Jump to content

Ethiopian Airlines 737 Max crashes killing 157


Nueces River Rat

Recommended Posts

From the WSJ article.  Ss you’re plummeting to the ground you might be thinking everything’s going to be ok   QED no suffering damages  

““While passengers undoubtedly perceived the flight as scary, humans have a tendency to hold on to hope and not expect the worst,” Jonathan French, a Boeing witness who is an expert in human factors and aerospace physiology, said in a court filing. “Ultimately, it is impossible to know the subjective experience of each occupant.”

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

Well, I mean....that's probably not wrong.  But....what about the excruciating moments of abject terror and pants-shitting as they realized they were about to auger in?  If you're gonna discount the pain because the death itself was instantaneous, my recollection is that you also have to account for the complete and total "I'm going to die" terror they experienced for a shitload longer than anyone wants to experience such things?  I dunno.  I ain't a PI lawyer. 

That is a hail marry for a defense team. You either get a really reduced verdict... or you piss the jury off and get absolutely crushed. I don't think you dust this one off in unless you have nothing else for a defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

That is a hail marry for a defense team. You either get a really reduced verdict... or you piss the jury off and get absolutely crushed. I don't think you dust this one off in unless you have nothing else for a defense. 

Yea, if I was on that jury and had that presented to me I would be going into that room looking to punish the shit out of them for that move.  How do you let it get too this point and not figure out a settlement if that is what you got in your bag?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Dahobbs said:

That is a hail marry for a defense team. You either get a really reduced verdict... or you piss the jury off and get absolutely crushed. I don't think you dust this one off in unless you have nothing else for a defense. 

and then you piss off the public when they read this online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Dahobbs said:

That is a hail marry for a defense team. You either get a really reduced verdict... or you piss the jury off and get absolutely crushed. I don't think you dust this one off in unless you have nothing else for a defense. 

If I were on that jury, this bullshit argument would lead me to increase punitive damages significantly 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
14 minutes ago, ClubWhatever said:

What’s the definition of “immediate”?   Like you’ll be able to take off, but landing might be a real challenge?

Pretty much.  Just realized the earlier link didn't say what the problem was.  It's the vertical stabilizer fittings.  https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/aircraft-propulsion/new-production-issue-will-delay-737-max-deliveries-require

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

When I was in residency my wife worked for an attorney who had a personal injury case where a woman was hit by a dairy truck. She had significant injuries and after all the emergency surgeries were finished she still had some jaw injuries that needed to be reconstructed and she had lost most of her teeth. They couldn’t find any facial reconstruction specialists that would do it on a letter of protection, and the insurance wouldn’t settle. At trial the attorney played a video deposition where he asked one of the insurance executives how she was supposed to eat and he responded “well, she can eat soup. “


When it went to the jury they sent a note out to the judge asking how much over what she was asking were they allowed to award her 

Anastasis should have known better than to let himself be recorded saying that.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/16/2023 at 5:30 PM, ClubWhatever said:

From the WSJ article.  Ss you’re plummeting to the ground you might be thinking everything’s going to be ok   QED no suffering damages  

““While passengers undoubtedly perceived the flight as scary, humans have a tendency to hold on to hope and not expect the worst,” Jonathan French, a Boeing witness who is an expert in human factors and aerospace physiology, said in a court filing. “Ultimately, it is impossible to know the subjective experience of each occupant.”

“When I die I wanna go like my grandpa did, no pain and just go to sleep…not crying and screaming like the other people in his car.”

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

When I was in residency my wife worked for an attorney who had a personal injury case where a woman was hit by a dairy truck. She had significant injuries and after all the emergency surgeries were finished she still had some jaw injuries that needed to be reconstructed and she had lost most of her teeth. They couldn’t find any facial reconstruction specialists that would do it on a letter of protection, and the insurance wouldn’t settle. At trial the attorney played a video deposition where he asked one of the insurance executives how she was supposed to eat and he responded “well, she can eat soup. “


When it went to the jury they sent a note out to the judge asking how much over what she was asking were they allowed to award her 

Too bad that can't happen in Texas thanks to Hot Wheels tort reform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Alaska Air grounded their fleet of MAX 9's.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67899564

 

The Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 Max 9 returned to Portland 35 minutes into its flight to California after an outer section, including a window, fell.

Alaska said 177 passengers and crew were on board and "landed safely".

