Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bookman said:

Meadows wrote a book? Does he expect MAGA to read it?

It's crazy what a white man without a bachelor's degree can accomplish in America.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

So Meadows has to be one of the biggest idiots of all time.  He cut a deal with the Feds, and instead of trying to cut a deal with Georgia he committed perjury in an attempt to get the state case moved to Federal Court.   So while he may have immunity in the Federal Case, he's potentially fucked that up in Georgia and is facing prison time.  

 

Only the best people.  

Don't forget the credible death threats that are about to rain down on him and his loved ones! Couldn't have seen that coming!

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Satchel said:

Trump must be dyspeptic:

Mark Meadows Granted Immunity for Testimony

October 24, 2023 at 4:59 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard Leave a Comment

“Former President Donald Trump’s final chief of staff in the White House, Mark Meadows, has spoken with special counsel Jack Smith’s team at least three times this year, including once before a federal grand jury, which came only after Smith granted Meadows immunity to testify under oath,” ABC News reports.

“The sources said Meadows informed Smith’s team that he repeatedly told Trump in the weeks after the 2020 presidential election that the allegations of significant voting fraud coming to them were baseless, a striking break from Trump’s prolific rhetoric regarding the election.”

“Meadows also told the federal investigators Trump was being ‘dishonest’ with the public when he first claimed to have won the election only hours after polls closed on Nov. 3, 2020, before final results were in.”

https://politicalwire.com/2023/10/24/mark-meadows-granted-immunity-for-testimony/

IMG_1799.gif.793398dedb15ea72be47d4156cdce935.gif

  • Haha 1
Posted

IMG_1845.thumb.jpeg.8e96f8adbddc3adf794c0a2968c58185.jpeg

It looks like it took many, many pints of Häagen-Dazs ice cream while she was deliberating her decision to flip before she finally decided that an all-starch Georgia prison diet was not for her.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

IMG_1845.thumb.jpeg.8e96f8adbddc3adf794c0a2968c58185.jpeg

It looks like it took many, many pints of Häagen-Dazs ice cream while she was deliberating her decision to flip before she finally decided that an all-starch Georgia prison diet was not for her.

Holy Fucking Shit.

She's turning into Linda Tripp right before our very eyes.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
  • Drool 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

IMG_1845.thumb.jpeg.8e96f8adbddc3adf794c0a2968c58185.jpeg

It looks like it took many, many pints of Häagen-Dazs ice cream while she was deliberating her decision to flip before she finally decided that an all-starch Georgia prison diet was not for her.


that thickness + just getting out of jail / lock up = hell yes !!!

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Bookman said:

Meadows wrote a book? Does he expect MAGA to read it?

I don’t know.   But I do expect the publisher to sue his ass for the money they gave him to write a book that turned out to be a whole lot of lies. 

I have no idea what his contract with the publisher says, but I have faith in my fellow lawyers that there’s about 1500 clauses, one of which says we don’t have to pay for a “memoir” that contains complete falsehoods.  

They had an expectation of selling that shit to the gullible MAGATs, and now MAGATs  won’t buy the book b/c Meadows is a fake news RINO traitor….Like a dog. 

Edit: also, name checks out

Edited by Gatorubet
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chooky said:

I think it's disrespectful and classless to keep pointing out that she looks like a fat, bloated manatee. We can discuss her faults without reducing the discourse to the singularity of her being a fat bitch. Do better. 

Can we call her repignant, I mean repugnant?

  • Drool 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:


that thickness + just getting out of jail / lock up = hell yes !!!

Better man than I because in that photo she looks like a clean shaven Ted Cruz in drag. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Posted
I think it's disrespectful and classless to keep pointing out that she looks like a fat, bloated manatee. We can discuss her faults without reducing the discourse to the singularity of her being a fat bitch. Do better. 
 
8c4ebe66e6635b53d188f11654a1ce4b.jpg

“Wait! What? My boyfri…..lectern salesman told me that “manatee” was Cherokee for beloved…”
Posted
20 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

I have no idea what his contract with the publisher says, but I have faith in my fellow lawyers that there’s about 1500 clauses, one of which says we don’t have to pay for a “memoir” that contains complete falsehoods.  

image.jpeg.1cc79b7752eedd144539a1c27c1b2054.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

I don’t know.   But I do expect the publisher to sue his ass for the money they gave him to write a book that turned out to be a whole lot of lies. 

