Jump to content

Israel


SmokeyBear1861

Recommended Posts

Well that was interesting.

Wolf Blitzer was just interviewing an IDF spokesperson on CNN, asking if the refugee camp in Gaza that was just obliterated was done by the IDF on purpose, knowing that there were civilians there.

The IDF spokesman said, "yep, we did it on purpose."  It was clear as day, no distortion or delay or anything.

Wolf then feigns that he can't hear the guy for a minute and asks another question.  Again, IDF guy answers clearly.

CNN then cuts to two other anchors and said they lost the feeds for Wolf Blitzer and the interview and cut to commercial.

 

Seems to me like they didn't like the IDF answer.

Edited by Biff Tannen
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

So it could've been actual Cornell students, or it couldn't been Russian propagandists, or it could've been some good old fashioned American nazis trying to stir shit up. We won't know unless/until law enforcement actually tracks down who posted the threats.

it's been a hallmark of russian active measures to use stochastic tactics like this to gin up a genuine response to a fake outrage bait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Well that was interesting.

Wolf Blitzer was just interviewing an IDF spokesperson on CNN, asking if the refugee camp in Gaza that was just obliterated was done by the IDF on purpose, knowing that there were civilians there.

The IDF spokesman said, "yep, we did it on purpose."  It was clear as day, no distortion or delay or anything.

Wolf then feigns that he can't hear the guy for a minute and asks another question.  Again, IDF guy answers clearly.

CNN then cuts to two other anchors and said they lost the feeds for Wolf Blitzer and the interview and cut to commercial.

 

Seems to me like they didn't like the IDF answer.

yep, saw that. Then brought on a US Military retired Officer to say they were looking for a high value target. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

About this:

 

So it could've been actual Cornell students, or it couldn't been Russian propagandists, or it could've been some good old fashioned American nazis trying to stir shit up. We won't know unless/until law enforcement actually tracks down who posted the threats.

and yet....?

https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/31/us/cornell-antisemetic-threats-person-of-interest/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Palestine* (not Hamas) gets most of its aid from the Western and democratic world with some petrodollars thrown in. 

Hamas is aligned with Iran and Russia because they are a violent, authoritarian movement that fundamentally share Iran and Russia’s views of the world and how it should work.  Only nations like Russia and Iran will help them, they are awful and so they need awful regimes to help them launch terror attacks.

This isn’t near as complicated or as morally grey as people would have you believe, and the resources that the Palestinian PEOPLE  actually get and that are helpful are coming from sources that aren’t acknowledged because it upsets the big narrative. 
image.thumb.jpeg.56ed9a37c85440f57b369054b9b4f77b.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.d09c3d8b7548dbde816ae66ef16193e8.jpeg
 

image.thumb.jpeg.ad42be3473452cdcfccf8c705c49f184.jpeg

this is how you cloak room, people.

thank you for the informative answer. i learned a lot from this post.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, statsman said:

Hayden, are Iran and Russia resources for the Palestinians or are the Palestinians more of a resource for Iran and Russia?

Iran is helping Hamas kill Jews, but I don’t believe it is actually advancing the Palestinian cause. 

 

3 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

You're not understanding his point. They turn to these people out of desperation, because they appear to them to be the only ones willing to offer any resources. It's a rational decision even if it's a bad one.

and yes, this was my ultimate point.

this is something i was talking to my teenage sons about. palestinians are in an ultimate no win situation. they are expected to act perfectly while they endure and witness abuse after abuse around them. obviously, the answer isn't violence, but let's be real. if we don't feel comfortable with "apartheid" as a desciption, then we can compare it somewhat to jim crow america, i guess. black people could succeed if they played perfectly by the white man's rules. that's the situation palestinians are in. hamas is a terrorist organization, but put yourself in their shoes. there is actually no place else for a desperate palestinian to go. 

i dunno. when you treat people like animals, sometimes they fulfill your wishes and act like them. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:

 

and yes, this was my ultimate point.

this is something i was talking to my teenage sons about. palestinians are in an ultimate no win situation. they are expected to act perfectly while they endure and witness abuse after abuse around them. obviously, the answer isn't violence, but let's be real. if we don't feel comfortable with "apartheid" as a desciption, then we can compare it somewhat to jim crow america, i guess. black people could succeed if they played perfectly by the white man's rules. that's the situation palestinians are in. hamas is a terrorist organization, but put yourself in their shoes. there is actually no place else for a desperate palestinian to go. 

i dunno. when you treat people like animals, sometimes they fulfill your wishes and act like them. 

