Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, victory88 said:

So Bobby made a comment in today’s coffee and football that guys like Smith, Filsame, Phillips, Zina, Terry, maybe I missed another name or two are taking the next steps in practice.  Then he said he would be shocked if 1-2 of those didn’t leak into the portal.  Thought it was interesting.


We are basically staring our second string defense against Michigan in the bowl game. On one hand that will be good for 26 so we can get clarity on who is likely to be the most ready but on the other hand the bowl game might not be that fun to watch when our defense is on the field. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


We are basically staring our second string defense against Michigan in the bowl game. On one hand that will be good for 26 so we can get clarity on who is likely to be the most ready but on the other hand the bowl game might not be that fun to watch when our defense is on the field. 

Treat it as an early spring scrimmage.  Nothing to get upset about.  It's meaningless.

  • Hook 'Em 9
Posted
12 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


We are basically staring our second string defense against Michigan in the bowl game. On one hand that will be good for 26 so we can get clarity on who is likely to be the most ready but on the other hand the bowl game might not be that fun to watch when our defense is on the field. 

I'd rather be starting a second string defense than going through whatever the hell is happening in Ann Arbor currently. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
Posted
Treat it as an early spring scrimmage.  Nothing to get upset about.  It's meaningless.

10-3 vs 9-4 is meaningful to me for some stupid reason.
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, victory88 said:

So Bobby made a comment in today’s coffee and football that guys like Smith, Filsame, Phillips, Zina, Terry, maybe I missed another name or two are taking the next steps in practice.  Then he said he would be shocked if 1-2 of those didn’t leak into the portal.  Thought it was interesting.

Found the clip - he said he "wouldn't be surprised if 1-2 leave". A little different than what you wrote.

Filsaime or Zina wouldn't shock me. The other three would and would be dick punches.

Also, Bobby said 90% Endries going pro.

Edited by Tex-19
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Red Five said:

We’ve got a 9.95-off on Endries. IT thinks he’s likely staying.

My favorite IT is when they are happy to die on a hill only to surrender to reality at the last minute…

  • Haha 4
Posted
45 minutes ago, DaysOff said:


10-3 vs 9-4 is meaningful to me for some stupid reason.


I want us to compete and play well on offense. Arch needs to look good because there’s no excuse there. Defense we are just going to have to understand it’s like a spring game there. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, 6th Street said:

image.thumb.png.4dc6adce7ee4d1f4a222fc6cfac3a1db.png

She says off to the draft in 2026 but also posts Texas schedule lol

I don’t think this means anything, I think she’s just saying 2026 is going to be a big season for him with this schedule and heading to the draft after. 

Either way there is no reason to parse player’s parents IG captions as official announcements. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
28 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


I want us to compete and play well on offense. Arch needs to look good because there’s no excuse there. Defense we are just going to have to understand it’s like a spring game there. 

It does help we are playing a 1980s offense. I am hoping Barnes has a big game.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
On 12/16/2025 at 12:12 PM, Hookem2147 said:

Will be interesting to see who gets Baxter's touches in the bowl game between Simon and Clark. Whoever is on the short end can't feel good about their place on the depth chart entering 2026 if Wisner returns and we add a portal RB as expected. 

Clark so far has shown nothing. But he does need more time to rehab. So maybe he eventually shows something. 

Simon immediately showed a little something on the field but got yanked off and buried on the depth chart. I wonder why. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

Clark so far has shown nothing. But he does need more time to rehab. So maybe he eventually shows something. 

Simon immediately showed a little something on the field but got yanked off and buried on the depth chart. I wonder why. 

Simon redshirted. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Sgt. Slaughter said:

What’s more confusing than her wording is your comprehension of it.

i'm pretty confused trying to figure out exactly whose social media account it is...

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I might be in the minority but I don't really care if we lose Endries.  He's a poor blocker and a solid receiver.  Nothing about his skill set seems irreplaceable by what we currently have on the roster.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, gurt said:

I might be in the minority but I don't really care if we lose Endries.  He's a poor blocker and a solid receiver.  Nothing about his skill set seems irreplaceable by what we currently have on the roster.

Enjoyed his 93 yds receiving vs aggy.  He made them look pretty bad.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, Scholz said:

Enjoyed his 93 yds receiving vs aggy.  He made them look pretty bad.

he also had one catch for 50 yards.  other than that hes been a nil drain all year.  

Posted (edited)

Similar to DMo, Endries isn’t really a value add outside of his good hands and experience. They both require scheming to get their looks. 
Both of the freshmen show greater potential.
I also somehow thought Washington was faster than he looked this year. 

Edited by Atticus
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, texifornia said:

To give Endries some credit, it felt like he was the primary victim of Arch throwing passes at open receivers' feet in the first half of the year.

Yeah, he missed out on a lot of receiving yards because of bad throws.

Edited by kevwun
Posted
30 minutes ago, texifornia said:

To give Endries some credit, it felt like he was the primary victim of Arch throwing passes at open receivers' feet in the first half of the year.

I did that earlier in the year and Endries had like a 70- 80% completion per target. Wingo was the one that Arch could not throw to. Wingo finished pretty ugly on the year. 50 catches, 91 targets, and  770 yards (8.5 per target)

 

Posted
45 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

I did that earlier in the year and Endries had like a 70- 80% completion per target. Wingo was the one that Arch could not throw to. Wingo finished pretty ugly on the year. 50 catches, 91 targets, and  770 yards (8.5 per target)

Lot of that is also due to Wingo dropping passes, though.

By and large Endries was a sure-handed receiver.

Posted
Just now, satyanash said:

Lot of that is also due to Wingo dropping passes, though.

By and large Endries was a sure-handed receiver.

I dont recall Arch having issues with Endries and/or Livingstone. First couple games Arch and Wingo just could not connect. It was either uncatchable or dropped. 

Posted
3 hours ago, RollingPresidential said:

Simon redshirted. 

That’s what I mean. The running back room was limited. Baxter wasn’t really getting it done. I’m unclear why they didn’t just burn his redshirt and have him spell Wisner. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

His brother signed with BYU so…

Really enjoying seeing every big transfer seemingly tied to Tech or BYU

ew throw up GIF

Posted
19 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Really enjoying seeing every big transfer seemingly tied to Tech or BYU

ew throw up GIF

The LDS church has over $250 billion dollars. If they want, they can just buy a title. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...