I have no idea what his contract with the publisher says, but I have faith in my fellow lawyers that there’s about 1500 clauses, one of which says we don’t have to pay for a “memoir” that contains complete falsehoods.  

They had an expectation of selling that shit to the gullible MAGATs, and now MAGATs  won’t buy the book b/c Meadows is a fake news RINO traitor….Like a dog. 

Edit: also, name checks out

what_the.jpg.28721f1f4acf4c6fd0b9fff4f9779b1b.jpg

Why would the publisher do this? You can't BUY this kind of publicity! The book is about to fly off the shelves now. It's gonna become required reading, the same kind of infamous missing of the target that becomes famous forever as The Jungle. Kids are going to be forced to read it in High School as a great example of "Unreliable Narrator," tied in with a famous historical event in American History.

2 minutes ago, The Dog said:

 

The Simpsons GIF by MOODMAN

Posted
17 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

Why would the publisher do this? You can't BUY this kind of publicity! The book is about to fly off the shelves now. It's gonna become required reading, the same kind of infamous missing of the target that becomes famous forever as The Jungle. Kids are going to be forced to read it in High School as a great example of "Unreliable Narrator," tied in with a famous historical event in American History.

IMG_0311.gif.e7296e0a86eddb25ef9b9c6c3e27ec9d.gif

Enraged MAGAts will not buy it. He is a traitor.  Progressive who hate Meadows will not buy it.   I don’t know who would buy it.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

Not quite the same thing. 'Cuz this is what I hear:

 

 

Sure. You may not have synesthesia, but the result is the same through training your brain to hear a specific song when faced with a specific visual.

Personally, I do question whether I have synesthesia, as sometimes, particular colors evoke certain sounds.

Anyway, this is far afield from the squishy fart-sounding noises I hear from seeing images of Trump's face.

Peace.

Posted
What I like about Cohen, and why I 100% believe everything he says, is he lays it out so simply.  It is all as dumb as we thought.  He doesn't try to obfuscate or complicate or hem and haw.  He's just like, yep, this is what we did and that tub of shit was at the helm.  
I'm a bit surprised no one has tried to get rid of him yet.
Well half the country didn't get duped by a cunning criminal mastermind mob boss. They got duped by a gameshow host clown. It was a pretty simple grift.
Posted
1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

image.jpeg.1cc79b7752eedd144539a1c27c1b2054.jpeg

Oh, and Jenna.  When it comes time in my memoir's section about my romantic escapades...feel free to toss yourself out of the mix.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

So, Trump filed five more motions to dismiss the indictment in DC.  See them here. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/united-states-v-trump/

I think they're all pretty weak, some laughable even.  But a big flurry of activity that was somewhat expected.

One of the most astonishing arguments they've made is that his acquittal in the Senate on the two impeachments is double jeopardy for these criminal charges.

Someone, I think Biff said it above, these motions seem to be mostly political fodder.  One that is really laughable is a motion to strike all reference to January 6 violence from the indictment because allegedly Trump isn't accused of being responsible for 1/6.

I don't know what in the blue fuck they think conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding is if it isn't January 6.  They cite a NY Post article as evidence, without combing through the indictment, which clearly lays responsibility for January 6 at the feet of Trump by virtue of the entire conspiracy.

Laughable, man.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Someone, I think Biff said it above, these motions seem to be mostly political fodder.  One that is really laughable is a motion to strike all reference to January 6 violence from the indictment because allegedly Trump isn't accused of being responsible for 1/6.

I don't know what in the blue fuck they think conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding is if it isn't January 6.  They cite a NY Post article as evidence, without combing through the indictment, which clearly lays responsibility for January 6 at the feet of Trump by virtue of the entire conspiracy.

Laughable, man.

But we all know facts and the law don't apply to Trump.   You know, with Presidenitial immunity and stuff.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Macanudo said:

But we all know facts and the law don't apply to Trump.   You know, with Presidenitial immunity and stuff.  

Well that's why Trump doesn't fare very well in a court of law (which is actually to be distinguished from pretrial proceedings in a civil court):  it's a pretty fact-oriented place.

