Jump to content
Hugo Stiglitz

Perpetual Middle East Geopolitical Quagmire Megathread

Recommended Posts

 

13 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

You pussies neg for everything you don't agree with and have turned this board into the leftist version of Texags politics.

yeah this is all quality posting here, not at all the sort of shit aggroids do when trolling the football board here. 

 

On 1/11/2020 at 12:56 PM, immortal13 said:

Not if you're a liberal

On 1/11/2020 at 7:03 PM, immortal13 said:

Commies

On 1/12/2020 at 9:57 PM, Johnny Sack said:

Have you taught him to Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The sack and immortal are such quality posters. If only surly could better recognize their greatness in posting, we would all be better off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, enough of trying to break this down into various quotes the editing process is a total fucking clusterfuck.

"There are a lot of us non-Democrats on Cloak Room that rally around simple point---President Trump is a lying piece of human fecal matter."

Bush I-"Read my lips, no new taxes."

Bush II-"Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction."

"And he's hurting the GOP"

Then why does he have an over 90% approval rating with Republicans?  The only GOP he is hurting are the establishment do-nothing parasites that have buried their heads into the Beltway muck like Mitt Romney.

"he's hurting the country"

Stock market at all time high, unemployment lowest in ages particularly among minorities, wage income increasing for the first time in over a decade.  If that is hurting the country then may I have another.

"and he's hurting the planet while he's taking 62 million easily manipulated morons down with him.  I'd look forward to laughing at the bewildered looks on the faces of his supporters when he's either removed from office, dies in office, or is defeated in November...while many more millions take the streets to celebrate his no longer being in office---but when the former Director of the CIA tells you he's worried there'll be mass shootings at those types of anti-Trump rallies if he's dead/defeated/removed...then my attitude has shifted from get the man out of office to placate his supporters for the time-being because we're gonna have to figure out what to do with many of them once he's gone."

And you are taking the CIA at it's word?  The same CIA that was plotting to spy on Trump's campaign, the same CIA that has produced endless propaganda and been behind many secretive regime changes around the world.  An agency with practically no oversight, who becomes belligerent at any attempt by any politician to reign in their power or drain their swamp.  Taking the CIA's word on anything involving Trump is like taking CNN's word on anything involving Trump.

"Most of you are smart enough to just pick up and move on, maybe support the next Republican, or whatever.  But a good 20-30 million, the truly afflicted among his base, they're gonna be a multi-generation issue for our country.  They'll make dealing homelessness or opioid addicts look like a cake-walk.  I hate big government more than you could possibly know, but we're gonna have to think about a setting up some kind of tracking system to watch what these morons do for the next several years.  When your boyhood hero, Trump, is long gone...it's his batshit base that worries me.  It even worries the FBI already.  It worries more serious people in very serious ways than I think you understand.  That's not hyperbole,"

That's actually the very definition of hyperbole.  And again your source is the FBI.  An agency that was actively spying on Trump before his election, and plotting against him the moment he won the election.  An agency that lied to FISA courts, manipulated 302 documents, withheld exculpatory evidence from the FISA courts and numerous other crimes and other ethics violations.  This is like the Hatfields claiming that the McCoys worry serious people in very serious ways.

 

If the Republican establishment is so superior to Trump then why was Trump able to win Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania in a presidential election?  Something the establishment hasn't been able to do since Bush in 1988.  I will tell you why.  For a span of around 25 years Republican presidential candidates were synonymous with bland and staleness.  Bush, Dole, more Bush, even more Bush, McCain, Romney--a menu more bland and less flavorful than Irish food.  First Bush was able to ride Reagan's coattails once to win some of those states and his son managed to eke out a couple of elections without them against equally bland and stale Democrats.  However demographics have changed and you now need some of these states.

The Republican establishment's issue with Trump is that he is not bland and stale.  Why in the hell do you think the Republican Party got the reputation and stereotype of being dominated by bland, stale, boring, old, white men?  The Republican establishment hates Trump because he has proven that you can no longer win elections by running the same kind of political campaign these fossils have been set on running since before the invention of FM radio.  He has escorted in their irrelevance in the political world and they detest him for this.  They have no one to blame but themselves for their lack of political evolution. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay, enough of trying to break this down into various quotes the editing process is a total fucking clusterfuck.

"There are a lot of us non-Democrats on Cloak Room that rally around simple point---President Trump is a lying piece of human fecal matter."

Bush I-"Read my lips, no new taxes."

Bush II-"Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction."

"And he's hurting the GOP"

Then why does he have an over 90% approval rating with Republicans?  The only GOP he is hurting are the establishment do-nothing parasites that have buried their heads into the Beltway muck like Mitt Romney.

"he's hurting the country"

Stock market at all time high, unemployment lowest in ages particularly among minorities, wage income increasing for the first time in over a decade.  If that is hurting the country then may I have another.

