Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
35 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Just checked back into my hotel room in Alpine after a day in Big Bend, and of course, Johnny’s too much of a chicken shit to even state whether or not selling off our nation’s natural treasures is a good or bad thing. 

Imagine being so pussy whipped by the retard-in-chief that you’re too scared to voice an opinion on such an obvious fucking wrong.

Were you scoping out parts of the park to buy?

  • Haha 2
Posted
13 hours ago, bolverk said:

Just checked back into my hotel room in Alpine after a day in Big Bend, and of course, Johnny’s too much of a chicken shit to even state whether or not selling off our nation’s natural treasures is a good or bad thing. 

Imagine being so pussy whipped by the retard-in-chief that you’re too scared to voice an opinion on such an obvious fucking wrong.

Frank Drebin is Johnny?  That makes a lot of sense.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
45 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

Frank Drebin is Johnny?  That makes a lot of sense.

Always has been

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
20 hours ago, Chewbacca said:

Shit, at least he skis in Montana now instead of Colorado.  

Sorry, I ski a lot in both states.

Hopefully they don't sell of Glacier.  I can work remote pretty easily so my family spends summers in Whitefish. I hit up Glacier a couple times a week for day hikes while there.  Going to section hike the CDT portion in July.  Maybe Trump will let me do it any way since I voted for him.

  • Fuck You 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

At least some in that party aren't dipshits. Public land sale provision removed.

https://www.outdoorlife.com/conservation/public-land-sales-amendment-withdrawn/?utm_campaign=feed&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=later-linkinbio

House Republicans Kill Provision to Sell Public Lands

The controversial provision in the federal budget bill would have required the disposal of 500,000 acres of public ground in Utah and Nevada

 

Republican House leaders have pulled a controversial provision from the federal budget bill that would have required the sale or transfer of some 500,000 acres of federal public land in the West.

Late this afternoon, leadership of the House Rules Committee removed the provision through a mechanism called a “manager’s amendment” after being pressured by maverick House Republicans.

 

The land-sale provision threatened to derail The One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, the mega-bill that contains President Trump’s spending priorities and a permanent tax cut. The bill is projected to increase the national deficit by up to $4 trillion while reorienting many federal agencies missions and capabilities.

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
Just now, Biff Tannen said:

And the king of stupidity with a 3rd grade vocabulary. 

The Bestest 2rd grade vaco..vocobo..vacab...words EVER. In the history of the world, even! Shackespeer would have loved my words. Loved!

  • Haha 1
Posted

National Forrest’s aren’t national parks, which were established to preserve the natural habitat of animals and the outstanding natural beauty. National Forrests were established so the country would always have our own supply of lumber, they were meant to be harvested and replanted, the wildlife and other flora are just a bonus.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 hour ago, GoPokes83 said:

National Forrest’s aren’t national parks, which were established to preserve the natural habitat of animals and the outstanding natural beauty. National Forrests were established so the country would always have our own supply of lumber, they were meant to be harvested and replanted, the wildlife and other flora are just a bonus.

Ok, Forrest.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
8 hours ago, GoPokes83 said:

National Forrest’s aren’t national parks, which were established to preserve the natural habitat of animals and the outstanding natural beauty. National Forrests were established so the country would always have our own supply of lumber, they were meant to be harvested and replanted, the wildlife and other flora are just a bonus.

Do you support selling these lands?

Posted
Do you support selling these lands?

I’m the opposite of an expert but isn’t selling them still illegal? I believe the proposal is to transfer some forests (Furk my phone just tried to change that to Forrest again, thanks AI spellcheck BS) to state control in an effort to cut fed spending. TBH for the next 4 years I’d trust the states, at least this one, with managing them more than I would the feds.
Posted
14 minutes ago, GoPokes83 said:


I’m the opposite of an expert but isn’t selling them still illegal? I believe the proposal is to transfer some forests (Furk my phone just tried to change that to Forrest again, thanks AI spellcheck BS) to state control in an effort to cut fed spending. TBH for the next 4 years I’d trust the states, at least this one, with managing them more than I would the feds.

It’s not in an effort to cut fed spending. It’s in an effort to get them sold to private enterprise so they can be stripped bare without regulation. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

It’s not in an effort to cut fed spending. It’s in an effort to get them sold to private enterprise so they can be stripped bare without regulation. 

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

Everything we're seeing in this country right now only reinforces the truth in this quote. We're such a scared, hateful, and small people that we don't mind we're getting grifted in all new ways on the daily by the powers that be. Although he might grumble under his breath a bit if the public beach he lives on is sold to the highest bidder in a similar fashion as the 'forrests' because in that case he'd be directly affected.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, HenryJames said:

 

Magats, probably - "Doesn't matter to me. I'm too fucking high and fat on diabetes to get outside and enjoy nature so fuck everyone else."

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
23 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

Magats, probably - "Doesn't matter to me. I'm too fucking high and fat on diabetes to get outside and enjoy nature so fuck everyone else."

Also Magats, when they show up in the family truckster to National Park X, only to be turned away, or stuck in an entry line for 8 hours, or seeing no services, overflowing trash, etc....."THANKS, BIDEN!"

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

Believe me, I know someone whose main happy place is RMNP.  They fuck with it, she's going to go full Guy Fawkes.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Believe me, I know someone whose main happy place is RMNP.  They fuck with it, she's going to go full Guy Fawkes.

She likes a big line to get in and no camping spots available?

Posted
8 minutes ago, ClubWhatever said:

She likes a big line to get in and no camping spots available?

No line if you get there early.  At least on the Grand Lake side.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, ClubWhatever said:

She likes a big line to get in and no camping spots available?

She don't care about camping and we live 90 min from RMNP.  Pretty easy for us

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

Go blow your life partner.

Don't lash out just because mommy and daddy are fighting, lil' Johnny.

Edited by aggie08
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

Go blow your life partner.

Lulz.  Sorry to disappoint, but I've been married (to a woman!) for 25 years. I'm sorry you got priced out of Colorado, but enjoy Montana!  You fit in better up there.

Posted

imagine believing that telling someone to go perform cunnilingus or fellatio on their life partner is some sort of sick burn.

lulz. what a fucking dork.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, sidis said:

imagine believing that telling someone to go perform cunnilingus or fellatio on their life partner is some sort of sick burn.

lulz. what a fucking dork.

Bingo.  He's the kind of guy that doesn't trim his fingernails or brush his teeth before foreplay.  A good session of sex to him is probably only 5 minutes to maybe an hour at the most, instead of a couple of hours (or more) like the rest of us.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chewbacca said:

Lulz.  Sorry to disappoint, but I've been married (to a woman!) for 25 years. I'm sorry you got priced out of Colorado, but enjoy Montana!  You fit in better up there.

A woman? That is so gay!

  • Haha 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

I offer this link as nothing but notice of its existence. I do not know the entity that you would be giving your money to, nor the quality of the items offered for sale.  As always, buyer beware.   Thank you for your attention in this matter. 
 

https://shop.ourparks.org/collections/shirts

This just arrived (in a different color) yesterday. 
 

image.thumb.png.c1fa868fa67b548b52d67d031f1e8108.png

  • Hook 'Em 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...