Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

Routinely undervalued by whom?

Is this dipshit admitting to tax fraud?

It's always been a moving target depending on whether he's dealing with taxes, insurance, or loans.  I find it astonishing that I can go before the Travis County Central Appraisal District to dispute the value of my home and they will stick a flashlight up my ass to argue 1%, but Trump gets away with +/- 50% easily.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 4
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

It's always been a moving target depending on whether he's dealing with taxes, insurance, or loans.  I find it astonishing that I can go before the Travis County Central Appraisal District to dispute the value of my home and they will stick a flashlight up my ass to argue 1%, but Trump gets away with +/- 50% easily.

That’s the power of a fake tan, brah 

Posted

There really is legal precedent and an FMV evaluation process that can, with some acceptable accurateness to all parties, whereby properties or assets owned/operated/licensed by celebrities do receive a sizable markup given the name linked to it.  A private residence may be worth $5mm according to the tax rolls, but because it once owned by a movie star, it can be appraised at $10mm for their own loan needs or balance sheet.  Same with celebrity chef-owned restaurants where the building itself is owned in the name of the chef.  Or a retail store owned by some celebrity fashion designer, etc.  It can go the other way too, Neverland Ranch can be appraised for multiples more because Michael Jackson owned it...but can be negatively impacted at estate liquidation...you know...because of all the rape there.  But just like any other "expert" testimony from medical procedures to water rights to music IP...there are widely accepted guardrails on how real estate can tick up or down based on who is associated with it in/not in name only.  

But what Trump has suggested over the years, particularly before he became President is absolutely batshit insane.  And he has to have collaborators inside some of the lending institutions.  And some of them are gonna start flipping on him, if they haven't already.  Mar-a-Lago is worth 100x more than $18mm, Mr. President?  Even your most idiotic supporters would struggle on their iPhone calculators, but eventually would realize, "Whuh?  $1.8 billion dollars?  For that place?  I dunno, that seems like that would made the news.  I remember when that Kardashian broad sold her house for like $30mm and we thought was crazy.  This seems like it would have made the news at some point."  

It's perfectly normal to overinflate assets you hold near and dear, but when you start getting outside of any semblance of acceptable LTV/LTC parameters, there had to have been bankers assisting with this fraud. If it's just the AG saying, "I Say it's worth this" and Trump claiming "no, it's worth this."  The case is dead in the water.  But every single day in this country, loan officers cook balance sheets to get paid.  95% of the time it flies under the radar because a subpar credit score taking out a construction loan on a duplex isn't gonna set off any alarms with regulators.  But a gameshow host living inside a golf resort?  Hey now!  

Posted

Voice recordings of Trump and Ronna McDaniel pressuring people who were actually a part of the certification process to not certify and that the GOP would get them lawyers if they would just walk away and not certify legal votes.

Merry Christmas GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 3
  • Haha 3
Posted
32 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

There really is legal precedent and an FMV evaluation process that can, with some acceptable accurateness to all parties, whereby properties or assets owned/operated/licensed by celebrities do receive a sizable markup given the name linked to it.  A private residence may be worth $5mm according to the tax rolls, but because it once owned by a movie star, it can be appraised at $10mm for their own loan needs or balance sheet. 

It's not the overvaluation in a vacuum.  It's the sometimes way over, sometimes way under nature of it.  I don't know why insurance and tax appraisers don't account for the valuation data in his loan documents, but they don't.  It can't be that hard to access.  Shit, he admits to it.

Posted

Yeah, I wasn't even touching on the under nature of it at all.  That's other bag of shit to unpack.  In this fucking timeline, I'm 90% sure while he was the sitting President...while on some "official duties" trip to New York, he didn't reclaim different appraisal amounts on every single property or asset on term sheet updates/new tax rolls/new insurance enrollments so that when this day came.  Which he likely knew it would.  He could simply claim that he did while serving as President and therefore it's immune from legal scrutiny.  I know that sounds insane to you as a lawyer, and god knows i barely passed Contracts Law, but I'm almost certain in his head and given who is legal counsel was/is...he thinks that'll work.  Or again, as I've stated, there were enablers at the banks, LP's, and insurance companies all along the way that are complicit in this.  I don't know how the fuck else to explain it except that this should have been done long before he was ever President.  It's obvious this a half-century long bad habit on his part.  

Posted
37 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Voice recordings of Trump and Ronna McDaniel pressuring people who were actually a part of the certification process to not certify and that the GOP would get them lawyers if they would just walk away and not certify legal votes.

Merry Christmas GIF


old rona better start looking for a good lawyer ….


 

IMG_7615.jpeg

Posted
17 minutes ago, Underdog said:

Ronna McDaniel didn’t kill herself. 

we don't want her to, she is the architect of zero wins in 8 years while being in charge.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
  • Drool 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Do I need to send you my CV?  Because them's fightin' words.

Shit, my bad.  I don't know I thought you were an attorney.  In all honesty, how some posters can keep such accurate track of who said what, and does what for a living, and all that.  I can barely, barely do that in real life with people I know and care about.  You seem to know a lot about music IIRC.  South Austin's Mom is a Saint.  Armybrat worked for the Pony Express.  And a site of thousands of white/latino male Texans, only 7 people admitted to voting for Trump.  Other than that, I got no idea what the fuck is going on.  All on a site By an Aggie hippie who looks like Jesus.  Signs and wonders...

  • Haha 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

Shit, my bad.  I don't know I thought you were an attorney.  In all honesty, how some posters can keep such accurate track of who said what, and does what for a living, and all that.  I can barely, barely do that in real life with people I know and care about.  