"and he's hurting the planet while he's taking 62 million easily manipulated morons down with him.  I'd look forward to laughing at the bewildered looks on the faces of his supporters when he's either removed from office, dies in office, or is defeated in November...while many more millions take the streets to celebrate his no longer being in office---but when the former Director of the CIA tells you he's worried there'll be mass shootings at those types of anti-Trump rallies if he's dead/defeated/removed...then my attitude has shifted from get the man out of office to placate his supporters for the time-being because we're gonna have to figure out what to do with many of them once he's gone."

And you are taking the CIA at it's word?  The same CIA that was plotting to spy on Trump's campaign, the same CIA that has produced endless propaganda and been behind many secretive regime changes around the world.  An agency with practically no oversight, who becomes belligerent at any attempt by any politician to reign in their power or drain their swamp.  Taking the CIA's word on anything involving Trump is like taking CNN's word on anything involving Trump.

"Most of you are smart enough to just pick up and move on, maybe support the next Republican, or whatever.  But a good 20-30 million, the truly afflicted among his base, they're gonna be a multi-generation issue for our country.  They'll make dealing homelessness or opioid addicts look like a cake-walk.  I hate big government more than you could possibly know, but we're gonna have to think about a setting up some kind of tracking system to watch what these morons do for the next several years.  When your boyhood hero, Trump, is long gone...it's his batshit base that worries me.  It even worries the FBI already.  It worries more serious people in very serious ways than I think you understand.  That's not hyperbole,"

That's actually the very definition of hyperbole.  And again your source is the FBI.  An agency that was actively spying on Trump before his election, and plotting against him the moment he won the election.  An agency that lied to FISA courts, manipulated 302 documents, withheld exculpatory evidence from the FISA courts and numerous other crimes and other ethics violations.  This is like the Hatfields claiming that the McCoys worry serious people in very serious ways.

 

If the Republican establishment is so superior to Trump then why was Trump able to win Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania in a presidential election?  Something the establishment hasn't been able to do since Bush in 1988.  I will tell you why.  For a span of around 25 years Republican presidential candidates were synonymous with bland and staleness.  Bush, Dole, more Bush, even more Bush, McCain, Romney--a menu more bland and less flavorful than Irish food.  First Bush was able to ride Reagan's coattails once to win some of those states and his son managed to eke out a couple of elections without them against equally bland and stale Democrats.  However demographics have changed and you now need some of these states.

The Republican establishment's issue with Trump is that he is not bland and stale.  Why in the hell do you think the Republican Party got the reputation and stereotype of being dominated by bland, stale, boring, old, white men?  The Republican establishment hates Trump because he has proven that you can no longer win elections by running the same kind of political campaign these fossils have been set on running since before the invention of FM radio.  He has escorted in their irrelevance in the political world and they detest him for this.  They have no one to blame but themselves for their lack of political evolution. 

Is this where we say, “reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee”?

 

Am I doing that right, Johnny Sack?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, DDD Dad said:

Is this where we say, “reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee”?

 

Am I doing that right, Johnny Sack?

You, Jimmy, Bama Mee Maw and the 10 people that circle jerk on this board do it  every day 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BREAKING NEWS: Iranian protests grow in intensity as more effects of President Trump’s order to kill Iranian General emerge.

In other news, conservative trolls who had been in vegetative state for months collectively regain consciousness to proclaim ultimate victory against militant Islam, libtards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly, the remaining handful of Trumpists, the same who oddly believe that those disgusted by Trump are a mere handful, still scan the skies for some confirmation to feed their bias that they are the reps of true good.

It's been cloudy skies and fog for months, but, at last, a wee beam of sophistry shines squirts through like something you think is a fart that turns out to be a hot, thin stream of reeking brown.

Anybody against the killing of Gen. Soleimani must be an admirer of Soleimani and, therefore, aligned with Muslim terrorists who hate America.

It's like they found an overlooked bottle of GOP's Upchuck Amber Ale. They sniff it and gorge on the familiar taste they've cultivated for decades. There are real enemies out there! They're your fellow citizens. The only path to victory is we few virtuous brothers banding together with a vow of hate. Embrace sloganism! Embrace projection even though you don't understand what it is! It's a culture war for the soul you don't actually have!  Jump aboard morons and people willing to gain totally in the name of self and self alone!

Above all, remember that you're the tough guys and they're all fags. Giggle along as Rush comes up with clever names and speaks with a lisp to quote them! You're a realist with the interests of the USA ever at the top of your boldly unhidden agenda! 

A statue to you, you magnificent irony-deaf bastards!

monument-showing-communist-revolutionary

Edited by RomaVicta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

You, Jimmy, Bama Mee Maw and the 10 people that circle jerk on this board do it  every day 

i'm sure that there's never been any conservative circle jerking on this board by enchubben, zork, immortal, icono, chickensandwich, babayaga, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i'm sure that there's never been any conservative circle jerking on this board by enchubben, zork, immortal, icono, chickensandwich, babayaga, etc.

