Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Surly Horns

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Elon Musk: Nazi traitor piece of shit [Confirmed]

Featured Replies

  • Replies 31.7k
  • Views 2.5m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

Is it possible that @Guadaloopy is ghost-posting for Mussk? I dunno seems awfully desperate.

Screenshot 2025-12-31 at 1.51.40 PM.png

9 minutes ago, Firemans4Horn said:

“But he’s the greatest geenyus the world has ever seen! All of that would have happened if the woke trans libtards hadn’t interfered!”

We are in the era of peak gullible idiot stans, and it’s only getting worse. They furiously masturbate to a cascade of lies as they vehemently deny even a morsel of truth.

28 minutes ago, Firemans4Horn said:

bafkreia2yv6oqunvfgthcbvy4x6c27jelyajcru

Duh. AI is shit. Elmo-championed AI? A layer cake of shit, iced with runny shit.
He’s genuinely one of the most evil, malevolent human beings of modern times. It’s beyond debate.

2 hours ago, Ted Lange said:

image.png

1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

Duh. AI is shit. Elmo-championed AI? A layer cake of shit, iced with runny shit.
He’s genuinely one of the most evil, malevolent human beings of modern times. It’s beyond debate.

[laughs in proposed federal ban against AI regulation]

Teaching my parrot to say “I deeply apologize for my words and pledge to work every day to demonstrate this incident does not define me” after I teach it to greet every woman with “hey sugar tits, do those legs go all the way up?”

1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Teaching my parrot to say “I deeply apologize for my words and pledge to work every day to demonstrate this incident does not define me” after I teach it to greet every woman with “hey sugar tits, do those legs go all the way up?”

Better than "announcing the chicken fuckers" every time a bald guy and his wife enter the room.

Tesla loses title as world’s biggest electric vehicle maker as sales fall for second year in a row – KXAN Austin

Tesla lost its crown as the world’s bestselling electric vehicle maker on Friday as a customer revolt over Elon Musk’s right-wing politics, expiring U.S. tax breaks for buyers and stiff overseas competition pushed sales down for a second year in a row.

Tesla said that it delivered 1.64 million vehicles in 2025, down 9% from a year earlier. Chinese rival BYD, which sold 2.26 million vehicles last year, is now the biggest EV maker.

For the fourth quarter, Tesla sales totaled 418,227, falling short of even the much reduced 440,000 target that analysts recently polled by FactSet had expected. Sales were hit hard by the expiration of a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicle purchases that was phased out by the Trump administration at the end of September.

Tesla stock fell 2.6% to $438.07 on Friday.

What if we told you that one of the primary purposes of Elmo’s purchase of Twitter was to INCREASE the spread of CSAM, make it easier and safer to produce and create, and ensure that the small cadre of billionaires who literally run the planet got their “fair share” of profit from the sexual exploitation of minors?

Training AI on twitter, who knew it could lead to csam?

Everybody.

6 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

What if we told you that one of the primary purposes of Elmo’s purchase of Twitter was to INCREASE the spread of CSAM, make it easier and safer to produce and create, and ensure that the small cadre of billionaires who literally run the planet got their “fair share” of profit from the sexual exploitation of minors?

100% about normalizing it. Even MAGA has started to come around to the fact that Trump is indisputably a serial child rapist and human trafficker, but because they're incapable of rejecting him, they're embracing his perversions as normal. This is why we see people like Megyn Kelly calling 15 year olds barely legal, Ted Cruz lamenting attacks on pedophiles, and conservative "news" painting real life monsters like Ghislaine Maxwell as innocent victims of out of control law enforcement. These people are legitimately evil.

On 12/31/2025 at 3:22 PM, Firemans4Horn said:

You could make a similar list for every year since 2014 and this dude.

He has the formula down: promise, bullshit, and deliver on nothing. And people give you hundreds of billions.

All those people who told me to underpromise and overdeliver were clearly losers.

Hyundai owns Boston Dynamics, The Robot Company.

Hyundai sells over 7 million cars a year. Tesla just under 2 million a year.

So let's check in on Hyundai/Boston Dynamics. They are going to be building 30,000 of these a year and have them in production.

Edited by atomheartbevo

TIL Hyundai owns Skynet.

ETA
"We want people to know Atlas is a helpful robot, not a person."

Edited by Parliament

2 hours ago, HenryJames said:

Counterpoint: non-consensual sexual exploitation is how you MAGA. Epstein files out front shoulda told ya.

Isn’t technology awesome?