Actually, it’s worse than that. Blessed may be the peacemakers, but ask PM Rabin about how kind that part of the world is to them. 
 
The US south may have deserved a Toussaint Louverture, but it got a Frederick Douglas (America may really be blessed).  We got a MLK, Jr., instead of a Patrice Lumumba. 
 
There may be (probably are) Palestinians ready and able to make appeals to Israeli, Palestinians, and the world’s better natures. I think Hamas and IJ will put a bullet in their heads before they get very far. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:

 

and yes, this was my ultimate point.

this is something i was talking to my teenage sons about. palestinians are in an ultimate no win situation. they are expected to act perfectly while they endure and witness abuse after abuse around them. obviously, the answer isn't violence, but let's be real. if we don't feel comfortable with "apartheid" as a desciption, then we can compare it somewhat to jim crow america, i guess. black people could succeed if they played perfectly by the white man's rules. that's the situation palestinians are in. hamas is a terrorist organization, but put yourself in their shoes. there is actually no place else for a desperate palestinian to go. 

i dunno. when you treat people like animals, sometimes they fulfill your wishes and act like them. 

"Hurt people hurt people" applies at scale, basically.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, statsman said:

Actually, it’s worse than that. Blessed may be the peacemakers, but ask PM Rabin about how kind that part of the world is to them. 
 
The US south may have deserved a Toussaint Louverture, but it got a Frederick Douglas (America may really be blessed).  We got a MLK, Jr., instead of a Patrice Lumumba. 
 
There may be (probably are) Palestinians ready and able to make appeals to Israeli, Palestinians, and the world’s better natures. I think Hamas and IJ will put a bullet in their heads before they get very far. 

if they don't, israel would.

because this is all proceeding according to israel's plan. you put the screws to people, they eventually buckle. some will get angry and rise up and usually get brutally repressed. 

this is not a new pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:

if they don't, israel would.

because this is all proceeding according to israel's plan. you put the screws to people, they eventually buckle. some will get angry and rise up and usually get brutally repressed. 

this is not a new pattern.

It's Netanyahu's/Likud's plan, not Israel's. He'll also be trying to use this as an opportunity to crack down on domestic opposition.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, statsman said:

(Added because it’s too late to edit earlier post):

For the record, I believe Frederick Douglas’ anger was every bit as fierce as Louverture’s. He applied it very differently. 

You know, Frederick Douglas is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

You know, Frederick Douglas is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more.

A lot of great 19th century statesmen wrote and said things that are very cringey today. Douglas’ holds up really, really well. 
 
I’m planning to read one of his 4th of July speeches to my family next Independence Day. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Palestine* (not Hamas) gets most of its aid from the Western and democratic world with some petrodollars thrown in. 

Hamas is aligned with Iran and Russia because they are a violent, authoritarian movement that fundamentally share Iran and Russia’s views of the world and how it should work.  Only nations like Russia and Iran will help them, they are awful and so they need awful regimes to help them launch terror attacks.

This isn’t near as complicated or as morally grey as people would have you believe, and the resources that the Palestinian PEOPLE  actually get and that are helpful are coming from sources that aren’t acknowledged because it upsets the big narrative. 
image.thumb.jpeg.56ed9a37c85440f57b369054b9b4f77b.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.d09c3d8b7548dbde816ae66ef16193e8.jpeg
 

image.thumb.jpeg.ad42be3473452cdcfccf8c705c49f184.jpeg

Not sure what narrative you're referring to but it's nice to see graphics showing that it's very easy for nation states to tell the difference between Palestinian civilians and Hamas when it comes to tracking their dollars. A bit unclear how it becomes so much more difficult when it comes to one particular nation state tracking their fired munitions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

It's Netanyahu's/Likud's plan, not Israel's. He'll also be trying to use this as an opportunity to crack down on domestic opposition.  

Maybe Likud will continue with this “plan” but it will be without Bibi, he’ll be gone the next election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, statsman said:

(Added because it’s too late to edit earlier post):

For the record, I believe Frederick Douglas’ anger was every bit as fierce as Louverture’s. He applied it very differently. 

We didn’t get Louverture in the United States because in Haiti, there were about 10-1 enslaved people to the rest of the population, and the demographics of the United States and American South were quite different.  The U.S. for sure deserved it, but it would have ended in a terrible bloodbath going the other way. (And of course Louvertute was not part of the massacres in Haiti, which happened after his death). 
 

