Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just finished a 4 page catch-up. At least the last 2 didn’t include Hermanator blowing his Eric cartman explosive diarrhea all over the fucking thread with his pathetic both-sides bull shit. Jesus that was a beating. Maybe at least he had some sense of shame and retreated. I doubt it. But maybe. 
 

A close second was Snacks posting a multi-quote Ukraine war thread reply not only in the wrong thread, but the wrong fucking board. 

Edited by SydneyCarton
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Just finished a 4 page catch-up. At least the lady 2 didn’t include Hermanator blowing his Eric cart man explosive diarrhea all over the fucking thread with his pathetic both-sides bull shit. Jesus that was a beating. Maybe at least he had some sense of shame and retreated. I doubt it. But maybe. 
 

A close second was Snacks posting a multi-quote Ukraine war thread reply not only in the wrong thread, but the wrong fucking board. 

 It’s almost like the new conservative right has one thing in common…..

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 6/17/2023 at 7:54 AM, WBT said:

By next fall Ronnie is in need of a serious attitude adjustment.

Coach.jpg

 

Meatball is not athletic at all

Posted
7 hours ago, SydneyCarton said:

Just finished a 4 page catch-up. At least the last 2 didn’t include Hermanator blowing his Eric cartman explosive diarrhea all over the fucking thread with his pathetic both-sides bull shit. Jesus that was a beating. Maybe at least he had some sense of shame and retreated. I doubt it. But maybe. 
 

A close second was Snacks posting a multi-quote Ukraine war thread reply not only in the wrong thread, but the wrong fucking board. 

 

7 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

 It’s almost like the new conservative right has one thing in common…..

Both of you are fucking insane. I've never once supported anything republican and any of their bullshit.

I 100 percent want government to be regulated fairly and equally. The dream is peasants to presidents all judged equally by the law. It will never happen but the moment we stopped any semblance of striving for that dream was the moment we descended rapidly into the shit we're in now and will continue to get deeper in going forward. 

Posted
I’ve never said you supported Republican. I can’t recall you doing so. I also can’t recall Anastasia doing so. But equating unequal shit as equal is a tool, and it makes you a useful idiot, discrediting one side unfairly for the sake of “fairness.” 
 
Someone rapes a teenager, someone stole a car. “They’re both criminals.” Be better or be labeled as that guy. 

This. The false equivalency that ignores degree is fucking insane.
  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
3 hours ago, Hermanator said:

 

Both of you are fucking insane. I've never once supported anything republican and any of their bullshit.

I 100 percent want government to be regulated fairly and equally. The dream is peasants to presidents all judged equally by the law. It will never happen but the moment we stopped any semblance of striving for that dream was the moment we descended rapidly into the shit we're in now and will continue to get deeper in going forward. 

That would be my bad then.  Granted, nothing about your posts would have indicated that. They were right wing both-sides talking points.  To minimize confusion in the future, maybe it’s best not to post well-known right wing talking points. 

And, it sorta sounds like you’re continuing to beat that drum in your second paragraph.  I honestly don’t think that YOU think that the Biden case was different.

 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted

Here is some blurb about the protective order that prevents public dissemination of the non-classified evidence in the documents case.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/justice-department-submits-protective-order-mar-lago-case

This, in a routine fashion, accomplishes the same thing as Merchan's order in Manhattan that took the form of a gag order.  And is even broader.

Protective orders like this are quite standard in federal courts where information exchanged may be sensitive.

It may be that they aren't so standard in NY courts like they aren't in Texas anymore.  A few years back, Texas enacted a rule of procedure that made such protective orders a real pain in the ass to obtain, except on a "temporary" basis.

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
2 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

 

Chickenshits.

 

Quote

A wariness about appearing partisan, institutional caution, and clashes over how much evidence was sufficient to investigate the actions of Trump and those around him all contributed to the slow pace. Garland and the deputy attorney general, Lisa Monaco, charted a cautious course aimed at restoring public trust in the department while some prosecutors below them chafed, feeling top officials were shying away from looking at evidence of potential crimes by Trump and those close to him, The Post found.

This is how fascism is able to take hold.  

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Good article.  Thanks.

Agreed.  Good read and find Twice. 

I will be shoving the federalist papers quotes down some of my conservative colleagues‘ throats. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Pence was asked this morning on MTP, “Should Biden pardon Trump right now?”.

That’s it, I quit. Good luck everyone.

Well, it would not be so far out of the norm for Democrats.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Uh, don't you have to be convicted of something first, in order to be pardoned of it?  I don't think you can pre-emptively pardon.  IANAL.

Nixon was not convicted. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Quote

Now, THEREFORE, I, GERALD R. FORD, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9,1974.

Ford's pardon of Nixon

Posted
On 6/16/2023 at 12:02 PM, Red Five said:

He also wasn't charged for any of the documents he gave back willingly. 