I remember when it used to be.

5 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

Isn’t technology awesome?

I remember when it used to be.

Now I can make a full-blown 5 minute porno of me making sweet love to Sela Ward while some guy named Biscuit Techsan sits in the corner.

1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

Now I can make a full-blown 5 minute porno of me making sweet love to Sela Ward while some guy named Biscuit Techsan sits in the corner.

Grok would reject that, until you tell it “make Sela Ward 12 years old.”

On 1/3/2026 at 4:36 AM, 956 Worldwide said:

Teaching my parrot to say “I deeply apologize for my words and pledge to work every day to demonstrate this incident does not define me” after I teach it to greet every woman with “hey sugar tits, do those legs go all the way up?”

mark-cuban-shark-tank.gif

Elon Musk Shares and Endorses Shocking X Post That Says ‘White Solidarity Is the Only Way to Survive’

Mediaite
No image preview

Elon Musk Endorses Shocking Post About 'Non Whites'

Elon Musk shared and endorsed a post on X that declared that white men cannot become a "minority" and "white solidarity is the only way to survive."

World's richest Nazi. Bought the presidency and we gave him free reign to mole his way into every aspect of our government.

image.png

It would be really nice if someone could hack Grok so that no matter what it was asked do, it generated a picture of Leon sucking trump's tiny mushroom penis

49 minutes ago, Chopper said:

In unrelated news, pedo guy Elon Musk's ai generates pedo images because pedo guy Elon Musk likes to see pedo images on xitter

bafkreicrxewjicm2xob5wk3zbb22pbcux5cyh5y

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/tech/elon-musk-xai-digital-undressing

More on this front:

Musk’s Grok AI Generated Thousands of Undressed Images Per Hour on X

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-07/musk-s-grok-ai-generated-thousands-of-undressed-images-per-hour-on-x?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTc2Nzc5MDk4NywiZXhwIjoxNzY4Mzk1Nzg3LCJhcnRpY2xlSWQiOiJUOEhRS0hLR0lGUE8wMCIsImJjb25uZWN0SWQiOiJGRUIzODlCNUI2ODI0RTY0QjY5MENEODE1RTBDREZGRCJ9.3B4JWnmqmXFC3DOqhs11h99g5gNzi4j_poKAHLuWdrY&leadSource=uverify%20wall

Elon Musk’s X has become a top site for images of people that have been non-consensually undressed by AI, according to a third-party analysis, with thousands of instances each hour over a day earlier this week.

Since late December, X users have increasingly prompted Grok, the AI chatbot tied to the social network, to alter pictures people post of themselves. During a 24-hour analysis of images the @Grok account posted to X, the chatbot generated about 6,700 every hour that were identified as sexually suggestive or nudifying, according to Genevieve Oh, a social media and deepfake researcher. The other top five websites for such content averaged 79 new AI undressing images per hour in the 24-hour period, from January 5 to January 6, Oh found.

The scale of deepfakes on X is “unprecedented,” said Carrie Goldberg, a lawyer specializing in online sex crimes. “We’ve never had a technology that’s made it so easy to generate new images,” because Grok is free and linked to a built-in distribution system, she added.

Unlike other leading chatbots, Grok doesn’t impose many limits on users or block them from generating sexualized content of real people, including minors, said Brandie Nonnecke, senior director of policy at Americans for Responsible Innovation. Other generative AI technologies, including ones from Anthropic PBC, OpenAI and Alphabet Inc.’s Google, are “giving a good-faith effort to mitigate the creation of this content in the first place,” she said. “Obviously, xAI is different. It’s more of a free-for-all.” Musk has marketed Grok as more fun and irreverent than other chatbots, taking pride in X being a place for free speech.

X did not respond to a request for comment. Rather than preventing the chatbot from creating the content in the first place, Musk has spoken about punishing the users who ask it to. “Anyone using Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content,” Musk said in a reply to a post on X.

Read More: Musk Won’t Fix Grok’s Fake AI Nudes. A Ban Would

But that doesn’t leave many options for the victims. Maddie, who said she’s a 23-year-old pre-med student, woke up on New Year’s Day to an image that horrified her. On X, she had previously published a picture of herself with her boyfriend at a local bar, which two strangers altered using Grok. One asked Grok to remove her boyfriend and put her in a bikini. The next asked Grok to replace the bikini with dental floss. Bloomberg reviewed the images.

“My heart sank,” said Maddie, who requested anonymity over concerns about future job prospects. “I felt hopeless, helpless and just disgusted.”

