Jump to content

The Cloak Room is a terrible place.


Parliament

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Hate said:

That's kind of like having the largest boil on your butt.

Call Texas Highways Magazine.

What bothers folks, I think, is that politics is discussed at all. Why is that?

Edited to answer my own question: Because folks prefer to vote in blissful ignorance. You’re welcome to prove me wrong, but, please, show your work.

Edited by Willfully Horn
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Willfully Horn said:

Call Texas Highways Magazine.

What bothers folks, I think, is that politics is discussed at all. Why is that?

Edited to answer my own question: Because folks prefer to vote in blissful ignorance. You’re welcome to prove me wrong, but, please, show your work.

I’m sure there is a lot of rational thought and reasoned discourse in the Cloak Room.  

Edited by Frank Drebin
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Neonmoon said:

People that don’t like the CR are people that are uncomfortable with people disagreeing with them. For example, The CR is full of lawyers, finance, doctors, and tech people because they’re used to having to back up their arguments/beliefs/findings with facts and reason. 

Yeah, that’s it.  

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Neonmoon said:

People that don’t like the CR are people that are uncomfortable with people disagreeing with them. For example, The CR is full of lawyers, finance, doctors, and tech people because they’re used to having to back up their arguments/beliefs/findings with facts and reason. 

wine fart GIF by South Park

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember leaving the old site because of a UT application thing I was involved with right around 2016 election.  And I had so much pos rep from bashing Obama and Hillary (a lot of it from the people who neg rep posts of mine from months ago who are on this very thread).  And I basically sat out politics and the new site for 2017 and even 2018 (aside from Seinfeld and Ass posts, I am  human after all).  And I guess while that was happening, everybody who was pro-CR became anti-CR. 

And everybody but me was let in on some super magic secret that you couldn't post anything against Trump without meaning you were a beta-male, socialist cuck.  And i wasn't pro or anti-Trump at the time, but all of a sudden there were no more facts or articles or analysis.  It was just a shouting match.  Trump was sent by God and if you didn't like him, you sucked.  And then others felt that Trump was Hitler and was going to kill all of us and install a dictatorship.  Nobody ever showed their work.  It was ridiculous.  But by 2019, I finally realized the con he pulled.  Mainly out in America, but also on here.  This site, and CR especially, is different from the mainstream idiots he conned.  The folks on here, former Republicans like myself, aren't special...but we are different.  We are far more educated and insulated than the average MAGA member.  That's what made the shift of the CR so weird to me.  It could be a place of proper discourse and factual discussion, but it did kinda become an echo chamber of sorts. But then you also have much of the rest of the site bitching about it without coming to it and saying "Here's my position, here's the facts to back it up, here's why Trump did this thing correctly, fuck you very much, where's the tylenol?"  I understand why people just shout what Trump shouts to own the libs, but this is a very different group of folks. 

In the end, the two reasons I oscillated back to CR after my days of bashing Obama and Hillary is there are a lot of us on there still scratching our heads, looking at one another like "Did they tell you we were totally changing the party to stupid?  They didn't tell me.  Maybe we're the stupid ones then?  I mean, I do dumb shit but I was kind of in an influential position within the party.  Did you get the memo?  I didn't get the memo."   And the other reason is, it's fucking funny in the CR.  Maybe not your cup of tea, but something I know more about than politics is comedy, and it's fucking way funnier in there than it is with the rest of some of you miserable pricks.  And guys like Poe and Incrudelity, those guys are funny too.  Stern anti-CR's like PilotsError, StruggleBus, McFly...those guys could put the skids on a fun time real fucking quick.  

In the end, there's lotsa far-left folks that I don't agree with on pretty much anything.  But there's a lot of us there that again, just didn't get the stupid memo about Trump.  We missed the train so we're just partying with the folks still at the Depot.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Willfully Horn said:

Call Texas Highways Magazine.

What bothers folks, I think, is that politics is discussed at all. Why is that?

Edited to answer my own question: Because folks prefer to vote in blissful ignorance. You’re welcome to prove me wrong, but, please, show your work.

