Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

Don’t forget that Greg wasn’t alone in his foreign trip during Beryl. One of the people with him was a top exec of CenterPoint who was representing them with foreign business interests.

He’s not going to do anything to centerpoint that centerpoint won’t agree to behind closed doors.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 3
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
Don’t forget that Greg wasn’t alone in his foreign trip during Beryl. One of the people with him was a top exec of CenterPoint who was representing them with foreign business interests.
He’s not going to do anything to centerpoint that centerpoint won’t agree to behind closed doors.

This. Your Texas government is a wholly owned subsidiary of interests whose sole interest in you is how much money they can extract from your wallet (with 0% interest in actually providing you necessary services). And you keep choosing that path because…I dunno, Mexicans are scary or whatnot.
Do y’all remember this many massive grid failures and similar infrastructure disasters back when public utilities were actually…public utilities? No? Hmmmm….
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
On 7/11/2024 at 11:34 AM, Ghost of LL said:

The problem here isn't deregulation.  This is entirely a failure by Centerpoint, which is a transmission-and-delivery utility.

Electric generators are deregulated, as are retail utilities.  But the issue here isn't with the electric generators.  Unlike during the 2021 winter storm, there's plenty of electricity being generated.  And the problem isn't with the retailers--all they do is read your meter and bill you anyway.

The problem this go-around is entirely with Centerpoint.  And TDUs like Centerpoint are still regulated.  They still operate under a certificate of convenience and necessity, which delineates a territory in which they have a monopoly.  The PUC has to approve Centerpoint's rates; Centerpoint can't get a rate increase without getting the approval of the PUC.

Of course, that approval is typically forthcoming because . . . well, you know--this is Texas.  Regulators aren't really there to regulate industry so much as facilitate the regulated industry's fleecing of the citizenry.

So yeah--this isn't about deregulation.  This is about the failure of Greg Abbott's appointed regulators.

Have the Texas power utilities always been investor-owned, or mostly so?  Referring to Centerpoint and Oncor here?  They used to be more traditional utilities in the form of HP&L and DP&L, respectively.  I just don't know if they were investor-owned at that point.

Investor ownership creates something of a conflict of interest, but is fairly common nationwide.

But, you are correct that the PUC has rules that seem to favor utility owners/managers over customers by allowing them to recoup losses from ratepayers, losses for which their own mismanagement is mostly responsible.

I haven't thought about this in a while, but utilities as a class of stocks are supposed to have pretty steady, if small, growth or dividend rates because they are an incumbent monopoly (which should guarantee profitable operation), the profits of which are mostly regulated.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Have the Texas power utilities always been investor-owned, or mostly so?  Referring to Centerpoint and Oncor here?  They used to be more traditional utilities in the form of HP&L and DP&L, respectively.  I just don't know if they were investor-owned at that point.

Investor ownership creates something of a conflict of interest, but is fairly common nationwide.

But, you are correct that the PUC has rules that seem to favor utility owners/managers over customers by allowing them to recoup losses from ratepayers, losses for which their own mismanagement is mostly responsible.

I haven't thought about this in a while, but utilities as a class of stocks are supposed to have pretty steady, if small, growth or dividend rates because they are an incumbent monopoly (which should guarantee profitable operation), the profits of which are mostly regulated.

Back when they were HL&P, they were owned by the City of Houston. But at some point, the City divested itself and it became an IOU.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
The brown invasion has stretched our infrastructure past its capacity obviously

Too many DEI hires at Centerpoint, Harris County, and the City of Houston. City of Austin’s homeless population also impacted service along with defunding police.
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, miguelito said:

Does Greg count as a DEI hire?

 
yes 

Every job application you can state if you’re handicapped or not 

Edited by tx 3 putt
Posted

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/education/article/texas-teachers-spend-school-supplies-states-19604960.php?sid=5eb35f0cd14307791d11019c&ss=A&st_rid=2fa7d4dd-6d4f-48a7-81ac-0fdb75dd3d65&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_campaign=HC_The713

Quote

Texas teachers outspend their counterparts from all 50 states on yearly school supply purchases for their classrooms, according to survey released Monday as educators prepare for the 2024-25 school year.

The survey, which sampled 50 teachers from each state for 2,500 teachers nationwide, found that educators in Texas spend on average $1,396 per year on school supplies for their classrooms, compared to the nationwide average of $915. 