Maddie said she and her friends reported the images to X through its moderation systems. She never received a response. When she reported a different post from one of the users who prompted Grok to make them, X said it “determined that there were no violations of the X rules in the content you reported,” according to a screenshot. The images were still up at the time of publication.

Victims targeted by deepfakes have taken to arguing with Grok in the comments of their posts. Grok often apologizes and says it will remove the images. But in many cases, the images remain live, and Grok continues to generate new ones. Oh calculated that 85% of Grok’s images, overall, are sexualized.

Sexualized deepfakes posted online per hour

X's Grok is posting 84 times more deepfakes identified as sexual per hour, according to a third-party analysis of images published between January 5th and 6th.

Source: Genevieve Oh



Erotica is still a selling point for chatbots, with OpenAI planning to introduce an “adult mode” for ChatGPT in the first quarter of this year. But OpenAI’s current usage policy says the app prevents the “use of someone’s likeness, including their photorealistic image or voice, without their consent in ways that could confuse authenticity.” When tested, it responded, “I'm not able to edit photos of real people to change their clothing into sexualized attire,” and there is an explicit policy against sexualizing anyone under 18.

aorfmrmexqnrlnsblbvnngvy.jpg

Get the Morning & Evening Briefing Americas newsletters.

Start every morning with what you need to know followed by context and analysis on news of the day each evening. Plus, Bloomberg Weekend.

By continuing, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Grok, released in 2023, is facing mounting criticism for posting nonconsensual and sexual images, including of minors, from authorities in the European Union, UK, Malaysia, France and India. “We are aware of the fact that X or Grok is now offering a ‘Spicy Mode’ showing explicit sexual content with some output generated with childlike images,” EU commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier said at a press conference on Monday, referring to an early November update that generates suggestive material. “This is not spicy. This is illegal.”

Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act protects platforms from being held liable for content published on them, but when it comes to AI, lawyer Goldberg said, “It’s not acting as a passive publisher. It’s actually generating and creating the image.”

The Take It Down Act, a federal law signed in 2025, holds platforms liable for the production and distribution of this kind of content, Nonnecke said. “This is a pretty good example of where that law should be actualized and put into effect.” Platforms have until May, 2026 to establish the required removal process.

One X user, an influencer who goes by BBJess, said websites had finally started to take down undressed images of her that had gone up without her consent. But Grok last week started a new flood of undressed images, said BBJess, who keeps her name anonymous to avoid real-world harassment. The posts got worse, she said, when she took to X to defend herself and criticize the deepfakes.

Mikomi, a full-time costume performance artist who posts erotica, says the issue is particularly pronounced for women like her who already share images of their bodies online. Some X users are viewing that as permission to sexualize them in ways they did not consent to. Mikomi sees images generated by Grok of her wearing specific fetish outfits, or her body contorted or placed in strange contexts. One user riffed on the fact that she is a cancer survivor. “Make her bald like if she had cancer,” the user prompted Grok.

Like many X users, Mikomi, who does not share her full name publicly to avoid being harassed in the real world, wrote a post on X warning Grok she does not consent to the AI altering her photos. “It does not work,” she said. “Blocking Grok does not work. Nothing works.” She can’t leave the platform, she adds, because it’s “vital” to her work.

“What am I supposed to do? You want me to lose my job?” she said.

What needs to happen is for people to grab photos of various wives/husbands of people in Congress (as well as Congressional members themselves) and have Grok generate fakes of them, lots and lots of fakes, and then spread them around while @ all of the various members of Congress, their aides, etc.

23 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

What needs to happen is for people to grab photos of various wives/husbands of people in Congress (as well as Congressional members themselves) and have Grok generate fakes of them, lots and lots of fakes, and then spread them around while @ all of the various members of Congress, their aides, etc.

Do you know how horrified Josh Hawley will be if he's actually forced to gaze upon his wife's naked body?

FDtIGXhVUAQWTAq.jpg

9 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Do you know how horrified Josh Hawley will be if he's actually forced to gaze upon his wife's naked body?

FDtIGXhVUAQWTAq.jpg

reminds me of this guy

Screenshot 2026-01-08 at 4.26.45 PM.png

Ashley, mother to one of the elmo kids, voiced her opposition to all the pedo photos appearing on elon's site. And now...

X Didn't Fix Grok's ‘Undressing’ Problem. It Just Makes People Pay for It

X is only allowing “verified” users to create images with Grok. Experts say it represents the “monetization of abuse”—and anyone can still generate images on Grok’s app and website.

https://archive.ph/uiRr9#selection-709.0-715.181

This guy's cocksuckery knows no bounds.

