Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Arch played well last night.  He would have been 70-75% completion rate and maybe had another TD if Wingo, Endries, Moore et al just make catches and in the case of Wingo don't let the ground and or the slightest touch ground them.  

Posted
11 hours ago, Pods said:

Come on man, you know that's a bullshit example.

Arch has massively improved, but he also has a grandfather in the college football Hall of Fame, a Super Bowl/MVP winning uncle in the college and NFL Hall of Fames, and another uncle with multiple Super Bowl/MVP titles. All at his position. 

The rest of the offense are getting their advice from Sark and their position coaches with limited improvement this season to show for it. 

Only a fool would conclude Arch's improvement is solely due to Sark/Milwee and discount all the other advice Arch has from his family of star quarterbacks.

Who you are related to helps, but there is no guarantee of success.

I offer as an example Bob Lilly Jr. whose Dad is an all time college football great, 1st draft pick of the Cowboys, NFL HOFer, and played ins some of the biggest games in the 60's and 70's.

Son was terrible, 3-4" shorter, 50 lbs lighter, and didn't have the drive of Dad.  

Brian Griese wasn't elite and goodness knows all the recent Matthews boys aren't dominating the NFL.  

Arach has gotten better, he made some great throws last night he wasn't making early in the year and then he absolutely missed some open throws without people in his face.  Growing pains and whomever your family is and the amount of training you have gone through isn't going to get around those issues.

What would help is get rid of the plays that take 4-5 seconds to develop and let him make the throws in the mid area of the field he has shown he can be quite effective.  

Posted
25 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

our gameplans are not half baked.  they are fully baked.  the problem is every party is a vanilla cake with chocolate frosting.

See, that's where you've gone awry. It's not chocolate frosting, it's actually vanilla frosting mixed with an unknown brown substance.

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Pods said:

You quite clearly cited Arch's development as an example of Sark developing offensive players. 

 

 

@BurntEyes says Sark doesn't develop players. You cite Arch's development in rebuttal, clearly attributing it to Sark and his staff.

He said none. I provided one example. I also didn’t claim it was only Sark and the Texas staff as you say. I would assume they are part of it though as that is where he spends his time doing football things. So again, I didn’t do that. 

Posted

He made some strides after a bad start but this guy ultimately won't lead us where we want to go. When the defense finally settled in, his offense didn't go jack shit. I get there were drops outside his control but he's not someone who is going to elevate his team. Who knows if that can change. 2 games against really good teams this year, both on the road, both very meh overall. 499f8f15e08bbd611cb7af3875e785e8.jpg

Posted
23 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:

He made some strides after a bad start but this guy ultimately won't lead us where we want to go. When the defense finally settled in, his offense didn't go jack shit. I get there were drops outside his control but he's not someone who is going to elevate his team. Who knows if that can change. 2 games against really good teams this year, both on the road, both very meh overall. 499f8f15e08bbd611cb7af3875e785e8.jpg

No one is supporting him. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:

He made some strides after a bad start but this guy ultimately won't lead us where we want to go. When the defense finally settled in, his offense didn't go jack shit. I get there were drops outside his control but he's not someone who is going to elevate his team. Who knows if that can change. 2 games against really good teams this year, both on the road, both very meh overall. 499f8f15e08bbd611cb7af3875e785e8.jpg

and when he finally settled in (people actually catching the ball) and got us a score.. special teams fucked up.. and then the defense gave out..

 

it's not all on Arch

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:

He made some strides after a bad start but this guy ultimately won't lead us where we want to go. When the defense finally settled in, his offense didn't go jack shit. I get there were drops outside his control but he's not someone who is going to elevate his team. Who knows if that can change. 2 games against really good teams this year, both on the road, both very meh overall. 499f8f15e08bbd611cb7af3875e785e8.jpg

Shit OL.  Receivers that can’t catch. But hey at least he has an elite running game to lean on

Posted

Its so frustrating to watch college football and see WRs make great catches consistently. Takes a small miracle for one of ours to hold onto the ball when conditions are perfect, forget making a play on the ball

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Vic Mackey said:

He made some strides after a bad start but this guy ultimately won't lead us where we want to go. When the defense finally settled in, his offense didn't go jack shit. I get there were drops outside his control but he's not someone who is going to elevate his team. Who knows if that can change. 2 games against really good teams this year, both on the road, both very meh overall. 499f8f15e08bbd611cb7af3875e785e8.jpg

If you haven't figured out by now that Arch isn't the problem for the Texas offense, you know shit fuck about football. 

You say "his offense didn't go jack shit". It is not Arch's offense and he balled out best he could. This is Steve Sarkisian's offense and I've seen better organized stoner parties. 