There’s some lessons in there on the wisdom and morality of starting a war you can’t win against a force that you can’t defeat, which will almost assuredly hurt your own people worse than the enemy. Even if (unlike Hamas/Israel/Palestine in general), there’s no gray area about who is “right” and who is “wrong.” 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

You're not understanding his point. They turn to these people out of desperation, because they appear to them to be the only ones willing to offer any resources. It's a rational decision even if it's a bad one.

This objectively untrue, as I posted the actual aid figures to Palestine and where they come from below. It’s also backwards logic as there is a huge constituency, in Europe especially, that badly wants the cover to increase aid to Palestine in a big way and they can’t— because of the existence of Hamas and in no small part because of Hamas’ alignment with pariahs like Iran and Russia.  That choice almost certainly costs the Palestine people far more in aid than they get. 
 

It is rational in one sense, in that no Western nation will either arm a terrorist organization or will finance a life of luxury for leaders of said organization. Russia, Iran, and some petrostates are happy to do so. There’s rationality, in a sense of pure self-interest and advancement of ideological (destroy Israel, kill the Jews) but not so much rational if the goal is helping Palestinian people and advancing peace. 
 

You will see a great many of the things people want—- pressure for peace talks and a two state solution, less willingness to arm Israel, and a flow of aid “the likes of which have never been seen before,” if Hamas is removed and replaced by a PA that renounces violence and the aim of eliminating Israel. 

And the deep irony here is that Bibi has resisted doing this because of precisely what I wrote above for YEARS. And he’s now in a spot where he’s almost forced to do so,  but the very visceral human cost of using violence at a level that would be required is going to result in a very unhappy medium indeed. This problem is not unfamiliar to conflicts like this, with an asymmetry of power where the weaker counter- party loses everything if they concede. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

This objectively untrue, as I posted the actual aid figures to Palestine and where they come from below. It’s also backwards logic as there is a huge constituency, in Europe especially, that badly wants the cover to increase aid to Palestine in a big way and they can’t— because of the existence of Hamas and in no small part because of Hamas’ alignment with pariahs like Iran and Russia.  That choice almost certainly costs the Palestine people far more in aid than they get. 
 

It is rational in one sense, in that no Western nation will either arm a terrorist organization or will finance a life of luxury for leaders of said organization. Russia, Iran, and some petrostates are happy to do so. There’s rationality, in a sense of pure self-interest and advancement of ideological (destroy Israel, kill the Jews) but not so much rational if the goal is helping Palestinian people and advancing peace. 
 

You will see a great many of the things people want—- pressure for peace talks and a two state solution, less willingness to arm Israel, and a flow of aid “the likes of which have never been seen before,” if Hamas is removed and replaced by a PA that renounces violence and the aim of eliminating Israel. 

And the deep irony here is that Bibi has resisted doing this because of precisely what I wrote above for YEARS. And he’s now in a spot where he’s almost forced to do so,  but the very visceral human cost of using violence at a level that would be required is going to result in a very unhappy medium indeed. This problem is not unfamiliar to conflicts like this, with an asymmetry of power where the weaker counter- party loses everything if they concede. 

Dude, this is why I call you an annoying debatelord. I say "Palestinians probably perceive Iran/Russia as their only sources of material aid". I then say it's a rational point of view to take even if it's illogical and/or incorrect. You even said it in a later sentence, it is the pure rationality of self-interest/survival.

Your average Palestinian on the ground in Gaza doesn't have those figures in front of them for you to mock or ridicule then with, and you know that, so you're simply trying to use my rather obvious point to just spew debatelord energy for no good reason.

I'm not disagreeing with you here, I'm just begging you to stop trying to debate everyone, because when you do that you're just an annoying bludgeon no one wants to engage with.

  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

Dude, this is why I call you an annoying debatelord. I say "Palestinians probably perceive Iran/Russia as their only sources of material aid". I then say it's a rational point of view to take even if it's illogical and/or incorrect. You even said it in a later sentence, it is the pure rationality of self-interest/survival.

Your average Palestinian on the ground in Gaza doesn't have those figures in front of them for you to mock or ridicule then with, and you know that, so you're simply trying to use my rather obvious point to just spew debatelord energy for no good reason.

