Jump to content

2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, dcbc said:

Lumber Sectional

"Say, J.D.  Where'd you get that workshirt for the border photo opp...'The Lumbar Yard'?"  

I'll see myself out.

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, chainsaw said:

I don't know where she is on that issue, yet. It could cost her a lot if she plays it poorly.

I think she's done some early signaling that she wants to pivot from Biden's policies toward Israel. I hope she does, but it sure as hell isn't going to keep me from voting for her if she doesn't, and most of you know how strongly I feel about the Israel situation as it currently stands.

I am not gonna dogpile on you or neg you or anything, but I do think you're wrong in this instance.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, chainsaw said:

I don't know where she is on that issue, yet. It could cost her a lot if she plays it poorly.

Lol, but you’ll go ahead and project her in the worst possible light, which you’ve already done tacitly. Fuck you, dude, go ahead and vote trump because you clearly want it all to burn. At this point I’m questioning whether or not you and GRUHorn have the same fucking employers. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
22 minutes ago, 'stache said:

Is that an allegation of alcoholism because she laughs? Is that really what I just heard?

Allegation…confession, they’re so obvious at this point

Posted
34 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

It’s stupid and weird. 

 

Dude, you have no idea how weird Hollering Elk is until you read her other comics.

Let's just say that there was disappointment on Reddit that she, of all people, left the "Kamala dislocating her jaw and swallowing Trump whole" bit off-screen, as that's the sort of thing she'd normally draw rather explicitly.

It's amazing and wonderful and hating her is like hating Willie or Earl. No real Texan does that.

 

13 minutes ago, OU Sucks said:

 

 

LOL it's perfect, right down to the Ukrainian Fist Pumping :D

  • Haha 2
Posted

Yeah just because I'm not pumping sunshine doesn't mean I'm going to vote RFK or Stein. It's all going to come down to turnout, and the best way to maximize turnout is to give the base what it wants.

  • Fuck You 2
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, chainsaw said:

Yeah just because I'm not pumping sunshine doesn't mean I'm going to vote RFK or Stein. It's all going to come down to turnout, and the best way to maximize turnout is to give the base what it wants.

You have no concept of The Base and what independents want. Full stop. But you seem eager to depress turnout. 

Edited by SydneyCarton
  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
30 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

She can win Florida and compete in Texas if the Democratic base turnout is high. The honeymoon period will end by the convention. A substantial part of the base will regress to apathy if the policies and messaging are right-wing. Sorry if that's not what you want to hear, but that doesn't make it false.

image.gif.abc90f84de00cb7db7d6a24065475cbe.gif

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

You have no concept of The Base and what independents want. Full stop. 

There are twice as many Democrats (20%) who say supporting Israel is "much more likely" to negatively affect their opinion of a candidate than there are who feel the other way (10%). That is what the data says about the base Harris needs to turn out.

Edited by chainsaw
  • Fuck You 3
Posted
29 minutes ago, 'stache said:

Is that an allegation of alcoholism because she laughs? Is that really what I just heard?

 

23 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

*bottles

*boxes

 

Judge Boxwine

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

 

11 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Israel is the image, and immigration is the link.

The important cross-tab is "Democrats." Within that group of voters, the policies in the "border bill" and support for Israel are not popular. The percentages reflected in those polls (and Ipsos is reputable as a pollster) are too large to fuck with. I wouldn't write them off as some negligible fringe. We don't want a repeat of 2016. We need everyone to show the fuck up.

Dems lost 2016 because Hillary refused to visit the midwest. You know, the midwest swing states who want moderate policy. Hillary had like a 97% approval rating among the hardcore democratic base. The base showed up and Hillary lost. 

Biden won 2020 because he pitched himself as a moderate unity ticket and he won back the midwest. Biden appealed to Trump voters who didn't like Trump. Do you not understand what the term swing voter means? 

 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, chainsaw said:

There are twice as many Democrats (20%) who say supporting Israel is "very likely" to negatively affect their opinion of a candidate than there are who feel the other way (10%). That is what the data says about the base Harris needs to turn out.

And Harris has, if anything, given every indication that she isn’t going to support Israel. So you’re literally shitposting snd fear mongering and seeing doubt based on LESS than nothing. Like it’s fucking deliberate. Even as you’ve been roasted for your rock stupid takes. Fucking GRUsaw. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

@chainsaw dude you are getting cooked and showing your ass. 

Kamala is energizing non voting population to vote, much like Obama did. You know what that means? It means that shitheads who are so involved in politics that they are discouraged to vote are in the extreme extreme minority. They are the opposite of the base. The base is women, college educated people and minorities.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

immigration reform that includes both measures that make immigration run more smoothly AND involve more effective enforcement against illegal immigration.

Thats why she should be saying that (like Beto did) instead of the bill fucking James Lankford sobbed about not getting passed.