You didn't show any work

  • Fuck You 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cornpop said:

You didn't show any work

I do show my work when I am not giving an opinion. And, I try to answer questions directly. Maybe you could hazard a guess as to why people are put out by folks talking politics on the political forum. 
 

Granted, folks don’t like talking politics with others,* but the hostility towards people talking politics, among themselves, is rather fucked up. Wouldn’t you agree?

 

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/06/19/the-publics-level-of-comfort-talking-politics-and-trump/

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

I do show my work when I am not giving an opinion. And, I try to answer questions directly. Maybe you could hazard a guess as to why people are put out by folks talking politics on the political forum. 
 

Granted, folks don’t like talking politics with others,* but the hostility towards people talking politics, among themselves, is rather fucked up. Wouldn’t you agree?

 

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/06/19/the-publics-level-of-comfort-talking-politics-and-trump/

 

I don't think that's the problem

  • Fuck You 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/12/2022 at 2:51 PM, Cheeseweasel said:

You do you. I love this board & 99% of it makes my laugh/brings me joy. 1% of the people are a little too high strung for me, so I try to set them straight. I do this by going to the place where they congregate and offer my opinions.

 

 

Edited by Bullneck
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the latest on the UVa thread.  There's no point in continuing on the Football board but for some reason I feel compelled to respond to the stupidity.

12 hours ago, Tex Pete said:

It just has no place on this board. It’s been that way through all the shaggy years and now the surly years. I don’t want to read political shit because this is a football board. I don’t come here for political or religious advice. It’s one of the reasons I have always enjoyed these boards. That shit has ruined TV and just about everything else. 

If I want to talk that, I’ll find those places. There are plenty of them all over the internet. Most people are idiots and I don’t want their hot takes. Their football hot takes are usually moronic enough, and I know lots of people feel exactly the same. I don’t care what anyone thinks about whatever other topic. We have boards for those. I have literally never clicked on one.

Same reason I never listen to sports talk radio. Don’t give the first fuck about the NBA, MLB, or hockey. 

One day the decisions you didn't know you made will intrude on your life. 

2 hours ago, Tex Pete said:

It’s about football players on a football team. Concept isn’t difficult. Some people love to turn everything to their bullshit. 

OK, so pick three other players and post about them.  But they didn't die because of gun violence.  Something that statistically wouldn't happen in most other countries.  Now it's happening more than once a week (really, let that sink in) here.  It's fucking insane.  Why wouldn't you want to stop the insanity.

2 hours ago, USNALonghorn said:

They can’t let a tragedy go to waste.

What you call "go to waste" I call "we would endeavor to stop it from happening again."  I get it, you have no answers.  We do.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

Joe Biden renews call for assault weapons ban after latest mass shootings

There’s no such thing as an “assault” weapon. Assault is an action. You can assault someone with a pitchfork, knife, baseball bat, etc.

But be my guest, ban an inanimate object. I’m sure that will tame psychopaths. Let’s do it!!

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

There’s no such thing as an “assault” weapon. Assault is an action. You can assault someone with a pitchfork, knife, baseball bat, etc.

But be my guest, ban an inanimate object. I’m sure that will tame psychopaths. Let’s do it!!

OK.  Sounds like your answer is to do nothing.  Nothing can be done.  Remember that doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of insanity.  Some of us would like to stop the insanity. It doesn't seem like you do.

I'm wondering if you could answer a question for me. (see below)

Spoiler

What if next week we saw a Uvalde or Columbine or Sandy Hook or Marjory Stoneman Douglas type of mass shooting.  A mass shooting where, say 20 children died.  And the next week the same thing happened.  And the next week, and the next.

And it continued every week.  Every week another 20 children were sacrificed.  It would never stop until something real was done.

At what point would you say, "Enough."  Where is that?  How many children would have to die? Tell me your answer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bullneck said:

OK.  Sounds like your answer is to do nothing.  Nothing can be done.  Remember that doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of insanity.  Some of us would like to stop the insanity. It doesn't seem like you do.