I'm not disagreeing with you here, I'm just begging you to stop trying to debate everyone, because when you do that you're just an annoying bludgeon no one wants to engage with.


Well the average Palestinian doesn’t make these decisions, so it doesn’t really matter what figures they are. 

 

In between your personal insults you raise some interesting points without meaning to, mainly about how bad lots of regular people are at friend/foe identification. It’s almost like there are external actors and motivations beyond the people you’re mad at that are stoking this. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nivek said:


No, that is a fucking horrible idea.

Why? Nearly anyone else other than the IDF seems like a good idea to me.

 

‘A new Nakba’: settler violence forces Palestinians out of West Bank villages
Communities who have clung on for decades are leaving their homes in the face of rising attrition by Israelis

Life in Zanuta, a Palestinian village atop a windy ridge in the desolate south Hebron hills, deep in the occupied West Bank, has never been easy. The community are mostly herders who raise goats and sheep through the barren landscape’s scorching summers and freezing winters, and who have steadfastly refused to leave their homes despite the mounting difficulties posed by the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) soldiers on one hand and radical Israeli settlers on the other.

But after weeks of intense settler violence in the aftermath of the Hamas attack on Israel on 7 October, Zanuta’s 150 residents have made a collective decision to leave. Armed settlers – some in reservist army uniforms, some covering their faces – have begun breaking into their homes at night, beating up adults, destroying and stealing belongings, and terrifying the children.

After decades of a desperate fight to cling on to their land, the community has decided they have lost.

On Monday, men and women cried as they dismantled their homes and haphazardly packed solar panels, animal feed and personal belongings on to pickup trucks. The noise of the demolition drowned out the bleating from the animal pens and threw up dust and debris that tore at the eyes and throat.

“It is a new Nakba,” said Issa Ahmad Baghdad, 71, referring to the expulsion of 700,000 Palestinians in 1948 after the creation of Israel. “My family are going to Rafat. But we don’t know anyone there. We don’t know what to tell the children.”

In the Gaza Strip, where Israel has launched a campaign to destroy Hamas, the militant group that killed 1,400 people on its rampage through southern Israel, trapped civilians cannot leave; in the West Bank, they are being forced from their homes.

image.png.dc8129cc81522b204d183297a8f7c9a2.png

Masafer Yatta, a collection of shepherding hamlets including Zanuta, is in area C, the sparsely populated 60% of the West Bank under full Israeli control and under threat of annexation. Palestinian water cisterns, solar panels, roads and buildings here are frequently demolished on the grounds that they do not have building permits, which are nearly impossible to obtain, while surrounding illegal Israeli settlements flourish.

Israeli settlers herding sheep had in effect taken control of 10% of area C in about five years, according to research by Kerem Navot, an NGO monitoring settler activity, but in the last year alone, about 110,000 dunams, or 110 sq km (42 sq miles), of the West Bank has been annexed by settlers on herding outposts. By way of comparison, the entirety of the built-up Israeli settlement areas constructed since the occupation began in 1967 cover only 80 sq km.

“We have had hard times in the village since the settlers started the Mitarim farm across the valley three years ago. It has been harder to take the sheep out, and the settler young men destroy things like crops, or steal sheep, or call the army to come and harass us. But now they are coming into our homes. My daughters are terrified,” said Amin Hamed al-Hudarat, 41, as he began to cry.

“I had thought we might need to leave before, but we did not expect it to happen like this. I can’t believe that by tomorrow I am going to leave my home. We are going to camp on the outskirts of Deira, but I don’t know what will happen next, what I will do for work, what we will do with the sheep. My whole life is in Zanuta.

“The community is breaking up. I don’t know when I will see my neighbours to chat and tell stories and drink coffee again.”

After years of legal battles, Israel’s supreme court ruled last May in favour of the IDF that a 3,000-hectare (7,410-acre) area of Masafer Yatta would remain a military training zone, known as Firing Zone 918, a ruling illegal under international law and one of the single biggest expulsion decisions since the occupation began. Since then, the army and Israeli settlers have steadily increased the pressure to try to force the Palestinian community in the Firing Zone, as well as those living in dozens of nearby villages, to leave.

Demolitions of Palestinian houses, roads and infrastructure have increased since the court’s ruling, while shepherds say they are regularly told by the army to leave grazing land, which is then taken over by settlers, or settlers chase them away. Water and animal-feed deliveries, as well as visitors from charities and leftwing Israeli activists who used to help deter settler violence, have been turned back by the army. Since 7 October, settlers have begun beating and using live fire against the activists, as well as Palestinians.

