Jump to content

2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Ravishing Rick said:

Wall St / European stock markets all appear to be pricing in a Trump victory

I just checked and none of those markets have crashed to zero.  So no, they have not priced in a dotard victory.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chopper said:

Untrue. Long ago I learned how to analyze media and apply critical thinking skills. 

But you live in 'Merica.   Home of the Morons.  

Posted
Just now, SydneyCarton said:

Yes. But you’re still here. You post and read here. And you’re influenced by what you see here. We all do/are. 

Yes. Perhaps incorrectly, I thought the intent of whomever posted that originally was implying "exclusively."

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Chopper said:

Oh yeah I have an admission: sometimes I forget xitter exists. And I really wish some of you would, as well.

image.thumb.png.2b50f96c0036af639c386c16832ca802.png

 

People should listen to me 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
16 hours ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Ok I’m gonna let you in on a secret. No bro who listens to Rogan is undecided, nor will their minds be changed 

Ya that's just blatantly false. I know several and I am by no means extroverted. 

Posted

Look she might not appear on Rogan, and really I guess that is alright. Biden didn't appear on Rogan and Trump didn't exactly knock it out of the park.

But I really think it would be useful if she did. Joe wouldn't push too hard on her and plenty of his listeners would hear what she has to say. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, LTbear said:

Ya that's just blatantly false. I know several and I am by no means extroverted. 

Then you know some stupid motherfuckers.  Anybody undecided at this juncture is a fucking moron.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
Just now, Surly Bevo said:

Then you know some stupid motherfuckers.  Anybody undecided at this juncture is a fucking moron.  

Well that's true. And with so many people already having voted it might be too late to make a huge difference anyway.

Posted

I'm about 25 mins into the Trump Rogan interview. Rogan has asked just a few questions and basically just lets Trump ramble. And for the most part Trump comes off as harmless. Like your dipshit boomer uncle who is always embellishing stories and injecting hot takes to the point you just laugh and blow him off. obviously a lot of what he says is nonsense but that's always the case and Rogan certainly doesn't push back. Although as I type this Rogan is getting a little sycophant-y talking about how dangerous the job of POTUS is, especially for Trump.

Probably not going to listen to this while thing because it's almost 3 hours. Did get a Kamala ad lol. I don't think this will move the needle much at all. Maybe get a few Rogan listeners off their ass to vote for Trump.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Surly Bevo said:

Then you know some stupid motherfuckers.  Anybody undecided at this juncture is a fucking moron.  

Rogan reaches millions among a demographic who tends to be one of the least engaged in politics. Anyone thinking there's no undecideds in that group is a fucking moron. 

 

Edit: For clarity, I'm a college professor. Rogan is by far the most popular podcast among my male students. 

Edited by LTbear
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, LTbear said:

Rogan reaches millions among a demographic who tends to be one of the least engaged in politics. Anyone thinking there's no undecideds in that group is a fucking moron. 

 

Edit: For clarity, I'm a college professor. Rogan is by far the most popular podcast among my male students. 

So also least likely to vote at all then

Posted
Rogan reaches millions among a demographic who tends to be one of the least engaged in politics. Anyone thinking there's no undecideds in that group is a fucking moron. 
 
Edit: For clarity, I'm a college professor. Rogan is by far the most popular podcast among my male students. 

I didn’t say they are not undecided. I said if they are they are fucking morons.
  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Pato del Muerto said:

So also least likely to vote at all then

Yes. But many of them, IF they vote, lean Trump. All they need is a little more push to dampen their enthusiasm/ give-a-shit for the orange god. The more potential Trump voters stay home, the better. 

Just now, Surly Bevo said:


I didn’t say they are not undecided. I said if they are they are fucking morons.

That point wasn't directed at you, but the original poster I was quoting. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, LTbear said:

Yes. But many of them, IF they vote, lean Trump. All they need is a little more push to dampen their enthusiasm/ give-a-shit for the orange god. The more potential Trump voters stay home, the better. 

Share with them the threads on reddit where thousands of women are saying they'll never fuck a bitch who votes for Trump. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, gmr548 said:

I don't pretend to have any degree of confidence in how this election will go, but you've got some nerve coming to Surly and implying people spending their time posting on the internet are detached from reality.

My parents are detached from reality. Mom to a lesser extent but still she's now pretty deranged. 25 years ago I debated whether they were smart enough to recognize that the "fair and balanced" shit they were watching on Bill O'Reilly was total bullshit. I decided poorly. I thought they could recognize the obvious signs that the "no spin zone" was, in fact, all spin. In the years since they went from somewhat open minded to fully deranged. That transition coincided with Fox News's full embrace of Diaper Don during the republican primaries after Fox realized Cruz was a total loser.  

Edited by Chopper
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

You people have my head spinning. The level of confidence here on a Harris win is very exciting given the public media stories and polls. 

But, I recall eight years ago and this group was also highly confident. So, do we have that situation again?

I can’t remember the general tone four years ago, but I think there was a genuine lack of clarity one way or the other? Can’t remember. 

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, LTbear said:

Rogan reaches millions among a demographic who tends to be one of the least engaged in politics. Anyone thinking there's no undecideds in that group is a fucking moron. 

 

Edit: For clarity, I'm a college professor. Rogan is by far the most popular podcast among my male students. 