Well, none of us know what the fuck you do because your professional life seems to touch about 8 different career paths.  For what it's worth, I'm an engineer.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
Well, none of us know what the fuck you do because your professional life seems to touch about 8 different career paths.  For what it's worth, I'm an engineer.

YGIFS is a reformed (failed) male stripper, amateur baker, professional “business man,” and bon vivant for hire, price negotiable.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


YGIFS is a reformed (failed) male stripper, amateur baker, professional “business man,” and bon vivant for hire, price negotiable.

And all this time I thought David Lee Roth wasn't long winded.  

Posted

I didn’t fail being a male stripper, Brisket!   The industry failed me!  
 

my work in finance takes me into a lot of fields.  Works out well because I have the attention span and discipline of Donald Trump at a Puerto Rica hurricane refugee center.  While I care for thicc brown women, sooner or later I just start throwing paper towels. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

Shit, my bad.  I don't know I thought you were an attorney. 

44 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Well, none of us know what the fuck you do because your professional life seems to touch about 8 different career paths.  For what it's worth, I'm an engineer.

40 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

YGIFS is a reformed (failed) male stripper, amateur baker, professional “business man,” and bon vivant for hire, price negotiable.

jimmyjazz we can easily fit into the Surly demographics, but YGIFS, it's a little difficult:

  • 46% of Surly are lawyers
  • 46% of Surly are doctors
  • 2% of Surly are both
  • 2% of Surly are pilots
  • 2% of Surly are engineers (1 member of Surly is a lawyer and an engineer, but the stats don't reflect it)
  • 2% of Surly are in the entertainment industry
  • 2% of Surly are math majors
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

Dumb fucking people doing it where they could be recorded.

At this point, Trump should assume that everybody around him is either recording what is going on, or getting ready to turn on him before he turns on them.

And Michigan is a one-party consent state, so the recordings are good.

Edited by atomheartbevo
  • Haha 1
Posted

Whether it's a separate crime in and of itself, it's terrific evidence of an act in furtherance of the January 6 conspiracy, with Trump's direct involvement at a very low level.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

I'm very much putting my hope on state crimes over federal crimes to take him down.  If nothing else, there's just more opportunity.

That and nobody in the WH can pardon him.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
On 12/20/2023 at 6:20 PM, Biff Tannen said:

CNN literally today addressed that and said that democrats “believed” he had incited an insurrection and that is a big reason they think Biden should be more aggressive against dotard. 

Again, Democrats “believe” this. 
 

Im sick and fucking tired of the media placating this idea of two realities. No motherfuckers, we all SAW IT OCCUR IN REAL TIME. 

 

It’s not up for debate. It happened. When media outlets frame it this way, it gives credence to the “alternative reality” shit show that the Rs cower under. 

So, for me, these have been the two questions:

1. Was Jan 6 an insurrection or rebellion?

Many will say they believe it was. Many will say they believe it was a giant protest. Neither Insurrection nor rebellion are defined in federal law. 

2. If J6 was an insurrection or rebellion, did the President incite, set on foot, assist, or engage... or give aid or comfort thereto?

Whatever it was, some will say they believe he incited it. Some will say he did not. It does not appear that he "set on foot". He didn't appear to assist or engage. And I don't recall any evidence of aid or comfort to those who were involved (I may just not be aware.) 

 

And the uncertainty of what it was and his involvement is why media outlets say 'believe'. We all saw what we saw, but since we've never seen it before, it is subjective. Media corporations can't say it was it was a thing (yet). Saying it was a thing, saying he incited it, and then having a Court rule otherwise would likely shut down a network. That libel / slander lawsuit would be settled for billions. 

Posted

Does withholding aid to the gvt = aiding the insurrection?  Or would they be separate and distinct acts as defined by a court?

not engaging the NG on his own or when called to do so by pelosi/shumer most certainly aided the Maga side and is very affirmatively provable that he had the means to do so and refused the direct request. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Now I'm no lawyer, but I think what's happening here is that Lisa Rubin has big tits. Feel free to correct me on the specifics, surly lawdogs. 

Understand that this is a legal opinion, based on legal reasoning, so do your best to follow along: the evidence appears to support your suspicion.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Very telling that even Ronna McDaniel is being cautious with her statements today regarding that Michigan phone call. You can only imagine what other conversations some of them had that and how they stay up at night worried about the 5am "knock" on the door by the FBI.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I really, really just want one conversation to happen.  The one between Ronna, with her legal counsel present, and an AUSA, in the DOJ offices.  "Ronna, so here's the thing.  You can flip and sing like a canary, or you can go to prison.  The choice is yours.  I'll give you ten minutes to talk about it with your lawyer, after that, the deal is off the table, because the guys and I are gonna head out to lunch in a few - there's this new sandwich place that Ed's been raving about, says they use those really good italian sweet pickled peppers.  So, anyway...tick-tock."

Any immunity deal needs to include her retaining the head of Republican National Committee for life.  

Pretty sure that isn't a thing, don't care.  

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Brisketexan said: The choice is yours.  I'll give you ten minutes to talk about it with your lawyer, after that, the deal is off the table, because the guys and I are gonna head out to lunch in a few - there's this new sandwich place that Ed's been raving about, says they use those really good italian sweet pickled peppers.  So, anyway...tick-tock."

It really is good 

Edited by TexasEd
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

Understand that this is a legal opinion, based on legal reasoning, so do your best to follow along: the evidence appears to support your suspicion.

Res Titsa Loquitur? 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Red Five said:

Now I'm no lawyer, but I think what's happening here is that Lisa Rubin has big tits. Feel free to correct me on the specifics, surly lawdogs. 

MP04225-copy-1700x2125.jpg

confirmed

  • Drool 3


×
×
  • Create New...