Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Covri said:

Send this to all your mega peeps 😂

 

 

Seriously this shit is emotional kryptonite for them. I accidentally brought an old man I know to literal tears by talking  about the weakness of Trump and the men of the MAGA movement. 

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted

It's a weird flip -- progressives accusing MAGA men of not properly conforming to gender stereotypes.  I'm not sure what I think about that, although they are a bunch of pussies.  Oops.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

Well, since morality cannot be measured objectively, they could not be considered 100% “accurate“

Well, there are a couple of different aspects to this guy's paper.  First is that "we the people" was intended to exclude non-whites.  Second  is that it was proper and right for it to do so.  I think the former, although a repugnant idea, could be the subject of an award-winning paper.  The second aspect or topic is going to be far less defensible.

The article above ascribes the first topic or subject to the paper.  Ibram X. Kendi could have written that.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Slacks said:

I'll play devil's advocate...

Original Intent gets thrown around a lot by so-called strict constitutionalists. For those who claim this angle, one can argue that all policies should follow original intent.

Of course the counter to that is that original intent cannot apply, as the Constitution has been amended, thus amending intent.

But I'm not a ConLaw scholar, so what do I know?

The way I think it works or is supposed to work is the original text gets original intent, amended text gets original intent as of the time of the amendment.

Posted
1 minute ago, C-Man said:

Not seeing this anywhere yet.

Dotard announced it on one of his stupid truths things. Talking about it on the news stations.

Posted

Whether you're for or against these strikes, only Donald Trump is a big enough asshole to punch someone in the face and then immediately say, "Let's be friends."

He also doesn't understand Iranians even a little bit.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted

It's so insane that, of all people, Donald Trump has the sole power to decide when we go to war. Like if we were all waiting for Carrot Top or Mr. T to decide if we're gonna bomb someone or not. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted

I just made the mistake of mentioning this bombing while at my in-laws...I was happy watching CWS. Now it's faux outrage.

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, troph said:

this is Obama’s fault. Did I do that right?

#bothsides got dogwalked by Bibi into bombing Iran.  Great job burn it all down guys!

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, troph said:

this is Obama’s fault. Did I do that right?

The blame is shared equally by Barack's tan suit, Michelle's shoulders, Hunter's laptop, and Hillary's emails.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
I’d just like to congratulate [mention=179]Anastasis[/mention]

Within a few days, he’ll find a way to spin this as a brilliant move, and it’s what he’s always wanted to happen, actually. At worst, he’ll say it could have been done better…but the regime still has his unwavering support, as it has all along. Give him some time.
Posted
20 minutes ago, Red Five said:

It's so insane that, of all people, Donald Trump has the sole power to decide when we go to war. Like if we were all waiting for Carrot Top or Mr. T to decide if we're gonna bomb someone or not. 

Whoa! Catching strays outta nowhere! 
image.jpeg.29b42a71076989dada32f6ee32e2dcf9.jpeg

image.jpeg.c8caeacf1e88ed236a2d7e6dbaec3f30.jpeg

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

"After these very successful attacks, I have now declared peace. We are at peace. Any response from Iran will be considered an act of war, which is illegal since I have declared peace. I said peace out loud very quickly. Have a lovely weekend!"

 

Edited by Hank Kingsley
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)

Y’all remember a couple weeks ago when we were talking about Trump in the Epstein files? Yea me neither. Mission accomplished 

Edited by Hank_Hill
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 3
Posted

Let's talk near-term practical issues.  What are the concerns for Americans traveling abroad in the next few weeks?  Speaking for a very very very close family member.

I'm not entirely sure Americans are less safe in western Europe than in the lower 48.

Posted
1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

Let's talk near-term practical issues.  What are the concerns for Americans traveling abroad in the next few weeks?  Speaking for a very very very close family member.

I'm not entirely sure Americans are less safe in western Europe than in the lower 48.

It's gonna be a lot of security theater but my guess the danger to Americans is not going to be noticeably higher unless you're in the region.

Posted

He wanted to bomb somebody like he wanted a military parade. He’s been jonsing to show the world his dictatorship abilities so he could fit in with the assholes he associates with. What do you think about that Kim? Kim’s going to have to go after South Korea now. 
 

oh, and are we bringing asbestos back? Because it sure would be cool if we not only cut cancer research but then promoted cancer products. Maybe rollback smoking inside and any kind of cigarette bans. Wow. Probably won’t survive to see another election. 

Just now, Derka said:

 

His reply would be people voted for this, and they did. As did those that were indifferent. 

  • Hook 'Em 1


×
×
  • Create New...