Anyone saying "Biden did the same thing and wasn't charged!!" is either gaslighting or has an IQ under 70.

The term you're looking for is willful ignorance.

Posted
2 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

Agreed.  Good read and find Twice. 

I will be shoving the federalist papers quotes down some of my conservative colleagues‘ throats. 

Indeed.  Those are fucking great, spot-on, and COMMON.  FUCKING.  SENSE.

What the GQP knob-slobberers also don't get is that those of us fans of the rule-of-law aren't deterred by their threats of "oh yeah?  Well, what if  a Republican is elected president next and his DOJ indicts Biden?"  So...if there is evidence that Biden committed a crime (particularly committing a crime after he left office) that is anywhere close to as convincing as the evidence that Dotard has....FUCK YES!  INDICT BIDEN'S CRIMINAL ASS!  THAT'S THE FUCKING POINT!  THE RULE OF LAW DOESN'T GIVE A FUCK WHO YOU ARE, AND IT NEVER SHOULD.

They don't get it.  They can't comprehend it.  They can only think of the rule of law as a political power to be used by tyrants; they can't conceive of it actually being applied objectively and equally.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/17/2023 at 7:37 AM, Goredho said:

I think they want to eliminate the federal government outside of the military branches.  At least that’s what they want here in red-assed MAGA monkey country.  They are self-described libertarians who view the federal government as disconnectedly oppressive as the English monarchy was in 1776.  They identify with Randy Weaver and Cliven Bundy at a primordial level.

I can understand them feeling they don’t get a return on their tax dollars.  But the hardship these rural farmers and ranchers experience is 95% because time marches on, the world changes, and the only thing they produce or own that anyone cares about anymore is their land.  Yet they feel entitled to a life and livelihood that their grandpa had.

If they ever got what they are fighting for, they’d be without disaster relief when wildfires burned through.  The farmers and ranchers would lose their subsidies and most would fold.  They’d survive, but not as farmers or ranchers.  They would have to sell their farm or ranch and do something else.  The schools their kids go to would further decay, and their kids would get dumber and even less competitive in a world that passed their parents by.

And all of these people would be like:

7poat6.jpg

 

You on the western slope?  

Posted

Still no one has answered my original question and explained how low level government employees and contractors willfully taking home classified information to work at home and keeping it unsecured should be multiple years in federal prison while the Vice President of the US willfully taking classified information to his personal home to work on it and keeping there unsecured should be just no big deal give it back and we're all cool. 

Classified information was jeopardized either way. 

Y'all are either obtuse or gaslighting cunts. You've become what you claim to hate here. Instead of striving for unbiased treatment and application of government you're making excuses for when your team commits a crime just like the idiot maga fucks do. 

I will not do that. If you don't maintain proper principles of fairness and justice in your heart and mind you're not much better than the maga shits. A lot of you need to evaluate your lives and beliefs for your own good. 

  • Fuck You 4
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

Still no one has answered my original question and explained how low level government employees and contractors willfully taking home classified information to work at home and keeping it unsecured should be multiple years in federal prison while the Vice President of the US willfully taking classified information to his personal home to work on it and keeping there unsecured should be just no big deal give it back and we're all cool. 

Classified information was jeopardized either way. 

Y'all are either obtuse or gaslighting cunts. You've become what you claim to hate here. Instead of striving for unbiased treatment and application of government you're making excuses for when your team commits a crime just like the idiot maga fucks do. 

I will not do that. If you don't maintain proper principles of fairness and justice in your heart and mind you're not much better than the maga shits. A lot of you need to evaluate your lives and beliefs for your own good. 

18 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

And, it sorta sounds like you’re continuing to beat that drum in your second paragraph.  I honestly don’t think that YOU think that the Biden case was different.

9230EC89-C027-44C1-B73C-877243D23B01.gif.8fb25ca56102c218a60f85246ceb0d6f.gif

 

 

 

 

Edited by Gatorubet
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

Still no one has answered my original question and explained how low level government employees and contractors willfully taking home classified information to work at home and keeping it unsecured should be multiple years in federal prison while the Vice President of the US willfully taking classified information to his personal home to work on it and keeping there unsecured should be just no big deal give it back and we're all cool. 

Are you unable to read or do you simply not want to read?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Are you unable to read or do you simply not want to read?

He's proven it multiple times, he doesn't like the answer, so he ignores it, because reasons. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
28 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

Y'all are either obtuse or gaslighting cunts. You've become what you claim to hate here. Instead of striving for unbiased treatment and application of government you're making excuses for when your team commits a crime just like the idiot maga fucks do. 

And yet our brains see “willful retention” as the crime in the law - and our synapses fire in a way that tells us that arguing “willful taking” would be moronic.  

 

  • Haha 2


×
×
  • Create New...