Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Biff Tannen said:

God she sucks so bad.  The magat women make me more angry than the men, most of the time. 

I said the same the other day. I find the MAGA women far more grotesque than the men. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

I said the same the other day. I find the MAGA women far more grotesque than the men. 

have you seen Ted Cruz?

  • Haha 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

I said the same the other day. I find the MAGA women far more grotesque than the men. 

 

5 minutes ago, Fastbreak said:

have you seen Ted Cruz?

See, Ted and the rest of the maga douches are just run of the mill slobs.  They look just like their Big Mac eating orange pustule. 

The maga women purposefully deformed themselves to get the maga look.  Bee stung lips, botox, etc.  

While the men just passively turn into lumps of goo based on their unthinking intake of gravy and mashed potatoes, the women take an active and knowing role in their own disfigurement.  It's worse.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

 

See, Ted and the rest of the maga douches are just run of the mill slobs.  They look just like their Big Mac eating orange pustule. 

The maga women purposefully deformed themselves to get the maga look.  Bee stung lips, botox, etc.  

While the men just passively turn into lumps of goo based on their unthinking intake of gravy and mashed potatoes, the women take an active and knowing role in their own disfigurement.  It's worse.  

kto-kounotoritoken.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 6
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/25/2025 at 11:39 AM, Firemans4Horn said:

What are we even doing here?

 

 

there's gonna be a new term for whatever this form of lying is because it's not gaslighting, it's something else.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Red Five said:

I think it's just good old fashioned lying. Or alternative facts. 

maybe, but it feels different somehow. like it's one thing if the gov't lies to us and says there's no aliens or some shit, but when they start telling us what we're seeing with our own eyes isn't happening, it's too Orwellian to ignore

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted

nothing to see here.  This is all above-board.

 

Federal prosecutors on Wednesday moved to dismiss criminal charges against a woman accused of fraud in Florida who was being represented in court by Brad Bondi, the brother of Attorney General Pam Bondi.

The Biden Justice Department filed a criminal complaint against Carolina Amesty, a former Republican lawmaker, in mid-January -- just days before President Donald Trump took office. Amesty faced two counts of theft of government property related to COVID relief fraud and, if convicted, faced a maximum penalty of up to 20 years in prison.

But on Wednesday morning, Brad Bondi claimed in court papers that "counsel for Ms. Amesty learned [last month] that the government had ceased its criminal investigation ... and withdrew its outstanding subpoenas."

"We understand that the government no longer plans to seek an indictment," wrote Brad Bondi, a lawyer at the firm Paul Hastings.

Justice Department prosecutors followed up hours later, filing court papers asking the judge to dismiss the criminal complaint without prejudice.

 

This favorable outcome for Amesty, who repeatedly accused the Biden administration of targeting her for political purposes, demonstrates a unique dynamic in the current justice system: in Brad Bondi, a defendant can hire a defense attorney with a familial relationship with the top law enforcement official in the country.

A Justice Department spokesperson said that Pam Bondi's relationship with her brother had no bearing on the outcome of the case, telling ABC News in a statement: "This decision was made through proper channels and the Attorney General had no role in it."

A spokesperson for Brad Bondi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

The dropping of charges Wednesday was not the first legal victory Brad Bondi has scored during the Trump administration. He previously represented Trevor Milton, the disgraced Nikola founder who was sentenced to four years in prison for lying about the viability of his electric vehicle technology; Milton secured a pardon from President Trump in March.

Amesty, according to the case docket, retained Brad Bondi in December -- about three weeks after Bondi's sister, Pam Bondi, was nominated by then-President-elect Trump to serve as his attorney general.

In the intervening months, there have been multiple delays since the case was charged. The parties repeatedly informed the judge overseeing Amesty's case that they were "engaged in active discussions regarding the appropriate disposition of this matter," and repeatedly sought extensions to file an indictment. The first request noting these "active discussions" came two weeks after Trump took office in January.

The judge granted those extensions. But in June, he only partially granted their request for an additional delay, writing in a terse order that "sufficient time has passed for the parties to work out their differences," and that their rationale "does not support tolling the deadline for more than 210 days."

According to a filing from the government in July, Brad Bondi had provided them with "extensive" records of alleged exculpatory evidence, including over 500 pages of documents and "multiple in-person meetings and phone calls." The government continued to inform the court that their "investigation remains ongoing, due in part to a pending sealed motion related to grand jury proceedings."

Throughout the protracted legal wrangling over the deadline to file a complaint, Amesty's legal team, led by Brad Bondi, repeatedly characterized the case as a "hastily-filed and politically motivated complaint" targeting his client.

"Ms. Amesty is innocent," one filing stated, claiming the loans in question "were obtained appropriately in good faith and with no misrepresentations."

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 3
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

 

There's video of what Adam Schiff said (linked) but it's better in print because you don't have to listen to Spam make a mockery of the US by interrupting him with the most childish statements you can imagine. TNR published it.

“I think it’s valuable that the American people get a sense of what you’ve refused to answer today,” Schiff told Bondi. The following questions are those that Schiff noted went unanswered, or were met with personal attacks, by the attorney general:

1. Did Bondi consult with career ethics lawyers when she approved Trump’s acceptance of a $400 million jet gifted by Qatar’s royal family?

2. Who ordered that Donald Trump’s name be flagged in the FBI’s review of the Epstein files?

3. Did Homan keep his $50,000 from the undercover agents?

4. Did Homan pay taxes on the $50,000?

5. Did DOJ prosecutors determine there was “insufficient evidence” to charge former FBI Director James Comey before he was indicted?

6. How did the administration determine whether U.S. military strikes on Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean were legal?

(Here, Bondi interrupted, asking the senator, who worked for the justice department before his career in politics, “Do you have a law degree, Senator Schiff?”)

7. Did Bondi discuss indicting Comey with Trump? 

8. Did Bondi approve the dismissal of antitrust lawyers who opposed the Hewlett Packard–Juniper merger?

9. Does Bondi support a “compensation fund” for people prosecuted in connection with the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots? 

10. Is Bondi firing career prosecutors for working on January 6 investigations?

11. Does Bondi think government officials must follow court orders?

After concluding the list, Schiff made the following statement, though he was peppered with interruptions from Bondi—who brought up red herrings, such as wildfires and riots in his home state, and threw personal barbs, calling the senator a “failed lawyer.”

This is supposed to be an oversight hearing of the Justice Department, and it comes in the wake of an indictment called for by the president of one of his enemies. This is supposed to be an oversight hearing, and it comes in the wake of revelations that a top administration official took $50,000 in a bag, and this department made that investigation go away. This is supposed to be an oversight hearing, when dozens of prosecutors have been fired simply because they worked on cases investigating the former president.… This is supposed to be an oversight hearing in which members of Congress can get serious answers to serious questions about … the cover-up of corruption, about the prosecution of the president’s enemies.

Schiff implored members of the committee to “demand answers to those questions” and to refuse “personal slander as an answer to those questions.”

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Satchel said:

I never in my life thought there would be an AG who could disgust me more than the previous two. Congrats, Pam.

She reminds me of a soulless Alicia Silverstone.



×
×
  • Create New...