Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Bodacious Bevo said:

I just can't imagine how fucking stupid I'd feel getting up and wholeheartedly singing "varsity's horns are sawwwwed off" after watching varsity hire away my school's most successful coach and mercilessly spank me on the football field in the span of six months

After thinking about it a bit more, I think the spanking is better described as merciful than merciless 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, closetojumping said:

And yet people on this site and idiots in the media think these guys are going to do something better than 8-4. Right now, 4 of their road opponents are ranked, and higher than ATM to open. That doesn’t include @Missouri who very well could be ranked when ATM shows up. So, yeah, sure this is the year they break through on the road and become a completely different program. 

I don't need you to go full um.. Ewers thread on receipts.. but I guess I'm missing all these Surly posters that think aggie is gonna break the fucking 8-5 ceiling this year. I'm sure there are one or two regards here that think it and of course the mediots have bought in for unfathomable reasons once again. Just not seeing many posters here that buy the cult propaganda like the media. 

Edited by BurntEyes
Posted
9 hours ago, BurntEyes said:

I don't need you to go full um.. Ewers thread on receipts.. but I guess I'm missing all these Surly posters that think aggie is gonna break the fucking 8-5 ceiling this year. I'm sure there are one or two regards here that think it and of course the mediots have bought in for unfathomable reasons once again. Just not seeing many posters here that buy the cult propaganda like the media. 

Go back through the various aggie threads where people retread the trope “this site always underestimates ATM and then we’re all disappointed when they beat expectations”.  This thread, 2026 recruiting thread, the 2025 football thread, and Tell Me Abour ATM are good starters. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

Go back through the various aggie threads where people retread the trope “this site always underestimates ATM and then we’re all disappointed when they beat expectations”.  This thread, 2026 recruiting thread, the 2025 football thread, and Tell Me Abour ATM are good starters. 

Well, perhaps my brain skipped over them thinking them sarcasm or just ignored them for being dumb. I'm just going to have to take your word for it as I've zero interest in reviewing threads looking for stupidity. Plenty to be found without digging for them through archives.

Posted
31 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

Go back through the various aggie threads where people retread the trope “this site always underestimates ATM and then we’re all disappointed when they beat expectations”.  This thread, 2026 recruiting thread, the 2025 football thread, and Tell Me Abour ATM are good starters. 

Sir, I think you are forgetting about their glorious 2020 campaign and all those great teams they beat.  But the Sip media screwed them out of the playoffs, which they likely would have won.

Posted
8 hours ago, Pato del Muerto said:

they had stated quite matter-of-factly that we wouldn’t sashay into the conference and run it but it seems they are now saying we have done?

It's what they do in DoubleThink Station.

They also warned of our toxins wafting across Dixie and eroding the purity of SEC essence. We are

t.u.

Destroyer of Conferences!

Only Aggies see us for what we are. We zombified Sankey to do our bidding. Next, we voo-dooed the entire country outside of College Station and Katy so they couldn't detect what a horrible fate this was for the SEC.  The voo-doo worked so well that most see the move as good for the SEC. 

The Aggies face the fate of the prophetess Cassandra. Always right, but no one believed her.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Bodacious Bevo said:

After thinking about it a bit more, I think the spanking is better described as merciful than merciless 

But but but they killed us a meaningless SECSECSEC tournament softball game and stole a match from us in volleyball. 

Don’t forget the collapse against us in MBB in Austin and the SEC tournament game 

Posted

Does it really matter who our respective teams play?  I mean they have Marcel Reed who's Lamar Jackson 2.0 and we have that overrated celeb guy who's riding the coattails of his uncles.

  • Haha 6
Posted
21 minutes ago, Scholz said:

Does it really matter who our respective teams play?  I mean they have Marcel Reed who's Lamar Jackson 2.0 and we have that overrated celeb guy who's riding the coattails of his uncles.

Chicken Wings Truth GIF by First We Feast

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

Underestimating aggy, you say?

https://cfbselect.com/2025/08/14/ap-poll-overrated-underrated-preseason/

Quote

Most College Football fans could have probably guessed that Texas A&M would headline this list before they even opened the link to this article. Sometimes our preconceived notions about teams are accurate in the data set. Texas A&M’s famous Aggie Rollercoaster rolls on through the first half of this decade. Wisconsin, USC and Miami are a bit unsurprising, with Badgers, Trojans and Canes fans all experiencing their fair share of disappointment over the last few years. Perhaps most surprising is that Nebraska and Texas didn’t make this list given they have similar reputations, though Texas has come into their own lately. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 2
Posted

Good Lord that was mind numbing. What? About four original posts (they've appeared in hundreds of other threads, so not truly original) that are repeated over and over.

spacer.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Hank Chinaski said:

IMG_8799.thumb.jpeg.1ad7d8447396d36d4726c9155fc2f37a.jpeg

This is a good point. He seems miserable with his decision to go to Texas, probably due to a deep cultural disconnection. 

That guy saying he wished Manning went to Georgia so he could cheer for him has to be the tiniest dicked poster ever. Just flat out admitting he’s living vicariously through a conference opponent so he can enjoy wins. What a fucking pussy. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 4
Posted
5 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

That guy saying he wished Manning went to Georgia so he could cheer for him has to be the tiniest dicked poster ever. Just flat out admitting he’s living vicariously through a conference opponent so he can enjoy wins. What a fucking pussy. 