Do you even “Hillary isn’t president” threads, bro?
Have you ever watched .1 seconds of a Trump tally? For Trump supporters to call out “groupthink” and “circle jerks” tells us that irony is dead, dismembered, and cremated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


Do you even “Hillary isn’t president” threads, bro?
Have you ever watched .1 seconds of a Trump tally? For Trump supporters to call out “groupthink” and “circle jerks” tells us that irony is dead, dismembered, and cremated.

you forgot sodomized. somewhere in there was a smooth buttfucking. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SquishMitten said:

Is it still January 12 over there? 

HA!

Wrong tweet.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SquishMitten said:

Is it still January 12 over there? 

I was gonna say, I'm watching Al Jazeera's news feed right now and there hasn't been anything mentioned in today's broadcast. They're currently talking about Venezuela

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, elfenix said:

i'm sure that there's never been any conservative circle jerking on this board by enchubben, zork, immortal, icono, chickensandwich, babayaga, etc.

I've always wondered where am I on the list. 

I'm probably not good enough to be mentioned. Eh I'll take it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I've always wondered where am I on the list. 

I'm probably not good enough to be mentioned. Eh I'll take it.

There's only so much room on Mt. Rushmore 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, elfenix said:

i'm sure that there's never been any conservative circle jerking on this board by enchubben, zork, immortal, icono, chickensandwich, babayaga, etc.

Badge of honor IMO. However, as much jerking as I do on a given day, I guarantee you none of it is done in a circle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Badge of honor IMO. However, as much jerking as I do on a given day, I guarantee you none of it is done in a circle.

Congrats!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, workswithseed said:

I've always wondered where am I on the list. 

I'm probably not good enough to be mentioned. Eh I'll take it.

If you keep at it long enough and persistent enough there is always the possibility you will be accused of being Swam's sock.  I look at it as the Cloak Room version of Quintan Tarantino winning an Oscar for best original screenplay for Pulp Fiction while being snubbed for best director.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

If you keep at it long enough and persistent enough there is always the possibility you will be accused of being Swam's sock.  I look at it as the Cloak Room version of Quintan Tarantino winning an Oscar for best original screenplay for Pulp Fiction while being snubbed for best director.

*Quintin.  Quintan wrote Romance novels wherein the snotty upperclass blonde with a svelte body and expensive wardrobe was supplanted by the busty rosy-cheeked heroine who truly understood the brooding terse hero.

Carry on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

*Quintin.  Quintan wrote Romance novels wherein the snotty upperclass blonde with a svelte body and expensive wardrobe was supplanted by the busty rosy-cheeked heroine who truly understood the brooding terse hero.

Carry on.

*Quentin.

Carry on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, I'm a little behind. Did Sack really drop some real redpill 4chan slang? God, how far the trust fund beneficiaries have fallen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

No one saw this coming 

 

Concussions huh?  That’s your big gotcha?  Jesus.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Concussions huh?  That’s your big gotcha?  Jesus.  

Shh. Can’t you see we are trying to circle jerk?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of them returning to service shortly. Probably tripped over a rock on their way to the humvee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

Concussions huh?  That’s your big gotcha?  Jesus.  

 

29 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

All of them returning to service shortly. Probably tripped over a rock on their way to the humvee.

Yes, let's minimize the risk and blame their injuries on their own clumsiness and ignore the fact that some barracks took a direct hit. Had they not got out of there, they'd have been toast.

How about we hear what the soldiers who were present say?

https://www.npr.org/2020/01/15/796767495/the-views-from-u-s-troops-still-stationed-at-bombed-air-base-in-iraq

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All of them returning to service shortly. Probably tripped over a rock on their way to the humvee.

^^ 

You know this same guy, who is blaming soldiers for getting injured during a rocket attack, posts memes about how Democrats hate soldiers on his Facebook, and all of his white trash friends come and have a like/comment circle jerk.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Iranians could have killed everyone at that base if they’d wanted to, because Trump assassinated their top general without bothering to determine whether our troops in the region that were in range of Iranian ballistic missiles had any fucking missile defenses. Thousands of American troops were defenseless and exposed because of Trump’s idiocy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

Soldiers deployed just to carry out the mission of defending themselves is a horrible mission.

Did I say that’s what their mission was?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, washparkhorn said:

Soldiers deployed just to carry out the mission of defending themselves is a horrible mission.

this isn't the same WPH guy from years past, is he?  Anyway, agree with the statement, "yeah lets set up in a foreign nation to defend ourselves!" . If the local sand people hate us, they hate America!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

Did I say that’s what their mission was?

I was agreeing with you and enhancing. Force protection is difficult. Your point was well made. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mpu


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Recruiting ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Help ... For Sale ... Politics ... Board Discussion
×
×
  • Create New...