Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, WinningIsHard said:

There was no time left to worry about defense either way. If shanahan had a chance to redo the series, let’s say with some premonition that his kicker shanks it. You think he acts more ballsy and goes for the TD? That’s my point. How often do these guys, in the few seconds they have, get it right? Shanahan is a fucking wizard too, he probably gets it right more than most. Sark according to surly is a game day mongrel, just incapable of adjusting to the game flow. I guess it just surprises me the weird shit we expect of coaches and the program when we know damn well it has a low probability of happening based off history. 

Yeah I’m betting Shanahan throws it with a hot QB vs OU if he was in charge, but that’s my opinion in this hypothetical scenario.  I also think he’s a much better coach than Sark, but that’s just one man’s opinion.  

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

Yeah I’m betting Shanahan throws it with a hot QB vs OU if he was in charge, but that’s my opinion in this hypothetical scenario.  I also think he’s a much better coach than Sark, but that’s just one man’s opinion.  

Wow, really going out on a limb there lol. 

Edited by Hookem2147
Posted
Did anybody watch the end of that 49ers game? 45 seconds left with no timeouts, shanahan calls a fuckin run up the middle. They then went to the line to spike the ball. His field goal kicker is not reliable. He missed it lol. Forced with relying on a shit kicker or going for the TD with your weapons hampered and your OL struggling he decided to kick the fg. That sounds eerily similar lol. I’m sure it’s because shanahan is a pussy and didn’t put his players in the right spots to win lulz. I’m probably being an asshole, maybe it’s apples to oranges. 

Uh yeah not comparable at all.
Posted
Not even debatable.   I think sark took over as oc when Kyle left the falcons.    Results weren’t the same

Kyle Shanahan’s signature second half collapse is even more impressive than Sark’s. No contest.
Posted
11 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

Wow, really going out on a limb there lol. 

Yeah trying not to be a dick to the guy who made the original post.  Could have just laughed at him for comparing the two.  Noted.  

Posted
1 minute ago, ChiTownDoc said:

Yeah trying not to be a dick to the guy who made the original post.  Could have just laughed at him for comparing the two.  Noted.  

The scenario, I was comparing the scenario. He was left with an option of taking a fg or being aggressive and going for a TD. You can be a dick though, this is surly lol. 

Posted
Just now, WinningIsHard said:

The scenario, I was comparing the scenario. He was left with an option of taking a fg or being aggressive and going for a TD. You can be a dick though, this is surly lol. 

I got it, and I played along.  Some other bozo decided even comparing anything between the two is a joke.  This is Surly, serious business.  

  • Haha 1
Posted
11 hours ago, WinningIsHard said:

The scenario, I was comparing the scenario. He was left with an option of taking a fg or being aggressive and going for a TD. You can be a dick though, this is surly lol. 

San Francisco was not playing its only rival in the biggest game of the season- a game that determines every year whether or not a championship will be on the table for the 49ers. Stop trying to justify the unjustifiable. Sarkisian turtled. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, ChiTownDoc said:

Yeah trying not to be a dick to the guy who made the original post.  Could have just laughed at him for comparing the two.  Noted.  

Be a dick. He’s a dummy without any testicles. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

brother anyone GIF

I was ALWAYS worried about Oklahoma, I am every year, because it's a rivalry game.  We gave away 14 point on interceptions, and failed to make a goal line conversion that costs us another 7.  

But if you want to put money down on Steve losing 2 more regular season games?  Refer to GIF. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Tex Long said:

Bear in mind, the same guy who gave us the immortal Roll Left also gave us Route 66.

Somewhat similar to how the same guy who gave us an MNC win and an appearance also gave us: 63-14, 65-13, 55-17, and 63-21

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Tex Pete said:

Be a dick. He’s a dummy without any testicles. 

He went for it 4 times on 4th down. The mother fucker ran a fake punt two minutes into the first quarter on like our own 30 against our “only rival”. You just don’t like sark, which is fair because he got beat by Kansas lol. 4 plays from the 1 is the most egregious thing from that game, it’s inexcusable. I’m sure in 2005 you nitpicked, somebody could have jerked you off with a velvet glove and you would have bitched about the temperature of the room.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Tex Pete said:

Looking the part. 

Yeah. Unfortunately.

Our safeties have been slow all year, and it's only now we're facing offenses that can punish us for it.

Posted
1 minute ago, Rimbo said:

Yeah. Unfortunately.

Our safeties have been slow all year, and it's only now we're facing offenses that can punish us for it.

Exactly, how can you expect to stifle the mighty Cougar offense and their all American receiving corps?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Dilligas said:

Exactly, how can you expect to stifle the mighty Cougar offense and their all American receiving corps?

Well, we had 3 opponents where we faced their backup QBs, and Jalen Milroe.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Fuckin' hell. I don't want to hear any more talk about how much of an offensive genius Sark is.

