Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, InkaUtexas said:

I didn't say shit. Just wondering.

Anyways, I noticed a different pattern to you all. Tempo was different. Yours is US. His was a bit more choppy like someone just gave him his first adult keyboard.

Just messing with you.

Jeez. cannot make a fucking joke around here.

Hard to not have choppy replies when A. debating single handedly vs many guys, taking it from many angles (calm down any boy lovers, don't get too aroused by that statement) B. Debating many topics at once (one guy tried to take the position a poisonous gas wasn't a chemical weapon, 1 claimed government corruption by donors just began 6 weeks ago, 1 said red states receive more money than blue states - while also complaining that the red state voters are voting against that, so I was confused by his anger at the red state voters voting AGAINST that inequity).  You try debating 4+ people on 4+ topics at once and have the responses not come across as 'choppy'

1 minute ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

I wake up and you are still around doing the same stupid ass schtick?

Man, you really are one dumb motherfucker.

@immamac, does neg rules no longer apply?

 

So anybody who disagrees with your views is 'schticky'?  Only folks who agree with your views are 'non-schticky'?

  • Fuck You 9
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, RockwallJim said:

Hard to not have choppy replies when A. debating single handedly vs many guys, taking it from many angles (calm down any boy lovers, don't get too aroused by that statement) B. Debating many topics at once (one guy tried to take the position a poisonous gas wasn't a chemical weapon, 1 claimed government corruption by donors just began 6 weeks ago, 1 said red states receive more money than blue states - while also complaining that the red state voters are voting against that, so I was confused by his anger at the red state voters voting AGAINST that inequity).  You try debating 4+ people on 4+ topics at once and have the responses not come across as 'choppy'

So anybody who disagrees with your views is 'schticky'?  Only folks who agree with your views are 'non-schticky'?

 

You remind me of the evangelistic types that would show up to my college once a semester or so, stand on a box on a busy sidewalk and yell into a megaphone about how all the women were whores and the men were drunkards going to hell, and get 2-3 students to get confrontational with him, and eventually campus police would have to escort the dumbass off campus.

 

 

Edited by Francisco 2.0
  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

@immamac does purgatory not work anymore? Or is CR just an unmoderated board now where trolls are welcome?

How is this sock posting at -400 rep? Has BL finally gone rogue?? /s

Edited by Captainant
  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
10 hours ago, RockwallJim said:

got it.  so you are smarter than people who vote differently than you?  You have it all figured out and if votes don't vote the way you do, it's because they've been duped and don't understand?

Yes. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
9 minutes ago, Captainant said:

@immamac does purgatory not work anymore? Or is CR just an unmoderated board now where trolls are welcome?

How is this sock posting at -400 rep? Has BL finally gone rogue?? /s

I didn't log on yesterday at all because I was busy. It was a bug where his sub kept him in groups he shouldn't have been in while crowdsourced. It's fixed. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 3
Posted

The Aggies are in charge.

I was peacefully showing some visiting fans to our stadium which they couldn't find. I could tell they really appreciated my politeness and honor. Then some effeminate guys in tu shirts showed up and started doing their devil sign. My guests were frightened.

I asked the sips nicely to be polite and say howdy to everybody. They yelled louder. Rude!

I asked, "how many of you actually attended tu?" They all went silent. I just walked away.

  • Haha 5
Posted
6 minutes ago, Underdog said:

All this happened without SS? 

Just like the way weeping muscular guys just come up to President Trump and address him as Mr. President, sir.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Underdog said:

All this happened without SS? 

 

It's 2025. Someone would have produced phone footage by now. 

Edited by Francisco 2.0
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
9 hours ago, RockwallJim said:

Y'all enjoy your irrational, media fueled Trump Hate.  Off to bed, I'll be back for more tomorrow.  I do have a confession to make, I find everybody's TDS here wildly entertaining.  I hope to come back and see more later.   

Defend.  These. Tariffs.

No one contends that corporations don't have outsized influence in American politics.

But name the last time a bullshit government agency was created then headed up by SoROS!, er, a wealthy private citizen and outsized donor who is also a massive government beneficiary.  And is also wholly unqualified for the position.

Show me a DOJ that is dismissing prosecutions for political reasons, all the while bleating about "weaponization of government."

Show me the last time a president signed an executive order singling out a law firm that represented a political enemy, er opponent, a decade ago for adverse action by the federal government.

You are certainly living up to Rockwall's reputation.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Do we still have a Department of Education?

I think so.  Dissolution of DoE is actually defensible, provided its roles go back to the agencies from which it was spawned in 1979.

But of course, we know it won't go down like that.

Posted
1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said:

Defend.  These. Tariffs.

No one contends that corporations don't have outsized influence in American politics.

But name the last time a bullshit government agency was created then headed up by SoROS!, er, a wealthy private citizen and outsized donor who is also a massive government beneficiary.  And is also wholly unqualified for the position.