Posted

"You can keep your family"?

WTF?

A former President with an obvious history of having his minions do violence on his behalf said this about a former WH chief of Staff.  And nobody raised an eyebrow?

Posted

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-lawyers-prepare-betrayal-former-allies-flip-1234861640/

 

Quote

SINCE THE SUMMER,  Donald Trump’s legal teams have been wracked by one abiding fear: betrayal.

On one front, the former president’s inner circle has fretted about how many co-defendants in the Fulton County criminal case — or co-conspirators in the special counsel probes — might turn against him, accept a plea deal, and cooperate with the prosecutors. But lingering beneath the fear of disloyalty lies another, darker fear about whether anyone anyone still working in, or close to, Trump’s inner orbit could already secretly be working with prosecutors.

For months, Trump, his lawyers, and advisers have been preparing for a potential onslaught of co-defendants flipping on him ahead of trial in the Georgia case. In the last week alone, three prominent co-defendants — Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesebro, and Sidney Powell — have all struck plea deals with the district attorney, and the former president and his team are expecting more to come.

 

 

Quote

According to two sources familiar with the situation, and another two people briefed on it, the former president and his inner sanctum have tried for months to ascertain which imperiled Trump allies have been inching towards cutting deals. When Trump has sent his advisers and attorneys on these so-called “fact-finding” missions this year, they have routinely come up empty — unable to satisfy the former president’s demands to know who is preparing to snitch.

In the face of this uncertainty, several of Trump’s attorneys have been briefing the ex-president on what one source calls “threat and [potential] damage assessments.” These assessments have explained to Trump which co-defendants the lawyers believe are likeliest to cut a deal, and which ones prosecutors likely believe could do the most damage to Trump, if called to testify, according to the sources.

 

Quote

As part of this effort, the former president’s team has also been digging into troves of past communications and private documents related to some of these co-defendants, targeting those deemed likely to cooperate with prosecutors. The purpose of the research, according to the sources with knowledge of the matter, has been to unearth materials that Trump attorneys could use to undermine the credibility of these would-be witnesses.

People with knowledge of the matter say that Trump’s legal team has quietly carried out research along these lines into former Trump campaign attorney Ellis, Chesebro, who helped the campaign design the fake electors scheme, and Trump’s own former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, among others.

It is still unclear what Meadows will ultimately do in these cases — but some of his, and his lawyer’s, moves have given Team Trump reason to sweat.

 

Spoiler

On Tuesday, ABC News reported that Meadows spoke at least three times with prosecutors from the special counsel’s office investigating Trump’s attempts to overturn the election and told them he had warned Trump, in late 2020, that his election fraud claims were baseless. Trump advisers and attorneys have long suspected that Meadows may end up cooperating with prosecutors and had even spitefully used the rat emoji when discussing the former top Trump aide in text communications.

Meadows has also prompted speculation that he may look to avoid liability in the Fulton County case by highlighting Trump’s potential culpability. As Politico noted in September, a lawyer for Meadows pointedly noted in a pre-trial hearing that the infamous phone call between Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger contained “a lot of statements by Mr. Trump” but included no demands to “change the vote totals” from Meadows. 

The relatively lenient deals for Ellis, Cheseboro and Powell — who received probation and fines — have given some of Trump’s co-defendants an opportunity to end at least part of their election-related legal headaches without jail time and to save on the expensive legal bills that have weighed on Trump’s fellow accused. A fourth defendant in the Georgia case, bail bondsman Scott Hall, pleaded guilty to conspiring to access voting machine data. But it is unclear whether other defendants could take up similar offers.     

“For the fourth time, Fani Willis and her prosecution team have dismissed the [racketeering and conspiracy] charge in return for a plea to probation,” Trump attorney Steven Sadow said in a statement responding to Ellis’s plea agreement on Tuesday, calling the charges against Trump’s co-defendants “nothing more than a bargaining chip for DA Willis.”

On Tuesday, Trump’s attorneys offered a glimpse of what could await those who do end up testifying against him. Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen took the stand in the New York civil fraud case against Trump, and received an onslaught of accusations and insults from Trump’s legal team. Attorneys Chris Kise and Alina Habba underscored Cohen’s 2018 guilty plea for fraud and making false statements, blasting him as a “serial liar” who “lied to his wife” and called him a “completely out of control” witness for the prosecution.