That entire fanbase did that for OU in early Mack years.  Despite OU routinely kicking the shit out of them.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

Let me know if this is getting tiresome.

image.png.8fab76f98ba7ac4716487d43a4c68e7d.pngimage.png.442cb848dd7113e323d8746f370bb3b6.png

You're off to a difficult start, Olin, but you're an old pro. Let's see your sunshine pump from the koolaid stand. 

image.png.31a059b3f49a658d8fd2896c7bbd826b.png

Okay, I admire your swing for the fences here. Sports statistics lie and deceive. A guy averaging 10 tackles a game and .5 sacks might not really be doing that. Lyin' stats, man. But Olin isn't talking about those kinds of statistics.

image.png.2e2ae62f2042136751be1ab62fc82047.png

image.png.0543cb9a4d1f5c79322e47c59347aabd.png

Man, you're going to go all Perry Mason on these fucking stats when you prove that Tyler Onyedim actually did manage a sack last season! I can't wait to see you plunge in the dagger. Take this, Stats, you villain!

image.png.6d418db35573883104ef734c539ec256.png

It gets better and better! Onyedim was playing out of position even though it was his position! Now, how many sacks did have, Olin? I'm breathless!

 

image.png.aa66ad90040500d07f829b3a5cf23459.png

Okay, but you started out talking about lying stats. 

image.png.176c4aa0baf5684c34d9b3157448e218.png

Okay, now deliver the kill shot. You're not applying lipstick to a hog, you're blowing the whole notion of statistics being meaningful out of the water! You magnificent bastard!

 

image.png.42e1040ea842d5d46fc14602664445ea.png

So, still no sacks in 2024 and only 3 prior to that. You're losing me, Olin. I thought your whole point was to prove the stats wrong and Onyedim to be a solid pass rusher. What have you to say about that now?

image.png.7f010bcbb10aac360984e8a800433c96.png

That's a good thing because statistics suggest that he sucks at it. Stats are kicking your ass, Olin.

image.png.de6282ed7d63601dffff8872839ec05f.pngYou try hyping an Iowa State wide-body to rustle the jimmies. I deal in hope. 

Fair point, Olin.

 

image.png.440e5eb9c259c19b62f39bea604d5125.png

Well, that's disturbing.

Edited by RomaVicta
  • Haha 7
Posted
5 hours ago, Longhornfrenzy said:

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-00-46-97_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-00-52-98_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-00-58-04_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-01-03-81_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-01-16-36_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-01-23-27_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-01-28-06_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-01-33-38_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-01-42-27_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-02-00-10_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-02-05-51_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-02-10-41_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-02-14-10_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-02-26-98_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-02-33-19_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-02-41-83_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-02-57-04_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-03-05-52_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-03-10-58_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-03-17-71_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Screenshot_2025-08-14-16-03-29-92_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Several of these dipshits imply or outright say the media sets the odds (at least concerningthe Heisman). And nobody questions or calls them out. 

And yes Cletus, Arch is a weird name. 

Posted
On 8/11/2025 at 12:11 PM, RomaVicta said:

image.thumb.png.ca0e890de113d91c130037dde6f9ac29.png

1 Why would anyone do that when there's a summary? You ever listened to yourself, William? Beating. Beeeee-ting.

2 The word you're looking for is summary. A transcript is a word-by-word record. A short-handed transcript, I'm guessing, is a transcript that needs more employees. I know, William, it's the short-handed transcriber who makes you sound dull-minded again here.

3 I'm sure you're right. Listen, I have plenty of posts around here. Pick one and show me how it's done. Oh, and thanks for reading!

4 That's a mission statement for one of our schools.

I know I'm late (been a busy week) but THIS is the funniest off season thing to happen ever.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Foosters said:

Texas A&M’s famous Aggie Rollercoaster rolls on through the first half of this decade.

Holy shit. @THUJONE’s work is still being quoted in the national media over a decade later.

Posted
On 8/6/2025 at 11:46 PM, texifornia said:

I've always been a little disgruntled that we don't claim some extremely valid older titles while actual bluebloods like Bama will happily go out on some ridiculous limbs to put more years on the board.

Title claims based on retroactive rankings are stupid and I will die on this hill. If no poll or system considered you the No. 1 team in the land at the end of the season (before or after bowl games), the matter is settled. Claiming the national title based on a ranking invented many years later is just a lazy attempt at rewriting history to your benefit.

I guarantee you that if Sark makes it to the top of the mountain and wins a national title at some point, A&M will retroactively claim the 1917 national title to try and keep pace. It doesn't actually make that long-dead 1917 squad national champions. I would feel similarly if Texas ever attempted to claim the 1914, 1918 or 1920 teams as national champions. The 1941 team is a bit different because the Williamson system named us national champions at the time, but given that we didn't win the SWC that year I doubt we'd entertain claiming that season in this day and age.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, satyanash said:

Title claims based on retroactive rankings are stupid and I will die on this hill. If no poll or system considered you the No. 1 team in the land at the end of the season (before or after bowl games), the matter is settled. Claiming the national title based on a ranking invented many years later is just a lazy attempt at rewriting history to your benefit.

I guarantee you that if Sark makes it to the top of the mountain and wins a national title at some point, A&M will retroactively claim the 1917 national title to try and keep pace. It doesn't actually make that long-dead 1917 squad national champions. I would feel similarly if Texas ever attempted to claim the 1914, 1918 or 1920 teams as national champions. The 1941 team is a bit different because the Williamson system named us national champions at the time, but given that we didn't win the SWC that year I doubt we'd entertain claiming that season in this day and age.

Counterpoint: you display notoriously poor judgement on which hills you’ll die on. 

  • Haha 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...