UH defense's strength is the DL, they're dropping everyone deep into coverage, leaving the short passes open. So what do we do? Call runs right into the line (that work sometimes, but usually get stuffed) and passes that the QB has to call check downs.

Why don't you... I don't know... call short passes and kill them with them until they stop you? They're leaving that open, why not exploit it?

I'm pissed. I'm frustrated. I'm furious. I was never on either the "fire Sark" or "keep Sark" bandwagon but I'm starting to choose a side and it is not the pro-Sark side.

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

I disassociated myself from the Dallas Cowboys a few years ago when it became clear that Jerry Jones couldn’t manage a franchise effectively to win. 

This game imo is a pivotal moment for the program. I think it’s showing that Sark isn’t the guy, and we may be headed for a dark dark period. 

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Dbeasy said:

I disassociated myself from the Dallas Cowboys a few years ago when it became clear that Jerry Jones couldn’t manage a franchise effectively to win. 

This game imo is a pivotal moment for the program. I think it’s showing that Sark isn’t the guy, and we may be headed for a dark dark period. 

Nah.

The NIL machine keeps going. We just need a coach who can take advantage of it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

I disassociated myself from the Dallas Cowboys a few years ago when it became clear that Jerry Jones couldn’t manage a franchise effectively to win. 

This game imo is a pivotal moment for the program. I think it’s showing that Sark isn’t the guy, and we may be headed for a dark dark period. 

Can’t be worse than 2014-2016

Posted
35 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

I disassociated myself from the Dallas Cowboys a few years ago when it became clear that Jerry Jones couldn’t manage a franchise effectively to win. 

This game imo is a pivotal moment for the program. I think it’s showing that Sark isn’t the guy, and we may be headed for a dark dark period. 

This is dumb. Even if we lost today this team would be 6-2 with a win on the road against a top 10 team. Sark may not ultimately be the guy that gets us over the top but he isn’t leading us into any kind of dark period. Get a fucking grip.

Posted

Serious question: Is Sark shaving points?

I mean, we blew two 14-point leads last season, and we almost blew a 21-point lead today.

It's as if he wants to win, but doesn't want to cover, and sometimes it backfires more than he meant it to and we lose.

I'm not sure how else you come out and dominate for 1.5 quarters, then completely stop what was working, this frequently.

Christ, this is some annoying ass shit.

Posted
On 10/13/2023 at 11:52 PM, z009 said:

Anyone that was expecting another 49-0 was setting themselves up for disappointment. Anytime you beat a team 49-0, they will likely have you circled on their schedule the next year. Even though we should win if we play OU again, I wouldn't expect it to be a cake-walk at all. It's pretty obvious that they are a much improved team this year. They looked pretty even with us physically, and Gabriel is good enough to keep them in any game. 

Yea like when ou beat us 66-13 or whatever and we followed it up with more losses.

Posted
2 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

TH was 6-1 in year 2… we’ll see what happens in the next 5 games and next year in the SEC

Lost to Maryland, beat Tulsa, 5-7 USC, 7-6 TCU, 5-7 Kstate, and 7-6 Baylor. OU was the only solid win. This year has been better.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, TexArcher said:

Serious question: Is Sark shaving points?

I mean, we blew two 14-point leads last season, and we almost blew a 21-point lead today.

It's as if he wants to win, but doesn't want to cover, and sometimes it backfires more than he meant it to and we lose.

I'm not sure how else you come out and dominate for 1.5 quarters, then completely stop what was working, this frequently.

Christ, this is some annoying ass shit.

We finally got the fast start and he eased up for whatever reason. If we start slow he calls plays with a purpose. It’s just super odd. It’s like he doesn’t take every series with the intent to score, like he thinks “you know we just scored easily so let’s work on some plays that haven’t worked to see if we can get them to work”. Some series are so amazingly executed and set up then the opposite happens for multiple series after that.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, Thatguy said:

Lost to Maryland, beat Tulsa, 5-7 USC, 7-6 TCU, 5-7 Kstate, and 7-6 Baylor. OU was the only solid win. This year has been better.

Bama win was solid, but they’re not the same Bama team from the 2010s. Wyoming, Baylor, and Kansas win came agains backup QBs. Like I said, we’ll see. But Sark hasn’t separated himself from TH in play calling and game management at all. I can’t complain about the recruiting though.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

Don’t be that guy. Wait, you are ThatGuy. Proceed. 

Not every win is going to be pretty. Houston had a pretty good gameplan, and despite what people here believe they had the answer to our shortcomings. We have not had a great pass rush. Our edge players are just average at that. We also are average on the back end. UH, despite their shortcomings, are solid at the skill positions. On defense they just played prevent, and what they were doing to our interior O-line was causing us problems in the run game. It is what it is. On to the next.