Elsewhere, though, Trump’s legal advisers are grappling with another recurring problem this year: chronic distrust and petty feuds in their own ranks. Some of this drama has already exploded into public view, and cost Trump the services of some of his leading defense attorneys. 

The level of distrust among Trump’s current lawyers has reached a point where some of them have privately spread rumors or speculation this year that other Trump attorneys are secretly cooperating with federal or Fulton County prosecutors, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter. 

The sources add that this has hampered the multiple legal teams’ work defending Trump, because it has on occasion limited what these lawyers think they should say in the presence of the Trump attorneys they don’t trust.

Trump is tentatively scheduled to stand trial in Fulton County in early 2024.

 

 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

"Wearing a wire"?  What the fuck?  Is this 1979 ABSCAM?  

The fucking guy, Trump, posted online everything about all of his crimes, or left it on recorded phone lines and video feeds.  Why the fuck would you risk Meadow's personal safety by making him wear a wire if the people you're after just volunteer the shit for free?  Fucking gang that can't shoot straight.  After 8 fucking years, suddenly our government gets religion and wants to punish bad actors?  

Although I'm guessing given the timeline, and all of the amazing surveillance technology that exists in our shadow government...they were just fucking with Meadows and asked him to duct tape this to his inner thigh every morning: 

 

image.png.4ecde463570ecbf9f6eab610e74f1582.png

 

"Hi, my name is Mark meadows and I'm with the Cub Scouts of America.  And we're selling uncut cocaine this year to get to the Jamboree."  

Edited by YGIFS
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

SIAP, but it would appear that Powell is violating her plea agreement what with her newsletters that she is publicizing on her social media accounts, claiming that she's innocent and was forced into the plea

https://www.businessinsider.com/sidney-powell-doubt-election-results-attack-prosecutors-after-guilty-plea-2023-10

She had to stand up and swear that nobody did any such thing, in court under oath, for the plea to be accepted, right?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 5
Posted

While I appreciate your insightful questioning, what you may not stop to realize is that violating a plea deal out of duress is a viable defense.  Confirmed threats of violence against her and her family have already begun.  And they will continue for her co-conspirators/co-plea defendants.  And they will continue and grow worse.  They will suddenly pretend, despite being marked as "great attorneys, the best" by the Orange Godking, that they didn't understand and were forced into these plea deals.  Because bad people with real guns are coming for them and their loved ones.  And it is never going to stop.  So yeah, she's a piece of shit.  But a piece of shit that shares blood with innocent people that had nothing to do with her crimes or her overlord.  But they're hunted nonetheless.  May god be with her, because nobody else on this earth will be.

Posted
31 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

"Wearing a wire"?  What the fuck?  Is this 1979 ABSCAM?  

The fucking guy, Trump, posted online everything about all of his crimes, or left it on recorded phone lines and video feeds.  Why the fuck would you risk Meadow's personal safety by making him wear a wire if the people you're after just volunteer the shit for free?  Fucking gang that can't shoot straight.  After 8 fucking years, suddenly our government gets religion and wants to punish bad actors?  

Although I'm guessing given the timeline, and all of the amazing surveillance technology that exists in our shadow government...they were just fucking with Meadows and asked him to duct tape this to his inner thigh every morning: 

 

image.png.4ecde463570ecbf9f6eab610e74f1582.png

 

"Hi, my name is Mark meadows and I'm with the Cub Scouts of America.  And we're selling uncut cocaine this year to get to the Jamboree."  

Like ABSCAM Jerry

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
41 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

"Wearing a wire"?  What the fuck?  Is this 1979 ABSCAM?  

The fucking guy, Trump, posted online everything about all of his crimes, or left it on recorded phone lines and video feeds.  Why the fuck would you risk Meadow's personal safety by making him wear a wire if the people you're after just volunteer the shit for free?  Fucking gang that can't shoot straight.  After 8 fucking years, suddenly our government gets religion and wants to punish bad actors?  

Most likely he's got a recording app on his phone that doesn't look like a recording app.

  • Hook 'Em 3


×
×
  • Create New...