Little Baby Jesus at QB couldn't produce enough miracles to help this offense be worth a shit.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, cmontexas said:

Its so frustrating to watch college football and see WRs make great catches consistently. Takes a small miracle for one of ours to hold onto the ball when conditions are perfect, forget making a play on the ball

Wingo had 2 great snags after a terrible first half. According to the sideline reporter Arch was hyping him up after the drops. Not elevating his teammates tho.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Vic Mackey said:

He made some strides after a bad start but this guy ultimately won't lead us where we want to go. When the defense finally settled in, his offense didn't go jack shit. I get there were drops outside his control but he's not someone who is going to elevate his team. Who knows if that can change. 2 games against really good teams this year, both on the road, both very meh overall. 499f8f15e08bbd611cb7af3875e785e8.jpg

I have to vehemently disagree with you here. I watched him yelling at his teammates trying to fire them up. No one really stepped up and sark was squatting in his playbook. Too busy to see the train roll of the rails in the 4th too busy being OC. Arch plays what he is called to play behind a shit Oline and few people willing to make a play or able to execute one. He dint cause 21 yds of Running offense. Sark thought we ran well. No fucking way. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Vic Mackey said:

He made some strides after a bad start but this guy ultimately won't lead us where we want to go. When the defense finally settled in, his offense didn't go jack shit. I get there were drops outside his control but he's not someone who is going to elevate his team. Who knows if that can change. 2 games against really good teams this year, both on the road, both very meh overall. 499f8f15e08bbd611cb7af3875e785e8.jpg

Were you watching the same game everyone else was? At one point, he was around 22 for 30, with about 4 of those incompletions being passes that should've been caught and one (the INT) which should've been negated had the refs not turned to Stevie Wonder anytime UGA committed a penalty. And a lot of that was under pressure and getting the ball out right before getting hit.

Edited by OU Sucks
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Honest question, why the fuck would he stay and not transfer? How has Sark developed and built a supporting cast? Has running back been addressed? Has the line been upgraded or will it? Has/will Sark adjust game planning to his strength? will receivers develop and catch the mother fucking ball?

 

Why wouldn't he transfer to ol miss?

We have wasted to 5 star supposedly generational talent. That's all on Mr. Al! Gas no brakes while is it the bed Sark

Edited by nineliveslost
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, nineliveslost said:

Honest question, why the fuck would he stay and not transfer? How has Sark developed and built a supporting cast? Has running back been addressed? Has the line been upgraded or will it? Has/will Sark adjust game planning to his strength? will receivers develop and catch the mother fucking ball?

 

Why wouldn't he transfer to ol miss?

We have wasted to 5 star supposedly generational talent. That's all on Mr. Al! Gas no brakes while is it the bed Sark

I've said it multiple times and I'm gonna say it again now.

I actually hope Arch transfers if Sark comes back next year. Mainly because I think Sark is severely damaging that young man's future career prospects. If my nephew or son was at Texas (my nephew is) and the professors were damaging his potential career prospects through horrible education, I'd tell them to switch schools. I feel the same way about Arch and don't want his future ruined by the bumbling idiot that it the current Texas HC. Bonus action, if Sark returns and Arch goes elsewhere and does amazingly it will be the nail in the coffin for the fraud that is currently cucking our football program.

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Vic Mackey said:

He made some strides after a bad start but this guy ultimately won't lead us where we want to go. When the defense finally settled in, his offense didn't go jack shit. I get there were drops outside his control but he's not someone who is going to elevate his team. Who knows if that can change. 2 games against really good teams this year, both on the road, both very meh overall. 499f8f15e08bbd611cb7af3875e785e8.jpg

you have forgotten how to perceive correctly. 

54 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

I have to vehemently disagree with you here. I watched him yelling at his teammates trying to fire them up. No one really stepped up and sark was squatting in his playbook. Too busy to see the train roll of the rails in the 4th too busy being OC. Arch plays what he is called to play behind a shit Oline and few people willing to make a play or able to execute one. He dint cause 21 yds of Running offense. Sark thought we ran well. No fucking way. 

wait wut? he said something to this effect?

Posted
26 minutes ago, SarkAfterDark said:

The kid looked dejected at the end of the game. I hope it serves as motivation.

Motivation to find a program that isn’t dog shit 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, staboner said:

you have forgotten how to perceive correctly. 

wait wut? he said something to this effect?

A Sark special. Keep in mind after LOSSES the past FIVE years  he almost always has said that we shoulda run more. I can count at least what ten times off the top of my head he’s said that after a loss.
 

i mean I wish he knew who was in charge of calling plays and utilizing RBs? Maybe someone could put in a good word for Sark so we could run more? Maybe even employ some FB action and so on. 

IMG_9011.jpeg

Edited by Nicole44
Posted
2 hours ago, Vic Mackey said:

He made some strides after a bad start but this guy ultimately won't lead us where we want to go. When the defense finally settled in, his offense didn't go jack shit. I get there were drops outside his control but he's not someone who is going to elevate his team. Who knows if that can change. 2 games against really good teams this year, both on the road, both very meh overall. 499f8f15e08bbd611cb7af3875e785e8.jpg

Lulz  we scored to cut in to 14-10 and when he got the ball back it was 28-10 and the game was over.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, nineliveslost said:

Sark the dumb fuck says we rushed well !!??? We rushed for the lowest yards of any Georgia opponents this year. Including the scrubs. We suck at running g the ball! 

