.LL is from Long Island, and can recite that entire scene from heart with the appropriate accents.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Fox will always be a contagious brain disease.

I really want to hear DeSantis start giving Trump nicknames. "Many people call him Donald, okay. But I like to call him little tranny Trump. I mean this guy was pro trans, folks. Maybe I should call him Donna, I don't know. But I call him little tranny Trump. It's unbelievable."

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

Such a passive aggressive coward. Anybody willing to do a heel turn re Trump could destroy him. But Desantis is going to get buried 

 

2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Next to dogs playing poker, a velvet Elvis, and this:

619PFugCv6L._AC_SL1500_.jpg

 

2 hours ago, Ghost of LL said:

Honest story--I bought an oil-on-canvas replica of that for Mrs.LL for our fifth wedding anniversary, and it has hung over our fireplace ever since.  Only a few weeks ago did it come down when I replaced it with a piece that we bought in Tokyo in March.

It is worth observing that Mrs.LL is from Long Island, and can recite that entire scene from heart with the appropriate accents.

Need a big print of this photo

EVRH9cJX0AIiE31.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chooky said:

 

Fox will always be a contagious brain disease.

I really want to hear DeSantis start giving Trump nicknames. "Many people call him Donald, okay. But I like to call him little tranny Trump. I mean this guy was pro trans, folks. Maybe I should call him Donna, I don't know. But I call him little tranny Trump. It's unbelievable."

That is hilarious that Fox News is pushing that story.  Maybe they are a little pissed that Trump's proxies helped cost them a shit-ton of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chooky said:

 

Fox will always be a contagious brain disease.

I really want to hear DeSantis start giving Trump nicknames. "Many people call him Donald, okay. But I like to call him little tranny Trump. I mean this guy was pro trans, folks. Maybe I should call him Donna, I don't know. But I call him little tranny Trump. It's unbelievable."

If we have a Trump-Fox death match ahead, I may actually start looking forward to the 2024 elections, replacing the dread currently occupying that bit of mental space.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Degenerate Gardner said:

If we have a Trump-Fox death match ahead, I may actually start looking forward to the 2024 elections, replacing the dread currently occupying that bit of mental space.

Nothing will quell the rerun of the same diarrhea sundae of moral coalition, revitalized Ed Meese gibberish that's looming. It'll be the familiar drivel with slight plot twists, like should we invade Europe with Saudi, give Viktor Orban a handjob, and whether or not it's practical to eat minced immigrant out of a can. Think Ralph Reed with a baseball bat wrapped in barbed wire. That's what's coming. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

He’s such a pussy.

 

But I was told he was the manliest of all men.  The archtypical alpha male, as it were.

I mean, he even has his macho-Trump trading cards and all.  And they all sold out.  So he has to be a man.  And he fucks porn chicks.  How much more manly can you get than that?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was reading a bit about the E Jean Carrol case coming up, and found this amazing excerpt in his deposition:

Quote

In his deposition, Trump mocked both Carroll and Leeds for saying they couldn't recall the date — or in Carroll's case, even the year — of the alleged attacks.

Trump told Carroll's lawyer that if such a thing had happened, “your client would know to the second. She’d know down to the second. She’d know the month, the date, the year down to the second.”

Roberta Kaplan, who'd noted earlier in the deposition that Trump seemed to not remember when he got engaged to his wife Melania, then asked him the date of when he married the former first lady.

"I don’t want to even give you the answer. I’m not going to dignify it,” Trump responded, according to court filings.

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dutchrudder said:

Was reading a bit about the E Jean Carrol case coming up, and found this amazing excerpt in his deposition:

 

He also has said repeatedly that she is not his type as an excuse that he would not assault her. However, when they showed him her picture from that time, he thought it was his ex-wife, Marla Maples. Oops.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jhawkmvp said:

He also has said repeatedly that she is not his type as an excuse that he would not assault her. However, when they showed him her picture from that time, he thought it was his ex-wife, Marla Maples. Oops.

She coulda been a two-face like Jerry's girlfriend at Festivus......."Mama-mia, fright-night.  Bad lighting on the porch..." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jhawkmvp said:

He also has said repeatedly that she is not his type as an excuse that he would not assault her. However, when they showed him her picture from that time, he thought it was his ex-wife, Marla Maples. Oops.

That's true too. 

Trump is just so full of shit all the time, it's unbelievable people like him. How do you defend against that line of questioning? "She's not my type... That's my wife! Oh wait, no it's not, it's too blurry... I would never rape anyone like THAT..."

The whole "she's not my type" defense is so weird, because a normal person would recoil and say "I would never rape ANYONE!" Not Trump of course, because he's more worried about the type of person accusing him, as it may reflect poorly on his tastes. Just fucking bizarro world. I can't imagine what the right wing people would be saying if Bill Clinton reacted to the Paula Jones case like that.

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

But I was told he was the manliest of all men.  The archtypical alpha male, as it were.

I mean, he even has his macho-Trump trading cards and all.  And they all sold out.  So he has to be a man.  And he fucks porn chicks.  How much more manly can you get than that?