  • Fuck You 3
Posted

Props to the Harris campaign for having all VP finalists “clear their schedules” the next several days.

It started with Shapiro, and now I’ve seen updates of schedules clearing for Beshear and Walz.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

I think she's done some early signaling that she wants to pivot from Biden's policies toward Israel. I hope she does, but it sure as hell isn't going to keep me from voting for her if she doesn't, and most of you know how strongly I feel about the Israel situation as it currently stands.

I am not gonna dogpile on you or neg you or anything, but I do think you're wrong in this instance.

Within the biden administration, her role was that as an advocate for Palestine, she was supposed to be the balance in the cabinet. She called for a more sympathetic ear towards Palestinians in gaza. I think her role honestly was perfunctory and merely to give the illusion of being balanced on the issue, but for better or worse she was positioned from the get go to be more on Palestine's side. That gives her immediately a little bit of starting cred with the disenfranchised gen z: she was the only person from the biden administration even remotely listening to the talk about Palestine.

This will undoubtedly be the most difficult issue for her to navigate, especially since she has to look informed and well reasoned in her response. And it's not fair because Trump gets to basically say the worst, most offensive shit imaginable about palestine and it's a boost for him. But that's America in 2024. FWIW I think Kamala is going to be much more open to listening to Palestinians than any other option on the board, including Biden.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, immamac said:

@chainsaw dude you are getting cooked and showing your ass. 

Kamala is energizing non voting population to vote, much like Obama did. You know what that means? It means that shitheads who are so involved in politics that they are discouraged to vote are in the extreme extreme minority. They are the opposite of the base. The base is women, college educated people and minorities.

I want this momentum to continue, but it's still a long road ahead and when the excitement has worn off is when the real work will begin.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

200.gif

On a message board full of people who care way too much about being right on the internet, you stand out.

 

I know you’re not referring to me sir. 

4 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Thats why she should be saying that (like Beto did) instead of the bill fucking James Lankford sobbed about not getting passed.

She took an obvious and easy chance to dunk on Trump irrefutably on a topic and you’re literally grabbing handfuls of sand to rub into your vagina. You’re the one sobbing. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

I know you’re not referring to me sir. 

She took an obvious and easy chance to dunk on Trump irrefutably on a topic and you’re literally grabbing handfuls of sand to rub into your vagina. You’re the one sobbing. 

She can dunk on him about it without promising to bring it back and sign it. All she had to say was "you had your chance, you blew it, and when I am elected and we take back the House we are going to pass a comprehensive immigration reform that aligns with the America that I know"

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, WelfareBuysMyWeed said:

I saw someone say during the French 2-round elections that the first time you vote with your heart, the second time you vote with your brain. This is presumably what the primary system in America is supposed to be: vote for your ideological sweet heart during the primary, then get pragmatic and vote against what you definitely don't want in the general election.

 

This time a billion 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
12 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

I want this momentum to continue, but it's still a long road ahead and when the excitement has worn off is when the real work will begin.

You’re actively trying to make the excitement wear off, I hope you’re not doing this shit irl.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Js1 said:

This time a billion 

Large groups of people don't have brains. Trump maximizes his turnout by giving his base exactly what it wants secure in the knowledge that "Never Trump" republicans still bend the fucking knee.

Kamala doesn't need to have left wing policies to turn out the base, but she does have to avoid falling into the trap of trying to appease the right because it won't win any votes from the right and it will curb enthusiasm within her base.

4 minutes ago, Covri said:

You’re actively trying to make the excitement wear off, I hope you’re not doing this shit irl.

I'm talking to like five guys on the internet. Joe Rogan, I am not.

Edited by chainsaw
  • Fuck You 1
Posted

That’s it. I was gonna go vote for Kamala. I even bought me some Chuck Taylors. Guess I’m gonna go return them and not vote at all. 

  • Haha 4
Posted
1 minute ago, YChang said:

That’s it. I was gonna go vote for Kamala. I even bought me some Chuck Taylors. Guess I’m gonna go return them and not vote at all. 

Fv9sso8aUAEpQJH?format=jpg&name=small

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Kamala doesn't need to have left wing policies to turn out the base, but she does have to avoid falling into the trap of trying to appease the right because it won't win any votes from the right and it will curb enthusiasm within her base.

!Left != Right

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

She can dunk on him about it without promising to bring it back and sign it. All she had to say was "you had your chance, you blew it, and when I am elected and we take back the House we are going to pass a comprehensive immigration reform that aligns with the America that I know"

Let me translate what your quoted statement reads to me, who at this point is a rabid democratic voter who is donating time and money:

 

”Fuck you, I have no desire to comprise and meet in the middle.” Which turns off so many voters you can’t even comprehend, obviously. You have to be like 24 years old. 

