Jump to content

45 indicated


Cairn Horn88

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

f53084f0-1a4d-46a5-955d-97065dbc0ce9_tex

 

22 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

The Twitter account featuring scat porn that they wanted to watch was blocked?

1. Stormare needs a mention on the "best character actor" thread

2. You might block it, but I can still find more. It's the Internet, bitch

3. Re: non-refundable retainers, I'd only think there's an ethical issue if the lawyer quits. If the client fires you, or if the client otherwise breaks the contact through misbehaving, there's no ethical problem. Now you might philosophize that you can tell well in advance that this particular client is all but guaranteed to do either or both of those things. But that's not an ethical issue... it's a business opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pancho said:

Thought I read somewhere that this is deceiving because Twitter counts it as a view when someone just scrolls past it and sees like a few seconds…

 

Could be wrong tho…

Sounds on brand for Elon

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pancho said:

Thought I read somewhere that this is deceiving because Twitter counts it as a view when someone just scrolls past it and sees like a few seconds…

 

Could be wrong tho…

yes.  Views/impressions are counted even if seen while scrolling by.....  
"Anyone who is logged into Twitter who views a Tweet counts as a view, regardless of where they see the Tweet (e.g. Home, Search, Profiles, etc.) or whether or not they follow the author. If you're the author, looking at your own Tweet also counts as a view. "

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

It would be pretty funny if he resists getting the mugshot and winds up getting tased. We would then get a photo of him after the fact in the restraint chair, and to top it off he'd catch a charge and revoke his bail agreement.  

mug-shot-louis-winthorpe-iii.gif.70c92a475e7d23004def9b40a42b0cad.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SydneyCarton said:

This can't be the expectation, right? In every one of these cases people talk about how long Jury Selection will take, and now multiply this by 18 co-defendants. 

 

It's a response to the co-defendant's speedy trial motion.  That defendant is banking on Trump and his ilk trying to play the delay game, which now that he's requested a speedy trial, would benefit that defendant.  The State wants to respond in a way that upholds that right, knowing that one of these other 18 defendant's will ask for a continuance or otherwise request a later trial date.  But as long as the State is not responsible for the delay in a way that weighs against it, a speedy trial claim is less likely to hold up on appeal.  Conversely, if a defendant requests even one delay, that defendant potentially forfeits his right to a speedy trial.

Edited by dcbc
  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, texas08 said:

Infuriating how much this bastard costs tax payers with all these damned security detail for FUCKING ARREST BOOKINGS.

No kidding. And the disruption to the Atlanta airport and roadways. You're not president anymore, you shouldn't be treated like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...