Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is like a kid that finally stood up to their bully, earning the respect of their classmates, and then sighs "I just can't do this anymore" and voluntarily bends over for another atomic wedgie. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

This is like a kid that finally stood up to their bully, earning the respect of their classmates, and then sighs "I just can't do this anymore" and voluntarily bends over for another atomic wedgie. 

 

Yeah, but the sad truth is, they were going to lose no matter what. The government was going to open with or without them. 

Posted
On 10/17/2025 at 12:14 PM, Goredho said:

Its hard to have faith in the faithless.  And I am not talking about spirituality or religion here, I'm talking about a party devoid of any leadership that instills confidence or hope let alone a passion to act.  Whatever you think of MAGA, its given people something to believe in and to be a part of, and that is seductive even if completely misguided.

A couple democratic politicians have a pulse, but the party as a whole?  They are the hollow men, the stuffed men, crouched together, headpieces filled with straw...

Hey guys!  Just checking in on the state of the opposition party.  Seems to be business as usual.  Carry on…

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted

Honestly, it looks more like I would expect a dating/prostitution site would look like:  pictures of scantily-dressed young women with information along the side.  Maybe picking out his date for wherever he is flying to. 

But it's also possible he is researching AI fakes or on-line prostitution rings.  Who the fuck knows.  Generally Congressmen are better at covering their tracks.   

 

 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Tuco said:

He claims he was running through X and the algorithm had the "racy pics."  I don't have X so I don't know if that looks like the interface. 

But I did like this line:

“I must’ve looked at more than 1,000 posts,” he said, adding “If i see a picture of a woman, might I look at it longer than a sunset? Yeah.”

He's right about the algorithm. 

It will throw in random tweets and start feeding you a lot of the same subject if you engage with it at all (by clicking on or viewing a photo/video). It's so bad that even when you BLOCK a Twitter account, the algorithm still considers that engagement and will still send you similar stuff. I got a random video showing someone getting their ass kicked, I blocked the account, and the algo started sending me MORE fight videos from other accounts. Watch a Bijan Robinson video that ends up in your feed? Get ready for a bunch of Falcons content flooding your account. 

The algorithm is an abomination. 

Edited by Hank Kingsley
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

He's right about the algorithm. 

It will throw in random tweets and start feeding you a lot of the same subject if you engage with it at all (by clicking on or viewing a photo/video). It's so bad that even when you BLOCK a Twitter account, the algorithm still considers that engagement and will still send you similar stuff. I got a random video showing someone getting their ass kicked, I blocked the account, and the algo started sending me MORE fight videos from other accounts. Watch a Bijan Robinson video that ends up in your feed? Get ready for a bunch of Falcons content flooding your account. 

The algorithm is an abomination. 

image.png.b23191c8a9efdb4540981ee2fe3d6809.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Posted
Just now, Covri said:


Damn. Good read but damn it’s sucks to hear just how bad it was.

I enjoyed it, too, but that's largely because I'm still in the post-Georgia self-flagellation stage.  

I'm not sure that an attack from a Phd and self-described "bastard child of deconstruction and queer theory" and an "ultra-leftist" isn't tantamount to relying on the same, overly intellectual minority interest groups that are pulling at candidates to take non-mainstream positions that alienate voters.  Harris is a cypher and failed to connect to voters when she offered platitudes in response to criticism and the piece is better when it highlights that relative emptiness.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

I enjoyed it, too, but that's largely because I'm still in the post-Georgia self-flagellation stage.  

I'm not sure that an attack from a Phd and self-described "bastard child of deconstruction and queer theory" and an "ultra-leftist" isn't tantamount to relying on the same, overly intellectual minority interest groups that are pulling at candidates to take non-mainstream positions that alienate voters.  Harris is a cypher and failed to connect to voters when she offered platitudes in response to criticism and the piece is better when it highlights that relative emptiness.  


I didn’t even put a ton of weight on the authors opinions as general public opinions, just some of her own words and blame shifting. The towel thing was kind of stupid, but her not given the Charlamaigne interview the respect it deserves (and I’m no big fan of his either) was not good. Or the blaming time, or Pete being gay, or Biden not being all their and not saying anything kind of shows she’s not a real leader. She didn’t go far running solo in 2020 and she spent four years not changing that perception.

Posted

Reading at article about a very flawed Harris and noticing that the diagnosis was that America wanted someone further left than her on trans issues, immigration, and (of course) Israel-Gaza. 
 