New checkpoints have completely isolated villages such as Jimba, making it difficult for residents to leave. Palestinians are held up and questioned by soldiers sometimes for hours at a time, and dozens of unlicensed cars have been confiscated, forcing residents to use donkeys instead.

Under this campaign of attrition, some families had already made the difficult decision to leave, most of them for the nearby town of Yatta. During the Guardian’s visit to the area a month ago, two families in Khirbet ar-Ratheem, near the Asael settlement, insisted they would not leave, despite the pressure; today, they have gone.

image.png.ff486e95dc700e47145866f92e83bc2e.png

Now that entire villages such as Zanuta have decided to leave, it is feared there will be a domino effect in the area, said Nasser Nawadja, a field researcher from the village of Susiya for the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem. He has been beaten and arrested many times during his work.

“Settler violence is now worse than ever. Sometimes, they are wearing reservist uniforms, and we don’t know who is the army and who is a settler any more,” he said.

“The people in Tuba were given a 24-hour ultimatum to leave, or the settlers said they would come back and kill them. That was on Saturday. We don’t know what will happen next.”

According to B’Tselem, in the last three weeks 858 Palestinians from 32 different communities, and 13 entire communities in total, have been forcibly displaced. The numbers increase every day.

The international community, including the US, has issued strong statements to the Israeli government that it must “take measures to protect Palestinians from attacks by Israeli extremist settlers”. “These attacks are unacceptable, those responsible need to be stopped and held accountable,” a communique from the state department in Washington said on Monday.

However, Palestinians and Israeli activists say they have little faith in the Israeli authorities. According to UN data from September, in four out of five communities where residents had filed police complaints about settler violence, only 6% knew of any follow-up.

For some, it is too little, too late. In Zanuta on Monday, pickup trucks trundled down the dirt track to the main road, full to the brim; they came back empty a few hours later to collect more belongings from the destroyed community. Three Israeli soldiers stood next to an armoured patrol vehicle at the turnoff to the main road, silently watching.

“I don’t know when I will be able to come back again,” said Hudarat. “I think I am saying goodbye to my home for ever.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Why? Nearly anyone else other than the IDF seems like a good idea to me.

 

Yeah, I don’t think sending Americans and Europeans to pacify a populace hopped up on fifty years of propaganda about “Crusaders” is going to work out for anyone.

A third party isn’t an awful idea. There’s an argument for giving the neo-Ottomans (Erdogan) and the people who think they miss the Ottomans what they want just to see what happens. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tons of testimonials from former IDF soldiers.

https://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/

Breaking the Silence is an organization of veteran soldiers who have served in the Israeli military since the start of the Second Intifada and have taken it upon themselves to expose the public to the reality of everyday life in the Occupied Territories. We endeavor to stimulate public debate about the price paid for a reality in which young soldiers face a civilian population on a daily basis, and are engaged in the control of that population’s everyday life. Our work aims to bring an end to the occupation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Yeah, I don’t think sending Americans and Europeans to pacify a populace hopped up on fifty years of propaganda about “Crusaders” is going to work out for anyone.

A third party isn’t an awful idea. There’s an argument for giving the neo-Ottomans (Erdogan) and the people who think they miss the Ottomans what they want just to see what happens. 

 

Good point. I just don't want the IDF doing it. I'd also like to see that happen in the West Bank, but I think Israel is hellbound determined to annex Area C and don't want to relinquish their control over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Why? Nearly anyone else other than the IDF seems like a good idea to me.

I seriously doubt Biden would step on that geopolitical turd. He isn't putting U.S. troops in Palestine. The Palestinians probably don't see a difference between the IDF and the U.S. military.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

You’re a good poster.  I think if we want to practice good info hygiene it’s worth looking at what this guy was posting literally at the moments the kibbutz massacre was unfolding (Hamas propaganda on the ground, in real time). 
 

 

Yeah, I didn't look him up before posting. I was just disgusted by how the IDF and Israeli extremists were treating Palestinians in those videos.

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/israeli-tiktok-reenact-video-of-blindfolded-idf-detainees/

Edited by bolverk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, bolverk said:

I meant to only post the second tweet without realizing it was part of a pair. 