According to the survey, 93% of teachers dip into their own money for school supplies, including pens, paper, ink, classroom decorations, educational aids, cleaning supplies and even snacks. 

While teachers are not required by law to purchase their own supplies, many do so anyway out of fear that their classroom learning environment would suffer if they didn’t -- a statement that 77% of survey respondents agreed with.

While this is a survey and not backed up with receipts, I'm not surprised that our teachers are shelling out this much because Texas and the ISDs fail to adequately supply the teachers and students. But then they blame those same teachers when the students don't score high enough on an exam. 

  • Rage+1 3
Posted
3 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/education/article/texas-teachers-spend-school-supplies-states-19604960.php?sid=5eb35f0cd14307791d11019c&ss=A&st_rid=2fa7d4dd-6d4f-48a7-81ac-0fdb75dd3d65&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_campaign=HC_The713

While this is a survey and not backed up with receipts, I'm not surprised that our teachers are shelling out this much because Texas and the ISDs fail to adequately supply the teachers and students. But then they blame those same teachers when the students don't score high enough on an exam. 

And teachers get a whole $250 tax deduction on all of those personally purchased supplies too!

  • Rage+1 3
Posted

Cross posting but holy shit

I knew the Houston school takeover was not a good situation, I just didn’t realize the extent of the damage being done and how urgent something needs to change. The hearing today solidified my understanding of the situation. We listened to three hours of testimony from parents, teachers, community members and even a researcher, and I have provided some of the highlights below. Thank you to Rep. Christina Morales for pulling this hearing together, and for all of the Reps who participated. 

-Teaching in HISD became unbearable due to the toxic/hostile work environment. 

-Teachers were bullied. One teacher had his desk taken away. 

-Nearly 4,600 staff left HISD since the takeover one year ago. 

-Half the principals have been removed. Some had recently earned recognition for their work. 

-A teacher was fired in front of a classroom of kids because one student had a phone out during class.

-A disproportionate number of black teachers have been let go (fired). 

-30 out of 40 teachers in an A-rated school left.

-Teachers experiencing depression and anxiety. 

-New teachers being hired no longer need to be certified.

-They don’t have the resources to follow IEPs.

-Administrators are unresponsive and lack a connection to the schools. 

-Problems revealed in the data showing improvements in student performance. 

-Mike Miles has lied and there has been retaliation against teachers who speak up. 

-Schools are in chaos.

-Spanish is discouraged. The dual language program doesn’t exist, but is still getting funded. Where is that funding going?

-Libraries have been closed. They were turned into detention centers, now called “team centers.” What happened to the $7 million meant for purchasing books? 

-Kids were reprimanded for going to the restroom. Some would drink less water so they could last all day without going to the restroom. One child got a urinary tract infection as a result. 

-Extracurriculars are no longer funded: debate, UIL, drama, speech.

-Students have lost all motivation to learn.

-Quote from a parent: “What Miles is doing is wrong for our schools.” 

I felt heartbroken for the teachers, students and families dealing with such a massive mess in HISD. We must fix this! #txlege

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
On 7/14/2024 at 11:29 AM, Evil Bill Obrien said:

Guess it makes sense why he stayed about as far away on the planet as one could from the storm hitting his state knocking down trees, worried one might finish the job…
 

Do we really know that's Greg Abbott?  Some people say there are doubts.

What Happened in Waco? A Timeline of David Koresh and the FBI Raid -  Netflix Tudum

Posted (edited)

Dump of a few Texas noteworthy items lately.

survey that 70% of Texans support school vouchers. Perhaps Dems and rural republicans need to get somewhat onboard with Abbott to at least get something their way. Fighting the inevitable can be a losing cause for your constituents. (I’m not a fan of vouchers but can accept reality.)

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/education/article/two-thirds-texans-support-school-vouchers-new-19604424.php
 

while I hate him, I give Lt. Patrick props that he met with the Chronicle to provide his side of the story why Texas responded the way it did with Beryl. Seems legit and he didn’t need this interview. I actually like that Texas at least says it doesn’t need FEMA for a few days.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/dan-patrick-beryl-fema-texas-a-m-kidd-19610240.php
 

On the more positive front, here is a west Texas oil worker worth a follow on TikTok. Looks like his channel points out how poor of a job by the industry and railroad commission. The environment is a disaster. While the situation is negative, we need him pointing out the problems. EDIT: he’s exploring a run for RRC.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTNbLAN35/

Edited by Nice Guy Eddie
Posted
6 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Dump of a few Texas noteworthy items lately.

survey that 70% of Texans support school vouchers. Perhaps Dems and rural republicans need to get somewhat onboard with Abbott to at least get something their way. Fighting the inevitable can be a losing cause for your constituents. (I’m not a fan of vouchers but can accept reality.)