Looked up the author to see how she’s penned jeremiads about how not liking pitbulls (“nanny dogs”) is Racist and a truly unhinged “manifesto” (note, all manifestos are unhinged) written in the form of a letter to extraterrestrials. And I gotta say I question the diagnosis and who needs to be put in the penalty box during message development for voters. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Covri said:

IMG_3696.jpeg.43388e71d553052b51c7ff2e4e0eeed5.jpeg

 

Welp, Dems are cooked lol

You should run.

Get stacks of money.  Deliver zero results.  Call it a "well-fought fight, I'm proud to have tried."  Pocket cash.

Call it the "Allred plan."

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, chainsaw said:

Kamala had no vision for America, and very obviously got into politics for the same reason Trump did: the attention.

She might not have vision, but to say she got into politics to keep herself out of prison while grifting the country for billions of dollars is more than a bit unfair.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, The Hot Dog Buffet said:

She might not have vision, but to say she got into politics to keep herself out of prison while grifting the country for billions of dollars is more than a bit unfair.

He ran in 2024 to keep himself out of prison. He ran in 2016 for attention (and to grift, but he didn't need to be a politician to grift, which is his natural state of being)

Posted
4 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Reading at article about a very flawed Harris and noticing that the diagnosis was that America wanted someone further left than her on trans issues, immigration, and (of course) Israel-Gaza. 
 

Looked up the author to see how she’s penned jeremiads about how not liking pitbulls (“nanny dogs”) is Racist and a truly unhinged “manifesto” (note, all manifestos are unhinged) written in the form of a letter to extraterrestrials. And I gotta say I question the diagnosis and who needs to be put in the penalty box during message development for voters. 

Bet I can point to the one you disagree vehemently with.

Posted
4 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

You should run.

Get stacks of money.  Deliver zero results.  Call it a "well-fought fight, I'm proud to have tried."  Pocket cash.

Call it the "Allred plan."

Book deal on the back end? 

Posted

Should be a big fucking blinking red light for all the neoliberal dem squishes that stand for nothing that makes someone’s life better. Labour has just punched down on trans and immigrants in a “gentler” manner than the far right and it’s worked out how you would expect

 

 

Posted
21 hours ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Should be a big fucking blinking red light for all the neoliberal dem squishes that stand for nothing that makes someone’s life better. Labour has just punched down on trans and immigrants in a “gentler” manner than the far right and it’s worked out how you would expect

 

 

So you're drawing this conclusion that Labour "punching down" on trans and immigrants is the cause of the discontent of Britain's voters since they took control of the government in November...of 2025. So basically, you're saying the around 70% of unhappy people in the UK, which is about the same as it was when Labour took office, is unchanged in the last two weeks? Here's an illustration below:
image.png.df6b23864d509a4d36480793f29836e2.png

 

But the level of dissatisfaction (about the same) is definitely because of trans and immigration issues. Is that correct? As Stassney said, how did you come to this conclusion?

Also, do you want to tell us why the level of dissatisfaction with the conservative party was so fucking high for the time leading up to that? Since, you know, it wasn't trans and immigration.

2 hours ago, StassneyHorn said:

How did you reach that conclusion from the question, and why would it matter in America?

you've got to quote the guy, or he's never going to return to answer your question, Stassney. But I'm happy to assist.

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Never seen Talarico do this

 

What exactly is your beef with Talarico that you’re going out of your way to trash him in comments?  He’s a great candidate, so unless you’re a maga troll fuckface, or can articulate a legitimate reason to be against him, these kind of comments are not helpful.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Snake Diggity said:

What exactly is your beef with Talarico that you’re going out of your way to trash him in comments?  He’s a great candidate, so unless you’re a maga troll fuckface, or can articulate a legitimate reason to be against him, these kind of comments are not helpful.

No beef, just wish we had candidates like this in Texas. I think he will probably win the primary. The general, he'll probably do about as well as Beto did but perhaps the anti-Trump wave will be enough to get him over the hump over someone as flawed as Paxton.

Posted
11 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

No beef, just wish we had candidates like this in Texas. I think he will probably win the primary. The general, he'll probably do about as well as Beto did but perhaps the anti-Trump wave will be enough to get him over the hump over someone as flawed as Paxton.

You know Paxton is basically in a 3 way tie with the other two candidates, right? One of which is a sitting Senator with a huge war chest. Why are you anointing Paxton? I mean, sure, I'm cheering for Paxton. But lets not pretend it's fait accompli.

My beef is Talarico seems to be he's following the Colin Allred plan. 10 emails a day asking me for money, and I'm not seeing shit else. 



×
×
  • Create New...