Posted
2 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

Bama win was solid, but they’re not the same Bama team from the 2010s. Wyoming, Baylor, and Kansas win came agains backup QBs. Like I said, we’ll see. But Sark hasn’t separated himself from TH in play calling and game management at all. I can’t complain about the recruiting though.

  Man, Bama is 6-1 with their only loss being to us. I think you aren't giving them enough credit. They aren't what they used to be but they are a very good football team and we beat them in their stadium convincingly. The team came out balls to the wall today and lifted the gas pedal. Happens all the time to the best of them.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
Just now, Thatguy said:

  Man, Bama is 6-1 with their only loss being to us. I think you aren't giving them enough credit. They aren't what they used to be but they are a very good football team and we beat them in their stadium convincingly. The team came out balls to the wall today and lifted the gas pedal. Happens all the time to the best of them.

They’ve grinded out their wins and looked very vulnerable against Arkansas and  A&M. I don’t want to discredit our win, but it makes you wonder how they would’ve fared with a a better OC. I don’t miss TH at all and I’m thankful for Sark’s recruiting. However, Sark playing OC and HC does not seem like a good setup and the team has turtles so many times over the past 3 seasons. The turtles and the wtf calls (fake FG) are what drive the comparison with TH. I hope he can recruit his way beyond this being and issue, and hires an OC. Until then, this will limit us from being a conference championship and CFP level team. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Bama win was solid, but they’re not the same Bama team from the 2010s. Wyoming, Baylor, and Kansas win came agains backup QBs. Like I said, we’ll see. But Sark hasn’t separated himself from TH in play calling and game management at all. I can’t complain about the recruiting though.
Sark has yet to go Bob the Builder on some lockers and lose that battle.
  • Haha 4
Posted
11 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

Bama win was solid, but they’re not the same Bama team from the 2010s. Wyoming, Baylor, and Kansas win came agains backup QBs. Like I said, we’ll see. But Sark hasn’t separated himself from TH in play calling and game management at all. I can’t complain about the recruiting though.

 

1 minute ago, USNALonghorn said:

They’ve grinded out their wins and looked very vulnerable against Arkansas and  A&M. I don’t want to discredit our win, but it makes you wonder how they would’ve fared with a a better OC. I don’t miss TH at all and I’m thankful for Sark’s recruiting. However, Sark playing OC and HC does not seem like a good setup and the team has turtles so many times over the past 3 seasons. The turtles and the wtf calls (fake FG) are what drive the comparison with TH. I hope he can recruit his way beyond this being and issue, and hires an OC. Until then, this will limit us from being a conference championship and CFP level team. 

They just beat Tenn 34-20 at home after trailing 20-7.

Some of you need to pay more attention to the rest of cfb.

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
Just now, Born to Run said:
11 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:
Bama win was solid, but they’re not the same Bama team from the 2010s. Wyoming, Baylor, and Kansas win came agains backup QBs. Like I said, we’ll see. But Sark hasn’t separated himself from TH in play calling and game management at all. I can’t complain about the recruiting though.

Sark has yet to go Bob the Builder on some lockers and lose that battle.

I count the lack of gimmicky bullshit as a “personality” upgrade

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ztejas said:

 

They just beat Tenn 34-20 at home after trailing 20-7.

Some of you need to pay more attention to the rest of cfb.

I watched some of that game, the Arky, and aggy games. Doesn’t change the fact the Bama looks limited by OC ineptitude. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

Bama win was solid, but they’re not the same Bama team from the 2010s. Wyoming, Baylor, and Kansas win came agains backup QBs. Like I said, we’ll see. But Sark hasn’t separated himself from TH in play calling and game management at all. I can’t complain about the recruiting though.

We seem to be recruiting smarter, no doubt about that, but this years class doesn't seem to be coming together during Sark's best year, his mojo year, so I wonder.

Posted
3 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

They’ve grinded out their wins and looked very vulnerable against Arkansas and  A&M. I don’t want to discredit our win, but it makes you wonder how they would’ve fared with a a better OC. I don’t miss TH at all and I’m thankful for Sark’s recruiting. However, Sark playing OC and HC does not seem like a good setup and the team has turtles so many times over the past 3 seasons. The turtles and the wtf calls (fake FG) are what drive the comparison with TH. I hope he can recruit his way beyond this being and issue, and hires an OC. Until then, this will limit us from being a conference championship and CFP level team. 

The second half of this post is where I'm at. Sark as an OV wouldn't go pussy mode and turtle like he did after going up 21 he'd do his job and score fucking points until the coach told him to chew clock. Since he's both he decided to turtle and play conservative, but not really chew that much clock or even press the run and stretch the field. He just can't do both roles. 

  • Hook 'Em 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...