The airline said it would "temporarily" ground all 65 of its 737 Max 9 aircraft to conduct inspections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry folk, air travel sucks. Give me a C-130 and some ear plugs.

I travel to DC about once a quarter. I drive. Yeah, I know it is more dangerous, but I don't want to put up with the bullshit. Remember when people would dress nice to fly. Have a cocktail and talk? All gone.

Sorry for the bus drivers and crew of the sky.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Captainant said:

I'd love to hear from one of the resident surly pilots to hear how it was pilot error that caused the mechanical failure

Failed to notice shifting door and gap between door and fuselage on walk around.   Inadequate preflight procedures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Captainant said:

I'd love to hear from one of the resident surly pilots to hear how it was pilot error that caused the mechanical failure

Why would anyone do that?  One set of accidents had a design flaw along with some clear cut flaws in basic airmanship, agreed upon and documented by every entity that investigated it. The other is pretty clearly a quality control issue having nothing to do with flying. 

Glad to see you still hold grudges like a woman though. Enjoy your trip next week. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Your Mom said:

Why would anyone do that?  One set of accidents had a design flaw along with some clear cut flaws in basic airmanship, agreed upon and documented by every entity that investigated it. The other is pretty clearly a quality control issue having nothing to do with flying. 

Glad to see you still hold grudges like a woman though. Enjoy your trip next week. 

🤣🤣 Such poor airmanship it caused them to ground the entire fleet? Gimmafugginbreak. Both were matters of quality control - the lawn dart incidents were because of slapdash programming by Boeing and a failure to properly integrate multiple systems, compounded by regulatory capture. 

Not sure why you're seeing this as a grudge though, just laughing at how fierce the defense of Boeing was in light of their continued negligence towards their customers. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry folk, air travel sucks. Give me a C-130 and some ear plugs.
I travel to DC about once a quarter. I drive. Yeah, I know it is more dangerous, but I don't want to put up with the bullshit. Remember when people would dress nice to fly. Have a cocktail and talk? All gone.
Sorry for the bus drivers and crew of the sky.

Dressing up and flying ended because of external forces. Security theater, shrinking seats, lesser services, charging for checked bags, changed the culture of flying.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boeing was one of the world’s greatest engineering powerhouses and then it became an MBA and lobbying company.  In my mind, this is the most important and telling part of the Boeing fraud agreement:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/boeing-charged-737-max-fraud-conspiracy-and-agrees-pay-over-25-billion

Quote

The department reached this resolution with Boeing based on a number of factors, including the nature and seriousness of the offense conduct; Boeing’s failure to timely and voluntarily self‑disclose the offense conduct to the department; and Boeing’s prior history, including a civil FAA settlement agreement from 2015 related to safety and quality issues concerning the Boeing’s Commercial Airplanes (BCA) business unit. In addition, while Boeing’s cooperation ultimately included voluntarily and proactively identifying to the Fraud Section potentially significant documents and Boeing witnesses, and voluntarily organizing voluminous evidence that Boeing was obligated to produce, such cooperation, however, was delayed and only began after the first six months of the Fraud Section’s investigation, during which time Boeing’s response frustrated the Fraud Section’s investigation.

The department also considered that Boeing engaged in remedial measures after the offense conduct, including:  (i) creating a permanent aerospace safety committee of the Board of Directors to oversee Boeing’s policies and procedures governing safety and its interactions with the FAA and other government agencies and regulators; (ii) creating a Product and Services Safety organization to strengthen and centralize the safety-related functions that were previously located across Boeing; (iii) reorganizing Boeing’s engineering function to have all Boeing engineers, as well as Boeing’s Flight Technical Team, report through Boeing’s chief engineer rather than to the business units; and (iv) making structural changes to Boeing’s Flight Technical Team to increase the supervision, effectiveness, and professionalism of Boeing’s Flight Technical Pilots, including moving Boeing’s Flight Technical Team under the same organizational umbrella as Boeing’s Flight Test Team, and adopting new policies and procedures and conducting training to clarify expectations and requirements governing communications between Boeing’s Flight Technical Pilots and regulatory authorities, including specifically the FAA AEG. Boeing also made significant changes to its top leadership since the offense occurred.

 

I am only half joking when I say that we should pass a law barring anyone with an MBA from being a CEO or on an executive board for a Fortune 500 or important defense contractor company. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...