You missed it last night.

I have worse news. Texas has AVERAGED 28 yards a game against Kirby in 3 tries. Sadly we didn't even meet our average yesterday. But don't try telling that to Sark.

IMG_9011.jpeg.4d1fcf1354c8c3ae20e666e7a460079c.thumb.jpeg.e43a720133cc3949a5fa5eeacef77282.jpegScreenshot_20251116_004549_ESPN.thumb.jpg.cf43af4d63aa6c4deb5be63a801acb95.jpgimages(1).jpeg.96dad24f9f724f02a5fd9369d3964d78.jpeg

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BurntEyes said:

You missed it last night.

I have worse news. Texas has AVERAGED 28 yards a game against Kirby in 3 tries. Sadly we didn't even meet our average yesterday. But don't try telling that to Sark.

IMG_9011.jpeg.4d1fcf1354c8c3ae20e666e7a460079c.thumb.jpeg.e43a720133cc3949a5fa5eeacef77282.jpegScreenshot_20251116_004549_ESPN.thumb.jpg.cf43af4d63aa6c4deb5be63a801acb95.jpgimages(1).jpeg.96dad24f9f724f02a5fd9369d3964d78.jpeg

image.gif.971434eeb7f061862de7741771744fd6.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

Or with lane kiffin at LSU 

Lanning, Cignetti, Freeman, Kirby, DeBoer, hell even Deion would make Arch look insanely better than he has under this shit show "plan" Sark has concocted in basement laboratory without lights. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

He doesn't need money to be convinced to stay or to be enticed into the portal, but I'm sure the Manning camp wants assurances things are getting fixed. He's a Manning with all the measurables; He's getting drafted high.

Posted
3 minutes ago, DaysOff said:

He doesn't need money to be convinced to stay or to be enticed into the portal, but I'm sure the Manning camp wants assurances things are getting fixed. He's a Manning with all the measurables; He's getting drafted high.

Maybe he'll transfer portal to the NFL. 

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

I doubt the rumors that the Mannings are controlling Arch's destiny with Sark.

But I imagine it will be another couple of voices that he has to acknowledge saying "what the blue fuck was that?  how do you roll out that OL and think anything's gonna be ok?"

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Arch doesn't need to go anywhere else to be a first rounder when he decides to leave. He may leave if he is not happy here but to boost his NFL prospects is not the reason he would leave imo. An athletic Manning with that arm is not getting passed over in the draft whenever that maybe.

Posted
14 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

Arch doesn't need to go anywhere else to be a first rounder when he decides to leave. He may leave if he is not happy here but to boost his NFL prospects is not the reason he would leave imo. An athletic Manning with that arm is not getting passed over in the draft whenever that maybe.

Maybe he wants to play with talent?

Posted
29 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

This thread went from "Arch is a nepo baby, start Caldwell!" to "Why would Arch waste his talents here?" in about 3 weeks. 

Well done, everyone. 

 

 

And to think no large company has tried to harness our persuasiveness in advertising. Corporations are missing out. 

Posted

In fairness to Sark we did run the ball better than I ever imagined we would the eight or so times we did it early.   I legit thought we would end up with less than 10 yards with sacks 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

I get that things are looking bleak right now, but we have two more winnable games at home. If we go 9-3, it's not terrible for a first year QB. Winning against all your arch rivals is a decent season regardless of what happens with regards to the playoffs.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

I get that things are looking bleak right now, but we have two more winnable games at home. If we go 9-3, it's not terrible for a first year QB. Winning against all your arch rivals is a decent season regardless of what happens with regards to the playoffs.

We all drank too much orange Kool-Aid this summer. 

Lesson learned. We should know better, but B2B Final Fours clouded our judgment. I'm gonna try to stick to golf until after kickoff next year.

Posted
27 minutes ago, deech said:

In fairness to Sark we did run the ball better than I ever imagined we would the eight or so times we did it early.   I legit thought we would end up with less than 10 yards with sacks 

I truly don’t get why we abandoned the run so early

Posted
2 minutes ago, DFW Horn said:

We all drank too much orange Kool-Aid this summer. 

Lesson learned. We should know better, but B2B Final Fours clouded our judgment. I'm gonna try to stick to golf until after kickoff next year.

Should be free the whole off season. No spring game to worry about 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, DFW Horn said:

We all drank too much orange Kool-Aid this summer. 

Lesson learned. We should know better, but B2B Final Fours clouded our judgment. I'm gonna try to stick to golf until after kickoff next year.

The one thing, what happened with the OL really is inexcusable.  A drop-off from last year should be expected, particularly early in the season, but this OL shitshow is a massive failure.

And I don't really buy the notion that we're at a point where we should be reloading every year and never rebuilding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...