Jump to content

Things not going well for Joe Rogan


Parliament

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Bravo said:

That would be up to each local district how they want to approach that. My school in Texas in 80s and 90s had a moment of silence. 

Our schools in Texas in 2022 have the same thing.  But it's not good enough for many.  Unless their will is being imposed, it's never enough.  Validation via coercion.  

Edited by Lobo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

Meh, the old “I know you are, but what am I retort.”

Nice job confirming your dumbassedness, Beavis. 

Lol you think your comment deserved more than that. I’m happy with my responses to your posts and those prior. You’re welcome to refute the posts but you want to sling insults. I responded in kind 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CNN does more for Republicans than Fox News ever could. 

We had to vote for a conman because Hillary was a Democratic Party member! Defense.

At least in retrospect I can laugh at my older brother rhetorically asking “why are you hitting yourself?” because we were children.

You are supposed to grow up and change, not just apply the same reasoning that an 9 yr old does.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nivek said:


We had to vote for a conman because Hillary was a Democratic Party member! Defense.

At least in retrospect I can laugh at my older brother rhetorically asking “why are you hitting yourself?” because we were children.

You are supposed to grow up and change, not just apply the same reasoning that an 9 yr old does.

I’m rubber and you’re glue, everything you say bounces off of me and lands on you. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bravo said:

Stupid constitution. 

Burger was wrong.  It does violate the establishment clause.   Benevolent neutrality is bullshit.  All it does is shift the tax burden from clubhouse members to non-clubhouse members.  Nothing neutral about that.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/14/2022 at 4:50 AM, Poe It Up said:

CNN does more for Republicans than Fox News ever could. 

of course man. its already programmed and we aren't strong enough to undo it. one is dumb and one is just outrage porn for the grieving. neither is productive at all, so we roll on aimless, permanently grieving and texting gotchas to each other. 

quoth stabone 'nevermore' 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/14/2022 at 4:31 AM, Bravo said:

I was just bringing attention to the separation of church and state. Simple. Some may not like that but I'm willing to put up with the mostly good with it. 

more flashbacks to the posting of Hellraiser97 and his weird world view. this is eerily familiar territory, which is properly addressed by brother Nivek here:

On 2/14/2022 at 8:04 AM, Nivek said:

Burger was wrong.  It does violate the establishment clause.   Benevolent neutrality is bullshit.  All it does is shift the tax burden from clubhouse members to non-clubhouse members.  Nothing neutral about that.  

treating one party different than other parties is interfering, not separating. 

Edited by staboner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw there was an old episode of Fear Factor on some channel the other night so I tuned in for a few minutes. There were 3 or 4 pairs of contestants, all young and attractive. A pair was selected to go first in the next stunt. He looked a surf punk with spiky, frosted hair. She was hot blonde in shorts and a halter top. No way she wasn’t an aspiring actress.

This stunt was so bogus. It was kind of like a pie eating contest with the addition of coins that had to be located in the pies. They had all these fluorescent green pies laid out on the table. THEN they demonstrated what they were made of. It was maggots, duck tongues, rotten fish, and some fourth ingredient I can’t recall. I’m not even sure they were real maggots because maggots are small and white and these looked larger and tan in color. Maybe grub works which would show up better on camera. Anyway, they put it all in a blender and pulverized it. Cut away to the “contestants” for a reaction shot. Then back to the blender which was filled with a substance that wasn’t remotely the same color of the pies on the table. They didn’t even bother with a shot of Joe pouring the mixture into a pan. Then the young couple started eating their pre-made pies, made some gratuitous expressions of how gross it tasted, then, “I found a coin!” That’s when I tuned out.

So obviously phony and staged. You can’t find several hot young women to eat maggots and rotten fish every week and you can’t afford to have one of your actors get sick because you made them eat rotten fish...or donkey sperm and urine. It’s not reality. It’s a tv show. There’s no law against calling something donkey urine on tv and having someone drink apple juice and act like it’s donkey urine. It’s a lot cheaper and safer that way too. 

Edited by WhatTheBuck
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhatTheBuck said:

There’s no law against calling something donkey urine on tv and having someone drink apple juice and act like it’s donkey urine.

And furthermore, I would NOT want to live in a country where there WAS such a law!

Edited by Brisketexan
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had this dude on today:

Andrew Dessler is a climate scientist and professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Texas A&M University. He served as a Senior Policy Analyst in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy under President Bill Clinton, and is a Google Science Communication Fellow. Dessler is also the author of several books, among them the award-winning "Introduction to Modern Climate Change."

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Caponata said:

Had this dude on today:

Andrew Dessler is a climate scientist and professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Texas A&M University. He served as a Senior Policy Analyst in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy under President Bill Clinton, and is a Google Science Communication Fellow. Dessler is also the author of several books, among them the award-winning "Introduction to Modern Climate Change."

 

This motherfucker bringing aggy on the air now?  Cancel him. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Caponata said:

Had this dude on today:

Andrew Dessler is a climate scientist and professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Texas A&M University. He served as a Senior Policy Analyst in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy under President Bill Clinton, and is a Google Science Communication Fellow. Dessler is also the author of several books, among them the award-winning "Introduction to Modern Climate Change."

And? Did he accept the scientific consensus that human activities are causing global warming and climate change? Or will he have a denier on next week to give equal time to “the controversy?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fattyflattie said:

This motherfucker bringing aggy on the air now?  Cancel him. 