Show me a DOJ that is dismissing prosecutions for political reasons, all the while bleating about "weaponization of government."

Show me the last time a president signed an executive order singling out a law firm that represented a political enemy, er opponent, a decade ago for adverse action by the federal government.

You are certainly living up to Rockwall's reputation.

“Would a real fascist do X policy” is a fools errand because fascism, its implementers, and its philosophical forefathers were explicitly anti-rationalist and uninvolved with political science as we know it.  This is especially true of the economy, which Hitler was notoriously uninterested in.  Franco did an about-face between planned autarky and market reforms and saw no conflict with the fascist state. 
 

Fascism is an anti-rational mood or vibe that places collective “national greatness” and the interests of a nation (inseparable from the state as controlled by a leader) above all else while completely subordinating the individual and attacking or eliminating those defined as outside the “nation”. The economy is an instrument to achieve those aims and there are no prescriptive economic policies or even political principles.  Even racism isn’t required, an out-group can be selected along other grounds. A genuine theocrat or free-market zealot might be brutally authoritarian but would not be “fascist” because elevating a faith or the market above the “nation” and its leader is antithetical to fascism which identifies “national greatness” as the highest metaphysical, spiritual, and temporal value. 
 

In the past I’ve been cautious about using fascism to describe anything in the United States, preferring “authoritarian” even for DJT.  But I believe that MAGA has coalesced into a fascist movement.  MAGA’s instrumental and incoherent stance towards market economics and Christianity (where the latter two may be useful, but MUST be subordinate to MAGA) rhymes with historical fascism.  The rhetoric about Americans being ready to suffer economic hardship to restore America is very fascist.  And on the economic front,  the emerging partnership between tech and MAGA and especially Musk is resonant of fascism’s relationship to industry. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Defend.  These. Tariffs.

No one contends that corporations don't have outsized influence in American politics.

But name the last time a bullshit government agency was created then headed up by SoROS!, er, a wealthy private citizen and outsized donor who is also a massive government beneficiary.  And is also wholly unqualified for the position.

Show me a DOJ that is dismissing prosecutions for political reasons, all the while bleating about "weaponization of government."

Show me the last time a president signed an executive order singling out a law firm that represented a political enemy, er opponent, a decade ago for adverse action by the federal government.

You are certainly living up to Rockwall's reputation.

Addendum to this.  You also know that the behind-the-scenes quid pro quo going on in the Trump Administration, that you try to equate to past administrations, is off-the-charts, if it hasn't really gotten going yet.

  • Like 1
Posted
sock spends four and a half years dormant then decides to self immolate one day.

Maybe there needs to be a purge of these accounts. This is a common tactic on here.
  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
6 hours ago, RockwallJim said:

Ana,  glad you're here.  I've been running circles around these guys for a couple of hours.  How do I know?  The personal insults, d--k jokes, spelling / grammar and hyperbole laced responses came flooding in.  Heck, I had 1 guy tell me the Corporations didn't pull the strings of the Bush Administration on the Iraq War, another say Halliburton didn't profit because they were an energy company and not a defense contractor and Elon's conduct (while silly, theatrical, and sometimes counter productive) the last 6 weeks is worse than lying to start a war, killing AT least 200,000 Iraqis, 4,000 US Troops and costing the American Tax Payer over $1.1T.  There are no words for folks who see the world through that lens. (thought about misspelling it lense just to get the spell check police riled up).

I know one thing Ana, these folks (irrationally) hate Donald Trump.  Just like he said Tuesday, there is nothing he can do to make the crew here happy. 

Rest easy, son.  The cavalry has arrived.  Ana is here.

You can take a well earned break as you have charged up the Cemetery Ridge and San Juan Hill and Mount Suribachi of internet websites.  When word gets out, there will be the Presidential Medal of Freedom ceremony at the White House waiting for you, as presented by The Orange One himself (don't get too excited, though, they pretty much give them out to anyone these days). 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

One of the things that low-key amuses me is that the white-supremacist types like to crow about western civilization and judeo-christian ethics and whatnot.

And that, the whole Enlightenment, was led by the western Europe they're now trying so hard to distance themselves from while aligning with conspicuously anti-Enlightenment cultures/countries like Russia and Hungary.

Dark Enlightenment, indeed. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 4
Posted
6 hours ago, RockwallJim said:

I know one thing Ana, these folks (irrationally) hate Donald Trump.  Just like he said Tuesday, there is nothing he can do to make the crew here happy. 

Incorrect. He can reunite with his good buddy epstein.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Posted
One of the things that low-key amuses me is that the white-supremacist types like to crow about western civilization and judeo-christian ethics and whatnot.
And that, the whole Enlightenment, was led by the western Europe they're now trying so hard to distance themselves from while aligning with conspicuously anti-Enlightenment cultures/countries like Russia and Hungary.
Dark Enlightenment, indeed. 