After creating thousands of “undressing” pictures of women and sexualized imagery of apparent minors, Elon Musk’s X has apparently limited who can generate images with Grok. However, despite the changes, the chatbot is still being used to create “undressing” sexualized images on the platform.

On Friday morning, the Grok account on X started responding to some users’ requests with a message saying that image generation and editing are “currently limited to paying subscribers.” The message also includes a link pushing people towards the social media platform’s $395 annual subscription tier. In one test of the system requesting Grok create an image of a tree, the system returned the same message.

The apparent change comes after days of growing outrage against and scrutiny of Musk’s X and xAI, the company behind the Grok chatbot. The companies face an increasing number of investigations from regulators around the world over the creation of nonconsensual explicit imagery and alleged sexual images of children. British prime minister Keir Starmer has not ruled out banning X in the country and said the actions have been “unlawful.”

Featured Video

 

Neither X nor xAI, the Musk-owned company behind Grok, has confirmed that it has made image generation and editing a paid-only feature. An X spokesperson acknowledged WIRED’s inquiry but did not provide comment ahead of publication. X has previously said it takes “action against illegal content on X,” including instances of child sexual abuse material. While Apple and Google have previously banned apps with similar “nudify” features, X and Grok remain available in their respective app stores. xAI did not immediately respond to WIRED's request for comment.

For more than a week, users on X have been asking the chatbot to edit images of women to remove their clothes—often asking for the image to contain a “string” or “transparent” bikini. While a public feed of images created by Grok contained far fewer results of these “undressing” images on Friday, it still created sexualized images when prompted to by X users with paid for “verified” accounts.

“We observe the same kind of prompt, we observe the same kind of outcome, just fewer than before,” Paul Bouchaud, lead researcher at Paris-based nonprofit AI Forensics, tells WIRED. “The model can continue to generate bikini [images],” they say.

A WIRED review of some Grok posts on Friday morning identified Grok generating images in response to user requests for images that “put her in latex lingerie” and “put her in a plastic bikini and cover her in donut white glaze.” The images appear behind a “content warning” box saying that adult material is displayed.

On Wednesday, WIRED revealed that Grok’s standalone website and app, which is separate from the version on X, has also been used in recent months to create highly graphic and sometimes violent sexual videos, including celebrities and other real people. Bouchaud says it is still possible to use Grok to make these videos. “I was able to generate a video with sexually explicit content without any restriction from an unverified account,” they say.

While WIRED’s test of image generation using Grok on X using a free account did not allow any images to be created, using a free account on Grok’s app and website still generated images.

The change on X could immediately limit the amount of sexually explicit and harmful material the platform is creating, experts say. But it has also been criticized as a minimal step that acts as a band-aid to the real harms caused by nonconsensual intimate imagery.

“The recent decision to restrict access to paying subscribers is not only inadequate—it represents the monetization of abuse,” Emma Pickering, head of technology-facilitated abuse at UK domestic abuse charity Refuge, said in a statement. “While limiting AI image generation to paid users may marginally reduce volume and improve traceability, the abuse has not been stopped. It has simply been placed behind a paywall, allowing X to profit from harm.”

The British government also said, according to reporting from the BBC, that the change to limit image generation to paid-only accounts is “insulting” to those who have been impacted. It said that it “simply turns an AI feature that allows the creation of unlawful images into a premium service.”

“While it may allow X to share information with law enforcement about perpetrators, it doesn’t address the fundamental issue of the model’s capabilities and alignment,” says Henry Ajder, a deepfake expert who has tracked harmful uses of the technology for years. “For the cost of a month’s membership, it seems likely I could still create the offending content using a fake name and a disposable payment method.”

“They could have removed abusive material, but they did not,” AI Forensics’ Bouchaud says. “They could have disabled Grok to generate images altogether, but they did not. They could have disabled the Grok application to generate pornographic videos.”

3 minutes ago, C-Man said:

X Didn't Fix Grok's ‘Undressing’ Problem. It Just Makes People Pay for It

X is only allowing “verified” users to create images with Grok. Experts say it represents the “monetization of abuse”—and anyone can still generate images on Grok’s app and website.

https://archive.ph/uiRr9#selection-709.0-715.181

This guy's cocksuckery knows no bounds.

agxsrm.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business & Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Advertise... Tailgate Donations

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.