 

Quanah sat down close to him and said 'Move over.' Miller moved. Parker moved with him, and again sat down close to him. ‘Move over,’ he repeated. This continued until Miller had fallen off the log. 'Like that,' said Quanah.

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:


Well the average Palestinian doesn’t make these decisions, so it doesn’t really matter what figures they are. 

 

In between your personal insults you raise some interesting points without meaning to, mainly about how bad lots of regular people are at friend/foe identification. It’s almost like there are external actors and motivations beyond the people you’re mad at that are stoking this. 

I apologize for the insult. We're not at a disagreement here.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An Israel Defense Forces statement said the strike on Jabalia, Gaza's largest refugee camp, had killed Ibrahim Biari. It said he was a ringleader of what it called the "murderous terror attack" on Oct. 7.

Palestinian health officials said at least 50 Palestinians were killed in the refugee camp blast and 150 wounded. Hamas spokesperson Hazem Qassem denied any senior commander there and called the claim an Israeli pretext for killing civilians.

A Hamas statement said there were 400 dead and injured in Jabalia, which houses families of refugees from wars with Israel dating back to 1948. Reuters could not independently verify the reported casualty figures.

The blast left large craters in a rubble filled area surrounded by wrecked concrete buildings.

Israel has sent repeated warnings to Gaza residents to evacuate northern areas and while many have gone south, many have not.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/hamas-says-it-fires-israeli-troops-pressing-gaza-ground-assault-2023-10-31/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

I took it to mean the Israeli people outside of their whack job government.  Regular civilians.

I suppose it’s about as true of Israeli citizens as it is of American citizens. They have their share of the populace that share the extremist ideology of their whack job government just like we have our MAGA crowd. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A hearty LOL at this fucking dipshit. A junior at Cornell is by definition one of the most privileged people on this planet and he just learned the hard way that none of that post-9/11 CT infrastructure disappeared.  Enjoy never having a normal adult life, asshole.

Quote

The complaint alleges that Dai posted threatening messages to the Cornell section of an online discussion site, including posts calling for the deaths of Jewish people and a post that said “gonna shoot up 104 west.” According to information provided by Cornell University Police and other public information, 104 West is a Cornell University dining hall that caters predominantly to Kosher diets and is located next to the Cornell Jewish Center, which provides residences for Cornell students. In another post, Dai allegedly threatened to “stab” and “slit the throat” of any Jewish males he sees on campus, to rape and throw off a cliff any Jewish females, and to behead any Jewish babies. In that same post, Dai threatened to “bring an assault rifle to campus and shoot all you pig jews.” 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:

You’re a good poster.  I think if we want to practice good info hygiene it’s worth looking at what this guy was posting literally at the moments the kibbutz massacre was unfolding (Hamas propaganda on the ground, in real time). 
 

 

Israel doesn’t treat them like equal humans. That’s not propaganda. That’s fact. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, F250 said:

I seriously doubt Biden would step on that geopolitical turd. He isn't putting U.S. troops in Palestine. The Palestinians probably don't see a difference between the IDF and the U.S. military.

Yeah, he’s not going to put U.S. service members at risk. The Israelis are never going to allow fair living conditions to the Palestinian people. There’s not going to be a Palestinian state because Israel doesn’t want one. They’ll just offer shitty deals that no one in their right mind would ever accept then blame the Palestinians for why there’s no Palestinian state. Just like they’ve always done. Whatever comes after Hamas is eliminated, if Hamas is eliminated, will still involve the Palestinian people being treated like shit. Our support of Israel already makes us complicit in that arrangement. Putting U.S. troops on the ground would just make them targets. Sooner or later someone would get killed and then we risk getting sucked into a larger conflict. It would just be asking for trouble to get our own troops involved. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

A hearty LOL at this fucking dipshit. A junior at Cornell is by definition one of the most privileged people on this planet and he just learned the hard way that none of that post-9/11 CT infrastructure disappeared.  Enjoy never having a normal adult life, asshole.

 

 

From the comments:

"I wonder if he's going to find federal prison as "exhilarating" as his professor found the slaughter, rape, and kidnapping of Jews."

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

You’re a good poster.  I think if we want to practice good info hygiene it’s worth looking at what this guy was posting literally at the moments the kibbutz massacre was unfolding (Hamas propaganda on the ground, in real time). 
 

 

Are you suggesting that the TikTok videos Bolverk posted are fake?  That Israel isn’t using this as a opportunity to expand settlements in the West Bank?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...