It doesn’t amuse me really. It is just the same salad bar tactic used by the right to justify whatever stupid or horrible shit they want. See clearance Thomas.
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

One of the things that low-key amuses me is that the white-supremacist types like to crow about western civilization and judeo-christian ethics and whatnot.

And that, the whole Enlightenment, was led by the western Europe they're now trying so hard to distance themselves from while aligning with conspicuously anti-Enlightenment cultures/countries like Russia and Hungary.

Dark Enlightenment, indeed. 

Curtis Yarvin explicitly wrote that Europe should all be under Russian domination, complete with masturbatory prose about Cossack cavalry hooves on Parisian cobblestones. 
 

Very typical of Russophilic lightweights whose entire experience is reading some Dostoevsky and Lermontov and maybe a couple weeks of Moscow and St. Petersburg.  Just a complete disconnect from the Russian world as it exists. They’re like Weeaboos except they control our government. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted (edited)

I by no means speak fluent Dotard, but I think what he's saying is that he won in spite of a rigged election? 

Edit: We are so numb to him. However he meant it, a sitting president talking about a rigged presidential election from the Oval Office would have been the biggest story of the week/month not that long ago.

Edited by Red Five
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
3 hours ago, RockwallJim said:

I might be dumb, but my point is things aren't as cut and dry as the creator of that map / post would want you to believe.

Anyone with a half functioning brain who's even remotely paid attention to elections for the past two decades can easily parse the minutia of the map while still understanding the central thesis. And it may well be that the mapmaker understands this, and that your assumptions of what they "want you to believe" is just your own defensiveness rapidly bubbling to the surface. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Red Five said:

I by no means speak fluent Dotard, but I think what he's saying is that he won in spite of a rigged election? 

Edit: We are so numb to him. However he meant it, a sitting president talking about a rigged presidential election from the Oval Office would have been the biggest story of the week/month not that long ago.

 

take a closer look at 'one off' ballots in north carolina and mariposa county az 

Posted
30 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Curtis Yarvin explicitly wrote that Europe should all be under Russian domination, complete with masturbatory prose about Cossack cavalry hooves on Parisian cobblestones. 
 

Very typical of Russophilic lightweights whose entire experience is reading some Dostoevsky and Lermontov and maybe a couple weeks of Moscow and St. Petersburg.  Just a complete disconnect from the Russian world as it exists. They’re like Weeaboos except they control our government. 

That's what's so bizarre about this.  Only in internet world could Yarvin be considered anything but a bizarre crank.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, tx 3 putt said:

 

take a closer look at 'one off' ballots in north carolina and mariposa county az 

If his intent was to say that he won due to a rigged election, we're in a much worse place than I thought.

Posted
11 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

take a closer look at 'one off' ballots in north carolina and mariposa county az 

So they’re just making up counties in AZ now? Suspicious.

  • Haha 4
  • Drool 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Defend.  These. Tariffs.

No one contends that corporations don't have outsized influence in American politics.

But name the last time a bullshit government agency was created then headed up by SoROS!, er, a wealthy private citizen and outsized donor who is also a massive government beneficiary.  And is also wholly unqualified for the position.

Show me a DOJ that is dismissing prosecutions for political reasons, all the while bleating about "weaponization of government."

Show me the last time a president signed an executive order singling out a law firm that represented a political enemy, er opponent, a decade ago for adverse action by the federal government.

You are certainly living up to Rockwall's reputation.

Great post. 
I’d add, show me the president who wholesale fired knowledgeable non-partisan civil service federal employees, presumably to replace with partisan hacks, and also fired a large swath of military leadership.

Edited by Willfully Horn
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

Great post. 
I’d add, show me the president who wholesale fired knowledgeable non-partisan civil service federal employees, presumably to replace with partisan hacks, and also fired a large swath of military leadership.

Yep. Where else have we seen this before?  Hmmmmm

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
20 hours ago, RockwallJim said:

I'll consider myself warned.   I've learned you can always tell when a person has nothing of consequence to add to the discussion if they do 1 of 3 things.. 1. grammar police, 2. swear, 3. ad hominem attacks.    Pardon the pun, but the 2025 trump card is when they label somebody a Nazi.  When they use that, it's because they have nothing more convincing to add.   

Or it could be that there are very obvious similarities between Trumpism and Nazism. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Red Five said:

I by no means speak fluent Dotard, but I think what he's saying is that he won in spite of a rigged election? 

Edit: We are so numb to him. However he meant it, a sitting president talking about a rigged presidential election from the Oval Office would have been the biggest story of the week/month not that long ago.

The problem is he's so fucking stupid that it's difficult to understand what the fuck he is saying.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1


×
×
  • Create New...