 

When you take away the high heel shoes, spray paint, mascara, and hair extensions, well…

image.jpeg.7a854fb2a71d4fc6482f773efd814dc6.jpeg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, the Carroll suit is bizarre.

First off, you have a sexual assault that occurred some 40 years ago that might be barred by limitations and is certainly stale as hell, as far as evidence, witness recollections and maybe even survival.

But that's been boostrapped into a defamation case** by recent Trump's denial that it happened, within the statute of limitations.  And it wasn't just a denial, which might not have been actionable, it was his usual disgusting personal attack, filled with the usual witch hunt hoax hyperbole.  I wish that fat motherfucker would broaden his vocabulary.

**I see now that she was able to put the sexual battery claim in the suit under a NY law that temporarily revived limitations-barred sexual assault claims.  I also see that she originally filed both cases in NY state court, and I haven't seen an explanation why it's in federal court, maybe the Westfall Act provides a federal question basis, not sure.

So, as plaintiff, I guess Carroll has to prove that his denials are false, or the converse proposition that he raped her.  Well, it is a civil suit, so more likely than not  . . . .

Then you have the fact that when Trump made the denials, he was sitting POTUS and there's an argument that such denials were within the scope of his office, and, if that's the case, then the federal government is the proper party, not Donald Trump, and the gubmint has near-absolute immunity from the claim.   Weirdly enough, the Biden administration supported this interpretation/application of the relevant Westfall Act (acting presumably in the broader interest of government and federal officials).  Nevertheless, that seems to have not happened, but still could, I'm a little hazy on the procedural posture there.

And then you have all this nonsense Trump himself has generated.

This thing is a real one-off.  I think I'd be surprised if Carroll wins, but then again, I never would have guessed this would make it to trial.

 

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Trumpco has sent a letter to "Congress," but only the House (funny that), asking it to intervene in the MAL documents investigation.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/26/politics/trump-foreign-leader-briefings-classified-documents/index.html

Very disingenuous letter confined only to the first 15 boxes, as opposed to the later-discovered material over which Trump obstructed jusstice and presumably is the stuff he really wants.

Sometimes, that ol' separation of powers comes in handy, don't it?

Also, I think this is a desperation move to avoid indictment as Smith gets closer.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

So, Trumpco has sent a letter to "Congress," but only the House (funny that), asking it to intervene in the MAL documents investigation.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/26/politics/trump-foreign-leader-briefings-classified-documents/index.html

Very disingenuous letter confined only to the first 15 boxes, as opposed to the later-discovered material over which Trump obstructed jusstice and presumably is the stuff he really wants.

Sometimes, that ol' separation of powers comes in handy, don't it?

Yeah, until McCarthy does something stupid.   We call that Thursday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

So, Trumpco has sent a letter to "Congress," but only the House (funny that), asking it to intervene in the MAL documents investigation.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/26/politics/trump-foreign-leader-briefings-classified-documents/index.html

Very disingenuous letter confined only to the first 15 boxes, as opposed to the later-discovered material over which Trump obstructed jusstice and presumably is the stuff he really wants.

Sometimes, that ol' separation of powers comes in handy, don't it?

Also, I think this is a desperation move to avoid indictment as Smith gets closer.

I doubt anyone here has said there shouldn't be separation of powers. If anything people here have said there should be better organized and defined separation of powers to the point when anyone, including the president, has committed crimes as obviously as Trump has and has such a ridiculous trail of criminal activity that they should be dealt with sometime before the 2.5 year mark after they INCITED INSURRECTION.

We all know US citizens are routinely imprisoned for far lesser crimes and with much less evidence than is present in this case. We just want the same justice that is levied on the door man and kitchen cook levied on every single American. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2023 at 12:51 PM, tx 3 putt said:

Bwahahahahahahaha

 

Is it looking like Jack Smith will go right to Ivanka's lawyers and offer her immunity in exchange for damning testimony against her family? That's gotta be what he's looking at, especially after seeing something like this. I know this is the fraud suit but if she'll turn on them over that she'll turn on them if prison is staring her in the face. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a truly twisted version of Marry, Fuck, Kill.

But imagine your three choices in life are:  Turn your father in and spend the rest of your life looking over your shoulder, blow your father like he always wanted and he'll go to the ends of the earth to protect you, or do actual time in prison away from your young children.

Unfortunately for her, she appears to be the only one of the four children Trump mentions by name that has any sense of self-awareness, twisted though it may be.  Which means, she is the one most likely to commit suicide when backed into a corner like this.  

The plot thickens...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

Is it looking like Jack Smith will go right to Ivanka's lawyers and offer her immunity in exchange for damning testimony against her family? That's gotta be what he's looking at, especially after seeing something like this. I know this is the fraud suit but if she'll turn on them over that she'll turn on them if prison is staring her in the face. 


the family text messages 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hermanator said:

Is it looking like Jack Smith will go right to Ivanka's lawyers and offer her immunity in exchange for damning testimony against her family? That's gotta be what he's looking at, especially after seeing something like this. I know this is the fraud suit but if she'll turn on them over that she'll turn on them if prison is staring her in the face. 

They cannot arrest a father and daughter for the same crime.  

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...