Edited by SydneyCarton
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, WelfareBuysMyWeed said:

!Left != Right

The "border bill" was everything the right wanted. That's a right-wing policy for no reason at all (only five percent of Democrats had immigration as their top issue). I hope it doesn't become a pattern, because that will have negative consequences.

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
1 minute ago, SydneyCarton said:

Let me translate what your quoted stammer reads to me, who at this point is a rabid democratic voter who is donating time and money:

 

”Fuck you, I have no desire to comprise and meet in the middle.” Which turns off so many voters you can’t even comprehend, obviously. You have to be like 24 years old. 

The bill was hardly a compromise. It was always intended by Biden to be a bluff.

  • Fuck You 3
Posted
Just now, SydneyCarton said:

Let me translate what your quoted stammer reads to me, who at this point is a rabid democratic voter who is donating time and money:

 

”Fuck you, I have no desire to comprise and meet in the middle.” Which turns off so many voters you can’t even comprehend, obviously. You have to be like 24 years old. 

Not to mention, there's a party running on obstructionism already: The republicans. There are so, so, sooooo many people out there in the country who are tired of extreme division and just want a functioning government that is willing to forego ideological purity for the sake of making the damn machine run again. We've basically been without a functioning government for 16 fucking years now, as politics has become a game of not letting the "wrong side" get victories.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

The bill was hardly a compromise. It was always intended by Biden to be a bluff.

Again, perfect illustration of your lack of understanding but ceaseless certainty: it wasn’t a bluff. It was a political effort to remove a glaring fucking weakness from his campaign. That’s called politics. He needed to stop being hammered. 
 

now the people hammering the left on it are your ilk, as you project weakness to Harris on the topic and ignore her dunking all over Trump. You’re a real asset. 

Edited by SydneyCarton
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TexasHooch said:

I kind of like it as it's written.  If she said what you think she should have said I'd be discouraged.

This isn't your moment dude-sorry.  This is the middle-left's moment. 

She's not trying to make you happy, she's trying to make me (and the millions like me) happy.  And that's the difference between winning and losing.  

If he can’t win he wants everyone to lose. That’s what he has repeatedly demonstrated. That or he’s on the take with GRU. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, TexasHooch said:

I kind of like it as it's written.  If she said what you think she should have said I'd be discouraged.

This isn't your moment dude-sorry.  This is the middle-left's moment. 

She's not trying to make you happy, she's trying to make me (and the millions like me) happy.  And that's the difference between winning and losing.  

That's just it though. Her policy is right-of-center. That's why Lankford and Lindsey Graham support the policies of the bill but the republicans didn't want Biden to get credit.

If you want to improve turnout, don't demoralize the people left of center. I hope she's only acting like this for immigration because if she goes with right-of-center positions for other issues people care about it will have consequences. Don't shoot the messenger, it's just true.

  • Fuck You 2
Posted

There is at least 1 thing about every candidate that I "very likely" find negative, does that prevent me or 99.3% of other rational human beings from voting for them, no.

The only way everyone would get to vote for a candidate that didn't have at least one position, that wasn't 100% aligned with their view, is if we had 100+ people running for president.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Chips O'Toole said:

I don't think "weird" was the endgame for that messaging, I expect it to shift to "strange" or "off-putting" and eventually end up at "backwards" to sync with the overall message.  Or that's what I think they should do. 

The biracial stuff is only going to land with their hardened base, yet again. For like the 5000th time, it appears that winning this election in a legitimate manner was never really plan A for these people, and all they believe is necessary to regain power is to keep their base angry and loyal. I'm not a concern troll or conspiracy person at all, I'm just having a hard time connecting the dots and not seeing an overall plan that wasn't intended to end in blatant election fuckery at the very least. 

The fundamental problem here is this.  Republicans haven't really known how to win a national election in the face of a decent candidate for 20 years or more.  By this, I mean pre-Trump Republicans.

Trump only knows how to be Trump.

Because Hillary was such a shit candidate, turnout was low and Trump won electorally as kind of an accident with his energized and crazed base.  Although astoundingly large, Trump's base doesn't get him the whole election.  He's going to have to swing some people from undecided or independent or hope for a low turnout.  The more conventional Republicans may understand the problem, but they don't know how to fix it.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

There is at least 1 thing about every candidate that I "very likely" find negative, does that prevent me or 99.3% of other rational human beings from voting for them, no.

The only way everyone would get to vote for a candidate that didn't have at least one position, that wasn't 100% aligned with their view, is if we had 100+ people running for president.

Same here. But if you're running a campaign and you need to maximize turnout, why would you choose a position that is twice as likely to harm you? I'm not saying she should totally lack her own principles or morph her views to suit the electorate but that's sort of the name of the game in a general election and in many instances she didn't have a strong opinion one way or the other going into the race.

  • Fuck You 2


×
×
  • Create New...