 

too late in the game

these interviews needed to hit in june, to give listeners time to REGISTER. the listeners that are registered, have already decided or already voted 

this might move the needle of a small undecided group, but likely not rogan listeners 

Edited by tx 3 putt
Posted
1 minute ago, Dbeasy said:

You people have my head spinning. The level of confidence here on a Harris win is very exciting given the public media stories and polls. 

But, I recall eight years ago and this group was also highly confident. So, do we have that situation again?

I can’t remember the general tone four years ago, but I think there was a genuine lack of clarity one way or the other? Can’t remember. 

I was not confident at all eight years ago and I certainly was not four years ago because Trump was in office and who the hell knows might happen?

I am optimistic now because of the early voting data in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. I feel like we have a good chance. It is what it is though.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

too late in the game

these interviews needed to hit in june, to give listeners time to REGISTER. the listeners that are registered, have already decided or already voted 

this might move the needle of a small undecided group, but likely not rogan listeners 

Putt, every state isn’t Texas. There are plenty of places where you can still register and then vote in this election. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

You people have my head spinning. The level of confidence here on a Harris win is very exciting given the public media stories and polls. 

But, I recall eight years ago and this group was also highly confident. So, do we have that situation again?

I can’t remember the general tone four years ago, but I think there was a genuine lack of clarity one way or the other? Can’t remember. 

I don't remember anyone thinking Hillary had it in the bag. The Hillary Bernie thing was really messy and bad and everyone hated Hillary. 

This is not that.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted

I think people thought Hillary had it in the bag because Trump was such a joke of a candidate. Everyone underestimated how much people hated Hillary combined with her terrible campaigning. Trump's team played the EC exactly how you need to to win the election. Kamala isn't getting caught flat footed and she doesn't have the baggage that Hillary does. But she's still a black female and I think there's a lot of men and women out there who won't vote for her for that reason. I just don't know that they'd vote for Trump either. They may just not vote. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
4 minutes ago, immamac said:

I don't remember anyone thinking Hillary had it in the bag. The Hillary Bernie thing was really messy and bad and everyone hated Hillary. 

This is not that.

And Comey.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
49 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

Thank you for your service.

You couldn’t pay me enough money to listen to either of those dumbasses for more than five minutes (Meathead) or 5 seconds in the case of the dotard. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
You people have my head spinning. The level of confidence here on a Harris win is very exciting given the public media stories and polls. 
But, I recall eight years ago and this group was also highly confident. So, do we have that situation again?
I can’t remember the general tone four years ago, but I think there was a genuine lack of clarity one way or the other? Can’t remember. 

I think you’re confusing confidence and optimism. I’d call this forum optimistic for Kamala’s chances, not confident.

Eight years ago was very different. The national media was basically already crowning Hillary, while downballot Democrats were trying to sound the alarm and the MAGA enthusiasm was obviously through the roof. No idea what this year will bring, but the narrative is currently favoring Trump yet no Democrats are publicly sounding the alarm, Kamala is drawing 30k on a Friday night, and Republicans are claiming that electoral college electors should be awarded prior to counting votes.

Again, I’m not CONFIDENT in her chances, but there are a lot of things that would make a Kamala win look obvious in hindsight.
  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
1 minute ago, mdmost said:

I think people thought Hillary had it in the bag because Trump was such a joke of a candidate. Everyone underestimated how much people hated Hillary combined with her terrible campaigning. Trump's team played the EC exactly how you need to to win the election. Kamala isn't getting caught flat footed and she doesn't have the baggage that Hillary does. But she's still a black female and I think there's a lot of men and women out there who won't vote for her for that reason. I just don't know that they'd vote for Trump either. They may just not vote. 

From this month's Harper's Index:

Factor by which Americans are more likely to disapprove of a woman's election to the presidency than a person of color's: 3

Source: NORC at the University of Chicago

Posted
19 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

I was not confident at all eight years ago and I certainly was not four years ago because Trump was in office and who the hell knows might happen?

I am optimistic now because of the early voting data in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. I feel like we have a good chance. It is what it is though.

I was somewhat confident until James Comey’s October surprise.

Posted
22 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

too late in the game

these interviews needed to hit in june, to give listeners time to REGISTER. the listeners that are registered, have already decided or already voted 

this might move the needle of a small undecided group, but likely not rogan listeners 

Further clarity: I'm not arguing for either do it/ don't it as to Rogan. Just responding originally to a dumb assertion that there aren't any undecideds in Rogan's listeners. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, mdmost said:

I think people thought Hillary had it in the bag because Trump was such a joke of a candidate. Everyone underestimated how much people hated Hillary combined with her terrible campaigning. Trump's team played the EC exactly how you need to to win the election. Kamala isn't getting caught flat footed and she doesn't have the baggage that Hillary does. But she's still a black female and I think there's a lot of men and women out there who won't vote for her for that reason. I just don't know that they'd vote for Trump either. They may just not vote. 

And Steve Bannon spent this campaign cycle with n federal prison. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
51 minutes ago, Satchel said:

The first lesson in Professor Timothy Snyder’s On Tyranny, is - Do Not Obey in Advance. He explains:

Most of the power of authoritarianism is freely given. In times like these, individuals think ahead about what a more repressive government will want, and then offer themselves up without being asked. A citizen who adapts in this way is teaching power what it can do.”

Sadly, this is what the WAPO and the LA Times have done, owner’s prerogative notwithstanding.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1


×
×
  • Create New...