That’s a predictable response. Get this, I have one of his books: The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change which is co-written with Edward A. Parson, a policy expert from the University of Michigan. It’s a good book.

I wonder if Joe reads books. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Caponata said:

Had this dude on today:

Andrew Dessler is a climate scientist and professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Texas A&M University. He served as a Senior Policy Analyst in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy under President Bill Clinton, and is a Google Science Communication Fellow. Dessler is also the author of several books, among them the award-winning "Introduction to Modern Climate Change."

 

So good or bad?  I'm not about to listen and find out, but 11 million others did.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JohnnyRage said:

It was  couple of episodes before.

I’m not surprised. That’s a classic approach by science deniers. The “red team-blue team” approach. Let’s get input from someone on both sides and pretend we’re being fair. But when it comes to climate science, you should have 99 climate scientists explaining the science and the consensus about AGW and one denier explaining their side if you really want to be fair. It’s a rigged game and it’s intentional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WhatTheBuck said:

That’s a predictable response. Get this, I have one of his books: The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change which is co-written with Edward A. Parson, a policy expert from the University of Michigan. It’s a good book.

I wonder if Joe reads books. 

It was a joke. I fully understand there’s probably 10-15 aggys out there that actually know their stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

I’m not surprised. That’s a classic approach by science deniers. The “red team-blue team” approach. Let’s get input from someone on both sides and pretend we’re being fair. But when it comes to climate science, you should have 99 climate scientists explaining the science and the consensus about AGW and one denier explaining their side if you really want to be fair. It’s a rigged game and it’s intentional. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Oh well if Lil’ Ragamuffin the Problematic Seamstress say so then that CHANGES EVERYTHING!

 

24 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

I mean, she shops at Hobby Lobby and everything!

And she has 423 followers!!!!

d7a58b50e9b2f120bfe9ed2522149866.jpg

Thanks for doing the legwork of checking the credentials for that humorous tweet. You must be a blast at parties. 😂 

  • Haha 3
  • Fuck You 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

This motherfucker bringing aggy on the air now?  Cancel him. 

Yeah and dude, I wouldn’t listen if I were you. They talked aggy recruiting. You know, your biggest fear 

Edited by Fletch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bama Chick said:

I mean, she shops at Hobby Lobby and everything!

And she has 423 followers!!!!

d7a58b50e9b2f120bfe9ed2522149866.jpg

She looks like D.J. Qualls if he went full hipster, but yet also full MAGA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, DDD Dad said:

Seems more apropos that Joe deleting them was a waste of time.

The date was removed from that screen cap but it was from 2009. In his 12+ years of podcasting and having a presence on the internet there has to be a lot worse. The Patriot Takes account begs for donations after every post, no way they can't hire someone better to do some digging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Lewis is right. He’s also a hell of a lot funnier than Joe Rogan, to say nothing of the genius sitting silently next to him. 

And I should say, this isn’t a new phenomenon and it wasn’t even when that movie came out (2006). Anyone remember this fuckin bullshit?

Yeah, that was 1970 and we still had this issue of putting morons like Lester Maddox on TV. Maddox became governor of Georgia after an infamous incident where he refused to serve blacks in his restaurant after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed, which is like Kyle Rittenhouse becoming governor of Wisconsin.

Anyways, the mere idea of putting him alongside Jim Brown to talk about race relations is like putting Seth Rogen and Dick LeBeau side by side on an ESPN show to debate each other about “the 4-3 vs the 3-4.” This is by no means the first time crap like this was splattered on television, and that’s really the point: it’s always been like this and there’s been no significant push to change it.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hpslugga said:

And I should say, this isn’t a new phenomenon and it wasn’t even when that movie came out (2006). Anyone remember this fuckin bullshit?

Yeah, that was 1970 and we still had this issue of putting morons like Lester Maddox on TV. Maddox became governor of Georgia after an infamous incident where he refused to serve blacks in his restaurant after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed, which is like Kyle Rittenhouse becoming governor of Wisconsin.

Anyways, the mere idea of putting him alongside Jim Brown to talk about race relations is like putting Seth Rogen and Dick LeBeau side by side on an ESPN show to debate each other about “the 4-3 vs the 3-4.” This is by no means the first time crap like this was splattered on television, and that’s really the point: it’s always been like this and there’s been no significant push to change it.

Man it’s amazing how many of his exact arguments are still being used today for CRT, mandates, lockdowns, etc.

“segregation isn’t racism, integration is the REAL racism.” Maddox was doing all lives matter before it was cool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2022 at 10:13 PM, Caponata said:

Had this dude on today:

Andrew Dessler is a climate scientist and professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Texas A&M University. He served as a Senior Policy Analyst in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy under President Bill Clinton, and is a Google Science Communication Fellow. Dessler is also the author of several books, among them the award-winning "Introduction to Modern Climate Change."

 

image.thumb.png.901c5e76338cd5c9874d911507ef586d.png

 

  • Haha 2
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2022 at 11:43 PM, Biff Tannen said:

So good or bad?  I'm not about to listen and find out, but 11 million others did.  

I'm listening for you

So far it's a power point of news articles :/

Is this what it's like attending aggy?

image.thumb.png.a7eacccdc675d52c69a380eb5b5d6cde.png

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...