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/education/article/two-thirds-texans-support-school-vouchers-new-19604424.php
 

while I hate him, I give Lt. Patrick props that he met with the Chronicle to provide his side of the story why Texas responded the way it did with Beryl. Seems legit and he didn’t need this interview. I actually like that Texas at least says it doesn’t need FEMA for a few days.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/dan-patrick-beryl-fema-texas-a-m-kidd-19610240.php
 

On the more positive front, here is a west Texas oil worker worth a follow on TikTok. Looks like his channel points out how poor of a job by the industry and railroad commission. The environment is a disaster. While the situation is negative, we need him pointing out the problems. EDIT: he’s exploring a run for RRC.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTNbLAN35/

I think a lot of parents have warmed to the idea of sending their kids to schools that don’t have to accept “problem kids.” If they can get help from the state to send their kids to Prestonwood, Jesuit or Midland Classical, then all the better. Who cares that public schools must carry the weight that privates could care less about.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
On 8/6/2024 at 2:49 PM, Satchel said:

I think a lot of parents have warmed to the idea of sending their kids to schools that don’t have to accept “problem kids.” If they can get help from the state to send their kids to Prestonwood, Jesuit or Midland Classical, then all the better. Who cares that public schools must carry the weight that privates could care less about.

Parents like this don’t understand that while school vouchers make it a possibility to send your child to an expensive private school, there is no law requiring these schools to accept students who are trying to use the vouchers. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, MrBig said:

Parents like this don’t understand that while school vouchers make it a possibility to send your child to an expensive private school, there is no law requiring these schools to accept students who are trying to use the vouchers. 

Seriously… talk about a classic fuck around and find out situation. Or admit but then triple the tuitions kind of deal.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
26 minutes ago, MrBig said:

Parents like this don’t understand that while school vouchers make it a possibility to send your child to an expensive private school, there is no law requiring these schools to accept students who are trying to use the vouchers. 


if you couldn’t afford that private school before vouchers , you won’t be able to afford it after vouchers 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
28 minutes ago, MrBig said:

Parents like this don’t understand that while school vouchers make it a possibility to send your child to an expensive private school, there is no law requiring these schools to accept students who are trying to use the vouchers. 

 

1 minute ago, tx 3 putt said:

if you couldn’t afford that private school before vouchers , you won’t be able to afford it after vouchers 

Exactly. Just look at how private schools in Arkansas reacted to their voucher program--they simply raised tuition.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, bolverk said:

 

Exactly. Just look at how private schools in Arkansas reacted to their voucher program--they simply raised tuition.

How much did they raise tuition?

Posted
54 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

How much did they raise tuition?

I can't find the article about Arkansas that reported it last year, but here are examples in other states (quick google):

Iowa (30-40%): https://www.kcrg.com/2023/04/20/amid-efforts-make-private-schools-affordable-handful-schools-increase-tuition-prices/

Indiana (20%): https://flaglerlive.com/as-florida-floods-private-schools/

Arizona (10-20%): https://hechingerreport.org/arizona-gave-families-public-money-for-private-schools-then-private-schools-raised-tuition/

Arkansas: https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2023/09/01/arkansas-learns-is-designed-to-make-rich-parents-richer

I'm sure you're aware, as has been discussed in this or the education thread, that the proposed voucher program in Texas would actually give more money in vouchers to private schools on a per-student basis than it allots for each student in a public school.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
1 hour ago, bolverk said:

I can't find the article about Arkansas that reported it last year, but here are examples in other states (quick google):

Seems reasonable that a state voucher program should track tuition increases and remove the school from eligibility if they appear to be gaming the system.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Seems reasonable that a state voucher program should track tuition increases and remove the school from eligibility if they appear to be gaming the system.  

Well, yeah, I agree, but I honestly don't think the governor or our legislature gives a damn. If they were concerned about private school tuition rates, why would they give more for a kid to go to private schools than public schools? 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

 

8 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Well, yeah, I agree, but I honestly don't think the governor or our legislature gives a damn.

 

I'd much rather them spend the time, energy, and effort on fixing the recapture system. 



×
×
  • Create New...