Jump to content

45 indicated


Cairn Horn88

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Today is the day the government is supposed to respond to the issue of witnesses testifying before the DC grand jury in the Florida case.  Must say I am interested in that, because at first blush, it sure looks like the government was violating its own policies, if not the law.  I hope they have a good explanation.  The best part of it may be under seal, though.

Also worth noting for those inclined to panic about Cannon denying the governments' motions to seal, Chutkan did it too.

MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: The government's 24 Sealed Motion for Leave to Submit Exhibit Ex Parte and Under Seal is hereby DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/10/2023. (zjd)

 

Cmon-man GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

a.k.a. "the only guy in this picture who still has a career"

Well, Eddie Murphy has a net worth of over 200 Million dollars and still is acting.  Is his recent work up there with Trading Places?  No.  But it's work and You People isn't exactly the worst thing I've seen this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rimbo said:

I mean... y'all all do realize that literally everything he said in that tweet was sarcasm, right? He was saying it to poke fun at the people who think he'd do it.

I'd have thought the "fly coach nobody would recognize me" bit in there would make that obvious, but...

Yeah kinda like that time that he kept poking fun at Bill Maher because he kept saying Trump would try to stay in the White House past his term…

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

I just don't understand why so many people love to fuck around when every single one of them hates the finding out part.

They think they are above the finding out part. Even here Selina Kyle, "the rich don't even go broke the same as the rest of us" is still in play.  Indicted by grand juries, but being given the luxury of ample time to turn themselves in, making motions to courts to NOT GET ARRESTED, etc etc.  

I realize that these folks are not the only case where they are being afforded time to turn themselves in but generally, the average person has law enforcement show up at their place when they damn well please and drag em in. They sure as fuck don't get the luxury of wasting the court's time trying to nullify the indictment....that's the point of the trial to come assholes.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 3
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, The Dog said:

 

Given that many of the charges are going to be harder to prove (which is why so many of them are missing from the DC indictment) this could backfire badly. Even if he's convicted and jailed for a decade, MAGAts will point to every minor mini-victory he gets at the expense of all else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Today is the day the government is supposed to respond to the issue of witnesses testifying before the DC grand jury in the Florida case.  Must say I am interested in that, because at first blush, it sure looks like the government was violating its own policies, if not the law.  I hope they have a good explanation.  The best part of it may be under seal, though.

Also worth noting for those inclined to panic about Cannon denying the governments' motions to seal, Chutkan did it too.

MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: The government's 24 Sealed Motion for Leave to Submit Exhibit Ex Parte and Under Seal is hereby DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/10/2023. (zjd)

 

I bet this won't be for a retarded reason though. No idea what this filing was but I have a feeling the ex parte bit was the problem. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Today is the day the government is supposed to respond to the issue of witnesses testifying before the DC grand jury in the Florida case.  Must say I am interested in that, because at first blush, it sure looks like the government was violating its own policies, if not the law.  I hope they have a good explanation.  The best part of it may be under seal, though.

 

about that:

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

That moran in the Cardinals t-shirt will haunt me every day of my life.  FFS.

I mean, the only shirt that would've been more fitting from a professional sports team might be a Cowboys shirt.  Or A&M if we were going college.  Otherwise, the Cardinals shirt is pretty much exactly what I would've expected that guy would've been wearing.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NameAlreadyInUse said:

I mean, the only shirt that would've been more fitting from a professional sports team might be a Cowboys shirt.  Or A&M if we were going college.  Otherwise, the Cardinals shirt is pretty much exactly what I would've expected that guy would've been wearing.

Okey-dokey.  I mean, if you're gonna have a stupid perspective, come strong, and you did.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't k now if there's like a Federal Judge/Magistrate lounge or something or Fall Mixer or anything like that.  But that she cited that and thought it was a slam dunk, to have to be then told, "Uh, this case was overturned.  So it's not really caselaw in the sense you think of caselaw."  And then she blasted back with, "AH-HAH!  So you admit it WAS STILL A CASE!"  

I mean, politics aside...some Trump fans...the ones still with a few operating brain cells have to realize the world looks to our judicial system literally on a daily basis for guidance, precedence, and direction.  This is not a great look for us considering the high profile nature of the case.  This is bush league, baked on weed, late for class, 1L plagiarize the first horn book they could find on the way to class type weak sauce.  fucking Keystone Kannons.  (also the name of a great porn site  and my alt.rock CivPro cover band).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That response was killer.

Quote

 “That proposed remedy is contrary to precedent and—except for the district court ruling reversed in United States v. Messino, 181 F.3d 826 (7th Cir. 1999)—would appear to be unprecedented.…..

Nauta has not identified any case, and the Government is unaware of one, in which a court has excluded evidence to avoid a conflict on facts remotely similar to this case, where the Government put Mr. Woodward on notice long ago about potential conflicts, and he is now seeking to affirmatively use those conflicts to gain a tactical advantage at trial by excluding highly incriminating evidence to the benefit of not only his own client but also a co-defendant (Trump) whose PAC is paying his legal fees.”

 

 

IE…try it Eileen and prepare to get benched slapped AGAIN on appeal.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...