I'm wondering if you could answer a question for me. (see below)

  Reveal hidden contents

What if next week we saw a Uvalde or Columbine or Sandy Hook or Marjory Stoneman Douglas type of mass shooting.  A mass shooting where, say 20 children died.  And the next week the same thing happened.  And the next week, and the next.

And it continued every week.  Every week another 20 children were sacrificed.  It would never stop until something real was done.

At what point would you say, "Enough."  Where is that?  How many children would have to die? Tell me your answer.

 

Yeah, you’re totally right, man. Let’s go ahead and ban a scary looking rifle! I can already see people lining up to turn them in!

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

You don’t have shit, pussy. 

Pot, meet kettle.

2 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

Yeah, you’re totally right, man. Let’s go ahead and ban a scary looking rifle! I can already see people lining up to turn them in!

Critical thinking isn't high on your list of aptitudes is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, royiv said:

Pot, meet kettle.

Critical thinking isn't high on your list of aptitudes is it?

His handle is "USNA" which I assumed meant the Naval Academy but I'm starting to wonder.  All the Naval Academy and Marine Option guys I knew were pretty sharp.  His game thread comments are nothing too interesting ("Lets gooooo") so I think I'll put him on ignore.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bullneck said:

His handle is "USNA" which I assumed meant the Naval Academy but I'm starting to wonder.  All the Naval Academy and Marine Option guys I knew were pretty sharp.  His game thread comments are nothing too interesting ("Lets gooooo") so I think I'll put him on ignore.  

Yeah, I'm beginning to think he's in his mom's basement. The guy appears to have the IQ of potato. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm an open minded person.  I have a black person in my avatar.
Duncan.thumb.gif.0e4ba100fb0e8c3a2df58c0fc48ceeb6.gif
ntf.thumb.jpg.d50888b386741a40314914896a78309b.jpg
1EEE2880-4894-45CE-97E8-116E7282C170.thumb.jpeg.3dcdb171fb1c65803a88f4c411966ab6.jpeg
Screenshot_20220711-203345_Chrome.thumb.jpg.ae26ceb0b31e231cde25c1753f219c1c.jpg
lavar-ball-big-baller-brand.thumb.jpg.c128fc27dfe2800ce54b3df8b719f107.jpg
And then there's this snowflake.  Based on his posts I imagine that's a real, actual picture of Texas Pete:
lbmmagnb3.thumb.png.a8deee39799286b5538f45dbe220eabe.png
 
 

Fuck you for any implication that I am racist. Find any such post here or on Shaggy that would implicate that I’m racist. I’ll wait here for your apology.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2022 at 6:20 PM, USNALonghorn said:

There’s no such thing as an “assault” weapon. Assault is an action. You can assault someone with a pitchfork, knife, baseball bat, etc.

But be my guest, ban an inanimate object. I’m sure that will tame psychopaths. Let’s do it!!

Bless your heart.  You really are a moron.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

Nice comeback...

Now go back to debating politics on the internet.

Harry Potter Idiot GIF
 

Hate to break it to you numb nuts, but you were having a political debate upthread.  You are just too big of a coward to go the appropriate forum to have it.  Show us where the big, bad Cloak Room touched you.  L-o- fucking-l.  Pathetic.

Edited by PenelopeWitherspoon
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

Harry Potter Idiot GIF
 

Hate to break it to you numb nuts, but you were having a political debate upthread.  You are just too big of a coward to go the appropriate forum to have it.  Show us where the big, bad Cloak Room touched you.  L-o- fucking-l.  Pathetic.

Yes, dimwit, I was totally trying to change people's opinion on a topic society will NEVER agree on... on an internet forum. Now take your brave soul back to the hostile trenches of the Cloak Room and change some minds. You're the real hero!

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

Yes, dimwit, I was totally trying to change people's opinion on a topic society will NEVER agree on... on an internet forum. Now take your brave soul back to the hostile trenches of the Cloak Room and change some minds. You're the real hero!

You certainly ain’t gonna learn what you don’t want to know.

To whit. (and spoilered because of some sensibilities:)

Spoiler

In the United States, assault weapon is a controversial term used to define firearmswith specified characteristics.[1] The definition varies among regulating jurisdictions, but usually includes semi-automatic firearms with a detachable magazine, a pistol grip, and sometimes other features, such as a vertical forward grip, flash suppressor, or barrel shroud.[1][2]Certain firearms are specified by name in some laws that restrict assault weapons.[3]When the now-defunct Federal Assault Weapons Ban was passed in 1994, the U.S. Department of Justice said, "In general, assault weapons are semiautomatic firearms with a large magazine of ammunition that was designed snd configured for rapid fire and combat use."[3] The commonly used definitions of assault weapons are under frequent debate, and have changed over time.[1]

Common knowledge might be less specific, but, it is common understanding.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

You certainly ain’t gonna learn what you don’t want to know.

To whit. (and spoilered because of some sensibilities:)

  Reveal hidden contents

In the United States, assault weapon is a controversial term used to define firearmswith specified characteristics.[1] The definition varies among regulating jurisdictions, but usually includes semi-automatic firearms with a detachable magazine, a pistol grip, and sometimes other features, such as a vertical forward grip, flash suppressor, or barrel shroud.[1][2]Certain firearms are specified by name in some laws that restrict assault weapons.[3]When the now-defunct Federal Assault Weapons Ban was passed in 1994, the U.S. Department of Justice said, "In general, assault weapons are semiautomatic firearms with a large magazine of ammunition that was designed snd configured for rapid fire and combat use."[3] The commonly used definitions of assault weapons are under frequent debate, and have changed over time.[1]

Common knowledge might be less specific, but, it is common understanding.

The definition listed further proves my point. The term is labeled as “controversial“ because it is almost exclusively used by one side of the political spectrum in an effort to sway opinion. Same thing can be said about the term “pro-life”. 
 

Back to my original point: there is nothing noble or even decent about turning a report of a tragedy into a political debate. Just like with abortion, American society will never come to a mutually agreed solution. There is no need to spill the mind numbing CR circle jerk over here. I’m sure there are plenty of threads over there for that.

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

The definition listed further proves my point. The term is labeled as “controversial“ because it is almost exclusively used by one side of the political spectrum in an effort to sway opinion. Same thing can be said about the term “pro-life”. 
 

Back to my original point: there is nothing noble or even decent about turning a report of a tragedy into a political debate. Just like with abortion, American society will never come to a mutually agreed solution. There is no need to spill the mind numbing CR circle jerk over here. I’m sure there are plenty of threads over there for that.

I will concede to your wishes. Perhaps someone in CR will explain what your first paragraph means. I must point out the frequency of such tragedies would dictate that the subject never be discussed, following the logic of your second  paragraph. Peace.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/11/23/us/2022-mass-shootings-tracking-second-highest/index.html

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, USNALonghorn said:

Yes, dimwit, I was totally trying to change people's opinion on a topic society will NEVER agree on... on an internet forum. Now take your brave soul back to the hostile trenches of the Cloak Room and change some minds. You're the real hero!

Maybe you shouldn’t post here if you are so fucking sensitive.  FYI, society largely agrees.  It is mouth breathers like you who drag their heels and continue to show everyone what trash you are.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, USNALonghorn said:

The definition listed further proves my point. The term is labeled as “controversial“ because it is almost exclusively used by one side of the political spectrum in an effort to sway opinion. Same thing can be said about the term “pro-life”. 
 

Back to my original point: there is nothing noble or even decent about turning a report of a tragedy into a political debate. Just like with abortion, American society will never come to a mutually agreed solution. There is no need to spill the mind numbing CR circle jerk over here. I’m sure there are plenty of threads over there for that.

Are you really this dumb?  A majority of Americans believe abortion should be legal.  It is a very vocal minority who bought and paid for the Supreme Court who thinks abortion should be banned.  Maybe if you stopped watching Fox News you might learn something.  We all know you are too big of a pussy to engage in meaningful discussion in the Cloak Room.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...